🦊 Furry Furry Fandom and Drama General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
http://archive.is/spetZ

Sparx has their own history of drama I'm currently trying to piece together because they've used a fair few aliases over the years. They were featured in the above "furry trainwrecks" blog about three years ago. Read through it if you want, but it was generally them apparently stoking flames to be an ebin troll and it backfiring spectacularly. In summary:

016d350e4e9c28029fb63eb98a9d2b5786574c7c.png

Screenshot from 2020-06-18 22-36-25.png
 
Carcin gets BTFO again for the 5th time this week
1592523357601.png
Archive

Also lol of course the pedophile didn't answer the fucking door. Gotta delete all that loli porn and CP off your computer before the feds take your devices.
 
Now back from court, she's pretty shaken about it.
View attachment 1387865
Tweet(Tweet Archive)
If she really didn't do anything wrong, I'd be shaking too like a fucking crackhead with Parkinson's. That shit's gotta be wack. Is it normal to go to court on the same day as an arrest though? This is the 1st time I've ever seen this. Usually takes a few days, MINIMUM, unless this is unrelated.
 
If she really didn't do anything wrong, I'd be shaking too like a fucking crackhead with Parkinson's. That shit's gotta be wack. Is it normal to go to court on the same day as an arrest though? This is the 1st time I've ever seen this. Usually takes a few days, MINIMUM, unless this is unrelated.

If you look at the context of that tweet, it seems they're trying to go for a restraining order against the guy. That can usually happen fast.
 
Can you be evicted for the crimes that only one roommate has committed? I'm betting they're not actually being evicted and are simply terminating their lease early due to losing a source of income but someone can fact check me on that one.
A landlord can, generally, evict due to the actions of any one person in the residence, even if they're not on the lease. If your guest shows up and blows up the toilet, you can definitely get evicted for it. That aside, I'm sure any pissed landlord could make up some bullshit about how their actions caused damage to the premises and evict them based on that. Probably not worth taking the landlord to court over, anyway.
 
If you look at the context of that tweet, it seems they're trying to go for a restraining order against the guy. That can usually happen fast.
Part of me wants to ask " Does she really think they're going to come back and start shit? " but I think we all know the answer. Smart girl at least for moving so quickly on that. Most people aren't even thinking that far ahead when shit like this happens.
 
Part of me wants to ask " Does she really think they're going to come back and start shit? " but I think we all know the answer. Smart girl at least for moving so quickly on that. Most people aren't even thinking that far ahead when shit like this happens.

I'm okay if they're simply using it as a method to get this person out of their life with no negotiation or ever-expanding timelines, just fuckin' out.
 
View attachment 1387233

View attachment 1387225

let's talk about that living room

"I was sleeping right there and the police blew in our door with a flash bang." (archive)

View attachment 1387264View attachment 1387265
I knew the person who was able to forward information about her boyfriend being a pedo to the police. im not too sure how he got the info but I believe he catfishes him and forwarded it to the feds.

but my god, I cannot imagine being those officers doing a no-knock raid on that house without laughing or cringing.
 
I call bullshit how do you live with someone, date them, and not notice they’re a pedophile?
I'm not going to make excuses for that guy's partner because I don't know the full story, but I think that this sentiment is kind of naive.

Some people get away with having whole other bank accounts, lovers, children; even entire fucking families. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some red flags, such as him talking about finding "younger people" attractive, liking questionable art/stories, being into ageplay roleplay-type shit; but most people shrug that off as purely hypothetical or a simple misunderstanding. This is often not helped by the partner themselves reasserting that this is the case; it's a common but dangerous assumption that simply because someone is upfront about one aspect of their sex life, that means that they're being upfront about all other aspects.

Most partners-- hell most people-- prefer to live and let live for the sake of avoiding conflict, oftentimes because they are in denial. For people who grew up in abusive families this sort of behavior is ingrained from an early age; some people get wise and get out, but more will just try to mind their own business and not challenge their partner's "quirks" or "interests" or "insights", especially if leaving isn't safe for financial or other reasons, and will simply content themselves that since they aren't seeing the assaults happen then it's probably just all talk.

But that, of course, is assuming that he did provide any red flags. Some weirdos are sneaky enough to know that outing themselves to their partner is a bad idea, and will go to extreme lengths to ensure that they are not likely to find out. If their partner is staunchly against such fetishes and they pretend to agree with those sentiments, then they know that they can use their partner as a shield for a false sense of credibility to back them up. We've seen serial killers do this, and some of them still have/had partners who were willing to defend them because "he was never like that around me!" even after the trial proved them unquestionably guilty, because they cannot connect the fact that their partner had a double life or that their good treatment towards their spouse is exclusive to their spouse.

It seems doubtful that any furry would be able to keep their online and offline lives separate like this, but we know from the Discord IRL Vore Fetishists (what a mouthful) that at least one of them had a partner who was completely unaware that he liked to eat live animals and shit out their remains for fun. A marriage certificate doesn't give you a telepathic link into someone else's brain, and although you might share most of your life with your spouse that does not mean you are likely to be there with them ever second of every day.

It's easier for people to believe the lie that their partner loves them for being who they are, and not the truth that their partner loves them because they're gullible and is enabling them through complacency.

Edit: To GlitchedPuppet or Kab or any partners of pedophiles/dogfuckers/abusers who might get forwarded this by asspatters to regurgitate as sympathy fuel; this post is not for you. Anyone who goes as far as to draw kiddie/beast porn for their child abusing/dog abusing spouse is probably also a child/dog abuser by proxy. You aren't just complicit; you're aiding and abetting.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to make excuses for that guy's partner because I don't know the full story, but I think that this sentiment is kind of naive.

Some people get away with having whole other bank accounts, lovers, children; even entire fucking families. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some red flags, such as him talking about finding "younger people" attractive, liking questionable art/stories, being into ageplay roleplay-type shit; but most people shrug that off as purely hypothetical or a simple misunderstanding. This is often not helped by the partner themselves reasserting that this is the case; it's a common but dangerous assumption that simply because someone is upfront about one aspect of their sex life, that means that they're being upfront about all other aspects.

Most partners-- hell most people-- prefer to live and let live for the sake of avoiding conflict, oftentimes because they are in denial. For people who grew up in abusive families this sort of behavior is ingrained from an early age; some people get wise and get out, but more will just try to mind their own business and not challenge their partner's "quirks" or "interests" or "insights", especially if leaving isn't safe for financial or other reasons, and will simply content themselves that since they aren't seeing the assaults happen then it's probably just all talk.

But that, of course, is assuming that he did provide any red flags. Some weirdos are sneaky enough to know that outing themselves to their partner is a bad idea, and will go to extreme lengths to ensure that they are not likely to find out. If their partner is staunchly against such fetishes and they pretend to agree with those sentiments, then they know that they can use their partner as a shield for a false sense of credibility to back them up. We've seen serial killers do this, and some of them still have/had partners who were willing to defend them because "he was never like that around me!" even after the trial proved them unquestionably guilty, because they cannot connect the fact that their partner had a double life or that their good treatment towards their spouse is exclusive to their spouse.

It seems doubtful that any furry would be able to keep their online and offline lives separate like this, but we know from the Discord IRL Vore Fetishists (what a mouthful) that at least one of them had a partner who was completely unaware that he liked to eat live animals and shit out their remains for fun. A marriage certificate doesn't give you a telepathic link into someone else's brain, and although you might share most of your life with your spouse that does not mean you are likely to be there with them ever second of every day.

It's easier for people to believe the lie that their partner loves them for being who they are, and not the truth that their partner loves them because they're gullible and is enabling them through complacency.

Edit: To GlitchedPuppet or Kab or any partners of pedophiles/dogfuckers/abusers who might get forwarded this by asspatters to regurgitate as sympathy fuel; this post is not for you. Anyone who goes as far as to draw kiddie/beast porn for their child abusing/dog abusing spouse is probably also a child/dog abuser by proxy. You aren't just complicit; you're aiding and abetting.

You make a lot of valid points. I realize now my comment was made in anger. It’s just exhausting seeing troon furries do this same song and dance over and over.
 
A lot of people are complaining about the mess, but that's going to happen if you have a pedophile who might have a cache of illegal content in the house, if not literally trafficking a child and hiding them. It doesn't help if you live in a shitheap of boxes and knockoff merchandise.
I'm going to just assume more than half the mess was already there, the cops probably just moved it around. The one bedroom picture looks exactly what I would have expected without knowing cops had raided the place.
 
I'm going to just assume more than half the mess was already there, the cops probably just moved it around. The one bedroom picture looks exactly what I would have expected without knowing cops had raided the place.
Yeah, it's a bit harder to do a indiscriminate search when your house is a hoarder den with the boxes and shit everywhere. When they remove their pedo roommate's shit they should probably watch some Marie Kondo or something

Screenshot from 2020-06-19 12-18-12.png


Screenshot from 2020-06-19 12-17-33.png


:optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic:
 
I knew the person who was able to forward information about her boyfriend being a pedo to the police. im not too sure how he got the info but I believe he catfishes him and forwarded it to the feds.

but my god, I cannot imagine being those officers doing a no-knock raid on that house without laughing or cringing.
It wasn't a no-knock. If you look at one of my earlier posts, the ex gf clearly stated that the cops were knocking on the door and the pedo didn't answer. Most likely trying to quickly delete as much evidence as humanly possible before the FBI barged in.


I'm going to need a minute to be MOTI because this is indicative of a much larger problem in the fandom.

Furries: WHY DOES EVERYONE THINK WE'RE ALL PEDOPHILES
Also Furries: GROWLY AND SANGIE DID NOTHING WRONG. LET'S GIVE THEM VENDING BOOTHS AND PUT THEM ON THE FRONT OF EVERY PHOTO OP AT ANY CONVENTION EVER AS WELL AS MAKING THEM STAFF BECAUSE UWU QT SUIT. ALSO SISK IS TOOOOOOOTALLY INNOCENT. THAT CHILD LURED HIM NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND OWO

Maybe if you assholes actually POLICED YOUR FUCKING FANDOM rather than pushing off the work onto us, then immediately taking credit for it, no one would think this. Seriously. I saw this happen during the Kero leaks where all these dumbfucks were like " I always knew such-and-such was a bad person. I've been saying it for years. " Then when you look back through their tweet history it was nothing but positive interactions with whoever they were joining in the callout bandwagon on until the day before. Seriously, go fuck yourselves.

Sparx is trying to downplay her shitty ex as " nOt A fURrY " but when you look at all of their other social media, it's pretty fucking obvious they were a furry. Just because you suddenly found out some heinous bs about them doesn't suddenly wipe away that they were in the fandom. This is what happens EVERY TIME someone gets called out for shit.

" KeRo WaSnT rEaLlY a FuRrY gAiZ "
Yes he is.
So is Snakething.
So is Sangie.
So is Woof
So is everyone who has a thread here.

Maybe if you actually paid closer attention and gave a shit about expunging bad actors, people wouldn't rightfully accuse your fandom of playing host to some of the worst people humanity has to offer.
But you don't.
All you care about is your shitty artwork and your wrank ass suits that turn into walking horror shows after a few months because the vast majority of you lot have shitty hygiene.

/rant.
 
https://twitter.com/foxyshiloh is the guy with the red hair 37 seconds into the house tour video I posted a page ago. Apparently them and Sparx have been dating since around late 2015, then they brought the pedo in for a polyam relationship or something.

Screenshot from 2020-06-19 14-40-36.png

http://archive.md/Zctz0

EaN5yqQUEAA4aYm.jpeg

Not sure which one is the one on the couch why are you bald

Edit: http://archive.md/TEFY5 Sparx / Christine Dawson's deadname is Chris Dawson. No obvious records for either names on the US whitepages probably because they grew up in Toronto. There won't be any records for "Christine" as of writing due to no legal name change according to recent tweets.

Curious - Sparx edits her own Wikifur. At one point, she changed the birthday of 01/01/1995 to 01/01/1996 which might've been her skirting around 18+ restrictions when she was active in 2013. The month and day is correct, but not sure about the year.
 
Last edited:
Curious - Sparx edits her own Wikifur. At one point, she changed the birthday of 01/01/1995 to 01/01/1996 which might've been her skirting around 18+ restrictions when she was active in 2013. The month and day is correct, but not sure about the year.

I haven't looked into it since I was just passing along shit for @Just Another Furgag Alog but how old is the pedophile?
 
Back
Top Bottom