I believe what my (much older) friend who went to a Catholic high school in the 60s was taught: whatever the truth is, it's important to believe that God created it.
Personally I don't believe the Bible gets everything literally right. The most important thing for a Christian is to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ (something I struggle with at times) and to accept Him as your savior. I personally believe a lot of the history of Creation as told in the Bible is designed to make us think and seek out answers. But I'm also a scientist by trade, so it makes sense that I might think that way.
I didn't mean that belief in God raises your IQ; on the contrary, I believe IQ is fixed at birth. I simply feel that to be an atheist is the most closed minded thing there is. I also believe that it is also the most unscientific. After all, something cannot come from nothing, but that is what atheists and the big bang theory want us to believe.
I also don't necessarily buy evolution, but that's not for religious reasons and it would make another great thread of discussion.
So here's a biblical question I often wonder about: many interpret the promise God made after the great flood to never do it again, and then ultimately the sending of His Son to us to better understand us as a sign of a living God who changes with time. However, the Bible also says that God is always and infinite. It makes sense that Jesus is needed for one such as God to better understand our lives here, but on the other hand even if we are so below God that he can't comprehend us, surely it is possible that instead of the convention wisdom that it is actually our understanding of God that has evolved over time. Perhaps that was the reason Jesus was sent here that we might better understand Him.
tl;dr random thoughts blah blah