Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The diversity quotas just make everything so much more annoying.
I've said if before, but it's because these people are empty shells.

They have no life experience to identify with. They don't have an actual internal moral compass they developed themselves, just what they were told to be like. They don't identify with part of a group that you have to actually accomplish or take part in something to belong.

So their sexual/ethnic identity is all they have. Worse, they project so hard, because they're empty inside, that they see those characters as THEM, as their own AVATARS, not characters to empathize with or feel familiar with.

When, when an SJW lesbian sees a TV lesbian, she isn't "cool, she likes to fuck girls like me" it's "this is the TV stand-in for ME ME ME ME!" so when said lesbian gets yeeted out of the show, THEY were killed off, not the character.

It's because everything sunk down to the lowest common denominator and the least possible effort with being a victim, not overcoming adversity, is what makes you special.
 
The phenomenon at large is called Hyper-Reality. If you say something vehemently enough and pervasively enough it becomes more real than reality.
They're playing the long game. They know they can't beat Trump now so they're making sure that everyone who researches his presidency in the future sees their articles and thinks "Well obviously he was a Russian puppet. These totally credible news sources told me so!"
 
People were guilt tripped into voting for obama out of fear?

I remember hearing whispers about some voter intimidation tactics going around, but they were quickly memory-holed. There was a case in Philadelphia of the New Black Panther Party being accused of voter intimidation, though it was dropped. If I remember correctly, though, the Black Panther Party is notorious for doing shit like that.

only thing i remembered was the media not shutting up about michael jackson being dead.

Oh yeah, Michael Jackson died on election year. That was everywhere, too, honestly forgot about that being the big thing that year next to the election. Everything just blends together after a while.
 
What caused the big drop in April? Was it the fake news about bleach, or were people angry because he didn't reopen the nation by Easter like he was suggesting he would? Or was it the fake news about how he was going to overrule the constitution and steal state rights?

Probably a combination of all of them, including the out of context or twisted bad news. The media definitely have decided in the past few months that Trump must be destroyed.

When things reopen and the economy starts taking off like a rocket -- that 22 million unemployment will vanish over the course of a month -- unless they can set up counterops and propaganda, Trump will get credit for it. And those numbers are going to go through the roof.
 
I've said if before, but it's because these people are empty shells.

They have no life experience to identify with. They don't have an actual internal moral compass they developed themselves, just what they were told to be like. They don't identify with part of a group that you have to actually accomplish or take part in something to belong.

So their sexual/ethnic identity is all they have. Worse, they project so hard, because they're empty inside, that they see those characters as THEM, as their own AVATARS, not characters to empathize with or feel familiar with.

When, when an SJW lesbian sees a TV lesbian, she isn't "cool, she likes to fuck girls like me" it's "this is the TV stand-in for ME ME ME ME!" so when said lesbian gets yeeted out of the show, THEY were killed off, not the character.

It's because everything sunk down to the lowest common denominator and the least possible effort with being a victim, not overcoming adversity, is what makes you special.

That could explain why the majority of entertainment in the late 2010's that keeps using the "FIRST GAY/ TRANS WHAMEN" shtick flopped.
reminds me of the far cry 5 controversy from both side because of Joseph seed apperantly being a mockery of christian fundamntalist despite his gang being the most racially and sexually diverse than the previous game's enemies. I remember when journalists bitched about this one line in the game were one of the npcs said libtard and they're pissed that the game doesn't portray conservatives as cartoonishly evil. Like my niggas, you do know this isn't the 2000s right?
 
I remember hearing whispers about some voter intimidation tactics going around, but they were quickly memory-holed. There was a case in Philadelphia of the New Black Panther Party being accused of voter intimidation, though it was dropped. If I remember correctly, though, the Black Panther Party is notorious for doing shit like that.



Oh yeah, Michael Jackson died on election year. That was everywhere, too, honestly forgot about that being the big thing that year next to the election. Everything just blends together after a while.
Here's the video
 
Just a FYI the BPP and the NBPP are two different things. The BPP doesn't even exist anymore and Huey Long has came out against the NBPP I believe because of how extreme they are. (I'm to lazy to look into it at the moment though)

Those guys are NBPP.
 
Good news is that historians love to shit on the press.

The thing with that is, they're shitting on the New York Times for publishing fluff pieces about Nazi Germany as they were persecuting Jews. That's a black eye that's never going to go away. The best the press can do to mitigate that damage is to do what they've always been doing, which is not fucking talk about it.

What I'm referring to is how the press wants people to perceive reality. That's Propaganda 101. You not only control how people perceive public figures, you control how they perceive narratives and historical events. Look at Ronald Reagan for example. He not only decisively beat Jimmy Carter in 1980, he literally turned Walter Mondale on his head and used him to mop floor from the tip of Maine to Southern California in 1984. Good luck finding a media outlet today who'll have anything good to say about that, much less him standing in West Berlin saying "Mr. Gorbachev... Tear down this wall!"

The press doesn't want you remembering that about him. But if you bring up the subject, they'll be quick to point out Reaganomics and the Iran-Contra deal. They simply don't want you remembering anything good he might have done. That's how they're going to do Donald Trump 20 years from now. They don't want you remembering how the DOW hit 26,000 on his watch or how he refused to perpetuate endless wars in the Middle East... or how the highest levels of government conspired against him and his campaign to frame them as traitors working for Vladimir Putin. They just want you remembering that Donald Trump was indeed Vladimir Putin's puppet who locked Mexican children in concentration camps, intentionally allowed Corona to spread throughout the world, and turned every single one of his speeches into a mini Nuremberg Rally.

It's all Propaganda 101.
 
You make a great point. I wasn't quite sure that the DNC would swap Biden out, not because they don't want to, but rather they don't know if they could do it and keep the support of their base. It's a risky move for an outcome they don't really need. They want to win, but they don't have to win. Just playing the opposition against Trump is almost as good, and in some ways better.

But Obama doesn't have that luxury. He has to see Trump defeated. I don't think he has any qualms with sacrificing the party if it means even a 1% higher chance of Trump getting beat. He already got his. As far as he's concerned, running the chance of the DNC imploding is just the cost of business.

Its not about the support of their base, its the support of their donors. As much as people like to portray the republicans as owned by corporations, its nothing compared to the Dems. They just are more crafty about hiding it, but more beholden to their corporate masters because of it.

Or more to the point: The Republicans will pass laws that benefits businesses on the whole. Dems will pass laws benefiting individual businesses.

I still think it's amazing how hard the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King Jr.'s advocating to "judge not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character" has been torpedoed to ashes at this point because history's not going to see Obama as anything other than just the first black man to become the U.S. President, and literally, that is always the first thing people point out, proving this was always a race issue that they politicized to hell and back. Outside of watching shows and movies and reading comic books that came out during his presidency to even remember he was president, they can't really look back at his legacy because he doesn't have one now, unless they want to get into the social issues going on under him at the time, but what current year history book is going to delve into that? He can barely even be called the "sitting duck" president like with Herbert Hoover (of which it wasn't his fault), although I remember him being called one during his second term.

I don't think people want to admit to this at all, but I'm thinking the "shattering of the glass ceiling" or whatever it goes for minorities to be the leader of the free world as a testament of how far we've come has been pushed back a good generation or two. As long as race continues to be made an issue, there's a chance we'll never see another black president, let alone a woman, in our lifetime (or at least not until we have more old, grumpy Kiwis), or until everyone suddenly goes blind and therefore can't judge by the color of one's skin anymore. Probably have a better chance of a Hispanic or Asian (but they're white now) to become President than we do another black President.

Thanks, Obama.

Remember, sex doesn't matter, men and women are equal, and that's why you are sexist if you don't vote for 100% women.
 
For all its faults (and there were many) and the hokey writing (we're talking Thundercats levels of cringe) the general storylines in Captain Planet were executed well.
And the message was simple and local: recycle, don't litter etc., stuff that everyone can agree with and see an immediate positive benefit.

Modern causes are so monolithic and political.
 
And the message was simple and local: recycle, don't litter etc., stuff that everyone can agree with and see an immediate positive benefit.

Modern causes are so monolithic and political.
Most of the messages were good, but it also had a lot of extreme climate propaganda and poz in it for the era. It was insanely anti-nuclear and anti-petroleum.
 
Most of the messages were good, but it also had a lot of extreme climate propaganda and poz in it for the era. It was insanely anti-nuclear and anti-petroleum.
Products of its time.

Nuclear safety saw its first major revamps only the decade prior, after a spate of meltdowns. in general the 80s and 90s had some severe reservations with nuclear power, reservations made largely defunct now but which had solid validity when the show came out.

At the same time, the 80s-90s saw the biggest boost in research on petroleum and the effects of fossil fuels, this was paired with the last few decades seeing a major acceleration of petroleum mining and the formation of major oil corporations as both industrial AND political powerbases.

The shows worries then also generally tended towards showing the problems of excess, steeped in those worries and the information of its time.
 

Is the writer aware that by implication they're saying a price for Freedom might be too heavy? (Of course they are).

But Rose McGowan? X to doubt. Not even with a borrowed dick. Guessing she's going through attention withdraws.

I will never get Internet posters who feel the need to dramatically proclaim how woman X isn't attractive enough for them. Nobody says you have to sleep with them. Nor would they let you. But "not even with a borrowed dick"? Sure, Jan.

1589107986606.png
1589108031668.png



I've been thinking this, but if we ever get a first woman president, I have a feeling she will be Republican. Now that's just my 2 cents. I wonder how hard Democrats will try to get her smeared, especially if shes a black woman.

It's funny how the Right seems to get more actual leaders who are female or "diverse" than the Left. Serbia has a lesbian prime minister. She's not interested in Identity Politics so far as I can tell. Alice Weidel is leader of AfD, also a lesbian iirc, seldom makes anything of it. On the Left, both would be held up as examples of how progressive the Left is without actually letting them get power. It's almost as if the Right is more meritocratic or something.

The thing with that is, they're shitting on the New York Times for publishing fluff pieces about Nazi Germany as they were persecuting Trump's Chosen People. That's a black eye that's never going to go away. The best the press can do to mitigate that damage is to do what they've always been doing, which is not fucking talk about it.

What I'm referring to is how the press wants people to perceive reality. That's Propaganda 101. You not only control how people perceive public figures, you control how they perceive narratives and historical events. Look at Ronald Reagan for example. He not only decisively beat Jimmy Carter in 1980, he literally turned Walter Mondale on his head and used him to mop floor from the tip of Maine to Southern California in 1984. Good luck finding a media outlet today who'll have anything good to say about that, much less him standing in West Berlin saying "Mr. Gorbachev... Tear down this wall!"

The press doesn't want you remembering that about him. But if you bring up the subject, they'll be quick to point out Reaganomics and the Iran-Contra deal. They simply don't want you remembering anything good he might have done. That's how they're going to do Donald Trump 20 years from now. They don't want you remembering how the DOW hit 26,000 on his watch or how he refused to perpetuate endless wars in the Middle East... or how the highest levels of government conspired against him and his campaign to frame them as traitors working for Vladimir Putin. They just want you remembering that Donald Trump was indeed Vladimir Putin's puppet who locked Mexican children in concentration camps, intentionally allowed Corona to spread throughout the world, and turned every single one of his speeches into a mini Nuremberg Rally.

It's all Propaganda 101.

In short, they know that they can't stop people unearthing these facts but the goal is to make the default having to do so. Rather than it being common knowledge. Political conversation between non-friends is 90% trying to prove you're right and the other wrong. So long as the default can be changed then the person bringing up the lesser known facts is forever on the backfoot having to PROVE to an unwilling party that their perceptions are wrong.
 
Either that or the investigators all commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head.

EDIT: And here's your daily dose of TDS posting.
View attachment 1281278
View attachment 1281281
laurence tribe.jpg
Laurence Tribe will eat your children

Love that genderfluid one. "I'm severely mentally ill and borderline retarded. I've been struggling..."

Not their first time around the eternal victim rodeo:
CMU student finds transphobic graffiti, death threat outside dorm room

piece of shit transie.jpg
Ah, that well-worn and common epithet of transie.

This was the threat:
TRANS-THREAT.jpg

obama aging.jpeg
He has aged poorly. He looks like he's about five fishmeals away from exiting his cave and ranting about his precious legacy.

david nakamura.png
Have you ever heard the rumors that Netanyahu had a thing for east asian women in his youth? Meet the result of those unholy trysts: David Nakamura update: Nakamura is half jewsh, so I was close. Amazing.
 
Last edited:
Most of the messages were good, but it also had a lot of extreme climate propaganda and poz in it for the era. It was insanely anti-nuclear and anti-petroleum.

Can you imagine them trying to remake it? How many of the villains would they repurpose to be blatantly Trump?


Is the writer aware that by implication they're saying a price for Freedom might be too heavy? (Of course they are).



I will never get Internet posters who feel the need to dramatically proclaim how woman X isn't attractive enough for them. Nobody says you have to sleep with them. Nor would they let you. But "not even with a borrowed dick"? Sure, Jan.

View attachment 1282590View attachment 1282591

Fair point. 1990s Rose actually looked human.

2020s Rose looks like she's the mole helping the lizard people invade Starfleet Command, or somesuch.

1589112262349.png

1589112365732.png


1589112345806.png
 
View attachment 1282153

Starting to go back up since May 1st. The big hump where he was within MOE of being net positive was around March 26th, which was when CNN et all started pushing to stop showing his daily briefings live so they could start taking things out of context. ("lol he said drink bleach and shove a flashlight up your arse! Trust us, we haven't spent the past 4 years lying.")

View attachment 1282157

Biden's supposedly polling +30 on Trump.

So why does no one believe he's gonna win?

There was an old saying in the online political circles I used to frequent: The bookies always know. That's why I don't believe the articles saying Biden is leading in swing states and I'm thinking a lot could be read into California bringing in mail in voting.
 
Back
Top Bottom