- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
This is an extremely out of date definition of rape that hasn't been used since the 19th century. It's funny anyone who calls themselves a feminist would use it because the same definition of rape that used to be the legal definition required not only traditional penis in vagina sex, but that the woman had to have physically fought back or else it wasn't rape. Not a good look to go back to the literal patriarchal society definition of rape.
Well, that explains why that crowd has been so quick to dismiss the woman accusing Joe Biden. Fingering isn't rape. Probably doesn't even register as sexual assault for them. Maybe just sexual inconvenience.
It does not count as rape, however the sentence is around the same length as Rape. Case in point Woman Gets 8 Years in Jail for Pretending to Be Man to Have Sex with Friend What pisses me off, is that it's actually Feminists who are preventing the law from being updated.
Also the definitions under British Law. Source: Sexual Offences Act 2003
I especially love how BritBong members of Woko Haram will endlessly screech about how superior their country is, but the US has a more up-to-date federal definition for rape, and most states have a better definition.