🤮 Gross Brittany Venti / Brittany Dier - Stinky.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What she really wants is a trad white boyfriend who will impregnate her so she can stop debasing herself on YouTube and raise a family. However, the men she attracts are pathetic. No woman is attracted to the kind of person who sits in Twitter replies going "you look like you smell like lavender!" or, on the other end, "women should smell like vinegar, it brings out my animalistic pheromones" (both real replies she got retweeting that message). The man she wants to attract is not going to want a frumpy mutt so she's stuck in this limbo and will probably resort to dating another man who cries and hides under his desk during arguments.

I don't know why but "women should smell like vinegar" is my new favorite shit.
 
Ok you got me there.

Still I’m pretty sure she doesn’t mean it that way, but in the sense that, by her ridiculous standards, someone wearing some casual clothes to promote some brand is the same as getting paid to have sex. Which is odd.

Yes, it cannot be the same. Models can be prostitutes who want semi respectability, but wearing some sportswear for some photographer as part of some advert, isn't.
 
Ok you got me there.

Still I’m pretty sure she doesn’t mean it that way, but in the sense that, by her ridiculous standards, someone wearing some casual clothes to promote some brand is the same as getting paid to have sex. Which is odd.

You know, when people call a somebody a 'prostitute' when they're not a legitimate prostitution-is-actually-her-job prostitute, they're just making negative judgements on the dignity and moral integrity of that person, not trying to say they're literally having sex for money.
 
You know, when people call a somebody a 'prostitute' when they're not a legitimate prostitution-is-actually-her-job prostitute, they're just making negative judgements on the dignity and moral integrity of that person, not trying to say they're literally having sex for money.

I know.

However, if you watch the video, that's not what Venti implied. I am not language police insults, but pointing out that putting foot fetishists pictures on the same level as paying for sex is nonsensical which she literally did and even showed in a PowerPoint presentation.

I am critiquing her saying it's "just as bad". I am not saying they are literally the same thing.
 
My point is that calling activities that don't involve sex as "prostitution" which she did is nonsensical.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first. "
 
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first. "

I recommend you to watch the video so you can see what I mean. I want to believe this is just a misunderstanding.

Saying politics are "like prostitution" to attack politicians who nobody likes and saying selling pictures (including those that don't involve sex) "IS prostitution" are entirely two different statements.
 
I recommend you to watch the video so you can see what I mean. I want to believe this is just a misunderstanding.

Saying politics are "like prostitution" to attack politicians who nobody likes and saying selling pictures (including those that don't involve sex) "IS prostitution" are entirely two different statements.

Getting kind of pedantic there, friendo. Eveyone knows "you're a whore" and "you're acting like a whore" mean the same thing.
 
Getting kind of pedantic there, friendo.

I'm feeling the same thing.

We will have to agree to disagree then. Sorry, this has gone too long with no compromise in sight.

Though my issue is that I see you have strong opinions about this topic, which you are defending and it's fine, but, I am criticizing Brittany's points, not yours, which are in fact nonsensical and I do stand by that.

She is saying that any picture even if it's nonsexual, but happens to get a sexual reaction (which would be basically any picture of an atractive person) is literally prostitution. Not "like prostitution" but literally prostituton. and I don't agree with that.
 
Last edited:
I'm feeling the same thing.

We will have to agree to disagree then. Sorry, this has gone too long with no compromise in sight.

Though my issue is that I see you have strong opinions about this topic, which you are defending and it's fine, but, I am criticizing Brittany's points, not yours, which are in fact nonsensical and I do stand by that.

She is saying that any picture even if it's nonsexual, but happens to get a sexual reaction (which would be basically any picture of an atractive person) is literally prostitution. Not "like prostitution" but literally prostituton. and I don't agree with that.

No that's wrong.
 
No that's wrong.

Not to get into the murky depths of this but this is precicely why child pornography is difficult to prosecute. I think the legal definition in America at least goes beyond explicitly pornographic, and more "images designed to titillate" which could be an extremely wide spectrum.
As dark as the whole discussion is, it's funny to image foot fetish pedos being a gross ones in the pedo world nobody wants to associate with.
 
Is Venti even still liked by the Trad crowd these days? I know she talked to people like Nick Fuentes a while ago but I wonder what do the Trad people still think of her.

I don't think most of Venti's simps are part of the Trad community because that would be contradictory to the No E-Girls Never rule they have.
You'd be correct and she also courted irritation by essentially arguing that "gold digging is trad". Which is not incorrect but also not what that crowd wants to hear and not a reasonable expectation for a relationship nowadays. As ever she's the wrong person to say something, and she also doesn't say it particularly well.
 
You'd be correct and she also courted irritation by essentially arguing that "gold digging is trad". Which is not incorrect but also not what that crowd wants to hear and not a reasonable expectation for a relationship nowadays. As ever she's the wrong person to say something, and she also doesn't say it particularly well.
I'm guessing she's no longer "The Honorary E-Girl" of the Trad community?
 
I'm feeling the same thing.

We will have to agree to disagree then. Sorry, this has gone too long with no compromise in sight.

Though my issue is that I see you have strong opinions about this topic, which you are defending and it's fine, but, I am criticizing Brittany's points, not yours, which are in fact nonsensical and I do stand by that.

She is saying that any picture even if it's nonsexual, but happens to get a sexual reaction (which would be basically any picture of an atractive person) is literally prostitution. Not "like prostitution" but literally prostituton. and I don't agree with that.
So she's admitting she's a prostitute?
 
So she's admitting she's a prostitute

Indirectly, but yeah pretty much.

By the way I seize the chance to make clear that I’m not making a moral statement about prostitution or defending something. Which is what the people that disagree with me seem to think I am doing.

In reality I am just pointing out that. Brittany hates Anisa aka Idubbbz’ girlfriend so much (Not undeservedly mind you) That she is being super conservative despite being an edge lord, and Her definition of prostitution is so broad it would include even her own streams.
 
Last edited:
Indirectly, but yeah pretty much.

By the way I seize the chance to make clear that I’m not making a moral statement about prostitution or defending something. Which is what the people that disagree with me seem to think I am doing.

In reality I am just pointing out that. Brittany hates Anisa aka Idubbbz boyfriend so much (Not undeservedly mind you) That she is being super conservative despite being an edge lord, and Her definition of prostitution is so broad it would include even her own streams.
Brittany literally makes a living showing off her cleavage so thirsty autists give her money. She's in no position to morally grandstand.
 
Last edited:
Brittany literally makes a living showing off her cleavage so thirsty autists give her money. She's in no position to morally grandstand.

Funny you say that because she did a video calling out cam models

And as of the writing of this post, she is exposing the “cam model life syle” and calling them prostitutes.

Which, again, even if you agree with her, it’s hypocritical.
 
Which, again, even if you agree with her, it’s hypocritical.
Brittany only became trad because the men in her life looked at porn and it filled her with jealousy. She's extremely envious of women prettier than herself. The moral dilemma of prostitution is an afterthought. She didn't wage a campaign against thotery, until around the time she split with her ex. It's almost like a personal vendetta she has against other females competing for male attention, stemming from a history of insecurities.
 
Back
Top Bottom