I was under the impression that they would only be releasing non-violent offenders that were near the end of their sentence, or inmates that were otherwise vulnerable to the virus (so, geriatrics i guess).
I could be wrong on that first point but by the sounds of it I wouldn’t expect our good friend SnakeThing to be going home any time soon Unless it turns out WuFlu actively targets dogfucking degenerates
Yeah I'm rather doubtful SnakeThing will qualify as a "non-violent offender" but the US judicial system is kind of a mess at the best of times. Hope for the best but brace for the worst, etc.
So since the Allison Reed thing has blown up, some zoos came out of the woodwork. Here's one in particular who caught my eye, as well as some of his friends.
EqualEquine is a vegan, if you couldn't already guess. From Roanoke Texas apparently.
This was the post that brought him to my attention; dude crawled out of the woodwork to defend Allison Reed while citing Bill Cosby as a "not all animal rapists" defense.
Post where he was badgering someone about their anti-zoo stance. I forgot to unhide the conversation before screencapping (oops) but the gist was that EE was fighting someone over whether body language can be used to give informed consent.
This guy owns horses that he probably fucks and apparently everyone around him knows he's a zoo and is fine with it. Only in Texas.
A friend of EqualEquine. Interesting that he notes himself as gay for people but bi for animals. Almost like wanting to fuck animals is completely outside of their concept of sexual orientation. Almost like that's what a fetish is. Also another idiot who thinks being a zoo isn't against ToS.
"I would be embarrassed if I implied anyone murder/suicide. Anyway Coronavirus killing old and sick people is the best thing that's ever happened to the environment."
This is someone EqualEquine follows. The blurred videos are as follows; dude shoves his dick down a fish's throat while someone else holds it in place. Dude fucks a dog (not sure if male or female, don't want to look closer to check). Unclear porn that seems to be of a different dog. And some twink blowing a cow. The fact that this fucker was looking for megalink archives and a zoo chat is concerning.
Another EqualEquine friend account. This guy has a lot of bestiality porn all over his profile, particularly involving dogs (most of the pics in the top right corner are of men and women getting fucked by dogs; of particular note seems to be a Merle dog of some type, which might be identifiable by the coat pattern) but also cats (the big blurred pic on his feed is of an adult cat breastfeeding from some woman). There's more but I'll openly admit to being too squeamish to look.
I'm sure this is autistic as fuck, but it needs to be reiterated. Since the beginning, the Furry fandom, at its core, has been based off of fantasizing and simulating sex with animals or anthropomorphized animals, and especially engaging in this rampant sexual behavior at conventions. If I'm not mistaken, the very first true furry "artwork" was sexual in nature. There seem to be some sectors of the fandom that are less interested in the sexual aspect and do this mostly as a hobby, but being a furry is fucking weird in most cases. In almost all cases, "furry" is synonymous with "I want to fuck animals and/or jerk my dick to cartoon porn of humanized animals with wildly exaggerated genitalia." And in many cases it goes further than that with these sick fucks engaging their other harmful paraphilias (decapitation and rape for example) with their animal paraphilia via commissioning artwork or actually committing acts of bestiality. Being a furry is just a somewhat acceptable excuse to express your unhinged sexual appetite and desires to others who do the same thing. The whole thing is entirely disgusting and corrupt, and is bound to result in horrible things happening to innocent, trusting creatures who cannot defend themselves. Making a paraphilia socially acceptable by hiding it behind a re.tarded fursuit facade is corrupt as fuck and the fact that it's allowed to go on is so disturbing.
I was digging up details on people on FurAffinity and there's someone I found om FurAffinity that I'm afraid that they may be kidnapping minors in their basement and/or raping their pets. His username is "Paddy" and he's been on the site since 2006 or 2007. We all know that the older furries are no good.
I was digging up details on people on FurAffinity and there's someone I found om FurAffinity that I'm afraid that they may be kidnapping minors in their basement and/or raping their pets. His username is "Paddy" and he's been on the site since 2006 or 2007. We all know that the older furries are no good.
I was digging up details on people on FurAffinity and there's someone I found om FurAffinity that I'm afraid that they may be kidnapping minors in their basement and/or raping their pets. His username is "Paddy" and he's been on the site since 2006 or 2007. We all know that the older furries are no good.
Do you have any actual evidence he's actually been kidnapping minors? Missing persons flyers in his former areas correlating with weirdly specific fetish art? Comments posted from former victims of his talking about their experiences being abducted from a furrycon? Literally anything other than hand-drawn furry art that just shows he has a very specific bondage fetish?
Don't just post "look at the image above" and link us to his entire gallery. Give us something specific or stop wasting our time.
Edit: Looked at this dude's profile and he's talking to a 16-year-old. Possibly something here.
Do you have any actual evidence he's actually been kidnapping minors? Missing persons flyers in his former areas correlating with weirdly specific fetish art? Comments posted from former victims of his talking about their experiences being abducted from a furrycon? Literally anything other than hand-drawn furry art that just shows he has a very specific bondage fetish?
Don't just post "look at the image above" and link us to his entire gallery. Give us something specific or stop wasting our time.
He’s your average furry porn artist, what’s your point? You aren’t even sending full images, just thumbnails. And I don’t see anything even remotely suspicious in that screenshot. Yeah, he drew a dolphin having sex with a furry. But it’s art. No real dolphin was actually molested.
Are you accusing him of this because he draws cub...? I’m really lost here. I don’t think you understand what this thread is for.
That's him, a decade ago, wearing Ferris's ponyplay gear. What in the fresh mother of fuck made you think this was some kidnapped child in his basement. All you have here is some faggot who wants to yiff Balto in a gimp suit.
I think at this point it's fair to say anyone who uses the specific term "minors" is a paranoid retard who has no idea what the fuck they're talking about.
Good job doxing your timezone idiot. It's not 1:22 am where I am.
Anyway Paddy is talking to a kid named ArtieKnightYT_Alt (who is, get this, the alt account of ArtieKnightYT). ArtieKnightYT_Alt is an alt account ArtieKnightYT made to get past FA's mature content filters, and it's the account he's talking to Paddy on.
Good job doxing your timezone idiot. It's not 1:22 am where I am.
Anyway Paddy is talking to a kid named ArtieKnightYT_Alt (who is, get this, the alt account of ArtieKnightYT). ArtieKnightYT_Alt is an alt account ArtieKnightYT made to get past FA's mature content filters, and it's the account he's talking to Paddy on.
ArtieKnightYT_Alt's profile, where he claims to be 18 but that his other one got age restricted "from a glitch". Also Paddy getting this kid into his private messages/telegram.
ArtieKnightYT's main account listing his age as 18, but his (probably real) age as 16 listed at the bottom. Notice the date; if ArtieKnight was 16 as of last October there's no way he'd be 18 now.
Edit: Odds are Paddy isn't abducting minors, but he's definitely talking to them. Which makes the cub bondage shit a lot worse.
You know what? Fair point. Paddy doesn't really claim any of his stuff is cub and as far as I can tell he doesn't have an Inkbunny (feel free to prove me wrong; I just searched a few variants of his name). His art style draws a lot of cub-like characters wearing diapers and fucking plushies so it's a pretty honest mistake to assume he might be into kiddie shit.
I see wild_life callouts pop up every couple years, I'm glad some people didn't sweep it under the rug but my god the fact she still has a following and people defending her just proves theres corruption within the fandom.
Less of a corruption and more of a willing ignorance I think. She makes cute suits, who cares what her past (and most likely present) is? Her clientele is mostly made up of cloutchasers and after dark accounts so it wouldn’t surprise me if most of them are aware and just don’t care.
Post is littered with positive comments, commending her for overcoming a hard time and turning her life around, furries disgust me. How anyone can read that post and feel sympathy for her is beyond me.
Here she is blaming a bad relationship to her turning to beastforum,
I was in my early 20’s, living on my own for the first time ever, and in a toxic stressful first major relationship that was spiraling out of control. My partner and I at the time were utterly incompatible and didn’t know how to end our relationship like adults, so both of us kept acting out in more and more destructive, bizarre behaviors. Because I was so unhappy in my relationship, I made some reckless, self destructive decisions, and developed some stress-induced porn consumption habits which I came to deeply regret indulging in.
Most people in that situation would cheat, turn to a friend, alcohol, not to fucking their dogs and posting it online, Allison. She tries to paint is as simply "acting out" due to a bad relationship, when it is much more.
block harassing accounts on twitter because it’s traumatic to have gangs of bullying abusive strangers sending me death wishes and airing my dirty laundry to everyone I know,which I have worked so hard to learn from and move on from.... I go through periods of receiving daily verbal abuse and cruelty from strangers making assumptions about the way I live my life, who completely obsess about my alleged current sexuality. Total strangers are projecting narratives of what they imagine me to be doing in my bedroom, and that is invasive, abusive, and not ok.
Note the referring to zoophilia as a "sexuality", note how there is no indication of a repulsion towards zoophilia throughout any of this. It is all "pity me". Once you put a video of you fucking a dog out there, people aren't going to let you forget it, and they shouldn't, you should be living with that guilt forever. This is somebody with no remorse, this is somebody likely still acting out on their wants, this is somebody that does not deserve forgiveness.
Not to A-log, but if I didn't have at least a bit of hatred for her before this post, I do now.
Here she is blaming a bad relationship to her turning to beastforum,
Most people in that situation would cheat, turn to a friend, alcohol, not to fucking their dogs and posting it online, Allison. She tries to paint is as simply "acting out" due to a bad relationship, when it is much more.
Note the referring to zoophilia as a "sexuality", note how there is no indication of a repulsion towards zoophilia throughout any of this. It is all "pity me". Once you put a video of you fucking a dog out there, people aren't going to let you forget it, and they shouldn't, you should be living with that guilt forever. This is somebody with no remorse, this is somebody likely still acting out on their wants, this is somebody that does not deserve forgiveness.
Not to A-log, but if I didn't have at least a bit of hatred for her before this post, I do now.
Here she is blaming a bad relationship to her turning to beastforum,
Most people in that situation would cheat, turn to a friend, alcohol, not to fucking their dogs and posting it online, Allison. She tries to paint is as simply "acting out" due to a bad relationship, when it is much more.
Note the referring to zoophilia as a "sexuality", note how there is no indication of a repulsion towards zoophilia throughout any of this. It is all "pity me". Once you put a video of you fucking a dog out there, people aren't going to let you forget it, and they shouldn't, you should be living with that guilt forever. This is somebody with no remorse, this is somebody likely still acting out on their wants, this is somebody that does not deserve forgiveness.
Not to A-log, but if I didn't have at least a bit of hatred for her before this post, I do now.
You don't get to play the "it was just mental stress impulse" card when you not only had sex with your dog, but did it enough times that it started getting aggressive, then found a new owner for the dog, and then proceeded to buy another dog with the intention to fuck it.
No court on the fucking planet would consider that "impulse". That's "premeditated and malicious". Your sexual exploitation of your own animal caused it to respond in an aggressive, impulsive manner towards you. You fucking knew that what you'd done was wrong, and proceeded to plot to do it a second time.
I'm not normally a fan of government interference, but this feels like the sort of thing there should be a background check for. At least at the county/state shelter level. You shouldn't be able to physically abuse a dog in extreme ways, toss it aside, and then go buy a new one with no trouble.
Post is littered with positive comments, commending her for overcoming a hard time and turning her life around, furries disgust me. How anyone can read that post and feel sympathy for her is beyond me.
I don't feel sympathy for her, but I do wonder when it comes to punishment for people who did horrible things many years ago... when is enough, enough?
Is the only recourse for these people to commit suicide? Do we abandon all hope for restorative justice in extreme cases? Why not do that for the drug dealers and corporate lobbyists too?
If she did turn her life around to not be a dog-fucker anymore, that doesn't excuse what she did... but isn't that what we want? For people who do bad things to stop doing bad things and instead become productive members of society?
Most people in that situation would cheat, turn to a friend, alcohol, not to fucking their dogs and posting it online, Allison. She tries to paint is as simply "acting out" due to a bad relationship, when it is much more.
She's probably being genuine here: In the stress of her bad relationship, her exceptional individual mind probably thought, "Well I've already screwed the pooch in this relationship, so I might as well seal the deal" or something equally horrid.
Note the referring to zoophilia as a "sexuality", note how there is no indication of a repulsion towards zoophilia throughout any of this. It is all "pity me". Once you put a video of you fucking a dog out there, people aren't going to let you forget it, and they shouldn't, you should be living with that guilt forever. This is somebody with no remorse, this is somebody likely still acting out on their wants, this is somebody that does not deserve forgiveness.
This is-- and god do I hate myself for the appropriateness of this term and the want of a better one-- clearly a dog-whistle for pro-zoophilia support.
I've largely been removed from the drama and am just getting caught up on things. So I can say, as someone who didn't previously hate her, this post was enough for me to do so.
I'm not normally a fan of government interference, but this feels like the sort of thing there should be a background check for. At least at the county/state shelter level. You shouldn't be able to physically abuse a dog in extreme ways, toss it aside, and then go buy a new one with no trouble.
Just like how pedophiles shouldn't be allowed around children, people who go out of their way to sexually abuse an animal in their care should not be allowed to own animals. I don't care if they didn't make the animal bleed or it mounted them and they just went with it; it's the responsibility of a pet's owner to not take advantage of them in such a manner. An animal is about as dependent upon the person caring for it as a child is, and using that to exploit them for sex is rape no matter how gently it's done, or whether the animal was in heat or had a boner. None of those factors fucking matter where the consent is concerned, because they cannot communicate why they are responding to you in a tangible fashion.
"Body language" can only go so far and misses a lot of important information that simply cannot be communicated without linguistic nuance.
You can't tell a dog what HIV+ is and have it understand what the fuck you mean.
You can't tell a dog that, no, it mating with you will not produce any offspring or that the action is purely for personal gratification.
You can't tell a dog that its largely involuntary reaction to reproductive impulses are only acceptable towards you, and not every other human they encounter once they start associating humans with breeding opportunities.
You can't tell a dog that it fucking you was fine but it biting you (a natural part of sex for dogs) is unacceptable, and then throw the dog to another person to deal with. (Except that's exactly what Allison did, wasn't it.)
You can't tell a dog that if it does try to reject your attempts (assuming you're the sort of zoophile who would take the hint and back off) that it won't get punished for it in some way; explaining this further, a lot of people don't discipline their animals with violence, of course, but being put into their crate earlier than usual or giving them some other mild sign of rejection can be just as devastating. Animals, like small children, can be eager to please those who they consider their family (especially if they're being provided food and care by said family) and may put up with abuse in order to avoid rejection rather than out of genuine interest.
On that note, reading through Allison's massive "explanation"post (because it certainly wasn't a fucking apology) is so much to process.
I don't feel sympathy for her, but I do wonder when it comes to punishment for people who did horrible things many years ago... when is enough, enough?
Is the only recourse for these people to commit suicide? Do we abandon all hope for restorative justice in extreme cases? Why not do that for the drug dealers and corporate lobbyists too?
If she did turn her life around to not be a dog-fucker anymore, that doesn't excuse what she did... but isn't that what we want? For people who do bad things to stop doing bad things and instead become productive members of society?
She's probably being genuine here: In the stress of her bad relationship, her exceptional individual mind probably thought, "Well I've already screwed the pooch in this relationship, so I might as well seal the deal" or something equally horrid.
Nobody said Allison was smart, okay?
This is-- and god do I hate myself for the appropriateness of this term and the want of a better one-- clearly a dog-whistle for pro-zoophilia support.
Valid.
I've largely been removed from the drama and am just getting caught up on things. So I can say, as someone who didn't previously hate her, this post was enough for me to do so.
I think a large part of it is genuine acknowledgement that what they did was wrong, and a willingness to put themselves in a compromising situation (submitting themselves to law enforcement, psychiatric therapy, and/or keeping away from potential targets) to prevent things from escalating further. While it can be argued that Allison did this by her explanation post, she also did everything she could to gloss over the details and it reads far more as a personal vindication for her behavior (basically, a narrative she's concocted in order to make her history more palatable to herself) rather than genuine dedication to acknowledge the root of the problem; her attraction to animals and her willingness to have sex with them in order to get gratification. Whether she was having a stressful episode in her life is largely irrelevant; we all go through bad times and some of us struggle with mental illness and domestic violence, and some of us further do horrible, regretful things as a result. But a critical part is to acknowledge what was done and to, most importantly, ensure that it doesn't happen again.
If that means not owning or taking care of animals (or at least not the type of animal you might be attracted to), then that might be what it takes. Especially for someone like Allison who has not really done anything to redeem herself until public pressure has forced her to make a statement.
This may be rather soft-hearted of me but I am willing to be sympathetic to someone who has actually put in substantial effort to change their behavior, or has gone through some extreme trauma (domestic violence/coercion is really the only thing that could come to mind in this) that could've led to this behavior, provided they are doing everything available to them to change. While Allison may be able to argue for domestic violence, I don't get the impression that her boyfriend was forcing her to screw the literal pooch.
Someone who has committed harm to a child or animal in a sexual fashion is abominable in my opinion, but a readiness to acknowledge that in a sincere fashion (as well as taking steps towards ensuring that it doesn't happen again, regardless of personal risk) isn't a bad start. I feel I should also note that this does not apply to no-MAPs or non-contact Zoos either; if someone has taken enough pride in their sexual fixations to consider the fact that they don't go out of their way to fuck kids or critters a commendable effort, then they really aren't apologetic at all when it does happen.
A lot of pedophiles and zoophiles will move goalposts in order to pass the "I'm not so bad, at least I didn't do _____!" statement in order to justify their behavior. That is typically not a sign of someone who is legitimately apologetic or even really aware that what they're doing was wrong, and that's a problem if they are attempting to placate people who are asking for them to acknowledge their error. Regret and recompense is only really adequate as long as it's for the benefit of the harmed rather than simply to ease the conscience of the abuser, particularly so they can feed the notion that they've become a better person by surviving a trial of fire, such as getting outed publicly on Twitter and being forced to talk about what they did. Because, quite frankly, once they've harmed another person or animal in such a way then their ability to sleep at night or live with themselves really isn't anybody else's responsibility, especially not at the victims' expense.
On that note, the biggest thing I dislike about the "zoosexual" and "pedosexual" rhetoric are the claims that such behavior is a completely involuntary impulse and can't be changed or altered once they're rooted, when that isn't really true. There are enough people who grow out of your bog-standard loli/shota shit that despite decades of research the jury is still out on whether drawn pedophilia is a sincere danger or if it just makes people into that kind of weird; and there are a lot of people who think dogs are hot in a similar fashion, but keep their shit to furry art, with a good percentage of these people not going so far as to fuck animals. However, once the active consumption IRL child porn or bestiality porn is involved the odds of "turning back" are greatly diminished, and it can be argued that exploitation of a child or animal (even indirectly through shared content) is actively occurring even if the viewer wasn't physically there.
Our mentality is probably the one thing in the world that we can truly have some degree of control over; you can't will a cancer to disappear from your body on thoughts alone, but you can change the way you think about it. Likewise, you can change the way you think about a lot of things, including paraphillias. Sexual fixations aren't just random impulses you need to or should follow just because you have them; it's a choice to be made like any choice, and acknowledging it as such is important for anyone to have a healthy sex life.
Unless it turns out WuFlu actively targets dogfucking degenerates
