r/childfree - Where child-haters congregate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A total hysteroectomy is just the removal of the uterus and cervix, but since she is not also having an oophrectomy, her ovaries will still be intact. So, she won't go into menopause but cannot physcially get pregnant. She may go into menopause slightly earlier, but probably not until her 40s. Many people with no uterus still go into menopause at an average age. The ovaries will continue cyling and making hormones, even with no uterus. Ordinarily, they do not want to do an oophrectomy unless is absolutely needed, because when you put a person into surgically induced premature menopause, their cardiovascular mortality risk goes way up, as well as their risk of osteoporosis.

A hysterectomy is last resort if drug therapy has failed or conservative surgery like ablation (which also can make you sterile) has not helped. Salpingectomy (removal of fallopian tubes) is done if the endo has spread to the fallopian tubes in very severe cases which is how it can cause symptoms even with no uterus. But even then, they don't touch the ovaries.



It sounds like a bit of sour grapes and overcompensating, with a hint of jealousy that at least those people got picked. There is an overlap between FemCels and CF. In many ways it could be the MGTOW of women, in the sense of expressing "You can't fire me, because I quit" with regards to starting a family, at least in her case.
She does have a boyfriend, but so do lots of childfree people. Then they lie to their mom and say they’re infertile when she asks about grandkids. Or they make her call a terrier a ‘granddog’.
 
Here is a good vibe for you. Boss took the time and effort to grind down the sides of tables so that kids couldn't sit perched on the side of tables.
Childfree waitress gloats.
If the place had a no high chair/stroller sign, then people who bring them in anyways are kind of being dicks.
 
If the place had a no high chair/stroller sign, then people who bring them in anyways are kind of being dicks.

That is a good point about the sign. However I would also use a portable baby seat thinking that the issue with strollers and high chairs was that they trip the waitress, not that they block the aisle.

We bypass these issues by packing a lunch or going to a different place. Who the hell wants to drop 60 bucks on lunch, and have your kid stomping on your lap and drooling on your food?

But on the other hand I dare this establishment to put up a sign "no wheelchairs, walkers or canes allowed."

Or "we do not accommodate children under 5, the disabled, the morbidly obese or the elderly"

Is this really about blocking the aisles?
 
That is a good point about the sign. However I would also use a portable baby seat thinking that the issue with strollers and high chairs was that they trip the waitress, not that they block the aisle.

We bypass these issues by packing a lunch or going to a different place. Who the hell wants to drop 60 bucks on lunch, and have your kid stomping on your lap and drooling on your food?

But on the other hand I dare this establishment to put up a sign "no wheelchairs, walkers or canes allowed."

Or "we do not accommodate children under 5, the disabled, the morbidly obese or the elderly"

Is this really about blocking the aisles?
Also those foldable baby chairs could be placed to the same space as a normal chair normally is in. How hard would it for the waiter to ask that? That's what I have seen when large bags or something else is an issue. Blocking limited walking space is understandable issue but if it's a place where babies can come then babies should be taken into consideration and safety reasons babies are better off with high chairs.
 
I'm not cleaning any faeces that's the woman's job. Any man that says otherwise is a BETA SIMP. Period.

I know a Hispanic guy with like 8 kids he never changed a diaper in his life.
If you have kids then there is going to be a time when you will need to.
 
Also those foldable baby chairs could be placed to the same space as a normal chair normally is in. How hard would it for the waiter to ask that? That's what I have seen when large bags or something else is an issue. Blocking limited walking space is understandable issue but if it's a place where babies can come then babies should be taken into consideration and safety reasons babies are better off with high chairs.

Like most of these stories, I highly doubt the restaurant shaving down the edges of tables so they won't support folding baby seats really happened. Restaurants are businesses, and most businesses aren't going to inconvenience their customers because their employees hate kids. The waitress author of that story would have the reader believe that their boss and coworkers hate children just as much as they do.
 
Nah, he'd rather his kids get anal rashes and stink up the place than be CUCKED by his OWN CHILDREN into TAKING CARE OF SOMEONE ELSE.

If changing poopy diapers is "beneath you" or "a womans job" (read: poop is gross and I won't go near it), then you're a pussy who should turn in your man card. A real man takes care of his family, and that includes changing your kid's shitty diapers. Making your wife do it just says that she's tougher than you are. There are worse things than changing a dirty diaper, like cleaning a dear or other game animal. I mean, what's next? Making your wife kill a spider or getting rid of a mouse while you cower in fear in the other room? Nut up and do your fatherly duty.
 
There is no difference between your babies and some hobo bum outside with shit in his pants. Babies also vomit as much as the average street bum as well. Babies are gross and you won't catch me changing a diaper.
Lol why does it gross you out that much, it’s really not the same, it’s a little unpleasant the first time but you gotta do it, I’ve done it a few times with my baby girl cousin and she was so cute and good throughout Itwas able to clean her poopy diaper without a fuss. Lol grow up a bit :lit:
 
Lol why does it gross you out that much, it’s really not the same, it’s a little unpleasant the first time but you gotta do it, I’ve done it a few times with my baby girl cousin and she was so cute and good throughout Itwas able to clean her poopy diaper without a fuss. Lol grow up a bit :lit:

Disgusting, I'm alerting the authorities you nonce. Hope you share a cell with Nick Bates.
 
Disgusting, I'm alerting the authorities you nonce. Hope you share a cell with Nick Bates.
wtf are you talking about I just said she was cute like a lot of b babies are don't fucking accuse people of being nonces you great flaming pussy or ill deck u one mate 🤬🖕
 
the idea of "anti-natalism" seems so strange to me. an act of rebellion against one of the most basic human traits, reproduction. it's literally a rebellion against the human race itself, and yet they promote it. there gleeful about it. the same thing happened in ancient Rome, despite their (sexual) excess they were on the brink of destruction.
you know the old adage, those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

I suppose some of it could come from the circle-jerking "mommy communities" on the internet were they constantly complain about how much their children/husband/life sucks, how they are sexually bored, worn out, exetera, rather than cherishing the good things in life. if I was a young impressionable girl who saw that, I might be wary. of course, a lot of it seems to come from state and media "climate" propaganda. Georgia guide stones stuff.

Hating children and babies is age discrimination, it's no worse than hating 20 year olds, middle aged people or old people. You don't magically turn human when you are 18, and if people are treated as subhuman before 18, how are they ever going to develop self esteem and feel like they matter in the world? It's arguably worse to hate kids and teens because people are impressionable at that age, and being taught you don't matter because you're just some crotch goblin by even one person can fuck up your self esteem for life.
yeah, I can remember being really susceptible to insults when I was young (not being called a "crotch goblin" but other things) that can fuck you up mentally and last for years. sometimes it wont ever go away.
cherish the youth lads, they are the future.

View attachment 806865

no matter what. I will protect him with my life against a child, end of story.
dogs are better than humans huh? what other stuff can they do for you?
in all seriousness, there was a book or movie or something in which something happens and all people become sterile. the women of the world coped by carrying small puppies around, dressing them up, so on and so forth. it seems to me that the women who "like dogs better than kids" are being fooled to think they don't want kids, but that subconsious part of them that DOES want kids is reacting by making them love dogs instead. disturbing as fuck, why do dystopian stories always seem to come true?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no difference between your babies and some hobo bum outside with shit in his pants. Babies also vomit as much as the average street bum as well. Babies are gross and you won't catch me changing a diaper.

You're cleaning a soiled diaper, not running away from the Mafia.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me if a lot of these CF spergs are just bitter because they're either too ugly for anyone to want to have sex with them (let alone start a family with them), or were too busy "living their life" (read: fucked around doing childish shit) to the point where they got old and passed over for younger people. A lot of their posts reek of desperate "Oh yeah? Well, I didn't want to play your stupid game anyways!" attempts at saving face.

Reminiscent of "loveshies" they like to place the blame on anything, everything, anyone and everyone but themselves. It's not their antagonism or psychopathy that should change (maybe a sunnier attitude if not an occasional personal grooming will get them a "Becky" or "Karen"), its society that should submit and become its gigantic hugbox. They sound like Antifa.
 
ladies and gentlemen, meet u/Clownose or "Clownose Jenkins". a frequenter of both r/childfree and r/antinatilism, as well as r/prochoice, r/abortion, r/birthstrike and is a personal lolcow of mine. she works in retail (or at least did) and is in her 20's.
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.22.43 AM.png

they used to have what I was pretty sure was a selfie for their profile pic, it has since been changed to some autistic cartoon, shame I never saved it.
here are a few examples of just how much this lady hates the human race, right off the bat we have this:
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.09.48 PM.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/childfree/comments/dcl1vf/should_there_be_a_license_to_breed/
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.21.04 AM.png

careful hun, you might cut yourself on that edge
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.21.15 AM.png

she trolls the r/prolife sub but there isn't much there worth screencapping, as its mostly one word responses, or snippy comments. you can get the idea that she spends way to much time on reddit.
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.20.26 AM.png

yikes. i'm guessing she's never been pregnant.
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 11.58.50 AM.png

Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.00.03 PM.png

Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.01.04 PM.png

Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.02.17 PM.png

Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.03.14 PM.png

and more child hate, this time for her own niece:
and more:
this one just makes me sad, her boss was honestly hoping she would change, and she snapped back at him, I mean holy fuck:
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 9.40.21 AM.png

Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 9.41.53 AM.png

you can tell she's a cat lady in the making, complete with a hatred for pitbulls:
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.49.44 AM.png

like she really, REALLY hates pitbulls. the copypasta of links is much longer than I can screengrab, and she posts it a lot. get a life, lady.
relevant to an earlier post of mine about women who use dogs to satisfy their mothering instincts: her dog.
8042tnbbzf441.jpg

case in point:
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 9.26.11 AM.png


anyway she also has a fair amount of sjw stuff in her post history, but I don't want to spend hours looking for it.
strange, I went looking for anti child "child free" content, and while there certainly is quite a bit of it in her post history, she really has a lot of pitbull hate.
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 8.56.10 AM.png

funny, because she's the type of person to get salty over men saying they wouldn't date single mothers. can't expect logic from these people I suppose.
and the penny drops with this very real and not totally made up conversation she had with a guy on bumble:
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 9.03.36 AM.png

I honestly wonder what those 5 mental disorders are. there's probably more info out there to find on that.
here's the full post, which is totally real and not fabricated for internet points (a bit long)

[beginning] It’s long, so buckle up!

Here’s a conversation I had on Bumble with some idiot. Forgive me for how wordy it is, we were both being pretentious assholes. I didn’t send screenshots because it’s hard to edit those into one picture. Also, I had to rephrase and edit minor details (lightly, the content is still original and bears the same message).

I know I should have ended the conversation earlier but I was immature and it was in the heat of the moment.

On mobile, apologies.

Here’s the conversation:

ME: Is it a deal breaker that I’m not interested in having kiddos?

IDIOT: Is it a deal breaker if I say no, but I think that women tend to value having kids higher as they age?

ME: I mean, I’m pretty set. I’m not going to change my mind. There’s no way I’d ever change my mind 😂. Everyone says I will, but I’ve known from a young age what I do and don’t want, and that’s not going to change. So we can have the conversations, but they won’t change anything. So what I’m saying is, if you’re really okay with this, prepare to not have kids with me.

HIM: Well I can find buckets of examples of women who said exactly that and then wished in hindsight that they had kids. Therefore, sticking hard and fast to one value when the context of your life hasn’t been fully revealed to you is a little silly in my opinion. But I’m not writing off your reasons for not wanting kids, maybe you could even convince me that having kids wouldn’t be a good idea for us. I’m simply saying that you should be open to the idea that one day you may discover more about yourself or about the value of children and your mind may be changed. As long as you’re willing to have honest conversations then there’s no issue.

ME: Okay, then let me be honest here and now: my decision to not have kids in my life?

Isn’t silly, regardless if what you might think and comparing me or compartmentalizing me in with other women isn’t going to change that, it’s just going to make me angry.

It’s a conscious and real decision I have made for good reasons and I plan to stick by them. I will not have some child screw up my life because society tells me I’ll regret it when I’m older, and I will not compromise my values for society, or even my closest loved ones.

I have fought my family on this for years and have finally convinced them that they will not change my mind and they have come to agree with me that children would not be in my best interest.

So no, it isn’t silly. You know nothing about me and shouldnt assume you can just put me in a box with other women because that’s convenient for you. People aren’t simple. People aren’t convenient. To apply such rules to me is wrong and offensive to say the least.

HIM: I understand but I wasn’t comparing you to anyone I was just providing an example of people who felt about having kids the same way you do now then changed their mind. If you believe you have a perfect understanding of the value of children and a perfect understanding of your future self then I could see why you’d draw a hard line in the sand. My point is that wouldn’t be an honest assessment. But I don’t believe my understanding of these things is perfect either which is why I’m open to the possibility of being convinced by you.

But I wouldn’t want this to get in the way of us giving it a shot. This has already been the most promising conversation I’ve had with anyone from this app.

ME:

  • The world is overpopulated.
  • I have five mental disorders.
  • I am not caring or loving or nurturing. I would not provide my children with sufficient love or care.
  • I am more interested in my future. I haven’t lived my life for anyone else or changed for anyone else and I don’t intend to change my mindset.
  • I don’t like children. They’re immature, needy, stupid, and noisy.
  • I will not change my lifestyle for someone dependent on me. I don’t want anyone to be dependent on me.
  • I will not, at any point, compromise the integrity of my body for anyone, especially not someone who is going to end up taking all my money and resources and time and other valuables away from me in the future. Should anyone convince me otherwise, I know I wouldn’t want it in my heart and I would end up resenting the child.
But the primary reason? I have a hard enough time connecting with adult people. Why on earth would entrusting me with a small child be a good idea? I can barely fend for my own mental health needs. Place a small child in my hands and we’ll both fall.

But mostly? I just don’t like kids.

An honest assessment? This is about as honest as it gets. I know myself and there is nothing more honest than that.

If you are hoping or even thinking that I will change my mind or that I’m mistaken, this will not work...

IDIOT:

  • The world is not overpopulated.
  • You don’t know how much you’ll love a kid once you have one so you can’t make that claim.
  • You can have kids later in life (30+) after you’ve sorted out your life sufficiently.
  • It’s not taking it’s giving and I’d compromise my body for the life of my dog, let alone my child.
  • People get better at interacting with others. I did by massive amounts. It’s a skill you can improve on and reap benefits from.
  • You’re saying that you know yourself and what you want which I think is dishonest because no one has a perfect understanding of themselves nor the knowledge of something they’ve never even considered a possibility. If you genuinely believe those things and don’t have an open mind even when considering children, then I agree that you probably shouldn’t reproduce and that we probably won’t work out as a couple...
ME: (Going out of order at this point) Uhm yeah. That’s what I was trying to tell you. I’m not having kids. I will not consider having them at any point in time. I’m happy to discuss them, but you’d better be prepared for me to say “no” each and every time.

I won’t love the child, and I know this for a fact. I hate children.

I don’t want to. I want my stuff to be mine, I want to be able to live without having to worry about someone else’s schedule. By age thirty, there’s a higher chance of labor complications. The older I am, the more risk I place on my life and the child’s.

It’s a skill, but I do not wish to waste my time and energy interacting with someone I will not love.

I have considered it a possibility. Logically, it wouldn’t work. I could probably pull it off, but it would take an enormous amount of effort and time and it would stress me out.

I prefer not to take that effort and time.

Just because I genuinely believe these things doesn’t make me wrong or immoral. It means I have considered all possible angles and I know exactly what I want and have planned accordingly. I have been a loner for most of my life and think that more than one person in my home at a time would stress me out beyond reason. It’s why I know that I’d be just as happy single as in a relationship.

And I still, under no circumstances, would compromise my body.

There is no dishonesty in my statements. What you believe to be true for yourself does not apply to me. It’s great that you think everything can be opened or changed, but not everything can. This is how I feel about children. I will give you the same responses I always have.

Are you kidding? We have billions of people on this planet. The suicide rates mean nothing to you? There are too many people. I don’t need to contribute to the population, others are doing that just fine.

“Then I agree that you probably shouldn’t reproduce,” 😂 way to make things personal broooo. That’s not exactly a mature response to a life decision that I’ve made under careful consideration and discretion. But no matter. I wouldn’t want to compromise your morals for the sake of mine. It seems you were under the impression that I would some day change my mind and I have disappointed you, so you felt the need to make things personal.

Such antics are barbaric and unnecessary in this context as I have only given you what I believe to be true and factual under all circumstances. I’m sorry that I hurt you so much that you felt the need to personally attack me, but it seems as though you may need to reconsider your own words before you send them to me. But maybe I’m mistaken and you meant them honestly. In which case, I’d hate to pursue a relationship with someone who thinks he’s superior to me simply because of my own thoughts and beliefs.

NOW: He never responded after this. I blocked him shortly after. Thankfully, I never heard from him again.

Meanwhile, I have a CF boyfriend who loves me very much and we both know the world is clearly overpopulated.

TLDR: Idiot thinks I’m not actually CF and the world isn’t overpopulated and gets mad when he can’t convince me otherwise.
[end]

yeesh.

weak insult but I thought it was kinda funny, from an argument she had with one of my sock accounts (she has had quite a few arguments)
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 9.09.03 AM.png

not 100% sure but she might have been sharing photo's of protesters outside her workplace (which is legal)
Screenshot 2020-02-19 at 12.46.11 PM.png


I dunno, she's easy to bait into a flame war, and the best part is that she thinks she always "wins" or something. she's 100% oblivious to bait, and spends enough time online to actively try to argue shit with strangers on the internet. some aftermath of being baited:

[new info added]
[possible happening] I might be able to get her to give me the link to her "ban pitbulls' discord. from there opens many options. however I just realized the account I used was one with a lot of troll posts so she might vet it and decline giving the link. it should be easy to get a hold of though, if one poses as an "ally" to the "cause". ill report back later if I get a link and drop it here.
 
Last edited:
ladies and gentlemen, meet u/Clownose or "Clownose Jenkins". a frequenter of both r/childfree and r/antinatilism, as well as r/prochoice, and a personal lolcow of mine.
View attachment 1152063
they used to have what I was pretty sure was a selfie for their profile pic, it has since been changed to some autistic cartoon, shame I never saved it.
here are a few examples of just how much this lady hates the human race:
View attachment 1152067
careful hun, you might cut yourself on that edge
View attachment 1152068
she trolls the r/prolife sub but there isn't much there worth screencapping, as its mostly one word responses, or snippy comments. you can get the idea that she spends way to much time on reddit.

>clownnose

Forget clowns, bitch is a whole circus of Hebrew bullshit.
 
I can smell the wine and daddy issues from here. Xhe lives with xer parents in a room that doubles as a storage room but xhe's too much of a narcissist to kill xerself.

The last bit reminds me of this classic:

CRtVGlbVAAAn_tE.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom