Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Andrew Yang Ends His Presidential Campaign




Mr. Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience, mounted a long-shot campaign that promoted a universal basic income and persisted well beyond expectations.

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Andrew Yang, an entrepreneur with no previous political experience who evangelized a universal basic income and warned of the perils of automation, ended his longer-than-long-shot bid for president on Tuesday night after a yearslong campaign that endured even as those of members of Congress and governors fell away.

Speaking to supporters inside a ballroom in Manchester, N.H., as the state’s primary results were coming in, Mr. Yang said “endings are hard” and that he had intended to stay in the race until the end.

“I am the math guy, and it’s clear from the numbers we’re not going to win this campaign,” he said. “So tonight I’m announcing that I am suspending my campaign.”

Mr. Yang’s campaign has spent considerable time and resources in the state and was banking on the backing of its many independent voters. Mr. Yang had signaled in recent interviews and emails to supporters that he would need to vastly outperform expectations in the Granite State for his campaign to continue.

The end comes a week after Mr. Yang, 45, failed to win any pledged delegates in Iowa despite spending a significant share of his war chest on ads there.

Mr. Yang’s decision to exit the race closes out one of the Democratic primary’s most surprising story lines, removing a candidate who developed a fiercely loyal following of disaffected voters from across the ideological spectrum and intrigued even skeptics with his wit, levity and relentless positivity.

The son of Taiwanese immigrants, Mr. Yang was one of about a half-dozen viable Asian-American candidates to ever run for president. He became something of an involuntary torchbearer for Asian-Americans as he grappled with how to discuss his identity on the trail and how to address and confront racism.

But it was Mr. Yang’s plan to give every American adult $1,000 a month that formed the foundation and rationale for his run. Aware that a candidate beginning with essentially no name recognition and few traditional credentials would face stiff odds, Mr. Yang often told audiences that he had not initially wanted to run for president, because he was not “crazy.”

But he would add that during a trip to Washington, he was told that if he wanted the government to do anything about job loss caused by automation, he would need to bring a “wave” crashing down on the heads of bureaucrats. His run for president, he said, amounted to that wave.

Mr. Yang enjoyed steady growth from under the radar as higher-profile candidates took turns as the front-runner and absorbed the media scrutiny and attacks from rivals that came with that status.
But two days after Mr. Yang’s underwhelming performance in Iowa, his campaign laid off dozens of staff members from a team that had ballooned from fewer than a dozen people to over 200. Despite having raised more than $30 million over the course of his presidential campaign — a remarkable sum for a political outsider — Mr. Yang’s team had only $3.7 million in cash on hand at the start of this year, according to federal filings.
In an email to supporters last week, he suggested he would need to finish in the top four in the New Hampshire primary for the campaign to get “the boost” it needed — a goal he failed to achieve.

Mr. Yang’s base of political support consisted mostly of young and male voters — some progressive, some who previously supported President Trump, and many in between. His departure from the race could aid Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, whom many of Mr. Yang’s most loyal fans said they had voted for in 2016.But given that Mr. Yang’s support in the polls never exceeded the mid-single-digits, no candidate is likely to be significantly helped by his exit. Indeed, at rallies and town halls throughout the primary, many members of the so-called Yang Gang said they had never been involved in politics before encountering Mr. Yang.His plans moving forward were not immediately clear, though senior campaign officials would not rule out a return to politics. “We are just getting started,” Zach Graumann, Mr. Yang’s campaign manager, said Tuesday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/09/...lback=false&imp_id=438993197&imp_id=139083322

Speaking to reporters later that day, Mr. Yang was asked if he would consider running for mayor of New York City. “I wouldn’t rule anything out,” he said.

Early in his campaign — sometimes in front of audiences of a few dozen people or less — Mr. Yang, the Schenectady, N.Y.-born former head of a test-prep company and a nonprofit organization, often sounded the alarm about what he called the “fourth industrial revolution.” Automation, he warned, would bring mass unemployment, chaos and even violence if no remedy were pursued; free money combined with a more human economic system, he argued, would buffer American society against its worst effects and help restore people’s dignity.

The candidate and a small campaign staff labored in relative obscurity for about a year until February 2019, when Mr. Yang went on a popular podcast and raised hundreds of thousands of dollars overnight. From there, he began a slow but steady rise, raising millions of dollars each quarter and moving from less than 1 percent in the polls to 4 and 5 percent early this year. His political operation grew and formalized.
Unlike several more experienced candidates, Mr. Yang qualified for all of the 2019 Democratic debates, and he appeared to grow more comfortable on the trail and the debate stages. At a debate in the fall, moderators asked the candidates about automation, a moment of pride for Mr. Yang.

By the time the Iowa caucuses arrived, Mr. Yang was one of just 11 people in the field, which had at one point ballooned to two dozen.
But Mr. Yang’s modest rise also coincided with increased scrutiny of his policy proposals, his past treatment of employees and his handling of topics like race and gender. The news media began digging into the cost of his universal basic income proposal; he was criticized for saying at a debate, “I am Asian, so I know a lot of doctors”; and he faced claims of gender discrimination from campaign volunteers and past employees.
Still, when Mr. Yang ostensibly kicked off his campaign in February 2018 by announcing it in an article in The New York Times, few would have expected him to make a run so deep into the primary.

Mr. Yang seemed self-aware enough to comprehend this. At a debate in December that had been winnowed down to seven candidates, Mr. Yang earned laughs when he remarked, “I know what you’re thinking, America: How am I still on this stage with them?”

In an interview last week, he reflected on his two years on the trail.

“Supporters come up to me just about every day and say, ‘Thank you, this campaign lifted me out of a depression,’ or ‘Thank you, this campaign made me feel so much better about my future,’” he said. “It’s really incredible.”

“And while you’re running, you don’t really reflect on these things because you’re trying to get to the next benchmark,” he continued. “But it’s very touching that this campaign has touched other people. It is something that I had hoped for, but I didn’t realize what it would feel like to actually see it.”
 
I was looking forward to seeing how many votes he got in the West coast cities, just to gauge the strength of the Azn on Azn vote.

asian yang.jpg
 
Good, nobody needs any pie in the sky socialist economic policies. UBI = hyperinflation. We'd be just like post WWI Germany or current day Venezuela.
 
Good, nobody needs any pie in the sky socialist economic policies. UBI = hyperinflation. We'd be just like post WWI Germany or current day Venezuela.
Eh, it wasn't that far removed from a lot of those "tax credit" schemes for people who don't pay taxes. Credits for Children, on Earned Income for folks who don't earn an income, etc. Uncle Sam isn't shy about doing a bit of wealth redistribution. The goofy bit was the neo-Luddite justification for it all. Some actually believed it but a good portion just went along because, hey, $1000 bux.
 
I've just felt a great disturbance in the autism.

Like millions of basement-dwellers suddenly REEEEE'd out in poorfaggotry, and then were suddenly Bernie voters.
 
Eh, it wasn't that far removed from a lot of those "tax credit" schemes for people who don't pay taxes. Credits for Children, on Earned Income for folks who don't earn an income, etc. Uncle Sam isn't shy about doing a bit of wealth redistribution. The goofy bit was the neo-Luddite justification for it all. Some actually believed it but a good portion just went along because, hey, $1000 bux.
Simple math will tell you that $1,000 a month for everyone is impossible unless you embrace hyperinflation & just destroy the economy as a whole. I guarantee that after that, price controls would be put into place to keep prices from hyperinflating in response. Then you're really fucked.

Any Yang Gangers out there who think that $1,000 freebux a month would bring peace on Earth, end world hunger and create goodwill toward man, I have some required material for you to digest and bring you back to reality.
 
And just like that, 10,000 basement slackers had to fess up and tell their Mom that "job" they told her they were "close" to getting was actually just going out and voting for Yang .....

Maybe he can ask Trump about getting a cabinet position?

There is no Department of NEET Affairs.
 
This isn't some revolutionary new idea Yang was shilling, Richard Nixon wanted to enact a Guaranteed Basic Income in the 1970s which would have saved money by making all welfare programs (and administrators/workers) superfluous, eliminating them completely. Who shot this down? The Democrats.
A time when the Dems weren't the biggest retards in politics. How times have changed.
 
Simple math will tell you that $1,000 a month for everyone is impossible unless you embrace hyperinflation & just destroy the economy as a whole. I guarantee that after that, price controls would be put into place to keep prices from hyperinflating in response. Then you're really fucked.
Hyperinflation would happen if they just printed off money to pay for it. He wasn't that dumb. The scheme was only slightly less dumb. His plan was some crazy high VAT to pay for it all. A VAT that somehow the consumers didn't pay for. A magical VAT that was only paid for by that other guy that we all hate. All of it. By him. Personally.

That, of course, wouldn't happen and we'd end up paying for it. Cost of living would then move up to accommodate this whole picking from our own pockets nonsense then stabilize. In theory.
 
Ah yeah that. He said something along the lines of "rural america needing UBI in order to soothe them and make them complacent in accepting the fact that they are becoming a minority" That freaked the hell out of a ton of alt-right types.
That's gotta be it. Thanks. I remember it now. Posts around it made it sound like he was bribing white people to disappear, which sounds even more bonkers than the kind of shit Pelosi says, which is an achievement.
 
A time when the Dems weren't the biggest retards in politics. How times have changed.
Milton Friedman came up with the idea, he despised the welfare state. I don't remember all the details but an absolute requisite was all participants has to register with the Labor Department since it was meant to provide for basics like housing, utilities and food so if you wanted a car you'd have to work for it. I do recall the amount of $1,600 a month being throw around which went pretty far in the seventies.

Look it up, it was a really interesting idea especially since the people that claimed to care about poor blacks and whites raged against it hard because it would have destroyed every welfare office in the US overnight. Since it assumes everyone would behave responsibly it would have probably failed anyway.
 
I wrote it earlier in the main election thread, Yang appeared to be a pretty alright dude with absolutely no idea how people act outside of a middle-upper asian family. The UBI shit wouldn't have worked for the same reason food stamps are a thing, and the idea that people will invest the money into stonks rather than waste it on frivolous shit is beyond :optimistic: .
And horrificly he was the second best candidate the Dems had do offer.
 
Milton Friedman came up with the idea, he despised the welfare state. I don't remember all the details but an absolute requisite was all participants has to register with the Labor Department since it was meant to provide for basics like housing, utilities and food so if you wanted a car you'd have to work for it. I do recall the amount of $1,600 a month being throw around which went pretty far in the seventies.

Look it up, it was a really interesting idea especially since the people that claimed to care about poor blacks and whites raged against it hard because it would have destroyed every welfare office in the US overnight. Since it assumes everyone would behave responsibly it would have probably failed anyway.
The only reason welfare works is because it's a selective system that picks and chooses who gets to have it on a case by case basis.
 
It's possible a UBI may one day be a necessity and maybe it would be wise to start it sooner than later.

Or maybe it just isn't feasible.
 
UBI is to the left what the Fair Tax was to the right. A convoluted mess with nearly identical flaws.
 
Back
Top Bottom