The autist who threw a child off a London balcony because he wanted his iPad back - Jonty Bravery’s KF thread was inevitable

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
How son of company director grew up to commit Tate horror


https://mol.im/a/7975865

E4DD923F-55E7-4BE9-90C3-7CC7AEE96DCB.jpeg

Carers in charge of Tate pusher Jonty Bravery were instructed: ‘Never say no to him.’ The volatile teenager had a nasty habit of turning aggressive if he did not get his own way.

Staff assigned to the stocky teen around the clock said they were helpless to confront him if he stole from shops, and were not even allowed to wake him if he overslept.

The details of the way this emotionally disturbed teenager was supervised raise yet more questions about whether the terrible tragedy could have been averted.

At least two carers knew of Bravery’s plan to throw someone off a tall building, which they recorded. The Daily Mail has been handed the chilling recording by one of the carers, whom we are calling Olly.

He said: ‘This was a tragedy waiting to happen. I genuinely thought he was going to do it, because Jonty is the kind of person who, if he says he will do something, he will do it. He doesn’t say something without trying to do it.

‘Jonty was very challenging and complex. He could be nice but was also highly manipulative, and very difficult when not getting his own way. He was constantly trying to get out of the house, get access to females, get on to the internet.

‘If he didn’t get a specific item that he wanted, he had the potential to either steal the item or he would give the staff hell. Basically, we would just go back later and pay for whatever he stole.

‘You can’t say no to Jonty. It was written in his care plan. If you say no, it will trigger him to do the complete opposite of what you told him not to do. It would aggressively work him up, and the situation would get more out of hand.’

Perhaps it is little wonder that 18-year-old Bravery, with his autism and myriad personality disorders, was allegedly described by one care professional as ‘my most complex client’.

He was not always like that. Family photos reflect a happy upbringing, with primary school-aged Jonty smiling happily in costume with a cardboard axe in a school play. Another shows him being hugged by his father.

Bravery was born on October 2, 2001, at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in West London. But his parents had separated by the time Jonty was three. His father Piers Bravery, 53, a Surrey-based company director who runs a printing firm, and mother, an ex-air hostess, both have new families.

Bravery, who struggled through early life attending various special needs schools, was said to have been jealous of their more ‘normal’ lives.

During his childhood, Bravery’s father campaigned passionately for more help for children with autism. He raised funds for a special needs centre that had been ‘incredibly caring and understanding to my son Jonty’. But as his son grew older, and bigger, he became more of a challenge for his family and teachers.

In 2017, Bravery was sectioned under the Mental Health Act, aged 16, and taken from his home. He spent six weeks in a mental health facility – but after that he was allowed to live semi-independently in a residential flat in Northolt, west London. He was the responsibility of Hammersmith and Fulham social services, and assigned up to six full-time carers. They worked in pairs to ensure – in theory, at least – he was never alone, day or night.

Bravery devoted himself to trying to outwit them. Olly told the Mail: ‘You could tell when Jonty was about to do something, because there were always signs when he was plotting – a lot of eye contact, a lot of aggression. Jonty’s aim was not to make your day tricky, but if you got in his way, he would make it tricky.


‘He was always scheming. We worked in pairs, not so much because Jonty was violent, but because he was highly manipulative and could easily manipulate a lone carer.’

The team of carers, who all worked for a private care firm that was contracted by Hammersmith and Fulham Council to look after Bravery, helped him with his domestic routine and taking his medication. If Bravery wanted to go out, there would be a ‘risk assessment’ and they would usually accompany him.

Bravery was articulate and intelligent, but ‘played dumb’ when it suited him. He had researched his own conditions online and deliberately exhibited the worst symptoms. Olly said: ‘He knew how to use autism, in terms of making it work for him.

‘Jonty had about four key aims. He wanted to get out of the house, access to the internet, access to his parents, access to females. I wouldn’t say it was a fascination, but he really liked women, especially when he was out, and you had to be very vigilant of what he might say or do around women. Everything was geared towards his aims and he would try to remove anything which caused a problem with achieving them.

‘His mindset was: you guys are in my way, so how am I going to get you out of my way? Cause you hell.’

Olly added: ‘He wasn’t unpredictable – he knew exactly what he was doing. He wanted you to quit, and then he would start again with your replacement.’

The carers had to ban Bravery from the internet after he used his iPad to try to stalk the family he no longer lived with. He had made it his ‘number one priority’ to get out of care and back to them.

Bravery’s techniques for manipulating his carers ranged from leaving ‘dirty protests’ around the flat, to wreaking havoc. A neighbour of the property in west London recalled how he would throw things out of his window and was often seen running naked around the estate after he had shaken off his carers.

He said: ‘I know he needs to have them with him at all times because he could hurt someone. He’s often managed to get away from them and I have seen him completely without his clothes running around the garden on many occasions.’

Another neighbour said that in the same week as the Tate incident, Bravery had kicked a hole in the door of his flat. ‘I heard him screaming, fighting with a carer. He was in a real rage,’ she said.

The teenager who threw a six-year-old off the top of the Tate Modern had revealed his murderous plan months earlier.

Yet astonishingly Jonty Bravery, who was in council care, was still allowed to visit the gallery alone.

The Mail has obtained a shocking recording of the autistic teenager vowing to ‘push somebody off’ a tall building – almost a year before Bravery hurled the French boy from the London landmark’s 100ft viewing balcony, nearly killing him.

Care workers – one of whom claims he alerted a senior colleague – were so alarmed by what Bravery was saying that they taped him as he calmly explained: ‘I’ve got it in my head, a way to kill somebody... and I know for a fact they’ll die from falling from the hundred feet.’ A Mail investigation into last summer’s horrific incident at Tate Modern reveals:

  • Bravery said he would kill so he could go to prison and get out of council care;
  • At the time of the attack, he was on bail after a previous arrest on suspicion of multiple assaults;
  • Stockily-built Bravery’s carers were instructed to ‘never say no him’;
  • One of them claims: ‘This was a tragedy waiting to happen.’
On August 4 last year, Bravery horrified tourists on the Tate tower’s viewing platform by suddenly lifting up the French boy, on summer holiday with his parents, and throwing him over a chest-high barrier. The boy’s mother gave a ‘primal scream’ as her son plunged 100ft.

The youngster was airlifted to hospital in a critical condition with fractures to his spine, legs and arms and a bleed on the brain. He remains in hospital, severely disabled.

In December, Bravery, 18, pleaded guilty at the Old Bailey to attempted murder.

Now, ahead of his sentencing hearing, the Mail in conjunction with BBC News has obtained a spine-chilling audio recording of Bravery outlining his plan to throw someone from a tall building.

Recorded by his carers in autumn 2018, Bravery calmly explains the plot taking shape in his disturbed mind, to go on a visit to central London ‘as if we’re having a normal day’ and ‘visit some of the landmarks’. He said: ‘It could be the Shard, it could be anything... as long as it’s a high thing. And we could go up and visit it, and then push one of... push somebody off it.’


He told his carers he was determined to kill someone because ‘I know for a fact, I’m going to go to prison, if I do that’.

Bravery, who was 17 at the time of the attempted murder, claimed being in prison would be better than being in council care.

The teenager, who has autism, an obsessive compulsive disorder, and a personality disorder, was a challenge for his family and had been moved into council care in 2017.


Hammersmith and Fulham council in London had responsibility for him, and it subcontracted the work to an experienced private care provider named Spencer and Arlington. Bravery lived in a flat provided by the council in Northolt, west London, where a team of up to six Spencer and Arlington carers, working in pairs, looked after him day and night.

In autumn 2018, Bravery admitted to one of his carers that he wanted to throw someone from a tall building. Concerned, the carer asked him to repeat it in front of a second carer, and that is when they recorded his confession.

Although neither of them was working with Bravery on August 4, 2019, they claimed he was allowed out that day entirely on his own to visit the Tate Modern, which has a ten-storey-high observation deck with open views over central London.

An independent serious case review has now been set up to find out exactly what went wrong.

Of the carers, who was interviewed by the Mail, says he alerted a more senior colleague to Bravery’s horrendous ‘tall building’ plot. He also claims to have played the shocking recording to someone else involved in Bravery’s care. They both deny this. Spencer and Arlington said in a statement that it had ‘no knowledge and no records’ of the claims being made.

The firm said: ‘We will continue to co-operate openly and with complete transparency with the serious case review and await its conclusions. We are confident the full facts will emerge from this process. We believe we have acted entirely properly in managing and reporting the provision of care for Jonty Bravery. However, with regards to the entirely speculative claim put to us that Jonty may have told carers of his plans, there is absolutely no evidence of this and nor is there any mention of this recorded in any care plan, case report or review from managers or from his carers, psychologists, or health workers reporting to us.’

It added it had nonetheless recognised ‘the gravity’ of the Mail’s claims and had reported them to the care watchdog and the serious case review.

Hammersmith and Fulham council said: ‘Our sympathies go out to the child and his family following what happened at Tate Modern.

‘An independent serious case review is now under way. It will look at what happened and the role played by all the different agencies involved.’

'I've got it in my head… a way to kill somebody': Chilling audio reveals the moment Tate pusher Jonty Bravery told carers he wanted to throw someone to their deaths from a high London landmark

A chilling recording of the autistic teenager who threw a six-year-old boy from the top of the Tate Modern reveals he told carers he wanted to do it almost a year before the tragedy.

Jonty Bravery, 18, shoved the French schoolboy off the museum's viewing gallery as horrified tourists watched on August 4 last year.

The youngster fell 100ft and was airlifted to hospital with a bleed on the brain and breaks to his spine, legs and arms. He is still in hospital, severely disabled.


But a shocking new audio clip reveals he told carers he wanted to push someone off a high landmark in central so he could escape care and go to prison instead.

He tells social workers: 'If I could do it right now, I would. I've got it in my head, a way to, a way to kill somebody.'

Asked why he was prepared to commit murder to get out of council care, he said it was because his iPad had been confiscated.

Recorded by his carers in autumn 2018, Bravery calmly explains the plot taking shape in his mind, to go on a visit to central London 'as if we're having a normal day' and 'visit some of the landmarks'.

He said: 'It could be the Shard, it could be anything... as long as it's a high thing. And we could go up and visit it, and then push one of... push somebody off it.'

Bravery told his carers he was determined to kill someone because 'I know for a fact, I'm going to go to prison, if I do that'.

He added: 'I've got it in my head, I have to, I have to kill somebody to go to prison, to be away from here…I just need to tell you….In the next few months – it has to be, the latest has to be by February, in my head, yeah - but ideally I want to do it before.'

The carer asks him: 'Has there been anything in particular that triggered this off?

The boy replies: 'Moving back here and my iPad going, yeah.'

The carer then asks: 'So if you were to get an iPad, for example, that would basically cancel everything,' to which Bravery replies: 'Yes!'

Bravery pleaded guilty to attempted murder at the Old Bailey in December and is awaiting sentencing.

Hammersmith and Fulham council in London had responsibility for Bravery, and it subcontracted the work to an experienced private care provider named Spencer and Arlington.

Bravery lived in a flat provided by the council in Northolt, west London, where a team of up to six Spencer and Arlington carers, working in pairs, looked after him day and night.

In autumn 2018, Bravery admitted to one of his carers that he wanted to throw someone from a tall building. Concerned, the carer asked him to repeat it in front of a second carer, and that is when they recorded his confession.

Although neither of them was working with Bravery on August 4, 2019, they claimed he was allowed out that day entirely on his own to visit the Tate Modern, which has a ten-storey-high observation deck with open views over central London.

An independent serious case review has now been set up to find out exactly what went wrong.


WARPED PLOT TO GET IPAD BACK

Bravery’s murder plot was partly a warped bid to get his confiscated iPad back.

He shocked carers by warning he would throw someone off a tall building – then suggested he would abandon the plan if they gave him back his gadget.

Bravery is autistic and was in council care. In his mind, the threat to kill someone was seemingly just part of a petty negotiation to get back the iPad, which his carers had been forced to take from him, and to escape the care system.

Carers recorded Bravery talking about the plot. When one of them asked what triggered it, Bravery answered: ‘Moving back here [into his care flat] and my iPad going.’ The carer asks: ‘So if you were to get an iPad, for example, that would basically cancel everything…?’ The teenager shoots back: ‘Yes!’

On December 6, he appeared with a scraggy beard at the Old Bailey via video link to plead guilty to attempted murder.

He is being held at Broadmoor high-security hospital and will be sentenced on February 17 after psychiatric reports.
 
At this point, this man needs to be institutionalized and monitored very closely. He's a danger to those around him and mentally unstable. That poor baby.
He’s in fucking prison after pleading guilty to attempted murder. Sentencing looms and while this is the UK so he might get out on day release after 30 days, I still hope he’ll be in prison for the rest of his life. Doubtful.

Self-rating: 🌈
 
“Dirty protests” means leaving shit and cum everywhere, right?

Is it the case that there are no care facilities in the UK for people like this? They all just individually get their own free apartments and full-time staff?
 
Also holy shit I hope that little boy pulls through!

The youngster was airlifted to hospital in a critical condition with fractures to his spine, legs and arms and a bleed on the brain. He remains in hospital, severely disabled.

There comes a point where pulling though probably isn't the best option. Being as severely disabled (probably both mentally and physically) as these injuries would cause probably puts you pretty close to that line, if not over.

Either way what the fuck "never tell him no"? That's only going to escalate shit you idiots, with cluster B types you need to be damn sure you're the one in control not just acquiescing to their every whim. As someone said above just try living with someone with a minor cluster B personality disorder, now imagine just giving in to their every request and where that would lead...

He’s in fucking prison after pleading guilty to attempted murder. Sentencing looms and while this is the UK so he might get out on day release after 30 days, I still hope he’ll be in prison for the rest of his life. Doubtful.

Self-rating: 🌈

If you get sent to a secure mental hospital for shit like this it is usually until the doctors say you're fit to re-enter society rather than the judge setting a term. There are lots of cases of people fighting to be tried as sane here because prison is a hell of a lot better than the secure hospital.
 
Last edited:
“Dirty protests” means leaving shit and cum everywhere, right?

Is it the case that there are no care facilities in the UK for people like this? They all just individually get their own free apartments and full-time staff?

Yeah, generally it involves taking your shit and smearing it up and down the walls and around the place, so the whole place stinks to high heaven and is repellent to anyone who tries to set foot in there.

It was pioneered by Republican paramilitary prisoners in Northern Ireland who were upset they were treated as the terrorists they were and not upstanding 'political prisoners'.

Some pics within, probably doesn't get the smell and true nastiness across though.


Anyway, any living space that has been subject to this is basically going to require expensive specialist cleaning. Yer mum with a washrag and some disinfectant won't cut it. Not that Jonti's mum likely ever set foot in the place.

Either way what the fuck "never tell him no"? T

I agree with your assessment that it was the worst thing for him, but this was probably about low paid care workers trying to avoid the kind of confrontations that would get them assaulted, have shit thrown at them or worse. Appeasing the horrible cunt because they had no right or training to restrain him, thump him back or whatever. Another reason why he was unfit for human society, even in a independent-living care context. I can't imagine care workers lasting more than a few shifts with this arsehole before quitting.
 
I hope someone leaks his prison cctv footage, I bet he does great chimpouts.
I’m sure he could give Ross a run for his money in the blowing-out-circuits-in-microphones stakes. Here’s hoping he gets Twitch streaming access while incarcerated.
 
So let me get this straight. He outright told both of his carers that he fully intended to murder someone by throwing them out the window, and then they decided sometime later it was a good idea to let him in, alone , inside of a 10 story building, with kids around?

Genius. Carers should be sued for negligence. The second he made that confession he should've been transferred to a secure facility, at that point its clear he can't be trusted not to hurt someone.
 
A whole lot of words and explanations to say this dude was a total and complete piece of shit.


He planned the murder out, stated his intent, carried it out, and did it all to get out of Counsel housing. Guy may be “disturbed” but he knew exactly what the fuck he was going to do and ensured he picked someone small enough he could pick up and carry (while possibly fighting off others) and that couldn’t fight him off.

I hate ppl like this. “Mentally disturbed” and “piece of shitaren’t mutually exclusive.
 
The teenager who threw a six-year-old off the top of the Tate Modern had revealed his murderous plan months earlier...shocking recording of the autistic teenager vowing to ‘push somebody off’ a tall building – almost a year before Bravery hurled the French boy from the London landmark’s 100ft viewing balcony, nearly killing him...‘I’ve got it in my head, a way to kill somebody... and I know for a fact they’ll die from falling from the hundred feet.’

PART AND PARCEL
 
He lives in the UK? If he just wanted to be incarcerated, why didn't he just say "nigger" on Facebook?
 
“Dirty protests” means leaving shit and cum everywhere, right?

Is it the case that there are no care facilities in the UK for people like this? They all just individually get their own free apartments and full-time staff?
We closed down the long term psych care beds a long time ago. ‘Care in the community’ was the push. This is the result. You can’t keep people like this in the community. They WILL find a loophole, or outwit carers, or there will be a fuck up somewhere. We need to accept that some people need lifelong secure places.
I hope he gets locked up on an indeterminate sentence. That poor kid.
 
I hate ppl like this. “Mentally disturbed” and “piece of shitaren’t mutually exclusive.

Truer words never spoken. Autism doesn't result in this behavior - a bad character does, and disabilities - unless they reduce you to a drooling vegetable incapable of thought or deed or send you stark, staring delusionally crazy - do not erase personality. This lad knew what he wanted, didn't care about anyone else, and planned and carried out a murder just to get back at having his iPad taken away. he's entirely responsible for his own actions, but his manner of thinking and personality make him a danger to the public and I can't ever see that changing.

This lad was a horrible piece of work. How he developed quite this way is anybody's guess, although I expect being brought up by rich, busy parents who both spoiled him materially, made excuses for him and acted like he wasn't responsible for himself because autism and then shunted him off physically and emotionally to others may have something to do with it. Maybe even without the autism he'd be a Cluster B nightmare of a human.
 
I firmly believe that there is a link between autism and narcissistic personality disorder that goes unrecognized because of a general reluctance to diagnose co-morbid disorders in general and NPD in particular. There's absolutely no hope for NPD cases and they can be incredibly destructive, as seen here. All criminal autists should be screened for NPD, and euthanized if they have it. Even autists without NPD can be hell if they are poorly raised; the combo of lack of empathy, stubbornness, irritability, anger problems, and high sex drive can make for a real piece of shit. The press is right to raise the issue of autists behaving badly; autism is a known risk factor for criminality.
 
Truer words never spoken. Autism doesn't result in this behavior - a bad character does, and disabilities - unless they reduce you to a drooling vegetable incapable of thought or deed or send you stark, staring delusionally crazy - do not erase personality. This lad knew what he wanted, didn't care about anyone else, and planned and carried out a murder just to get back at having his iPad taken away. he's entirely responsible for his own actions, but his manner of thinking and personality make him a danger to the public and I can't ever see that changing.

This lad was a horrible piece of work. How he developed quite this way is anybody's guess, although I expect being brought up by rich, busy parents who both spoiled him materially, made excuses for him and acted like he wasn't responsible for himself because autism and then shunted him off physically and emotionally to others may have something to do with it. Maybe even without the autism he'd be a Cluster B nightmare of a human.
My guess is “spoiled to the point of being useless” from the fact that being told “no” was forbidden. Instead of dealing with his issues of anger, disappointment, hurt, whatever at being told no, they spoiled him until he was utterly useless and a burden to society.
 
He lives in the UK? If he just wanted to be incarcerated, why didn't he just say "nigger" on Facebook?
All he had to do was misgender someone, really.

If there are indeed no long-term psychiatric wards in the UK, what exactly is the budget for these free apartments and full-time employees who look after each psycho’s every need and whim?

This is why the “austerity” lie about the UK is both hilarious and infuriating. No matter how much the growth of spending is slashed, taxpayers are still footing the bill for lunacy like this.
 
I firmly believe that there is a link between autism and narcissistic personality disorder that goes unrecognized because of a general reluctance to diagnose co-morbid disorders in general and NPD in particular. There's absolutely no hope for NPD cases and they can be incredibly destructive, as seen here. All criminal autists should be screened for NPD, and euthanized if they have it. Even autists without NPD can be hell if they are poorly raised; the combo of lack of empathy, stubbornness, irritability, anger problems, and high sex drive can make for a real piece of shit. The press is right to raise the issue of autists behaving badly; autism is a known risk factor for criminality.

NPD is basically all the negative traits of autism dialed all the way up to 11
 
Back
Top Bottom