Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Adamska]

Thankfully, I had previously taken the initiative to ask @Trimmed Archer in PMs what problems he has with Trump. To be frank, you guys are not missing much. It's just standard anti-Trump mainstream media article regurgitating. I really don't understand why he thinks any of that will cause a shitstorm here; maybe he's just an intellectual coward. Maybe he senses his arguments are weak so he doesn't want to expose them to open criticism and ridicule.

Intellectual coward and lazy for sure, because he could barely provide sources to any of his claims, and he ignored basic realities that made his opinion inconvenient.

 

[It's HK-47]

Intellectual coward and lazy for sure, because he could barely provide sources to any of his claims, and he ignored basic realities that made his opinion inconvenient.

That's generally why I stopped ever bothering to try and rationalize with almost anyone who's critical of Trump. They're overwhelmingly low-information and prone to making excessively-emotional arguments with no or very little basis in reality. I don't say that to be mean, I say it because it's true. They read a headline, fly completely off the handle, and base the entirety of their arguments on what 2-3 sentences in the CNN chyron told them. If you prove that the headline's wrong or misleading, they just yell at you anyways.

It's pointless, it's irritating, and absolutely no amount of arguing will ever break them out of it. Trying to convince them to see any other side of any other story is a complete waste of time because they will never back away from their prejudices. You can completely back these people into an intellectual corner and deflate every single argument they throw at you with first-hand sources and they will still double-down and go, "Well I still think you're wrong because [CNN Article]."

There's no reaching the unreachable, so just let them preach hate because apparently hate is all that they want.

 

[Baby Jane Hudson]

The Epstein guy?

The one and only. He got Claus Von Bulow off on his appeal for attempting to kill his wife Sonny by injecting her with insulin. Alan has a brilliant legal mind, but he is an admitted left leaning democrat. He's taking on Trump's case because he is also a Constitutionalist and is afraid of what this impeachment trial could do to change the Constitution.

 

[Memento Malum]

The one and only. He got Claus Von Bulow off on his appeal for attempting to kill his wife Sonny by injecting her with insulin. Alan has a brilliant legal mind, but he is an admitted left leaning democrat. He's taking on Trump's case because he is also a Constitutionalist and is afraid of what this impeachment trial could do to change the Constitution.

That is exactly the person I want defending the president: someone who dislikes him politically, but feels the need to defend him because of the precedent it sets. This is something I haven't seen from the Democrats for the last 5 years or more.

 

[Jarolleon]

The one and only. He got Claus Von Bulow off on his appeal for attempting to kill his wife Sonny by injecting her with insulin. Alan has a brilliant legal mind, but he is an admitted left leaning democrat. He's taking on Trump's case because he is also a Constitutionalist and is afraid of what this impeachment trial could do to change the Constitution.

How likely is it that he's just duping Trump with that rationale so he can intentionally fuck up the defense to secure victory for the "right side of history"?

 

[Baby Jane Hudson]

How likely is it that he's just duping Trump with that rationale so he can intentionally fuck up the defense to secure victory for the "right side of history"?

I suppose that is a possibility, but he has spent the last 3 years (since Trump got elected) on Fox news defending the right and criticizing the left (despite the fact that he has said repeatedly he voted for Clinton). He just doesn't like what the democrats are doing right now. He feels they've crossed a line from a democratic republic to acting like a 3rd world nation trying to get rid of the current leader through a political coup.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

I did not vote for Trump in 2016. I voted third-party largely due to grievances against the two-party duopoly (which I still have).

I largely abhor Trump's roll-back of the Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Treaty, and I think the wall is a waste of money (especially when the cartel coyotes already have tunnels under areas that were walled off prior to 2016). That being said I kind of like Trump's personality - of all the elitist suit-and-tie fucks in DC he seems like the kind of person I would encounter at a game of cards or at the gym.

What turned me into a Trump 2020 voter was the impeachment catastrophe. Why vote third-party when anyone outside of the establishment is just going to get impeached for non-issues?

Taking out Quesadilla Salami and embarrassing Iran in front of its neighbors was just icing on the cake.

Vox accuses NPR of sanitizing their coverage of a Trump rally:

https://archive.li/ekUUg

TLDR, trying to maintain normal standards of journalistic integrity and objectivity help Trump. The only sane thing to do is to screech autistically at him. Anything else is a betrayal of ideals.

I continue, as always, to be heartened by the way that Trump spreads disunity and madness through his opponents. They will turn on each other in their anguish, and by the time the election rolls around will be reduced to a mob of naked, blood-stained mindless beasts, trapped forever in a cannibal orgy of their own making. The streets will be slicked red with blood and other unspeakable substances. All hail Trump, Ia, Ia, Ma'r a Lago Ph'nglui Ma'ga Kag Trump Fhtagn!

This is the left pushing their shiny new "apathy is support" narrative. Basically if you dont actively "help" (re:vote Dem) people who are "oppressed" (re:dindus, austere scholars and all the subspecies of troon rapidly cropping up), preferring instead to stand on the sidelines (or just not give a fuck), then you are basically helping those who want to oppress them, therefore making you the oppressor too by not picking a side.

TL;DR: Neutrality is bad because neutrality is inherently against us

Its some Sith-tier absolutist horse shit.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

That's generally why I stopped ever bothering to try and rationalize with almost anyone who's critical of Trump. They're overwhelmingly low-information and prone to making excessively-emotional arguments with no or very little basis in reality. I don't say that to be mean, I say it because it's true. They read a headline, fly completely off the handle, and base the entirety of their arguments on what 2-3 sentences in the CNN chyron told them. If you prove that the headline's wrong or misleading, they just yell at you anyways.

It's pointless, it's irritating, and absolutely no amount of arguing will ever break them out of it. Trying to convince them to see any other side of any other story is a complete waste of time because they will never back away from their prejudices. You can completely back these people into an intellectual corner and deflate every single argument they throw at you with first-hand sources and they will still double-down and go, "Well I still think you're wrong because [CNN Article]."

There's no reaching the unreachable, so just let them preach hate because apparently hate is all that they want.

I got told "is that a conspiracy theory too?" whenever I stated something with sources in a discussion with a former friend. Any criticism of Hillary was a conspiracy theory, that ever present thought terminating cliche.

When I mentioned the origins of "conspiracy theory" he went deeper into NPC thinking.

 

[Flexo]

How likely is it that he's just duping Trump with that rationale so he can intentionally fuck up the defense to secure victory for the "right side of history"?

As likely as it is that Trump set him up in a trap where the dems investigate Alan more closely and uncover all of the Epstein secrets.

At least that's the 4d chess move.

 

[Trimmed Archer]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

Smoke some weed, dude

 

[Trimmed Archer]

Smoke some weed, dude

Your idea is my lighter! Cheers.

 

[Markorian]

Stir that pot Mr. President. Stir. That. Pot.
View attachment 1102393

Number of times president has tweeted dumb ops I suggested: 1
Number of times president has tweeted gamergate 2.0: 0

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

lol calm down

 

[Private Pyle]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

I honestly don’t know what you were expecting. You realize anyone is fair game if it brings in shits and giggles or food for thought, right?

 

[Chaptersevenbankruptcy]

Number of times president has tweeted dumb ops I suggested: 1
Number of times president has tweeted gamergate 2.0: 0

I have actually wondered, from time to time, why Trump doesn't set up a shell political fundraising organization to fork over some bucks to various Democrats. Some fringe, some center. Don't say anything about it, and obfuscate the organization just enough that people don't know it's him at first. And don't donate enough to make a difference, but enough that it sounds like a big number because normies are innumerate and don't realize that ten thousand dollars means fuckall in actual politics.

And then later that XYZ woke candidate NPCsocialismbot9000 or neoliberalmccuckface was a Trump plant all along. Like, just reveal this once or twice. The circular firing squad will take care of the rest, and make the excesses of the Khmer Rouge look positively amateurish as they attempt to purge the insidious influence of the King in Orange.

 

[Adamska]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

Someone's mad they know they have no point and are basically parroting the old moral busybody playbook from the 1970s-2000s as their biggest argument and that got yeeted. Seriously, you bleat the same points that have been lampooned, mocked, or destroyed on here, and then wonder why no one on here is inclined to listen and believe based on garbage tier sources that you barely looked for.

Maybe learn to not be a coward next time when you want to stand for your beliefs, since sure you can spout them, but expect this shit to happen if they're stupid.

 

[Flexo]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

Smoke some weed, dude

lol calm down

Kids, kids... you're all exceptional meatbags. Bond over your mutual inferiority to robots and move on.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

So I mention creating shit-storms and get a waffling malaprop goatse (@Ghostse) whose SS were famous for partaking in lightning strikes. Then, an un-ironically blood-sucking boomer (@Dracula's Spirit Animal) blasts in berating a straw-man for not separating “the art from the artist" when my posts had explicitly concerned Trump’s presidency and not the man himself. And now, the person I was to talk to in DMs (@Iwasamwillbe) randomly shares our private discourse without my prior notice (whilst accusing me of cowardice.) Countering the scant few academic studies I had given as examples with a scoffing “lel they don’t get economic realities”, and a Youtube video... Are you ladies partaking in an autistic Monty Python skit, or were you all just trying to make me look like this?

Oh shut the fuck up you raging aspie. You clearly aren't nearly as smart as you think you are if you honestly thought your Twitter-tier takes are unparalleled and unrefuted in a Trump Derangement Syndrome thread.

I took it to PMs because I was curious and wanted to humor you, thinking you had something new to bring to the discussion. If I had known you'd just regurgitate MSM headlines and "studies have shown" bullshit, I'd have simply called you a stereotypical homosexual and told you to fuck off.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

Kids, kids... you're all exceptional meatbags. Bond over your mutual inferiority to robots and move on.

You know, I've got a really great comeback to that. It's right over here, if you'll just join me under this giant motorized can opener...