Even assuming the Dems hold on to the House what would make impeachment any more effective or legitimate the second time around?
Well, since this is the right thread for this...
I think he was saying the media because the Democrats take the media seriously, not average Americans.
Yeah but then it will be a DOUBLE-DOG IMPEACHMENT! That means that Drumpf will be DOUBLE-DOG IMPEACHED for life!
Putting it bluntly, there's a fat difference between shooting the shit and starting a proverbial shit-storm where you are the vocal minority.
The TDS thread is weird, unlike A&H, or chat, or the social justice thread, or the community /r/the_donald thread, any criticism of the President is met with 15 spergposts about why you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Even the 'when i lynch nigs lmao' A&H posters are less likely to play D for (((Donald))) then people here. I think this thread has a lot of people who don't really post anywhere else.
You're 100% wrong. If you can articulate a good reason to dislike the president instead of braying like a donkey and arguing in bad faith about how bad the orange man is people will respect your opinion. Most of the people who come into this thread to whine about donny are not capable of these simple prerequisites.
Well the the_donald community thread is the ideological opposite of this one and is supposed to make fun of people too militant in their support, so I’m not why you’d get anyone defending him there.
I've given my opinion as to why, many pages back. to repeat, I don't really object to him as a president, but you can't really argue that he's not a fat faggot with stupid opinions on physical health, and his deep dicking of Stormy Daniels shows he's got both questionable morals, and taste. Even outside of the adultery, imagine being a billionaire and choosing to ride roughshod on a below average porn star who had man features in her prime.
Probably because almost everyone who doesn’t like Trump says a variation of this. It’s almost never a specific policy disagreement or failure, it’s just “he’s a fat ugly bastard and I’m tired of seeing his face.” It’s fine to feel that way, but you shouldn’t be surprised when people don’t, especially in a thread centered around making fun of that exact concept.
I think the moral failings are more pertinent. His lifelong obesity only matter in that it's a showcase of this stupid anti-exercise mentality. Not being able to keep a marriage, your dick where it belongs, or your kids in your circle, are bigger personal failings than not being able to put your fork down.
I definitely agree with this. The silence from him in regards with what's going on in VA right now is telling.
That’s fair, but good person and successful politician are not things that usually go together. I think the days of supporting someone because he is morally righteous isn’t viable in an age where we actually know everything about a person. Most people, some fundies aside, support him because he’s seemingly able to get things done, not as some moral leader.