💥 Trainwreck Onision / James Gregory Jackson / Gregory James Daniel/Jackson/Avaroe - Edgy king of the tweens, Vegan with deformed dick, Pedo, Destroying the Environment. Serial Domestic Abuser, Served the wrong Chris Hansen.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
PlasticOwls said:
It looks like Greg is clawing his way into the YouTube mainstream now. You can always rely on moist Cr1tikal to come up with some humdingers.

"[Onision] just exists to be made fun of, just an internet punching bag. He's like a fucking blobfish, just cursed to be a loser to point and laugh at"

-- Charlie 'Cr1tikal' White

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ENg3UjSlJKE
Click to expand...

Onision vs Chris Hansen - YouTube.png

WHAT IF I SAY IM NOT LIKE THE OTHERS
 
mrsm0rbid said:
  • Chris says the obvious, Briana & Jaclyn tweet was fucking weird
  • Jaclyn signs out with solid advice - Don't live in fear, know that people are different than they appear on YT/internet/TV, and trust your gut. Don't do things because you idolize someone and none is worth idolizing.
Click to expand...
a) What Briana and Jaclyn tweet?
b) "solid advice" - I hope you were being sarcastic.

Anyway, thanx for bothering to do that.
 
bigshot said:
He would have to file a complaint, right? That would be sure to be a laugh riot.
Click to expand...

Correct, all we see right now is that he filed some kind of paperwork and asked for an initial hearing. Hansen and Repzion will be receiving copies of his filed complaint (which I'm sure they will share). He could be trying to file a civil harassment protective order against Chris Hansen, in that case you have to look at what would constitute harassment.
  • "Unlawful harassment" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The course of conduct shall be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and shall actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner, or, when the course of conduct would cause a reasonable parent to fear for the well-being of their child.
Still no good - because Chris Hansen has legitimate purpose (journalism). It doesn't help Greg's case that he literally put all of his information about his activities online. When you distribute information about yourself online, the law is incredibly crippled in what they can do to help protect you. Basically, in the eyes of the court you did it to yourself.
 
Sorry I had to take a phone call.

State of Washington RCW 10.14.030
In determining whether the course of conduct serves any legitimate or lawful purpose, the court should consider whether:
(1) Any current contact between the parties was initiated by the respondent only or was initiated by both parties;
(2) The respondent has been given clear notice that all further contact with the petitioner is unwanted;
(3) The respondent's course of conduct appears designed to alarm, annoy, or harass the petitioner;
(4) The respondent is acting pursuant to any statutory authority, including but not limited to acts which are reasonably necessary to:
(a) Protect property or liberty interests;
(b) Enforce the law; or
(c) Meet specific statutory duties or requirements;
(5) The respondent's course of conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with the petitioner's privacy or the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive living environment for the petitioner;
(6) Contact by the respondent with the petitioner or the petitioner's family has been limited in any manner by any previous court order.


Onision has responded to several emails to Hansen's team and asked for money for an interview. That reason alone completely destroys any chance he has of a legitimate harassment charge. Same goes for Repzion - he challenged him to a fist fight for the love of geese.

"Unreasonable interfering" is also invalid because Greg puts all his business online. Any interference because of his public actions can't be unreasonable because he created the problem in the first place.

Courts hate dealing with internet shit unless it's criminal. I guarantee Hansen's attorney is better then anything Greg can scrounge up the money for. My money: The Judge will advise Greg that he doesn't have a case against Hansen or Repzion because Greg is the source of all their information really. Either indirectly or directly - you can't sue for harassment because people online are gossiping about your business that you, yourself, posted all over the internet.
 
Are civil court cases like this open to the public? We'll definitely hear a lot from Repzion, but it would be preferable to hear it from a Kiwi who's not quite turbo autist.
 
Willing to bet that the attorney Mike Morse who accompanied Hansen to the swamp shack will represent both Hansen and Repzion pro bono.
 
Ido said:
My late dog had better acting skills than Greg. He's reaching hella far to think a lot of people fell for it.
Click to expand...

It's weird, but my respect for Greg is so low, I kind of just took all of his bullshit for granted and rolled with it lol.

Except the dog mounting story. You can see the laughter trying to burst out of his mouth in that clip
 
meff mouff said:
Are civil court cases like this open to the public? We'll definitely hear a lot from Repzion, but it would be preferable to hear it from a Kiwi who's not quite turbo autist.
Click to expand...

Not with minor children involved. There will be an entry as to whether or not an order is entered or dismissed but we won't get specific details unless parties decide to share.

And unless Mike Morse has passed the bar in Washington state he can't represent anyone there in a Court of law. If he's not, I'm sure he knows someone who is.
 
Zyxia said:

Vocaroo | Online voice recorder

Vocaroo is a quick and easy way to share voice messages over the interwebs.
vocaroo.com vocaroo.com
Click to expand...
I like how he makes up some shit about Chris Hansen "following someone else with a child home" as if that makes any sense at all, as if his address isn't plastered across the entire internet, all just to make Hansen look like the predatory one.
 
ExceptionallyExceptional said:
And suddenly Grug's decision to include them as petitioners makes perfect sense.
Click to expand...

Except when you point your children out to the courts the courts look at them very, very closely. They assign advocates who don't give a shit if the parents hate them or disagree with them and love to let the court know what's actually going on.
 
Cyber Goose said:
Except when you point your children out to the courts the courts look at them very, very closely. They assign advocates who don't give a shit if the parents hate them or disagree with them and love to let the court know what's actually going on.
Click to expand...
Especially kids that age. They tend to blab the loudest. He may have cooked his own goose here. Most GAL's are very good with children and make them feel safe and secure and open to talking about their situation. This is not a good situation for Gruggles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom