- Joined
- Apr 8, 2017
"Revolution", of course.An interesting interpretation, although I have to wonder what they call all the hysteria and hyperbole surrounding Trump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Revolution", of course.An interesting interpretation, although I have to wonder what they call all the hysteria and hyperbole surrounding Trump.
Those blue checks can't wait until Twitter's reply changes are rolled out in time for the election. The change to allow only selective replies is to specifially to prevent the humiliation of being "ratioed'
Couldn't it also be like... illegal?The ratio isn't looking that great. I'm guessing most normal people realize this isn't news.
View attachment 1097846
Funny enough, in response to that tweet is a good group of blue checkmarks mocking the fuck out of him:Those blue checks can't wait until Twitter's reply changes are rolled out in time for the election. The change to allow only selective replies is to specifially to prevent the humiliation of being "ratioed'
I wonder if they realize there are secret Trump supporters in Hollywood, or if they realize the number of said supporters is probably higher than they know. This is only "news" because guys like Vince, Mel Gibson, and Clint Eastwood couldn't care less about trying to hide their political alignment unlike almost everyone else in that shithole town.
For anyone not aware of the changes mentioned:
Twitter will test reply limiting feature to beat back trolls
I'm sure there will be lots of screeching from the TDS crowd if Trump starts using the feature.
Oh, I hope they'd be stupid enough to do that, it's a major federal crime according to 18 United States Code 333, and you can be hit with criminal penalties for any action done to federally issued money that:
“mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued.”
yeah, vaguely remembered something about it earlier.
just imagine: trump releasing a limited run of trump-bills, making the left reeee. then their butthurt is gonna make them buy as many as possible even for scalped prices just to get back at orange man and burn/shred/shit on them in a virtue-signal competition on social media - only to get a few weeks later charged with a federal crime after prosecution had enough time to collect all that self-fabricated evidence.
the reeee-ing and twitter meltdowns would be a sight to behold. especially if he times it with his re-election. ultimate troll move.
Going? She's been there for a good long while. After she resumed her position as speaker of the House in 2017, she reverted to the last time she held the job and kept accidentally calling Trump "Bush":If you're wondering about Nancy's mental state, just a friendly reminder that she's turning 80 this year. Wouldn't be shocked in the slightest if she's going senile.
It's illegal to melt down pennies so by extension I'd imagine it is. But it definitely does increase the value of the dollar through its removal from circulation.Is burning money a federal crime? Wouldn't that just make the value of the dollar that much more higher, since they were removed from the economy circuit?
Yes and its Nancy who is going to bring the 25th against Trump and have him rendered medically incompetent.Going? She's been there for a good long while. After she resumed her position as speaker of the House in 2017, she reverted to the last time she held the job and kept accidentally calling Trump "Bush":
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dmSbnk9k2mw
Nancy was so disappointed the first time she heard that people wanted to bring the 25th.Yes and its Nancy who is going to bring the 25th against Trump and have him rendered medically incompetent.
They need to get rid of a lot of the radicals and IDPOL types if they want any chance of winning elections in the future.Democrats really need to get rid of Pelosi especially if they don't win the White House this year.
It won't ever happen though, their entire platform is built on moving further and further towards a centralized authoritarian government by any means necessary, be it importation of low-iq people or the forced dependency on government supportThey need to get rid of a lot of the radicals and IDPOL types if they want any chance of winning elections in the future.
It's a new decade, people have grown tired of this shit years ago.
They need to get rid of a lot of the radicals and IDPOL types if they want any chance of winning elections in the future.
It won't ever happen though, their entire platform is built on moving further and further towards a centralized authoritarian government by any means necessary
Will she save face by saying it was intentional, because Trump has turned into Dubya (supposedly)?Going? She's been there for a good long while. After she resumed her position as speaker of the House in 2017, she reverted to the last time she held the job and kept accidentally calling Trump "Bush":
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dmSbnk9k2mw