Culture Earth Science Has a Whiteness Problem - Dr White (not white) says too many whites

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Earth Science Has a Whiteness Problem
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/23/science/earth-science-diversity-education.html (http://archive.vn/MAFDL)

Barely 10 percent of doctoral degrees in the geosciences go to recipients of color. The lack of diversity limits the quality of research, many scientists say.

When Arianna Varuolo-Clarke was growing up, her favorite evenings were spent watching the Weather Channel with her grandfather. She wanted to “chase thunderstorms” and understand where tornadoes came from, she said. She decided to become an atmospheric scientist. In 2014, she landed an internship at the National Center for Atmospheric Research as a college sophomore, and quickly realized that her path as a woman of color would not be easy.

“You’d walk through the halls and it’s a lot of old white men,” Ms. Varuolo-Clarke said. Still, she pushed forward and began her Ph.D. in atmospheric science at Columbia University last year.

The field’s lack of diversity gained new urgency in May when her graduate student cohort was targeted with a series of racist emails. The messages, sent to affiliates of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia by a person outside the community, said that black people were genetically inferior and did not belong in academia. It was “hurtful and invalidating” to be told that she didn’t belong in the world that had drawn her in since childhood, Ms. Varuolo-Clarke said. “It was an isolated incident. But it brought to the surface what still needs to be done in the field.”

In a commentary last week in Nature Geoscience, Kuheli Dutt, Lamont-Doherty’s assistant director for academic affairs and diversity, wrote that “a lack of diversity and inclusion is the single largest cultural problem facing the geosciences today.”

The geosciences — which include the study of planet Earth, its oceans, its atmosphere and its interactions with human society — are among the least diverse across all fields of science. Nearly 90 percent of doctoral-degree recipients are white. In the country’s top 100 geoscience departments, people of color hold under 4 percent of tenured or tenure-track positions. A 2016 survey from the National Science Foundation showed that representation of people of color in geosciences has barely budged in the past four decades, although significant gains have been made in terms of gender balance.

Asian-Americans are better represented than other people of color, according to Dr. Dutt, accounting for 6 percent of those earning geoscience doctorates in 2016. Between 1973 and 2016, just 20 Native American women, 69 black women and 241 Hispanic women earned Ph.D.s in the field, of some 22,600 total.

The field’s lack of diversity begins with a pipeline problem, geoscientists say. National surveys have shown that black people are less likely than white people to participate in outdoor activities. One survey, conducted in 2009, queried 4,103 respondents and found that African-Americans accounted for just 7 percent of national park visitors, and another survey found that they were more likely to report receiving poor service by park employees. Robert Stanton, the first black director of the National Park Service, has said that the idea that “black folks don’t like parks” has become a “self-fulfilling prophecy.”

Lisa White, a micropaleontologist at University of California, Berkeley, said most public high schools, especially those in urban environments, did not have the resources to organize outdoor field trips introducing students to the earth sciences. As the assistant director of education and outreach at the U.C. Museum of Paleontology, Dr. White has noticed that students of color tend to be more familiar with medicine, engineering, computer science and other STEM fields that lead directly to job opportunities.

Compounding the pipeline problem is one of stereotypes. The typical earth scientist is often seen as a rugged white male.

“You think of a bearded guy on top of a mountain wearing flannel and hiking boots,” said Jonathan Nichols, an associate research professor at Lamont-Doherty. “We just had our big fall conference and there were 20,000-plus geologists, and you look around and it’s all old bearded guys.”

That stereotype, Dr. Nichols said, can make the field feel unwelcoming to people of color, who don’t see themselves represented at conferences and among faculty members. Dr. White concurred that the geosciences had an “image problem” that prevents young people of color from applying for research opportunities.

That lack of representation in turn affects the quality and focus of earth science research, especially on climate change.

“It’s not rich white people who will be impacted first and most by climate change,” Dr. Nichols said. “It’s the people in marginalized communities. And if you forget that this work isn’t just an academic pursuit, then why are you even doing it? You have to keep in mind the real impact.”

Lorelei Curtin, a fifth-year Ph.D. student at Columbia University, said her earth science classes could be enriched by a greater focus on nonwhite and Indigenous histories and voices, given that “Indigenous people have a unique connection to the land.”

Ms. Curtin helped start a book club at Lamont-Doherty called Race Talk, which brings together geoscientists for discussions on race and white privilege. The group has read “Race Talk and the Conspiracy of Silence,” by Derald Wing Sue, as well as “Home,” by Toni Morrison. Ms. Curtin said that scientists were not accustomed to conversations that center on individual stories and experiences rather than data, so sensitive discussion of racism presented a challenge.

Dr. Dutt, Lamont-Doherty’s diversity director, joined the Observatory 11 years ago as its only person of color in a leadership role. Since then she has led trainings for geoscientists on recognizing their implicit biases to foster a more racially inclusive environment.

Her article in Nature Geoscience last week, titled “Race and Racism in the Geosciences,” was so popular that the journal’s editors removed its pay wall. The article called on geoscientists to take personal responsibility for ridding their field of prejudice.

“I wanted to write the piece to address the disconnect between the way white people and people of color view topics of racism,” Dr. Dutt said. “Most of the people I’ve worked with in my role as diversity officer are nice people and well-intentioned people. But privilege tends to be invisible to the person who has it.”

After the discriminatory email messages in May, Dr. Dutt organized a forum to discuss diversity, and the lack of it, in geoscience; the event was standing room only. Ms. Varuolo-Clarke was moved by how many of her classmates attended, realizing that the emails had brought to the surface racial challenges that the earth scientist community must confront.

“Sometimes it’s an elephant in the room that I’m a woman of color,” Ms. Varuolo-Clarke said. “I’d rather we talk about it versus tiptoeing around it.”
 
The field’s lack of diversity gained new urgency in May when her graduate student cohort was targeted with a series of racist emails. The messages, sent to affiliates of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia by a person outside the community, said that black people were genetically inferior and did not belong in academia. It was “hurtful and invalidating” to be told that she didn’t belong in the world that had drawn her in since childhood, Ms. Varuolo-Clarke said. “It was an isolated incident. But it brought to the surface what still needs to be done in the field.”

Yeah I’ll believe one of the “victims” wasn’t behind it when whitey (or Asian-y) confesses. Because why in the world would such an obscure cluster...how would they even be identified by an “outsider,” why would anyone focus on them, why go to trouble for the highly specific group “black Columbia meteorology grad students” ffs. Pressing x here.
 
Barely 10 percent of doctoral degrees in the geosciences go to recipients of color.
They're not just picking people out of a crowd to bestow doctorates upon. People of color are roughly 30% of the population in The US, so yeah that number could be higher, but it's not like 80% of the population is peoples of color and Whitey is just scheming his way into 90% of all of the sweet Earth Science gigs.

That stereotype, Dr. Nichols said, can make the field feel unwelcoming to people of color, who don’t see themselves represented at conferences and among faculty members. Dr. White concurred that the geosciences had an “image problem” that prevents young people of color from applying for research opportunities.
If these people can't exist within (or even enter) a competitive hard-science field without getting their feels rankled then they absolutely don't belong in it at all.
 
white person bad story #41679 also 'earth science' when you mention geosciences in the next sentence?
 
I would say study harder, but we all know that studying means joining them white folks and betraying the race, so that'll never happen.
Seriously, they want all of the reward with none of the effort. Lazy bastards.
 
Lorelei Curtin, a fifth-year Ph.D. student at Columbia University, said her earth science classes could be enriched by a greater focus on nonwhite and Indigenous histories and voices, given that “Indigenous people have a unique connection to the land.”

So infect another subject with white guilt studies and stories of the magical savage then? I thought you people were worried about climate change and all that jazz so maybe don't cripple the branch of science that deals with that with nonscientific mumbo jumbo.
 
So infect another subject with white guilt studies and stories of the magical savage then? I thought you people were worried about climate change and all that jazz so maybe don't cripple the branch of science that deals with that with nonscientific mumbo jumbo.

Paul Gross and Norman Levitt tried to warn hard scientists in 1994, but most hard scientists probably just want to put their head down and be left alone, not getting involved until it's their turn against the wall.
 
You people know it's all old white men who came up with the material used to argue for global warming right? Give up global warming as your precious hot button before complaining about how white males do science wrong just because they're white males.
 
In a commentary last week in Nature Geoscience, Kuheli Dutt, Lamont-Doherty’s assistant director for academic affairs and diversity, wrote that “a lack of diversity and inclusion is the single largest cultural problem facing the geosciences today.”

Her article in Nature Geoscience last week, titled “Race and Racism in the Geosciences,” was so popular that the journal’s editors removed its pay wall. The article called on geoscientists to take personal responsibility for ridding their field of prejudice.
Of fucking course it was Nature. I heard they are going to launch Nature Yonic Energetics soon.
 
How do you even quantify whiteness? Are white skinned hispanics white? Are jews white? Do they just go through pictures of every graduate and classify it by the amount of melanin?

Also maybe it has a connection with the same black countries those niggers came from being shitholes that can't even grow food property.
 
That stereotype, Dr. Nichols said, can make the field feel unwelcoming to people of color, who don’t see themselves represented at conferences and among faculty members. Dr. White concurred that the geosciences had an “image problem” that prevents young people of color from applying for research opportunities.
if you have a true passion for something, you wouldn't give a shit over something shallow like "gee, people here don't look like me"

if you NEED someone to look like you to pursue something, then it's not for you.

edit: why push the envelope when you can wait for other people to do that work for you
 
I can see how lack of diversity might affect sociological research into like, the impact on people. And the biological sciences, sure, since men and women, and different races, have different needs. And STEM fields like engineering where all sorts of different humans will need to interact with the design.

But I cannot figure out how in the world it would impact research in the physical sciences. Does the hurricane model give a shit who’s loading the data?
 
I can see how lack of diversity might affect sociological research into like, the impact on people. And the biological sciences, sure, since men and women, and different races, have different needs. And STEM fields like engineering where all sorts of different humans will need to interact with the design.

But I cannot figure out how in the world it would impact research in the physical sciences. Does the hurricane model give a shit who’s loading the data?
13 percent of the hurricanes cause 53 percent of the damage
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom