📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hypnosis videos that make men dress like sluts and swallow other mens cum. Some get addicted to it & change their lives drastically.
That is one type but hypnosis isn’t mandatory for sissy porn. Sissy porn is one category of BDMS porn primarily about humiliation and lesser degree control. It’s basically about men acting in extremely girly and submissive manner because that’s taboo and wierd. Men dress like women or feminine manner, they are highly concerned about serving people especially those they are having sex with, they are unable to stand up for themselves and so on. Just like any other BDMS men can do this voluntarily or after being forced in some manner. This is more commonly form of gay porn but one can find straight variants.
 
I don’t know if it has ever been discussed before on this site, but what the fuck is sissy hypnosis porn? I get the general idea that it subliminally/overtly alters your mind to want to submit to other men and hate your own cock and become basically like a servant, but... how is it so effective that it is ruining people’s lives like this?

My guess is that these people are in the closet and instead of blaming the devil for their evil gay thoughts they are saying that the sissy porn made them want cock up their ass.
 
Bildschirmfoto 2019-12-21 um 12.14.18.png

Bildschirmfoto 2019-12-21 um 12.12.01.png

Bildschirmfoto 2019-12-21 um 12.10.53.png

Bildschirmfoto 2019-12-21 um 12.09.25.png

Bildschirmfoto 2019-12-21 um 12.08.35.png

If a Tranny on /transpassing looks remotely like a female, it's because of filters or positioning. Nothing can hide bone structure.
 
The JKR fallout on twitter has kept me entertained all day. The woke crowd in my twittersphere went crazy since this is a pretty relevant topic for biologists. And we all know how much academics, who are otherwise nobodies in their field, love to screech on twitter. Interestingly enough, it's mostly female PhD students/Early Career Researchers weighing in. A huge proportion come from pretty irrelevant fields too (like palaeoecology, anthropology, geosciences).
This is all FUCKING DUMB.

1. Biologists define the sex of all organisms -- animals, plants, and the swathes of unicellular eukaryotes that belong to neither -- the same way: the ability to produce microgametes (male) or megagametes (female). If an organism does not show differences in gamete size, the "sexes" of that organism is referred to as "mating types" and there can indeed be more than two (up to almost 300 in some fungi)
2. Biological sex is binary. Ecological modelings suggest there is no space for a third ("non-male", "non-female") sex (but see "mating types" above).
3. If intersex "is just another way of biological being" for humans, why is it so rare? It sounds as though Nature knows intersex humans are not meant to be.

(Sorry I can't go on as my wi-fi time's up).
 
Last edited:
So I plunged into r/traa and r/traansfw for cringe. I was not disappointed.

whyeverybodyhatesyou.PNG

MOTHERS, LOCK UP YOUR DAUGHTERS SONS AH FUCK IT THE KIWIS ARE ON THE LOOSE

ewsissy.PNG

Sassy fetish? Yeah, I've been told I'm a sassy - oh. Aside: is King for a Day some musicband that the teens listen to now?

lies.PNG

Stop showing your worthless junk on social media.

echo.PNG

Rarity is best pony, Arleen Sorkin is Harley Quinn to me, and every Batgirl episode on Batman TAS was either meh or trash (exception: that one two parter where it turns out she killed batman but it was all a dream or something). I literally don't know what the other two are besides Ben 10 being all over Cartoon Network. Is a Ben 10 some kind of hovercraft?

thewormturns.PNG

OK, I laughed, but for different reasons.

First looks like the 8 bit guy with a bad combover, second looks sort of like my dad without a beard ( :feels::feels::feels::feels:) third just looks like some meh looking 4/10 woman.
 
Last edited:
The JKR fallout on twitter has kept me entertained all day. The woke crowd in my twittersphere went crazy since this is a pretty relevant topic for biologists. And we all know how much academics, who are otherwise nobodies in their field, love to screech on twitter. Interestingly enough, it's mostly female PhD students/Early Career Researchers weighing in. A huge proportion come from pretty irrelevant fields too (like palaeoecology, anthropology, geosciences).

This lady (not a troon) is always one of the most whiny and annoying people. She's a paleo ecologist, so really no expert when it comes to human karyotype. "You're a bully" - is this how she peer reviews something she doesn't agree with?
View attachment 1060746
View attachment 1060747

This one, also not a troon, is just dumb. She's an ornithologist, so she can shut the fuck up. We're not studying some lame bird, we're talking humans.
View attachment 1060769

And then this (sorry can't archive) article is being used a lot as a response to the evil terfs. Written by a PhD student of neuroscience....so also highly qualified on the topic.
View attachment 1060779

A he/they expert in the replies to JKR. Wow, finally a human biologist!!
View attachment 1060780
Oh.
View attachment 1060781

Of course this whole thing is also an excellent opportunity for some e-begging. Doesn't come as a surprise that Mr Cartoon profile picture is a troon.
View attachment 1060767

I may or may not be a bird scientist as well and the ornithologist is full of shit. Birds are all sexually dimorphic. In birds there is an equivalent to "intersex" in humans called "gynandromorphs" where the bird is literally half male, half female:
Cardinal-feature-550-2013-08.jpg

However, they are also always sterile and unable to reproduce. They are genetic dead ends, incredibly rare genetic defects. The fact that they have a genetic disorder and cannot reproduce means they are not a third sex. Reproduction is kind of a main factor in being a sex, hence the term sex.

When we go out in the field to study birds and denote their sex we don't ask them what gender they identify as lmao. If they sing a song or have dymorphic male coloration, they're male. If they don't sing, have female coloration, or are actively laying eggs they are female. As birds do not have external gonads that is how we determine sex.

Also, if you actively use Twitter to get into bitch slaps on the internet about psuedo science you are not a real scientist and should never be published in a journal ever again.
 
Last edited:

Jayzus fucking Christ..

They really do believe they're cute, little, anime waifus, don't they?

The coveting of female tween girls repulses me the most. It's a form of paedophilia imo.
 
I may or may not be a bird scientist as well and the ornithologist is full of shit. Birds are all sexually dimorphic. In birds there is an equivalent to "intersex" in humans called "gynandromorphs" where the bird is literally half male, half female:
View attachment 1061440

However, they are also always sterile and unable to reproduce. They are genetic dead ends, incredibly rare genetic defects. The fact that they have a genetic disorder and cannot reproduce means they are not a third sex. Reproduction is kind of a main factor in being a sex, hence the term sex.

When we go out in the field to study birds and denote their sex we don't ask them what gender they identify as lmao. If they sing a song or have dymorphic male coloration, they're male. If they don't sing, have female coloration, or are actively laying eggs they are female. As birds do not have external gonads that is how we determine sex.

Also, if you actively use Twitter to get into bitch slaps on the internet about psuedo science you are not a real scientist and should never be published in a journal ever again.
This is something I always ask troons who like to post in chats, but never get answered. How can something which can be ascribed to as an error in meiosis account for a "third sex"? Errors can be caused by environmental factors, such as toxic chemicals and radiation. What environmental advantage would these new sexes serve? What response would trigger in a population "Shit, we need to survive as a species! Start adding chromosomes!"

5th grade biology!
 

Riiiiight.

Hundreds of thousands of White working-class girls from rough council estates and childrens' homes were violently gang raped by gangs of predominately Islamic Pakistani men for decades, while the British police looked the other way because they feared being accused of racism..

But England is too "dangerous" for White males in terrible drag.

Classic troon narcissism.
 
Last edited:
This is something I always ask troons who like to post in chats, but never get answered. How can something which can be ascribed to as an error in meiosis account for a "third sex"? Errors can be caused by environmental factors, such as toxic chemicals and radiation. What environmental advantage would these new sexes serve? What response would trigger in a population "Shit, we need to survive as a species! Start adding chromosomes!"

5th grade biology!
Glad I just saw this so your transphobe lies would not go unchallenged:
1576941760117.png
 
This is all FUCKING DUMB.

1. Biologists define the sex of all organisms -- animals, plants, and the swathes of unicellular eukaryotes that belong to neither -- the same way: the ability to produce microgametes (male) or megagametes (female). If an organism does not show differences in gamete size, the "sexes" of that organism is referred to as "mating types" and there can indeed be more than two (up to almost 300 in some fungi)
2. Biological sex is binary. Ecological modelings suggest there is no space for a third ("non-male", "non-female") sex (but see "mating types" above).
3. If intersex "is just another way of biological being" for humans, why is it so rare? It sounds as though Nature knows intersex humans are not meant to be.

(Sorry I can't go on as my wi-fi time's up).
Are women who are infertile or past menopause not women then?
 
Are women who are infertile or past menopause not women then?
One of my fave non-gotchas.

Is a man who has lost one eye no longer human? If not, does the existence of the one-eyed man mean humans don’t have two eyes? Is a woman who has MS and can no longer walk no longer human? If not, does her existence means humans are not bi-pedal and ambulatory?

Enduring an accident or disorder, and normal aging processes, are entirely irrelevant to this discussion. If only troons and their flying monkeys would stop being disingenuous, we could perhaps begin a real discussion.
 
Are women who are infertile or past menopause not women then?

I have seen twatter troons use that as an actual argument. The point they so spectacular fail to ignore is that a woman, having never had a cock, a set of balls, sperm or XY chromosomes etc., doesn't suddenly cease to be a woman the moment she has a hysterectomy or a mastectomy to save herself from cancer. This does not prove that men can be girls.

Troons using menopausal women or those battling cancer to prove that "girl dick" is still "female" even though they don't have XX chromosomes, uteruses and ova etc., is utterly vulgar.
 
Back
Top Bottom