Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BScCollateral said:
My take is that Sophie is addicted to being outraged. She wants to complain about being oppressed, but of course since she isn't in any sort of meaningful way, she needs to imagine problems. Like a liar who can't keep his story straight, Sophie invents new complaints, often contradicting herself.
Click to expand...

i believe shes just invented her own idea of how the world works in her head and goes off of that, in which case her arguments must make a lot of sense to her
 
@Trombonista
New comic
madeinbrighton.jpg

67134484_1188219998026929_4801374979927048192_n.jpg

67095116_2403095973312782_6250405604527964160_n.jpg


matilda.jpg


Poutine version of the Tapas comics will be coming next month
gsapoutine.jpg
 
Billy's entire "point" essentially boils down to
1) "Man" and "woman" are words with no inherent meaning, and you should just pick whichever you like the best.
2) "Homosexuality", "heterosexuality" and "bisexuality" are strictly determined as attraction to genders as defined in 1). Homosexuality is being attracted to those that picked the same word as you, heterosexuality is being attracted to those that picked the other one, and bisexuality is being attracted to both (and I'm not even sure what Billy considers the difference between bi- and pansexuality since that comic makes no real attempt to explain it in an understandable manner).
Click to expand...

The outmoded Freudian term "polymorphous perverse" perhaps fits best.

Maybe we need a new term that means the same thing without the negative connotations of "perverse" (even though Freud himself did not mean it that way).

"Polymorphous empowered" perhaps?

Yeah, that's the ticket. :lit:
 
Rubberchickenchu said:
@Trombonista
New comic
View attachment 845786
View attachment 845787
View attachment 845788

View attachment 845792

Poutine version of the Tapas comics will be coming next month
View attachment 845793
Click to expand...
Wait a minute, something's different about Stephie. I can't put my finger on it... let's compare it to an earlier depiction:
blargle-png.71839


THERE IT IS!!! Do you see? Stephie used to be a few shades darker! POOR BOYGIRL HAS BEEN WHITEWASHED!!!

That fucking disgusing racist piece of shit Sophie is really a big meganazi, we should rally some heroic Antifa soy warriors to teach him a lesson about erasing POC voices.
 
Rubberchickenchu said:
@Trombonista
New comic
View attachment 845786
View attachment 845787
View attachment 845788

View attachment 845792

Poutine version of the Tapas comics will be coming next month
View attachment 845793
Click to expand...
Oh look a thinly veiled begging comic.
We all know damn well LaBelle would REE just as much if Trunchbull was played by a woman. Also throwing out the "Why can't Matilda be played by trans girl" shit is a huge slap in the face to girls that have read, watched, and enjoyed Matlida. Trans women are already pushing other women out of women's only sports and events, let women and girls have their own things and their own space!
 
Didn't the musical and movie literally open with the doctors proclaiming It's a girl! much to the dad's disappointment? I HATE when Tumblr tards shove stupid trans headcanons on characters with cis actors and then whine about whenever trans characters are played by cis actors. Have your shitty headcanons but let them make SENSE.

Also fuck you, Billy. Matilda is an icon to celebrate smart bookish girls in a world that's against them. Stop shoving girldicks into goddamn everything.
 
FierceBrosnan said:
Oh look a thinly veiled begging comic.
We all know damn well LaBelle would REE just as much if Trunchbull was played by a woman. Also throwing out the "Why can't Matilda be played by trans girl" shit is a huge slap in the face to girls that have read, watched, and enjoyed Matlida. Trans women are already pushing other women out of women's only sports and events, let women and girls have their own things and their own space!
Click to expand...
Theatre already has a problem with a shortage of female roles - more women than men are into theatre, but plays tend to be overwhelmingly male. So no, girl roles should not be played by boys.

Although Miss Trunchbull could totally be played by a woman. Pam Ferris was the best thing about the movie version.
 
Amber the Hedgehog said:
I’m not fan of intersex there for trans argument, especially because they seem to fail to realize that intersex conditions are birth defects. Sure intersex is bit of umbrella term for various conditions of various severity but there definitely are those innersex conditions with really bad health issues that need early treatments.

When you dealing with things like severe hormone imbalances, seriously miss shapen body parts and brain development issues, the body will fail to function and that will lead chronic pain, loss of function and even death if there is no medical intervention. Have those medical interventions sometimes failed or been abused? Sure but that still doesn’t mean inaction is good idea. Especially when talking about development related conditions there are only so large windows to act to help the patient out and those can be well before the patient can fully understand what the treatments are about. Making sure that someone can pee or gets into normal range of intelligence aren’t something that can wait. That’s very different than giving out cross sex hormones and amputations to physically healthy teenagers.

To me intersex conditions actually demonstrate why we shouldn’t rush into transitioning treatments more than why trannies should have easier access to titty skittles and bottom rearrangement. Sex hormones have huge affects on our bodies and when they are out sync, it leads all sorts of health issues. Misshapen genitals don’t function right and can lead issues with peeing, pooping, periods, childbirth, having sex or even sitting and walking. Transitioning should a last resource, after failing to help the patent accept their body and biological gender as it is. If even that as more I have looked in transitioning it seems to work mostly as placebo. It might be just the rush of trastrenders but I do still worry that there are no people that get true help from transitioning that’s worth of all the side affects.
Click to expand...

Hey this is actually bigoted. There are people born without legs. Why can't I identify as translegless? Checkmate atheists.
 
CWCissey said:
Someone who this didn't happen to.
Click to expand...
At best LaBelle got some kind of corporate form letter to get more "exposure" if he gives Amazon a larger cut of the book sales. Having to choose between poutine now or the slim possibility greater of revenue later, LaBelle went with poutine. LaBelle knows his shit doesn't sell well.
 
Fingal Olsson said:
Billy's entire "point" essentially boils down to
1) "Man" and "woman" are words with no inherent meaning, and you should just pick whichever you like the best.
2) "Homosexuality", "heterosexuality" and "bisexuality" are strictly determined as attraction to genders as defined in 1). Homosexuality is being attracted to those that picked the same word as you, heterosexuality is being attracted to those that picked the other one, and bisexuality is being attracted to both (and I'm not even sure what Billy considers the difference between bi- and pansexuality since that comic makes no real attempt to explain it in an understandable manner).
Click to expand...

I think you're close to correct, with the following alteration:


1) "Man" and "woman" are words with no inherent meaning, and you should just pick whichever you like the best. If you don't like either, make up your own word.

2) "Homosexuality", "heterosexuality" and "bisexuality" are strictly determined as attraction to genders as defined in 1). Homosexuality is being attracted to those that picked the same word as you. Heterosexuality is being attracted to those that picked a different one. Bisexuality is being attracted to two or more of the chosen words. Pansexuality is being attracted to everyone regardless of what word they chose.

I think that's the logic being employed. It's not even remotely linguistically sound, but hey, there ya have it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom