TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Except debating with an actual dictator would make you liable to get your head cut off.

This is more like watching a five year old throw a temper tantrum that won't calm the hell down.
The fact that he acts younger than his adopted son is incredibly pathetic. I know he lives in Bethlehem, PA.
 
Fighteer just banned someone on their first offense because they tended to just post production trivia for shows they like and that was proof that they were posting in bad faith, alongside calling someone a Rooster Teeth shill for deleting a post surrounding the recent Glassdoor controversies.

View attachment 826438
Has anyone ever pointed out the hypocrisy of their header for the edit-banned thread, yet? Because this is an good example.

Plus, their "Dummied Ou" trope (or something) is about that kind of triva; soooooonce again, they don't give a fuck about their userbase.
 
How would you guys do the Pantheon?

The only good way to do it would be to make the characters who represent the tropes actually be characters who are intrinsicly tied to the trope, either being the first to use it, or the character that spread it.

This would remove most of the anime shit that massively clogs the horrible section of the website, unless the trope itself was an anime trope. It'd make the characters less 'literally who's

For example, they'd actually have a character for the tragic hero archetype, with the good choices either being Oedipus or Hamlet. All the "gods" are characters that the people like, instead of actual representations of the tropes. It ignores the literary aspect of a website that's meant to be about story analysis.
 
Use it as a honeypot to showcase what's wrong with people, nowadays. So for today's shitshow...

Tropers bitching about Amazon.

"Everyone makes mistakes." It's just that the site is managed by autists who can't understand this.
I just love how they don't care about corporations being cruel until some "woke" journalist talks about it.
Just like how they don't care about a franchise being """problematic""" until they get featured in a crossover party fighting game for kids.
Tropers and other SJWs are truly some of the most shallow "activists" out there (though this also applies to the opposite political spectrum like One Angry Gamer and YouTube skeptics).
 
John Oliver is considered a 'trustworthy' source?Do people not realise he's primarily a comedian who doesn't actually know much of anything about the world?I mean the guy would say anything that his bosses tell him to.He doesn't actually do research himself a staff behind the scenes looks for stuff and they then come up with the script and he says it.The guy in real life has no actual beliefs outside of what he's told to say.
 
John Oliver is considered a 'trustworthy' source?Do people not realise he's primarily a comedian who doesn't actually know much of anything about the world?I mean the guy would say anything that his bosses tell him to.He doesn't actually do research himself a staff behind the scenes looks for stuff and they then come up with the script and he says it.The guy in real life has no actual beliefs outside of what he's told to say.
What do you expect from a site that doesn't cite their sources, and if they do cite sources, it's from the most untrustworthy and biased websites out there?
 
They would even cite people like Dobson and Chipman if they say shit they agree with.
They already have pages on both of them, and in their respective YMMV pages, they are listed as acceptable targets for ridicule.
 
So what do tropers think of otherkin or as i like to call them 'teens who want to be edgy but can't think of something good'?
 
Back
Top Bottom