- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
He also wouldn't download a car. (Because Windows 98 doesn't support that.)He couldn't strangle a gnat.
Pff, he could go to the cheapest lawyers around and they'd still only bill him for 10 seconds looking at the page and saying he has absolutely no case here.Go on right ahead Sweet. Lawyers worth a shit cost thousands to keep, and they always ask for more the longer the case drags on. I mean, you're only in complete debt right now and have no income, why not add that expense? I'm sure your money managing bro will love it.
But since I don't have anything better to do, here's free tips for the Iconoclast - some random legal points that people usually level against Encyclopaedia Dramatica:
1) Defamation - usually involves false claims about criminal activity, and in any case he'd need some proof that this false information has caused him some damage. Shedding light on things that aren't socially acceptable is unfortunately quite legal. (I say unfortunately, because in many cases, we really don't want to know. /sneed)
2) Posting personal information - certainly unethical in most cases, possibly illegal if it's done specifically to promote criminal activity. ED generally doesn't post more information that the people in question are posting voluntarily, so this generally just falls under "a little bit iffy" category.
3) Copyright infringement - quotations and excerpts for purposes of commentary fall fairly solidly under fair-use provisions.
(Not a lawyer, just needed to study a lot of this stuff due to this being highly relevant in arts and information technology)