Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Biden definitely looked like the sacrificial lamb. The rise of Buttigieg is upon us. IMG_1075.JPG
 
CheezzyMach said:
I think one of two things is going to happen depending on how badly they lose:

1. We'll see another Clinton restoration of the party like in the early 90s who will lead it is anyone's guess but I'd expect a hard dropping of far Left progressiveness in favor of some kind of populism to get in touch with the average voter again.

2. The party will stagnate for the entire 2020s like the Bush era Republicans before taking a new direction in the late 2020s-early 2030s.
Click to expand...
The Bush era really weakened the Republicans until Trump came along.
 
Vorhtbame said:
I'm just posting this here so that I can quote it later, when Gabbard's facade of "reasonability" crumbles away like a cliffside under controlled demolition, or when she "graciously" concedes the nomination and mysteriously comes into money or a cushy new "consulting" job. It will happen. It always does.

They wouldn't even let her on that stage if she weren't destined to be the Pied Piper for folks who aren't ready to embrace the full re-tardation of the agenda. Her candidacy is nothing more than "moderate" virtue-signaling by a party who suddenly realized they hadn't yet managed to replace enough of us with compliant NPCs and imported slaves.

And it's working.
Click to expand...
Honestly, those reaction guys had it right; the other debate was literally the Dems sniping out who they want as the VP for that ticket, since they already are expecting Biden, Harris, or even Bernie to take the top (and their marching orders). This is entirely based on how none of the actual "big" names besides Warren were there. I fully expect them to fucking rig it again since they've not just learned nothing, their masks are off and they're going full reeetard.

And I died inside when they made those massive appeals to the illegals, especially Cory Booker pretending he knew Spanish after Robert spoke a bit in the language. That was some of the saddest attention grabbing I ever heard. It also made Robert Francis O'Rourke look like one of the better guys in the room. HOW DID YOU FAGGOTS MANAGE THAT.

Also apparently Yang is a corpse, so lol he's more a Dr. Ambien than a Trump.

As for Tulsi, it really is telling when the person whose cult was on the hook for brainwashing and murder looks the most reasonable out of the lot. Doubly so when the shill media openly plays her down and basically gives the most air time to Warren, clearly dismissing her as an entity worth selling to their backers.
 
CheezzyMach said:
I wonder where the Dems go from here if Trump eviscerates them next year.

MSM networks openly coaxing the candidates along, Google getting caught outright planning to bork Youtube to jury-rig the election, Twitter flirting with the idea of hiding politicians' mean tweets and every single mainline candidate has devolved into acting like exceptional,drooling, rabid dogs.

How do you come back from this?
Click to expand...
They can argue "If we didn't take such drastic measures, the Earth would become uninhabitable by 2100. We simply did what we had to do!". They probably see themselves as the Big Good from a fantasy novel, awoken from their usual slumber by the severity of the situation. Also the left seems to believe that the entire modern right is the result of a covert Russian propaganda campaign, so Google is simply taking up cyber-arms to defend the West from the insidious attacks of the KGB.
 
CheezzyMach said:
1. We'll see another Clinton restoration of the party like in the early 90s who will lead it is anyone's guess but I'd expect a hard dropping of far Left progressiveness in favor of some kind of populism to get in touch with the average voter again.
Click to expand...

The Clintonites are the most anti-Populist part of the entire Democratic party. That's why they have been actively against Bernie for about 5 years and why the media started trying to take out Yang when he started to rise by complaining that 4chan people were giving him support and attention.
 
Feline Darkmage said:
The Clintonites are the most anti-Populist part of the entire Democratic party. That's why they have been actively against Bernie for about 5 years and why the media started trying to take out Yang when he started to rise by complaining that 4chan people were giving him support and attention.
Click to expand...
By Clinton Restoration I meant how Bill Clinton took a stagnant dying Democratic party that had been under the heel of the Republicans for over a decade in the early 90s and revitalized it by going in a completely new direction.

Not the Clintons re seizing control of the party. I think if Trump wins 2020 Clintonite Neo Liberalism and the progressiveness that spawned from it will be on it's deathbed.
 
CheezzyMach said:
By Clinton Restoration I meant how Bill Clinton took a stagnant dying Democratic party that had been under the heel of the Republicans for over a decade in the early 90s and revitalized it by going in a completely new direction.

Not the Clintons re seizing control of the party. I think if Trump wins 2020 Clintonite Neo Liberalism and the progressiveness that spawned from it will be on it's deathbed.
Click to expand...

Ah sorry, yeah that makes sense. The wording wasn't clear to me at first so thank you for elaborating. There's part of your analysis that I disagree with because the NeoLibs are really trying to reel in anyone remotely progressive or lefty while co-opting all the trappings and failing at attempts to pander and placate everyone who's upset with them. Hence why people like Kamala Harris (aka Black Hillary) or Beta Oil Dork (used to be cool and hip internet man) becoming lead candidates.
 
Corbin Dallas Multipass said:
I'm still confused as to what actually happened...

Was gun dude chasing suv dude with the gun at the time of hitting the crowd? Because he supposedly backs up and rams into the crowd. But... a dude actually did chase him with a rifle right? But he also admitted that he went there planning to attack people. Was it just the perfect coincidence of maniac with a gun menacing maniac with an suv?
Click to expand...

I don't want to get too far off the TDS topic I just mentioned the life sentence here because I was too lazy to search for a corresponding thread and it is semi-related.

From the guy's post it seems like he chased Fields away from his ANTIFA cell. It is unclear if that was while he was in his car or what but it seems to immediately precede the event.

It should also be noted that this professor admitted carrying his rifle across state lines, brandishing it in public, and potentially causing the event. He has not been charged with a crime of any kind or faced disciplinary action from UNC. It truly boggles the mind.

819560
 
Feline Darkmage said:
Ah sorry, yeah that makes sense. The wording wasn't clear to me at first so thank you for elaborating. There's part of your analysis that I disagree with because the NeoLibs are really trying to reel in anyone remotely progressive or lefty while co-opting all the trappings and failing at attempts to pander and placate everyone who's upset with them. Hence why people like Kamala Harris (aka Black Hillary) or Beta Oil Dork (used to be cool and hip internet man) becoming lead candidates.
Click to expand...
So a stage full of people advocating free healthcare for illegal immigrants doesn't seem all that progressive or lefty to you. What would?
 
AprilRains said:
So a stage full of people advocating free healthcare for illegal immigrants doesn't seem all that progressive or lefty to you. What would?
Click to expand...

Never said that, I clearly said there were people in the race who were pandering about things like that while their actions indicate they probably wouldn't do so.
 
Feline Darkmage said:
Never said that, I clearly said there were people in the race who were pandering about things like that while their actions indicate they probably wouldn't do so.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, I misunderstood. Yes, that's a pretty common thing to do during the primaries. A Democratic candidate will tack left during the primaries and then right for the general election. Republicans tend to do the reverse.
 
Feline Darkmage said:
Ah sorry, yeah that makes sense. The wording wasn't clear to me at first so thank you for elaborating. There's part of your analysis that I disagree with because the NeoLibs are really trying to reel in anyone remotely progressive or lefty while co-opting all the trappings and failing at attempts to pander and placate everyone who's upset with them. Hence why people like Kamala Harris (aka Black Hillary) or Beta Oil Dork (used to be cool and hip internet man) becoming lead candidates.
Click to expand...
That's why my second guess is that they'll flounder and stagnate like the Republicans did under Bush Jr in the 2000s as the media slowly shifts to the Right and Neo Liberalism/progressiveness dies a slow and undignified death in the 2020s like the Evangelical Right did.

Personally I think that's more likely I can't see the Democrats taking a drastic approach unless Trump pulls a Nixon 72 or Reagan 84 style landslide and with how polarized the country's become this decade I don't see that happening.

I think Trump might manage to flip one or two Blue states at best.
 
NiggerFaggot1488 said:
Whenever people who support genital mutilation say the GOP has moved to the right I ask them to name exactly which policies they are more right wing on than in the past and they drop the subject.

Also, I don't think the winner of the D primaries will even have a debate with Trump.
Click to expand...
Trump's positions haven't changed in forever, yet he's supposedly far right now. When an old school New York Democrat wins the GOP nomination and that's too extreme for contemporary Dems, that says all you need to know about them.

And also how much Republicans have actually moved left. Although, I think that is actually due to a more prominent libertarian streak than anything.

I haven't verified this, but I'm pretty sure it's true: Out of the Republican and Democrat candidates in 2016 and 2020, Donald Trump supported gay marriage before all of them.
 
Godzilla@1989 said:
Do they honestly think the average Joe who’s trying to have a roof under his head just to provide meals on the table for his family gives a shit about the transexual black Muslims throwing a fit about the bathroom sign? No because they want a good raise for their job and frankly the Democrats haven’t been doing a good job with it.
Click to expand...

No, they know that "Average Joe" doesn't care about tranny rights or gay rights or Muslim rights.

But, where they make the mistake is consistently and arrogantly believing that "average Joe" isn't the average American anymore.

The back-to-back election of Obama to them was "proof" that Average Joe was now a minority, since if he still had 51% of the vote, he would've been able to stop Obama, so therefore, it doesn't matter what Average Joe thinks, they no longer have to win him over.

And that was 2/3rds the reason they lost in 2016, and even though it should be obvious why, they still haven't learned. They think that Average Joe still is ignorable (Hillary won the popular vote, remember?) and their last lost was due to some dirty trick or fluke and all they have to do is get the woke crowd riled up and they win, because, again, the average American to them isn't a blue-collar wage earner but a progressive proto-troon.
 
heyitsmike said:
Trump's positions haven't changed in forever, yet he's supposedly far right now. When an old school New York Democrat wins the GOP nomination and that's too extreme for contemporary Dems, that says all you need to know about them.

And also how much Republicans have actually moved left. Although, I think that is actually due to a more prominent libertarian streak than anything.

I haven't verified this, but I'm pretty sure it's true: Out of the Republican and Democrat candidates in 2016 and 2020, Donald Trump supported gay marriage before all of them.
Click to expand...
It's funny how true that is, the only issue I've seen the right move farther with is gun rights, especially at a state level. Open carry and other such bills probably wouldn't have made it 15 years ago. (Oddly both Trump and Romney were both weak in this area). The right completely gave up on the whole "family morality" thing outside of abortion. Buttigieg probably challenges Trump as one of the earlier supporters of gay marriage because he is gay.
 
Buttigieg2020 said:
It's funny how true that is, the only issue I've seen the right move farther with is gun rights, especially at a state level. Open carry and other such bills probably wouldn't have made it 15 years ago. (Oddly both Trump and Romney were both weak in this area). The right completely gave up on the whole "family morality" thing outside of abortion. Buttigieg probably challenges Trump as one of the earlier supporters of gay marriage because he is gay.
Click to expand...
With Boot Edge Edge I think it's more that he wants to challenge Mike Pence on it since he's an Evangelical Christian.
 
People are taking a shine to Harris without realizing her record (and it’s bad)

I just love it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom