🐱 Things To Know About Small Penises

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.

Although porn would have us believe otherwise, the average penis size, when erect, is only 4.7 to 6.3 inches in length. That’s right friends, a five-inch penis isn’t small, but literally average. Minds, everywhere, are being blown, I know. I think some of us live under the delusion that penises, even average ones, were somewhere around the seven-inch mark, but that’s not the case. The average penis is smaller than you think.

But, honestly, as much as men seem to be all about their penis size, women aren’t too concerned. According to a study published in the British Journal of Urology International, while 45% of men think their penis is too small, 85% of women are totally satisfied with the size of their partner’s dick. But what even counts as a small penis?

"There isn't a precise definition," Dr. Clare Morrison, of online pharmacy MedExpress, tells Bustle. "But the Journal of Urology recommends that penis-lengthening procedures shouldn't be considered if the flaccid penis length is 4 cm (1.6 inches) or more, and erect penis length is 7.5 cm (3 inches) or more. Therefore it would be fair to say that less than these measurements [could] be considered a small penis."

Still, no matter what size a person's penis is, chances are what they're doing with it can bring both them and their partners pleasure (and, it's non-pleasure-related functions should be working just fine). If you find yourself in bed with someone with a smaller penis, here's what you should know.

1. Small Penises Suit Long-Term Relationships Just Fine


A 2014 study found that when it comes one night stands, size actually might matter— but it found that girth, not length, was the most important metric. One reason for this is that the pleasure derived from a penis-in-vagina (PIV) one night stand typically has to do with the, erm, intensity of the hookup (that's code for wanting to really get pounded), while sex in long-term relationships benefits from deeper communication about each partner's likes and dislikes. For any partnership that involves a penis, it takes practice and finding the right positions, therefore making it better suited for a long-term relationship where emotions and feelings are involved, too.

"Even when making love, there is a lot you can do to ensure that your partner enjoys the experience," Dr. Morrison says. "This generally involves being romantic, making time for foreplay, and including sufficient clitoral stimulation."

“Only a small percentage of women orgasm from stimulation of the cervix,” Dr. Stanton Honig, MD, a Yale Medicine urologist and director of Male Urology, tells Bustle. For most women, “[Size] probably doesn’t matter. It likely be just as good in most cases.”

2. Circumcision Can Change How A Penis Is Perceived
Although circumcision is popular in the United States, in the rest of the world (aside from those who are circumcised for religious reasons), it’s much less common. While the pros and cons of circumcision is an ongoing debate, when we’re talking about penis size, at least in regards to appearance, it does make a difference.

“Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin, leaving the 'glans' exposed,” Dr. Morrison says. “When flaccid, a circumcised penis may look slightly smaller than a non-circumcised one, because there isn't the extra layer of tissue covering the glans. However, when erect, the foreskin retracts and is almost invisible, so in regards to size, there isn't any appreciable difference in how the penis looks.”

While it would be great if men were given the option to be circumcised or not circumcised, especially considering how many nerves are lost in the removal of the foreskin, that’s typically not the case.

3. Penis Anxiety Happens At All Sizes


“There is a tendency for men to think their penis is smaller than it actually is, because it will look smaller from above,” Dr. Morrison says. “Also, having a relatively small penis is actually very common, and indeed, more common than having a very large penis.”

In fact, a 2013 study found that 30% of men who have average or even above-average penises are disappointed in its size, too. If size anxiety is affecting your partner or your sex life, you can talk to a couple's counselor about ways to move past it together.

4. Less Than 1% Of Men Have A Micropenis
When we’re talking about small penises, it’s hard to not address the micropenis. According to research, the smallest of all small penises is medically known at a micropenis — but they're incredibly rare.

"About 0.6% of men have a micropenis," Dr. Morrison says. "This condition is generally recognized at birth or during infancy, and it means that the penis is unusually small.”

According to Dr. Morrison, once a man reaches adulthood and his penis has essentially stopped growing, having reached its “biggest” size, a micropenis is then “characterized by an erect penile length of less than 7 cm (2 3/4 inches)."

5. Specific Positions Can Make Sex Pleasurable For Both Partners


With only 20% of women being able to have an orgasm from penetration alone, you might say that the penis, at any size, is the least important part of penis-in-vagina sex.

“To increase penetration with a short penis, it can help to make love from behind,” Dr. Morrison says. “For example, doggy style. On the other hand, if you prefer face-to-face, try elevating the woman's legs towards her chest, to allow maximum penetration. It's worth experimenting with different positions to see what works best.”

In addition to doggy style, there are other specific sex positions that can feel nice for the receiving partner. For starters, “X Marks the Spot,” and “The Splitter,” allow for deeper penetration, as does “Tighter Doggy,” “Lowered Doggy,” and “Sofa Brace." Basically, any position that involves penetration from the back or, if it’s face-to-face, includes elevated hips or legs, as Dr. Morrison points out, a small penis can feel amazing.

6. Small Penises Aren't Always Small
An interesting fact about penises, is that they’re not always the same size. “Depending on your race, ethnicity, and age, your penis can change in lengths during the day,” Dr. Shaw says. “The penile chambers that fill up with blood during erections are called the corpus cavernosum. People will lose length due to age, diabetes, cholesterol, blood pressure, and hypertension. The arteries, veins and smooth muscle can atrophy (shrink!) secondary to these medical issues.”

This is important to know, since it could point to bigger health issues. “If you’re losing length, it could be a sign of cardiovascular disease,” Dr. Shaw says. While one shouldn’t rely solely on the length of their penis to determine whether or not they have any form of heart disease — regular checkups are best for that — it's a good reminder to stay in touch with your body.

At the end of the day, we need to remember that size isn’t everything. “Women need to know that men are often rather insecure about the size of their penis,” Dr. Morrison says. “This isn't helped by the fact that porn films often show men who are unusually well-endowed. Men may need reassurance that you find them attractive. Don't be embarrassed to tell them what turns you on, and make sure that you are getting enough clitoral stimulation.”

Ultimately, no matter what size the penis, sex is about thinking outside the box. When it comes to penises of all kinds, it’s all about being creative to make sure it’s enjoyable for all partners.
 
Author's Bio said:
Amanda Chatel is a lifestyle writer for Bustle, covering sex, relationships, women's reproductive rights, feminism, and more.
Looks like Amanda has decided she needs to give her soy-endowed sex partners a little boost.

Amanda, I think you're putrid but I think you need to experience some diversity. How about you let me feed you the MAGApede? 8)
 
I'd add that surgery in general that isn't absolutely necessary is really stupid and pretty much amounts to an upsell for hospitals and doctors in non-socialized systems. Elective surgery on infants in particular is "oh shit nigger what are you doing" tier.

But gotta get that collagen for beauty creams somewhere, right?
collagen can be harvested easily from animal products. Most human tissues are incinerated as medical waste, a special release is needed to donate tissue and it is for research purposes, not commercial. I know that when they use foreskins for medical research they generally try to get stem cells out of them (because of the retarded bans on using stem cells from aborted fetuses).

I like that you summarize the cost/benefit analysis. That's valuable.

I'd like to know how you come to some of your conclusions though.



What study are you basing the claim on that infants have lower rates of UTI?

I think you're refferencing this 1982 study. It is true that 95% of the infants brought in at the Parkland Memorial hospital Dallas with UTI were uncircumcised. But then, this isn't surprising, as barely any babies were circumcised at that hospital. 95% uncircumcised was an average sample of their patients and as such not evidence for lower rates of UTI at all.

Or are you basing it on another study?




This is only true for studies done in africa. Studies done in the western world show the exact opposite, with circumcised heterosexual men having a bigger chance of contracting HIV.



I've already addressed it. The high cortisol spike and pain for babies has negative effects that last into adulthood.




Mostly accurate.

It's not a risk of lowered sensitivity; that's a default result. The foreskin is among the most sensitive body parts on the male body and you're removing a good part of it.

As pointed out earlier, your HIV risk rises with circumcision, unless you live in Africa. (PS: they only taught the circumcised group how to use condoms in those studies, lol).

You're also ignoring all the data we have on psychological negative results, the heightened pain sensitivity in adults, the heightened behavioural problems as teens, the worsened sleep rhythm and difficulty breastfeeding and bonding as babies.

I'm drawing the conclusions I have based on reading countless physicians weigh the evidence for and against this procedure. This dumb argument has been hashed out so many times that they tend to repeat the same conclusions. Here's an example of a doctor saying the exact same thing.
What all this really boils down to is that there are no compelling scientific arguments for or against neonatal circumcision.

There are small risks and there are small benefits.
Anyone can sift through studies for information, and that is good within reason. You need a certain amount of education to interpret the studies correctly. Zinnia Jones is a good example of a lolcow that reads a lot of scientific literature but fails to understand it because of a lack of knowledge about biology and psychology. you don't know enough about medicine to interpret a lot of the things you're quoting here. like talking about circumcision interfering with breastfeeding, causing sleep problems, cortisol boosts, etc. These are common problems for all babies. It isn't a trauma to be avoided at all costs. You cannot make a causative link between a missing foreskin in infancy and behavioral problems in teenagers. All kinds of interesting correlations can be found if you want to look for them, like between getting tit implants and committing suicide, but that doesn't mean one thing caused the other. Anyway, this thread is gay now and I'm leaving it.
 
You cannot make a causative link between a missing foreskin in infancy and behavioral problems in teenagers.

I enjoyed reading your post and the arguments laid out by Harriet Hall.

What I don't understand is that you're holding my argument to a higher standard than the pro-circumcision argument.

You make a good point of criticism about causative links. Remember that there is no causitive link demonstrated between UTI's and circumcision either and in fact, your own linked article points that out.

----

Finally it's worth remembering that a previous study into adverse effects of circumcision was stopped and that any study of adverse effects of male circumcision would be forbidden by the ethical committees (at least in Canada):

Not only that, but the research that they did do, had to be destroyed.

Two of my physics professors at Queen's University (Dr. Stewart and Dr. McKee) were the original developers of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for medical applications. They and a number of other Queen's physicists also worked on improving the accuracy of fMRI for observing metabolic activity within the human body.

As a graduate student working in the Department of Epidemiology in 1998, I was approached by a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kinston General Hospital. They said that their observations indicated that babies undergoing the procedure were subjected to significant and inhumane levels of pain that subsequently adversely affected their behaviours. They said that they needed some scientific support for their position. It was my idea to use fMRI and/or PET scanning to directly observe the effects of circumcision on the infant brain.


The operator of the MRI machine in the hospital was a friend of mine and he agreed to allow us to use the machine for research after normal operational hours. We also found a nurse who was under intense pressure by her husband to have her newborn son circumcised and she was willing to have her son to be the subject of the study. Her goal was to provide scientific information that would eventually be used to ban male infant circumcision. Since no permission of the ethics committee was required to perform any routine male infant circumcision, we did not feel it was necessary to seek any permission to carry out this study.



We tightly strapped an infant to a traditional plastic "circumrestraint" using Velcro restraints. We also completely immobilized the infant's head using standard surgical tape. The entire apparatus was then introduced into the MRI chamber. Since no metal objects could be used because of the high magnetic fields, the doctor who performed the surgery used a plastic bell ("Plastibell") with a sterilized obsidian bade to cut the foreskin. No anaesthetic was used.


The baby was kept in the machine for several minutes to generate baseline data of the normal metabolic activity in the brain. This was used to compare to the data gathered during and after the surgery. Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes.

A neurologist who saw the results to postulated that the data indicated that circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim's brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions. Follow up tests on the infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the child's brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery.


Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings in the open medical literature. All of the participants in the research including myself were called before the hospital discipline committee and were severely reprimanded. We were told that while male circumcision was legal under all circumstances in Canada, any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was strictly prohibited by the ethical regulations. Not only could we not publish the results of our research, but we also had to destroy all of our results. If we refused to comply, we were all threatened with immediate dismissal and legal action.

I would encourage anyone with access to fMRI and /or PET scanning machines to repeat our research as described above, confirm our results, and then publish the results in the open literature.

Paul D. Tinari, Ph.D.
Director,
Pacific Institute for Advanced Study
 
Last edited:
This OP is of no concern to me. 7.5". Slide into my DM's, laydies....

Seriously though, about micropenises. That's gotta be rough. An ex gf, who I'm still very good friends with told me about a guy she once very briefly dated, who when erect, was about the size and girth of a typical thumb. That's got to be fucking devastating for a guy. I can't even.

I think there's such a thing as too big a cock too though however. I like to slam it in, so to speak, and sometimes I've encountered girls who are a bit shallow of depth capacity, if you know what I mean. I'm just a bit over average but then you see porn dudes, esp black guys with like 12" plus dongs? I'm not jealous at all. Good luck lad, attempting going balls deep without killing a gal.

Swings and roundabouts...
 
India and China, the lands of tiny dicks, 3 billion people. Riddle me that.


Just gonna leave this here

That's misleading. Technically removing all sensory receptors and all of the skin from a dick would not impair sexual function as most men can get erect on visual stimulation and can ejaculate with some anal play. Jewish tricks still remove 50,000 feeling receptors on average.
 
Just gonna leave this
If you want to have a good laugh, read that Kenya study about sexual pleasure.

They asked circumcised and uncircumcised men if they enjoyed sex and shockingly all men answered yes.

That one vague self-reported question is then used to assert that there is no difference in sensation.
 
India and China, the lands of tiny dicks, 3 billion people. Riddle me that.



That's misleading. Technically removing all sensory receptors and all of the skin from a dick would not impair sexual function as most men can get erect on visual stimulation and can ejaculate with some anal play. Jewish tricks still remove 50,000 feeling receptors on average.
But it wasnt just sexual function.

"Researchers in Kenya surveyed the sexual function, pleasure, and satisfaction of 2,784 uncircumcised sexually active adult men. Then they circumcised 1,391 of them, and re-surveyed the entire group every six months for two years. In every survey, the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in sexual function, pleasure, or satisfaction."

"The researchers also asked the circumcised men additional questions focusing on any differences they noticed before and after the procedure. At the two-year mark, 99.9 percent of the men said they felt “satisfied with their circumcisions,” and far from decreasing penile sensitivity, 72 percent said their sensitivity had increased. In addition, 78 percent said circumcision made it easier to don condoms."
 
So you telling me Elliot died for nothing?
1060j7t.jpg.png

I'm not sure if it was ever confirmed, but I always thought this implied he was like a 3.
 
collagen can be harvested easily from animal products. Most human tissues are incinerated as medical waste, a special release is needed to donate tissue and it is for research purposes, not commercial. I know that when they use foreskins for medical research they generally try to get stem cells out of them (because of the exceptional bans on using stem cells from aborted fetuses).


Don't bother explaining things to @Sprig of Parsley He just wants another reason to be mad at woman. He has quite the hang-up.
 
"Researchers in Kenya surveyed the sexual function, pleasure, and satisfaction of 2,784 uncircumcised sexually active adult men. Then they circumcised 1,391 of them, and re-surveyed the entire group every six months for two years. In every survey, the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in sexual function, pleasure, or satisfaction."
paying them would be cheaper than my rent...
 
I learned a lot more from this thread than the article. I actually didn't know this but sprig is right (sort of) that you can get a facial treatment made out of foreskin. If only asterisk were still here :(
 
I learned a lot more from this thread than the article. I actually didn't know this but sprig is right (sort of) that you can get a facial treatment made out of foreskin. If only asterisk were still here :(
I remember Oprah being involved with the product I'm thinking of. The product used the fibroblasts found in amputated foreskins.

Jokes about over 9000 penises on Oprah's face go here.
 
Rich white women inject potato toxins into their skin and then rub foreskins all over their faces. They then proceed to smugly tell us how to live our lives as if they weren't fucking completely out of control.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom