Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, he's just asking for more info on the guy not a full blown dox. Given that he's actively encouraging defendants and other people to continue antagonizing two of his clients, I can see why Ty wants to get in touch.
I edited my post. It is curious that a guy from NC is advising out of state residents on Texas law. Wonder if he's licensed there.

Q&D the guy doesn't seem to be licensed in CA or Texas.
 
Last edited:
I didn't even realize that Douchette was talking to Pridemore. He's not only fucking with Vic's case but fucking with Todd's case. This guy is a serious imbecile.
To those curious

https://twitter.com/jessiepridemore/status/1136837083148894208?s=20

789574


789577


789579
 
Here's this, too:

It looks like that has his office's contact info and a link to their website (under construction, lol). That should be enough, unless you're trying to establish a character profile.
 
This douche guy seems quite a piece of work. A thread dedicated to these superLOLyers might be warranted in the near future depending on the duration and extent of the gay ops.
 
OMG shes pulling a Shane. He said the same exact thing when Ron told him about it.
It's funny, I had just began the process of forgetting all about her but y'know, they always come back. They've already had their info out there, how could they think this is a good idea?
 
And there's the demand for retraction, which means she's getting sued and that exemplary damages will be sought.
Yeah, he got into her head that a CnD is just to scare people. When a lawyer sends you a CnD it means "take this down or you're getting sued." Guess she's gonna find out how reliable Douchette is.
 
Douchette's Facebook:

Campaign website:
 
And there's the demand for retraction, which means she's getting sued and that exemplary damages will be sought.

I thought that that one is in a holding pattern awaiting Habercorn deciding whether to proceed. Granted based on this little shitstorm there's a good chance that he will decide that this problem is not going away otherwise.
 
Hoping for a round of internet lawsports but it seems like this douche guy is a Twitter shitalker only so I doubt it’ll happen. What a digital dummy :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom