I'm not going to get into this but anyone who does Wikipedia should take a look at their Vic Mignogna article and the high level of activity regarding these defamatory allegations. I frankly suspect this bullshit is not up to WP:BLP standards and some editors appear to be pushing an agenda (yeah what else is new).
Note: scumbag lawyers have in the past edited Wikipedia articles and then cited them in their cases. While I doubt this specific thing is going to happen or that any defense lawyers are doing this, it's pretty obvious there's a high chance of kickvic scumbags being directly involved in this.
I'd suggest anyone who talks to Nick about this kind of shit give him a heads-up and if it's remotely relevant (and has not already been done) maybe the Beard firm should look at it.
Not to be paranoid, but the standard SJW mode of activity on shit like this is to place articles in friendly garbage media, trash that is about as reliable as a partisan's personal blog post that would not be accepted about anything but an SJW target, then their friendly little wikipedo buddies cite their fake news article to put their smears into the public record as somehow "encyclopedic." Etc. etc.
Might be tinfoil on my part but I don't like the look of this article at all.
archive.fo
