💰 Grifter Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I feel a primer is needed in what Renfamous is, why she does what she does, and most critically, why I am personally against her having a thread here. Renfamous' singular accomplishment is how much she whined about Comicsgate and how much she went after them on behalf of her friends in the Rat King. She's a miserably unattractive cosplayer that, despite appearances, is most-assuredly not a troon, and instead suffering from the Rebecca Hernandez-Gerber affliction first noted by @AnOminous whereby being a massive shithead to people prematurely ages you. She's the worst kind of deplatforming-advocating, autistic screeching, proud-to-be-cruel asshole.

I know you might be thinking: "Jaimas, she sounds like a glorious train-wreck. How can we not cover her?"
Because that's what she wants, and we shouldn't give it to her.

As her namesake suggests, Renfamous desires infamy and e-fame above all else. Twitter is her battleground and she's been suspended from it quite a few times (Twitter's blatant ideological bias at work). Her entire online persona is locked into being as big an asshole as humanly possible, and actively antagonize other Twitter users. Towards this end, she actively barges into controversies like Comicsgate (and now, the weeb wars) solely because it will give her targets she can attack without consequence.

In many ways, she comes across as being like Peter Katzinski or Nora Reed, but Renfamous is a worse person than either, because for her, the ability to hurt people is the end. She measures her success not by accomplishments but how much she's hated. She namesearches herself constantly, and whether talked about directly or indirectly, she'll swoop in to pontificate about how awesome a freedom fighter for Social Justice she is. In this regard, a thread on this website, for her, would be her crown, proof that she's been a big enough and scary enough to get those big nasty Kiwis to cover her.

The term "attention whore" gets thrown around a lot, but it perfectly describes her. To cover her on this website beyond mocking her periodically would be honoring her.



My single favorite Holocaust joke ever was told to me by my friend's grandfather (who was a Rabbi):

A: "You know, my grandfather died during the Holocaust."
B: "That's dreadful!"
A: "Yeah, he got drunk and fell out of one of a Guard Tower."

Very few Jews object to Holocaust jokes if they're funny enough in my experience. Similarly my friend John declaring his intent to be the world's first Ninjew (Jewish Ninja, armed with throwing Stars of David and dreidel caltrops) was enough to get said grandfather to laugh his ass off.

Huh? Because she supports doxxing and ordering her fans to attack innocent people through phone calls telling the Stand with Vic folks to kill themselves. Does that mean we can just brush her off as a silly child who did no wrong?

DUDE! By that logic? The media would have been truthful about New Zealand's killer's plan and many of this shit would have been forgiven. Like it or not? She is a nasty person who will most likely get the FBI up to her doorstep soon if not many people reported her to the FBI. It is illegal for her to not only support doxxing but even laughing about it and not denying it like so many SJWs have in the past. These idiots don't understand that they are making our government censorship work faster in their favor. She can laugh all she wants? But she will have her comings once people get smart and report her to the FBI.

This one more focuses on sexual assault but read the part on what that says.

he consequences of doxing
Internet users who dox other people sometimes fail to consider the long-term consequences of this action. It can seriously damage the lives of both doxer and doxed. Victims of doxing often experience fear, humiliation and other emotional trauma. They may live in fear of someone finding their personal information online and using it to stalk, rob or even physically attack them. Some victims who are doxed choose to pursue action against the offender in the form of civil suits; others may contact the authorities in an attempt to press criminal charges. If this happens, doxers would be wise to contact an attorney. And, fortunately, most attorneys' information is easily readily available online

So let's see once people knows about it by a simple Google search.
 
Shane thinks the only thing archived is Twitter....I wonder if that is true....
 
We got Shane on film on five different camera angles abusing his chair. It was a sick display enough to call the Geneva convention all over again.
 
She is a nasty person who will most likely get the FBI up to her doorstep soon if not many people reported her to the FBI. It is illegal for her to not only support doxxing but even laughing about it and not denying it like so many SJWs have in the past.

Lol it's not illegal to support doxing or to laugh about it either, or even to just dox people.
 
♪♫♬...In my safe space...♬♫♪
698902


Really worked out for you, huh Allison:
698901


“I don’t like getting a lot of attention.”
698899


“This is all MarzGurl’s fault”
698898


“The damage was already done, why do you homophobes keep botheting me. I should be able to get away with this”:
698900
 
♪♫♬...In my safe space...♬♫♪
View attachment 698902

Really worked out for you, huh Allison:
View attachment 698901

“I don’t like getting a lot of attention.”
View attachment 698899

“This is all MarzGurl’s fault”
View attachment 698898

“The damage was already done, why do you homophobes keep botheting me. I should be able to get away with this”:
View attachment 698900
I just had to create an account here just to publicly laugh at this damage control
 
Not sure if it's possible to archive this or if it can even be useful in this form, but figured Nick or the ALoD might see this and be able to pass it along to anybody who might be able to use it as proof of damage from the i09 article if nothing else...

I was listening to this in the background while working on something else, it's a Hero Hei video doing some follow up on the shenanigans that went on at ConMunnity:

I'm not quite done watching it yet, but I think these screenshots might be "interesting". I captured the time counter so folks can verify where in the video they came from.
698945


698946
 
Last edited:
Shane thinks the only thing archived is Twitter....I wonder if that is true....

The only thing that might be difficult to get are IM's. Twitter, E-Mail, Facebook, etc. Yeah they can get those easy.


LawsuitiscominglawsuitiscomingLawsuitiscominglawsuitiscoming
They are pretty much fucked at this point. If Vic prevail that will be a very expensive statement.

That's what is astonishing. It also shows that they have not spoken to a Lawyer yet. Both Monica and Ron have Tweeted out that they "Refuse to Retract Anything". Congratulations Morons, your nonstop obsession with living your life on twitter likely cost you at an absolute minimum $100,000k in combined legal fees. Just to address and answer the incoming lawsuit. No Lawyer would let them do this. Any Lawyer would start throwing fucking furniture at them if they did this. Because they just gave a formal answer the formal and required Retraction Letter without bothering to get benefit of counsel. And to make it worse on them, they can't even try and plead mercy because they are ignorant normies to how these things work. They have been bitching about Rekeita "harrassing them", when what he has been doing is wisely and firmly telling them to get in contact with a Lawyer, now. He has been telling them this for weeks, and they have acknowledged that they know about his videos.

♪♫♬...In my safe space...♬♫♪
View attachment 698902

Really worked out for you, huh Allison:
View attachment 698901

“I don’t like getting a lot of attention.”
View attachment 698899

“This is all MarzGurl’s fault”
View attachment 698898

“The damage was already done, why do you homophobes keep botheting me. I should be able to get away with this”:
View attachment 698900

Uh Oh! I think somebody may have inadvertently revealed something inconvenient. "If he didn't mean wrong in invading personal space". And there we have it kids. One of the "accusers" admitting that it is about some perceived invasion of personal space. Somebody got to close. Maybe a hug. She just said that the root complaint is not in fact sexual harassment and certainly not sexual assault or pedophilia by or to any "reasonable observer" standard. "he invaded my personal space" became 'HE MOLESTORED ME!!! FIRE HIM AND DESTROY HIS LIFE! CUT OFF HIS BALLZ!". I wonder what the Lawyers will make of that Tweet stream?
 
That's what is astonishing. It also shows that they have not spoken to a Lawyer yet. Both Monica and Ron have Tweeted out that they "Refuse to Retract Anything". Congratulations Morons, your nonstop obsession with living your life on twitter likely cost you at an absolute minimum $100,000k in combined legal fees. Just to address and answer the incoming lawsuit. No Lawyer would let them do this. Any Lawyer would start throwing fucking furniture at them if they did this. Because they just gave a formal answer the formal and required Retraction Letter without bothering to get benefit of counsel. And to make it worse on them, they can't even try and plead mercy because they are ignorant normies to how these things work. They have been bitching about Rekeita "harrassing them", when what he has been doing is wisely and firmly telling them to get in contact with a Lawyer, now. He has been telling them this for weeks, and they have acknowledged that they know about his videos.

Makes you question who Monica’s “attorney” she sent all those tweets to actually is. Ron could have easily said “we have an attorney” or something along the lines of that, but instead, he notched about Nick harassing him. If he really wanted Nick to stop “harassing” him, he would have said he had a lawyer.

Uh Oh! I think somebody may have inadvertently revealed something inconvenient. "If he didn't mean wrong in invading personal space". And there we have it kids. One of the "accusers" admitting that it is about some perceived invasion of personal space. Somebody got to close. Maybe a hug. She just said that the root complaint is not in fact sexual harassment and certainly not sexual assault or pedophilia by or to any "reasonable observer" standard. "he invaded my personal space" became 'HE MOLESTORED ME!!! FIRE HIM AND DESTROY HIS LIFE! CUT OFF HIS BALLZ!". I wonder what the Lawyers will make of that Tweet stream?

Archive them all. This may be important.
 
Back
Top Bottom