🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Optimus Prime said:
What if we claimed to be things we're not? Would this work in reverse and maybe get him to demand proof that we aren't smarter than him?
Click to expand...

Unlikely. I told him I speak multiple languages, and he called me a liar. I replied to him in three languages other than English, and he said that proves his superiority... somehow.
 
flossman said:
Mind sharing what he said? I'm curious, because he accused me of using Google Translate when I demonstrated I speak French.
Click to expand...

It's all there on his profile, but if you don't want to go digging for it...

Have a Pepsi:
"Being fluent in Italian as well as English and Hawaiian, it is very well proven that I speak not one, not two, but three languages. As you only know English, you choose to remain blissfully ignorant of the fact that "ridiculo" is of Italian vocabulary, used here for styllistic purposes. In conclusion, you have (once more) proven your inferior intellect of linguistics, and most likely all other fields of study."

TJchurch:
"Being that you are a liar in at least one other place on this site (the thread that is the reason I am here), nobody can prove to me you speak any of those languages well, if at all. (We know you're no good at English.) Likewise, I could be lying to you (though I am not) when I claim I also speak Spanish, French, & Latin quite well. Regardless, we both know you were using the abbreviation due to character limits in these posts, & that I am superior to you & the majority of members here in all areas that matter."

Have a Pepsi:
"Unfortunately, you know just as well as I do that you're simply "throwing stones", as the saying goes, and that your constant petty insults are simply to simulate winning an argument, much like Bill O`Reilly. We can argue all day, every day, but it's still a known fact that I am far superior. Being that this has already been proven, I will let you have the last word, as that is ever-so important to you.
My closing statements
I `olelo Hawai`i: `A`ole akamai `oe nui loa.
In italiano: Voi sapete molto poco in confronto.
In Ænglisc: Þú neart moch wīs.
And remember, Cowlick: ʻAʻole nō e lawa ka mākaukau ma hoʻokahi wale nō ʻōlelo! Una sola lingua non è mai abbastanza! An geþēode nǣfre genōg is!"

TJchurch:
"You say you're going to let me have the last word (which is not at all important to me), but post again hours later, using few English words.
Also, we know who is superior (& always has been), & that it's never been you."
 
Have a Pepsi said:
I could be lying to you (though I am not) when I claim I also speak Spanish, French, & Latin quite well.
Click to expand...
Well, good thing I speak French and just sent him this:
Je suis très désolé mais tu es un putain. C'est difficile.
Click to expand...
Followed shortly by this:
C'est un vie difficile, vrai? Mais je t'adore.
Click to expand...
Wonder how he'll reply...

(Edit: I AM a bit rusty, so I stuck to a relatively simple statement.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have a Pepsi said:
TJchurch:
"Being that you are a liar in at least one other place on this site (the thread that is the reason I am here), nobody can prove to me you speak any of those languages well, if at all. (We know you're no good at English.) Likewise, I could be lying to you (though I am not) when I claim I also speak Spanish, French, & Latin quite well. Regardless, we both know you were using the abbreviation due to character limits in these posts, & that I am superior to you & the majority of members here in all areas that matter."
Click to expand...
He speaks French as well? C'est pas possible. Il y'a pas de façon que un putain côme ça est capable à parler rien sauf l'Anglais.

So yeah, Churchkey? You say you read all these things even if you don't respond to them all. I want to hear you say something in French. Something classical. Something like a passage straight from Dumas, Voltaire or Proust in the original French of course. I'd be curious to hear your accent and how it is you actually speak.
 
Last edited:
He's been active on LitErotica the previous nights, so it's not inability holding him back. His own mantra is, "Not replying would mean they're right, & if they're against me, they're not" - of course, the ampersand and everything that follows is the silent aspect - so I doubt that he's backed off legitimately. Even I couldn't possibly scare him off, he's too deep in denial to admit that I'm not the Hunger Arcana.

This is probably just another one of his experimental withdrawals, where he attempts to prove we'll continue discussing him regardless of his involvement, thereby proving his point that this topic would continue regardless of his involvement and our obsession with him. It ignores the fact that he's given us ample room for discussion already, the people who've come to like him, and the ongoing assault on the site that coincides with his threat of destroying this topic, but why bring logic into this? It's TJChurch's thought process, logic fits into that like Hitomi Tanaka fits into an A cup bra.

With our focal point in mid-experiment, I'll keep the conversation going with a post from the LitErotica forums that I deeply enjoyed.

Discuss.
 
Last edited:
deductionotaku said:
He's been active on LitErotica the previous nights, so it's not inability holding him back. His own mantra is, "Not replying would mean they're right, & if they're against me, they're not" - of course, the ampersand and everything that follows is the silent aspect - so I doubt that he's backed off legitimately. Even I couldn't possibly scare him off, he's too deep in denial to admit that I'm not the Hunger Arcana.

This is probably just another one of his experimental withdrawals, where he attempts to prove we'll continue discussing him regardless of his involvement, thereby proving his point that this topic would continue regardless of his involvement and our obsession with him. It ignores the fact that he's given us ample room for discussion already, the people who've come to like him, and the ongoing assault on the site that coincides with his threat of destroying this topic, but why bring logic into this? It's TJChurch's thought process, logic fits into that like Hitomi Tanaka fits into an A cup bra.

With our focal point in mid-experiment, I'll keep the conversation going with share a post from the LitErotica forums I enjoyed.

Discuss.
Click to expand...

How long until he decides he's been gone, do you know? Because a certain somebody is leaving a message to him on his profile page that needs decoding by a certain someone.
 
DespicableFool said:
How long until he decides he's been gone, do you know?
Click to expand...

That depends. He'll stay away only until this topic achieves a certain level of activity, one that makes him conclude that the topic would persist indefinitely without him. The level is determined by him, but it's fairly low if I assume it's not influenced by a prior activity. When the original CHYOO got hit hard by...something, only four or five people mentioning him was deemed enough activity for him to return and say "I was gone for days, & you all still decided to make this topic about me!" However, at the time there were only seven or eight people who counter-trolled him, so this number can be seen as half as much related activity during his absence. Therefore, if prior levels are a factor, then we'll need to keep the topic lively - my reason for linking to an old post.

Well, if that old post wasn't enough, allow me to throw more into the ring.

Prior to 2010, TJChurch only had two usernames on CHYOO, and he left one untouched, implying it was a second registration before he learned LitErotica accounts were valid on CHYOO and vice versa. While he wasn't well liked, he was tolerated by most users. However, in 2010, a discussion was sparked over his ability as a writer when he was reviewed poorly and he expressed his desire to return the favor to these users. Most of the community "turned on him" when it was revealed most people agreed with the comments, citing his use improper use of numerals and ampersands as well as his extraneous commas with quotation marks as evidence of his power ability. One such user was the active site moderator (not me, I only have power on the forums), though he later claimed to have been scaling it back to be nice, and TJChurch elected to use his two accounts to maliciously rate the moderator's work with the lowest rating, even going so far as to include feedback that made both his identity and motive clear as crystal. The moderator's response was unrestrained criticisms of TJChurch, encompassing his writing, ego, and more. He punctuated this by banning TJChurch, thereby initiating the long line of re-registrations. After he was banished, he insisted that he had been hacked and the hacker was the cause of all those errors and comments. The person he accuses has changed repeatedly, which led him to claim it's a conspiracy against him. However, the one claim that doesn't change is his insistence that the accused - regardless of indicted user - learned his home address and made threats on his life, apparently frightening him and his family enough to move, though only to a different part of the county. Oddly, this has not changed many of his habits. While the previous problems in his writing have been removed - his way of trying to skate by us - he continues to post without concern of cyber safety.

In the interest of painting a picture, I'll bring up my incident. I was accused of being the hacker, but my threat was much more than words on a screen. According to TJChurch, I found out he was diagnosed as a diabetic and sent him a package containing a box of chocolates, a loaded handgun, and a card that said "Pick one" signed by my username. Yet this threat seems to have been dismissed, as I've spent no time in custody.

Discuss.
 
deductionotaku said:
In the interest of painting a picture, I'll bring up my incident. I was accused of being the hacker, but my threat was much more than words on a screen. According to TJChurch, I found out he was diagnosed as a diabetic and sent him a package containing a box of chocolates, a loaded handgun, and a card that said "Pick one" signed by my username. Yet this threat seems to have been dismissed, as I've spent no time in custody.

Discuss.
Click to expand...

XaPKXH3.png

EDIT: FTFY Immediate Past Self
 
Last edited:
Have a Pepsi said:
Unlikely. I told him I speak multiple languages, and he called me a liar. I replied to him in three languages other than English, and he said that proves his superiority... somehow.
Click to expand...

This tard is like Chris in some ways, but not amusing at all.

Why bother?
 
nad7155 said:
This tard is like Chris in some ways, but not amusing at all.

Why bother?
Click to expand...
He's a public service announcement: This is why you accept that you're not perfect and actually try and better yourself, rather than just saying you're the best at something and burying your head in the sand to all evidence to the contrary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom