UN US Midterm Elections 2018 Megathread - Blue Wave or Red Tsunami? Because you know we need one.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
November 6th, 2018.
You have less than one month to sperg about the midterm elections.

Hot Takes :
Tis the end of Drumpf!
It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

http://archive.is/1rEYe
Could the US midterm elections break Trump's presidency?

President Donald Trump. Source: AAP


Voting in the US midterm elections is now underway.

UpdatedUpdated 27 September
By Rashida Yosufzai, Nick Baker
In this article...
Americans have started to cast their ballots in a vote that could shape the rest of Donald Trump's presidency.

Although the US midterm elections are technically held on 6 November, early voting has already started in a handful of states.

Minnesota was the first state to allow early in-person voting on 21 September, with a handful of key states following, including New Jersey, California and Arizona.


Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia offer some form of early voting, meaning every day until 6 November counts for Democrats and Republicans.

It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

80 per cent chance of winning back the chamber.

Republicans have a 1 in 5 chance of keeping control of the House, while Democrats have about a 4 in 5 chance of winning control of the House. https://t.co/lyNh30TEIw pic.twitter.com/O38qtMPpIz

— FiveThirtyEight (@FiveThirtyEight) September 25, 2018
The Senate though is likely to be retained by the Republicans.

According to CNN, the Democrats are defending some two dozen seats, including 10 in states where Mr Trump secured victory in 2016, and five of those where he won resoundingly.

FiveThirtyEight gives the Democrats just a 30 per cent chance of taking the Senate.

Trump's election one year on: What do Americans think of him now?[/paste:font]


The Democrats could also use their numbers to set up House select committees targeting the president.

"They will have an opportunity to set up special panels and committees to essentially smear President Trump," United States Studies Centre research fellow Dougal Robinson told SBS News in April.

Mr Robinson pointed to the Benghazi committee set up by the Republicans against Hillary Clinton in 2014 to further investigate the fatal 2012 terrorist attack on two US government facilities in Libya.

Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Once seen as cruising to an easy vote - fulfilling Mr Trump's key promise to stack the Supreme Court with conservative justices - a string of sexual assault allegations has turned the Kavanaugh decision into all-out political war.

According to CNN's national political reporter Eric Bradner, the scandal and lukewarm response from some Republicans to Mr Kavanaugh's accusers could "drive suburban women away in midterms".

I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2018
Analysts also point to Robert Mueller's investigation as an ongoing potential source of political curveballs.

Mr Mueller has already indicted more than 30 people in connection with his probe into whether members of Mr Trump's campaign colluded with Russia to help get the real estate tycoon elected.

And speculation has swirled in recent days that Mr Trump may fire embattled deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein - who oversees the Russia collusion probe.

Doubts over how long Mr Rosenstein can keep the job have swirled since shock media reports that he once suggested secretly recording Mr Trump to collect evidence for ousting him under a constitutional amendment for presidents unfit to remain in office.

Mr Rosenstein's firing - and Mr Trump possibly putting someone more pliable in his place - would set off alarm bells over the future independence of a probe, which has the potential to rock both the midterms and the entire Trump presidency.

US wants ‘partnership, not domination’ in Australia and region[/paste:font]


A report co-authored by Mr Robinson predicted after the midterms, Congress would be highly unlikely to support a US re-entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership - a trade deal between 11 Pacific nations including Australia and New Zealand which Mr Trump pulled the US out of last year.

Another issue that may affect Australia is that if the Democrats retake the House, it is likely to lead to lower defence spending.

Additional reporting: AAP, AFP

This article was originally published in April 2018 and updated in September 2018.

How will Trump keep his voter base energized? "More Winning."
http://archive.fo/VkaHH

TRUMP HAS A TWO WORD RESPONSE WHEN REPORTER ASKS HIM HOW HE WILL KEEP GOP BASE ENERGIZED
5:52 PM 10/10/2018
Benny Johnson | Reporter At Large

President Donald Trump made portions of the White House press corps chuckle with his response on how he intends to keep Republican voters fired up after the ultimately successful confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

“How do you keep your base energized now that you have this Kavanaugh victory?” one reporter asked. Tuesday was the first day that Kavanaugh sat on the court after a contentious battle over his nomination.

“More winning,” Trump said.

Trump was leaving the White House on his way to a campaign rally Tuesday night when he took questions from reporters in the White House driveway.

The president was also asked about the mobs of paid progressive protesters that took over Capitol Hill during the contentious debate over Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Trump was specifically asked about the intense “energy” of the protesters.

“A lot of those were paid protesters. You saw that they are all unhappy because they haven’t been paid yet,” Trump alleged about the protesters. (RELATED: Trump Has A Theory Why The Anti-Kavanaugh Protesters Are So Mad)


Trump brought up his new trade deal with Canada and Mexico as a major policy win. “Our deal with Mexico and Canada was fantastic,” Trump said. “China wants to make a deal so badly. We will see where it goes. But I don’t think they are ready.”

Trump Will Lose 60 Seats in the house... Unless... Please Visit My Site
http://archive.fo/zHe4o

MATT DRUDGE WARNS OF MIDTERM BLOODBATH: TRUMP TO LOSE ’60 SEATS IN THE HOUSE LIKE OBAMA DID’
2:41 PM 09/14/2018
Peter Hasson | Reporter

Conservative news giant Matt Drudge on Friday made a somber prediction about Republicans’ chances in the November midterm elections, predicting President Donald Trump will see his party lose 60 seats in the House of Representatives.

Drudge, who runs the influential Drudge Report, compared the upcoming midterms to the electoral bloodbath Democrats suffered in the 2010 midterm elections under former President Barack Obama.

Matt-Drudge-Tweet-620x298.jpg

Screenshot/Twitter

“Trump and Obama both have 47% approval at this time of presidency, according to Rasmussen. Trump will also lose 60 seats in the House like Obama did during first midterm!” Drudge wrote on Twitter. (RELATED: Democrats Should Immediately Abolish ICE After Retaking Congress)

He added cryptically: “Unless…”

Democrats have to gain 23 House seats in November in order to flip the lower chamber. Democrats have an 83 percent chance of retaking the House, according to FiveThirty Eight.

Follow Hasson on Twitter @PeterJHasson

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


The Weird :
Mark Taylor "Red Tsunami Prophecy"
http://archive.fo/KJjj2

Mark Taylor (The Trump Prophecies): Most Important Midterm Elections In All Of US History
July 30, 2018 29 3159


Mark Taylor says the upcoming 2018 elections are the most important mid-term elections in all of America’s history. Here’s why…

Mark Taylor interviewed by Greg Hunter on USA Watchdog

Mark Taylor, author of the popular book “The Trump Prophecies,” contends, “If you are part of the army of God, you need to be ready also because there are going to be politicians that are going to resign. We have had the biggest number of resignations probably in history. This midterm election is going to be huge. This is going to be a red tsunami. They keep talking about the blue wave. I think it’s going to be a blue drip, a leaky faucet, and that is all they are going to get. You have had more resignations than we have ever seen. Now is the time to go in and capture this ground and hold it for the Kingdom of God. . . . It’s not a left or right thing. God is moving us towards a place of righteousness. That’s what’s happening right now. So, he’s going to be replacing these people. If you are called to be a judge, senator, congressman or a council person, I don’t care what level local, state or federal, take your place and get ready. If you are in the Army of God and you don’t vote, you need to get off your behind and register to vote. These are going to be the most important midterm elections in America’s history—period.”

In closing, Taylor says, “I don’t think there is going to be another Democrat in the White House for a long time, if ever again. I believe you are seeing the death of the Democrat party right now.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Mark Taylor, co-author of “The Trump Prophecies,” which has been made into a movie that is releasing in early October.

Donations: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/
 
Prior to 2016, I could feel alright being defined as a "moderate" and walking over the invisible line between "right" and "left" without issue. This is no longer the case for me.

A lot of people I used to work with (who you'd call conservative) consider my positions to be hyper-progressive simply because I don't align with the president, no matter what it is. Only after 2017 has someone said to my face that not wanting to import Islam is "leftist", but okay.

The unfortunate reality is that, in my personal opinion, modern day R candidates are attempting to ride off of populism instead of actual policy, feeding into the hands of the narrative of the "left" everyone's afraid of. The "new right" shares none of the values that prevented me from being a "liberal", and current establishment Dems are technically the closest in ideology at the moment. Just a hypothetical: if I had to choose between a 2020 authoritarian right vs 2020 authoritarian left, I'd be forced to choose the left for the sake of my own best interests. It sucks, but that's where we're at.

I know this is an unfavorable view on KF, but I don't really browse these boards for the imaginary forum points, so. I hope this explains my position a little, @It's HK-47.

The robot and @Regret are way more polite than I will be.

People who vote Democratic are low IQ, low information automatrons that support a party that has become the Republican party of the 1980s. Democrats are the party of pro-war corporatists, media shills, censorship loving, de-platforming, social media mobs, who are working to steal elections for those that are 100% anti-Bill of Rights.

Supporting the Democrats is begging for the rise of Socialism in America because of "muh feelings". Progressivism is a mental disorder that is destroying the American family in the name of trannies and faggots and soon the only solution is going to be a violent one.
 
The robot and @Regret are way more polite than I will be.

People who vote Democratic are low IQ, low information automatrons that support a party that has become the Republican party of the 1980s. Democrats are the party of pro-war corporatists, media shills, censorship loving, de-platforming, social media mobs, who are working to steal elections for those that are 100% anti-Bill of Rights.

Supporting the Democrats is begging for the rise of Socialism in America because of "muh feelings". Progressivism is a mental disorder that is destroying the American family in the name of trannies and faggots and soon the only solution is going to be a violent one.

This is like /pol/ the post.
 
f65d3087ee0655b1bad21fa647e0a04a.png

Islamic ratings. Fork'm over.

Wait, since when was eating meat cool and acceptable in far-left progressive circles?
 
Beto O Rourke is the most transparent attempt to manufacture the next Obama I've ever seen.
 
He's not going away, is he?
No, idiots think him doing well against a weak opponent like Cruz means he's ready for primetime. Cruz didnt even hit him that hard. Trump will be using a frozen turkey of a fist on him. Look at his insults against Rubio, Cruz, Bush, Romney, etc. The guy is quick and ruthless. Years of business deals will bring that out. There's a reason business has boxing references like killer instinct. It's vicious dog eat dog shit that Trump had to develop in the 80s.
 
No, idiots think him doing well against a weak opponent like Cruz means he's ready for primetime. Cruz didnt even hit him that hard. Trump will be using a frozen turkey of a fist on him. Look at his insults against Rubio, Cruz, Bush, Romney, etc. The guy is quick and ruthless. Years of business deals will bring that out. There's a reason business has boxing references like killer instinct. It's vicious dog eat dog shit that Trump had to develop in the 80s.
So the D ticket in 2020 is Clinton/O'Rourke then, right?
 
I keep seeing a whole bunch of "Beto losing is actually a GOOD thing, because now he gets to be PRESIDENT so fuck you Texas and your stupid little senate seat, he was too good for you anyhow!"

Insane.
 
No, idiots think him doing well against a weak opponent like Cruz means he's ready for primetime. Cruz didnt even hit him that hard. Trump will be using a frozen turkey of a fist on him. Look at his insults against Rubio, Cruz, Bush, Romney, etc. The guy is quick and ruthless. Years of business deals will bring that out. There's a reason business has boxing references like killer instinct. It's vicious dog eat dog shit that Trump had to develop in the 80s.
A big reason why Beto was seen as a big deal was having a close race in deep red Texas.
 
The robot and @Regret are way more polite than I will be.

People who vote Democratic are low IQ, low information automatrons that support a party that has become the Republican party of the 1980s. Democrats are the party of pro-war corporatists, media shills, censorship loving, de-platforming, social media mobs, who are working to steal elections for those that are 100% anti-Bill of Rights.

Supporting the Democrats is begging for the rise of Socialism in America because of "muh feelings". Progressivism is a mental disorder that is destroying the American family in the name of trannies and faggots and soon the only solution is going to be a violent one.

I think a lot of it has to do with "certain demographics" constantly voting for gibsmedat, and the population of those "demographics" are rapidly increasing for various reasons. They frequently demand the same shit in their countries of origin, but those countries don't have anything to redistribute. So they come to America and Europe to demand the same thing, because we DO have resources to redistribute (for now). Demographics capable of building functioning societies don't usually have those same proclivities. If those demographics are replaced, say goodbye to Mars colonies and hello to a global favela.
 
So the D ticket in 2020 is Clinton/O'Rourke then, right?
LOL you think those two egotistical fucks will get Pocahontas to have them smokem the peace pipe and bury the hatchet after a knock down, drag out primary that will make the previous ones look like a friendly game of pick up in whitest suburbia. The Dems have been trying to out lib each other at events. They proudly proclaim they have a lower grade from the NRA.
I keep seeing a whole bunch of "Beto losing is actually a GOOD thing, because now he gets to be PRESIDENT so fuck you Texas and your stupid little senate seat, he was too good for you anyhow!"

Insane.
Insanity is the definition of doing the same thing over and expecting different results. Dems are definitely doing that so far.

A big reason why Beto was seen as a big deal was having a close race in deep red Texas.
I'll let you in on a little secret. Ted Cruz isn't that terribly popular with Republicans here in Texas. Look at Abbott's race, he trounced Lupe Valdez. I guarantee if Beto runs against Coryn, he'd get smoked really badly.
 
I think a lot of it has to do with "certain demographics" constantly voting for gibsmedat, and the population of those "demographics" are rapidly increasing for various reasons. They frequently demand the same shit in their countries of origin, but those countries don't have anything to redistribute. So they come to America and Europe to demand the same thing, because we DO have resources to redistribute (for now). Demographics capable of building functioning societies don't usually have those same proclivities. If those demographics are replaced, say goodbye to Mars colonies and hello to a global favela.
You know what made me realize this fact of how too many people will be the death of the west? Soylent Green. When I first saw it and it dawned on me that it wasn't too far fetched on how we are kinda heading. Third worlders come to this country, pump out a ton of kids, don't always assimilate (some being openly anti-American in their attitudes) and seem to view our resources as limitless.

It's easy to think that way. How many of you doubt water won't come out of the tap when you turn it on? How many of you even think about that? I rarely do.

The problem is that it's not just the immigrants who can have this attitude, a lot of natives here think that's the case. They don't understand lifeboat ethics.

I don't want to sound sexist but I think it has to do with the nurturing tendencies of women and putting them in positiions of power inevitably lead to them ignoring some basic lifeboat ethics. If you try to save everyone by having them pile onto a lifeboat with only enough of a capacity, you end up drowning everyone.

Same concept with hunting a population of deer within a certain amount. If you don't keep the numbers in line, they all suffer because not enough food to go around.
 
To be fair, the people of Arizona might actually be that exceptional.
Arizona's a dumping ground for spics, so you're not too far off--really, the whole state is just one big flip-flop that I sometimes wonder how the state's managed to even function. But Arizona has its share of exceptional political leaders. Biggest one folks still remember is Governor Mecham, who has gone down in infamy as the first Arizona governor to be impeached. He got impeached because he was using public funds towards his automotive business on the side, and he skimped out on including a six-figure loan from a real estate developer in his campaign report. As he was a cars salesman before getting into politics, you'd think people should've known what they were getting by voting him in, but apparently not. It was such a shitshow that at least one of his supporters had written one of those b'awwwww journals that ended up comparing his impeachment trial to Jesus Christ's crucifixion (it's a TL;DR .pdf, got the quote from Wikipedia which cited this). So take that as you will.

Btw I just came across this HuffPo article about comparing Mecham to Trump which is all sorts of text dump insanity. Most likely would fit better in the TDS thead, but just wanted to share since it's a thing. :story:

(Apologies if it got :offtopic: there.)
 
You know what made me realize this fact of how too many people will be the death of the west? Soylent Green. When I first saw it and it dawned on me that it wasn't too far fetched on how we are kinda heading. Third worlders come to this country, pump out a ton of kids, don't always assimilate (some being openly anti-American in their attitudes) and seem to view our resources as limitless.

It's easy to think that way. How many of you doubt water won't come out of the tap when you turn it on? How many of you even think about that? I rarely do.

The problem is that it's not just the immigrants who can have this attitude, a lot of natives here think that's the case. They don't understand lifeboat ethics.

I don't want to sound sexist but I think it has to do with the nurturing tendencies of women and putting them in positiions of power inevitably lead to them ignoring some basic lifeboat ethics. If you try to save everyone by having them pile onto a lifeboat with only enough of a capacity, you end up drowning everyone.

Same concept with hunting a population of deer within a certain amount. If you don't keep the numbers in line, they all suffer because not enough food to go around.
I definitely think that women's tendency to be nice has ended up hurting women as a political group. For example, I think women have been too accepting of troons in the past, reasoning that it's ok because it isn't hurting anyone. At every opportunity to assert themselves over the small things, like wearing dresses or using the same bathroom, women surrendered to avoid hurting a misfit's feelings. Now women have to deal with fetishists butting into the sports or even getting raped in women's prison because mentioning the obvious is verboten. I don't know if this is due to women's natural instinct to nurture, or if it's "society" discouraging women from being assertive, but I truly feel that if women had not conceded so much ideological ground over to trans rights groups in the beginning, we wouldn't be seeing so much garbage about how "feeling" like a woman and being a woman are the same thing.

So I definitely see what you mean, that politically, women tend to value sympathy and empathy when it's not the best long term strategy.

t. woman
 
Back
Top Bottom