- Joined
- Aug 4, 2016
Well, that, and the fact that John K.'s involved at all doomed it from the start.Well, now you know why the Spumco comic book was such a bust.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, that, and the fact that John K.'s involved at all doomed it from the start.Well, now you know why the Spumco comic book was such a bust.
Oh wow, he outright claims to to better than both Carl Barks and Bill TytlaAnd in case if I havent linked it, Micheal Barrier talks with Johnk one on one here, and we learn that Johnk doesnt like Carl Barks's work:
http://www.michaelbarrier.com/Feedback/feedback_johnk.htm
I remember a blog entry of his when he said (paraphrasing here) that Frank Thomas could occasionally do an interesting pose, but that more often than not, it just led to more boring drawings. John K is almost fascinatingly conceited.Oh wow, he outright claims to to better than both Carl Barks and Bill Tytla![]()
This might be my inner European bias for duck comics talking, but I'm not sure how anyone who doubles down so hard on his gratuitous poo and gay jokes can dismiss the idea that duck comics can be complex so easily.And in case if I havent linked it, Micheal Barrier talks with Johnk one on one here, and we learn that Johnk doesnt like Carl Barks's work:
http://www.michaelbarrier.com/Feedback/feedback_johnk.htm
And in case if I havent linked it, Micheal Barrier talks with Johnk one on one here, and we learn that Johnk doesnt like Carl Barks's work:
I remember a blog entry of his when he said (paraphrasing here) that Frank Thomas could occasionally do an interesting pose, but that more often than not, it just led to more boring drawings. John K is almost fascinatingly conceited.
Very much so. I'm not sure why John K. calls modern animation garbage, but praises something as stiff and on-model as Hanna-Barbera animated shows.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if John K. were one of the few people in the industry who genuinely liked Scrappy Doo. He does seem like the kind of character who could have come from a late 50s-early 60s Hanna Barbara production, and I also heard that Joe Barbara directly based him off Henry Hawk.
And for the record, Scrappy probably doesnt deserve all the hate that he gets from autistic Scooby fans. He was still a much better character than Scooby Dum ever was. I was actually kind of offended when they made him the villain in the first movie, to the point where I like to pretend that Monsters Unleashed came out in 02 instead.
John is not a fan of Scooby-Doo.
He views it as the moment when hippies and dykes took over the cartoon industry and ensured it wouldn't be fun for another two decades.
I'm still waiting to hear Bakshis input on this whole thing, last I heard he wasnt happy about Johns scam-raiser (meanwhile Bakshi was able to complete his own and lets people watch it online for free).
He's got his own elephant graveyard in his closet (no pedo stuff) so he's probably just hoping he'll die before the "REAL" Bakshi story comes out.
I'm not sure why John K. calls modern animation garbage, but praises something as stiff and on-model as Hanna-Barbera animated shows.
The clearing shit out of the toilet before Bakshi's date comes over bit in "Firedogs 2" was based on a real story. Only as it originally happened, it was a black hooker coming over to bang Ralph. (Ralph loves banging black women.) Funny how John K. didn't go for the chance to depict one of those big lipped "darkies" he's so fond of.
He's got his own elephant graveyard in his closet (no pedo stuff) so he's probably just hoping he'll die before the "REAL" Bakshi story comes out.
Like what? So he has a black BBW fetish. That's practically normie these days. At least they're adults.
Now that you're back, mind answering two questions?
How racist is John?
And what was the real deal with the Games Animation guys and the DVDs?
Would you mind explaining how? I'm curious.Very racist.