since he operates his once respected community like a high school clique, He won't because he is an inconsistent loser and a coward.
it's just like the candid thing where he did that stream with harmful opinions, denied that there is such a thing as a 'skeptic community,' then made a video about how the community is super important and people should 'stop with the drama'
'stop with the drama' is code for 'stop criticizing people's hypocritical and scummy actions because some of the shit might splatter onto me too'
Pretentious YouTubers who take themselves seriously and act like they're revolutionaries who are saving the world are always shit, no matter the political leanings. It's even worse when there's an incestuous group of them who are willing to lie, attack people, and commit hypocrisies to further their political agenda and refuse to call out each other's shitty behavior because it makes the group and their ideology look bad. Kinda reminds me of a certain group of video game journalists...
this was what i found so fascinating about all this, the events of the past year are hard proof that something akin to a gamejournopros thing exists among fucking
political youtubers. even if your evidence is something as simple as the way vee pops out every time somebody criticizes don sargone.
He can't be mad at Kraut because Kraut gathered CRP's dox and sent it directly to him, but Sargon was a principled man and told him you don't need to attack his character Kraut, attack his ideas.
he 100% made that recording specifically to cover his ass, good thing we got it from the other end where we can hear the terror in the sperg patrol's voices
Article 13 apparently passed at least its first stage. Does this mean Sarg'n will have to stop stealing memes?
looks like sargon's suit just couldn't cut it. jim wins again.
The tweets with Dankula and Louis whatever trying to take a pot shot at Jim, still thinking its funny Jim thinks YouTubers doing IRL activism is gay was really pathetic.
not to mention that they are totally ineffectual and irrelevant to any of the decisions being made. they naively believe that democracy is a legitimate system and that the people in charge of it care what they think. public opinion has little to no effect on what kind of policy decisions are made and article 13 proves that to a greater degree than anything i've seen in a while.
they have the same problem as white nationalist retards who think going on in the street and screaming at people will make the public want to 'save the white race.' the average person doesn't care about any of this shit, and the ruling class cares even less because they have their own interests and agendas to pursue.
i totally sympathize with virtually every criticism of the current system that these people might have to offer, but the idea that 'IRL activism' will fix it or even so much as make a dent is laughable. you cannot force this kind of thing, revolutions (whether violent or metapolitical) have to happen naturally. you do not get a large-scale sea change without a large number of people deciding that they've had enough. no amount of arguments you make to them, numbers you show them etc is going to magically spurn them to do it, because people's minds mostly aren't changed by arguments and factual information. people change their minds when they feel personally affected by something.
basically you need a large portion of society to be in the gutter and have literally no other option before they will actually stand up and say 'enough.'
and that's enough sperging from me