🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Cowlick said:
Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
Click to expand...
So you have no actual plan on removing the thread?
 
Cowlick said:
Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
Click to expand...

Did you learn your debating skills at wizardchan perchance ?
 
Cowlick said:
Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
Click to expand...
So you ignored his question by replying to him that you ignored his question. lol makes sense
 
Null said:
You've never answered my question.

Since you've proven that the thread is an immortal testament to your failures that will never recede on its own, how do you plan to remove it?
Click to expand...

I'd guess the same way he inadvertently got himself scrubbed from other forums.. being a fucking idiot. But he doesn't know we feed on this shit
 
@Cowlick, I have a serious question for you. Do you acknowledge the following two things?

1) A kiwi forums user attempted to start a thread about you, and nobody cared.

2) Until you showed up and made everyone care!

Thank you.
 
Null said:
You've never answered my question.

Since you've proven that the thread is an immortal testament to your failures that will never recede on its own, how do you plan to remove it?
Click to expand...

By insulting everyone around him, typing in bold, and repeatedly stating the thread will be removed.

Cowlick said:
Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
Click to expand...

But by choosing to ignore it means you're putting active energy into blocking it out, so you're still not really ignoring it. Plus you proceed to talk about it after saying that you chose to ignore it which further proves my statement right.
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:
3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.
Click to expand...
Actually, buster, there were a whopping two posts before you decided to revive this positively ancient thread. I thought we established this.
 
Null said:
So you have no actual plan on removing the thread?
Click to expand...

I myself don't know how to remove a thread... But "ours is not to reason why". First, I give the same people posting it/posting in it a chance to remove it (as King said would be done). If that fails to happen in a given amount of time, another way to will be chosen.
 
TJ, I have a question for you. What will you do if you can not remove this thread from existence? Will you still be dead set on getting it deleted some day or will you do something else?
 
Cowlick said:
I myself don't know how to remove a thread... But "ours is not to reason why". First, I give the same people posting it/posting in it a chance to remove it (as King said would be done). If that fails to happen in a given amount of time, another way to will be chosen.
Click to expand...
Okay, what's the another way lol?
 
Who is Buster?

GYPqEFf.jpg
 
Cowlick said:
I myself don't know how to remove a thread... But "ours is not to reason why". First, I give the same people posting it/posting in it a chance to remove it (as King said would be done). If that fails to happen in a given amount of time, another way to will be chosen.
Click to expand...
You seriously keep misunderstanding me the more I explain it to you.
 
Cowlick said:
I myself don't know how to remove a thread... But "ours is not to reason why". First, I give the same people posting it/posting in it a chance to remove it (as King said would be done). If that fails to happen in a given amount of time, another way to will be chosen.
Click to expand...
Before you destroy the forums, can you tell me about yourself? I'd like to hear, in your own words, who you are. A quick autobiography would be super cool.
 
Cowlick said:
I myself don't know how to remove a thread... But "ours is not to reason why". First, I give the same people posting it/posting in it a chance to remove it (as King said would be done). If that fails to happen in a given amount of time, another way to will be chosen.
Click to expand...

What way? You can't remove the thread and we won't.
 
You never answered my question. Who is your favorite wrestler? A man's favorite wrestler tells alot about him
 
@Cowlick You're wrong, we absolutely can discuss anyone here because the material they provide for us to discuss is available publicly, it's the same way we can discuss movie stars, musicians, and professional athletes. No one is going through your private life.
So yeah, guess your question isn't that rhetorical after all.
Also, those people I listed; maybe you're right and they are here, but they didn't raise a sky high shitfit over a thread about themselves and causing people to take notice and find out who they are. Hell, if someone made a "Pikonic Thread" I'd laugh it off.
Take my advice, leave or join the ranks of Rika, Tyce, and Moleman. Either way this thread is here to stay, so deal with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom