🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I find it pretty damn funny how Bovinelick has only been on this forum for less than 2 days and he's already broken the record for most negative ratings than any user on here.

He gave MylarBalloonFan a run for his money.
 
ASoulMan said:
I find it pretty damn funny how Bovinelick has only been on this forum for less than 2 days and he's already broken the record for most negative ratings than any user on here.

He gave MylarBalloonFan a run for his money.
Click to expand...
Mylar still is the king of autistic ratings, though. Long live the king.
 
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3]
buster_kitten said:
But TJ, you haven't proven your point. You claim you stayed away to prove that this thread would continue without your involvement, but you were only uninvolved for a very short time. Many posters hadn't even had a chance to catch up on the previous content before you returned. Not everyone here is as focused on this thread as you are, so it takes a little while for people to get up to speed, creating the illusion that this topic has more life to it than it actually does.
Click to expand...
- Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
 
So do you not own a toothbrush?

Cowlick said:
3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.
Click to expand...

orly
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
Click to expand...

You shor do got a Purdy mouth bby
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
Click to expand...

I knew you wouldn't leave us, my love! :heart-full:
 
Cowlick said:
I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.
Click to expand...
*yawn*
 
Welcome back, TJ Buddy. Please enjoy your crusade here and have a good day. :3
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
Click to expand...

But what about the audio book erotica, love?
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
Click to expand...
You've never answered my question.

Since you've proven that the thread is an immortal testament to your failures that will never recede on its own, how do you plan to remove it?
 
Null said:
You've never answered my question.

Since you've proven that the thread is an immortal testament to your failures that will never recede on its own, how do you plan to remove it?
Click to expand...

Perhaps we'll all be stars in bad literotica. For the record, I've got a 6 inch vacuum tube.
 
Null said:
You've never answered my question.

Since you've proven that the thread is an immortal testament to your failures that will never recede on its own, how do you plan to remove it?
Click to expand...

Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
 
Cowlick said:
A few quick, true statements:

1] hurrhurrhurr - No, I will not be coming into Chat or anywhere else on these Forums, as this thread (& probably other places on the Forums, if I cared/bothered to waste my time looking) prove it is the majority here, not I, who are in need of MANY kinds of help!!!

2] Pikonic - I heard it said on a few different TV shows that "For every rat you see in (certain cities), there are a bunch you don't." say that to point out that you make the statement of people who have been discussed but never joined here. That ;eaves me with two responses... The first is to ask how you can fully prove they were never members, & the second is to ask you or anyone else where you knew/knew of them from. If the answer (as it was for me) is "nowhere", I have a follow-up question, which is what gave any of you the right to discuss them. That question, regardless of the answer to the first, is rhetorical, as I can & will tell all of you the answer is "Absolutely nothing."

3] - Actually, buster, I proved my point. I was stating that if I stayed away, the thread would continue without my involvement (much the way it had continued, & in fact begun, before I ever even visited the URL). I stayed away for what (chronologically) may have been very little. However, if we measure it in thread activity, it was quite a lot, some of which had to do with things I had posted/done on my blog or other Forums, but none of which (of course, this being part of the point) had anything to do with anything I posted anywhere on "CWCKiforums" between one post & the next.

Therefore, my aim (to disprove King's claimed point it would have died &/or disappeared without my involvement) has been reached. The aim of the thread at its start was non existent (I believe the original thread title asked a question, proving further it had no statement to make/prove at the outset), so it can & should be ended. (Whether I find this thread removed tomorrow, I now state that the claims I saw semi-recently about me being a "psychopath" &/or having-or-being-at-all-related to things of "fetish"-like nature be removed.)​
Click to expand...
dude chill with the ampersands. the asterisk is getting lonely
 
image.jpg
 
Cowlick said:
Actually, I never saw your question before. Now, I see it, but choose to ignore it... Due to the fact it begins with a subordinate clause that is completely untrue.
Click to expand...

This is Null's website. We are all subordinate clauses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom