🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
yi2Yyxx.png
 
Reading through it there is not that much interesting in there. Majority of it is that Russel fails to make a claim and fails allege concrete injury, similar to all his other cases basically. Although I am impressed he was capable of proving standing against some of them, only to be demolished by the declaration that the prostitution ban is constitutional (as anyone could've and did tell him).
His great legal knowledge made him confuse two different types of challenges and label the challenge incorrectly, he is such a great paralegal'

Hahaha, one of his cited cases as a foundation for his case explicitly says that the constitutional right to sexual privacy does not include prostitution.

In support of his claim, Greer asserts sex in brothels is deeply rooted in this nation’s history. 80 Additionally, Plaintiff points to the “ambiguity” surrounding the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, striking down Texas’ law prohibiting homosexual sodomy.81 Admittedly, the nature of rights protected under Lawrence is imprecise. Nonetheless, the Lawrence court acknowledged the case “does not involve . . . prostitution.”
Click to expand...

Reading through this, in the statement of the facts you can almost hear the sarcasm and disdain of the judge (or that might be me reading into it), talking about him being well-educated, talking about 'feeling loved' with the prostitutes and going into quite a bit of detail about the business plan in the footnotes
 
TheGreatCitracett said:
Big update here:

CASE DISMISSED! BROTHEL BAN UPHELD!
View attachment 446020
http://archive.is/1zig8
Not sure if he's seen it yet, because there hasn't been a meltdown and he hasn't gone apeshit on the Fox 13 facebook yet. Best part is, it mentions the Swift and Grande lawsuits and even links you to them too!
Click to expand...

Ohhh, the meltdown from this is sure to be epic. And it couldn't come with much better timing either. No doubt he'll still be frothing from this decision when the dismissal of his newest Taylor Swift lawsuit is handed down.

Also, in re-reading the article about Russhole's first lawsuit against Tay-Tay, I see that it looks like Russhole is lying yet again about how allegedly none of his claims were directed against Taylor Swift directly and her alleged 'duties' to accept his shity song or warn him that she would never accept his shitty song:

upload_2018-5-10_5-2-29.png


So contrary to his legal screeching, he's most definitely trying to re-litigate already settled matters. I'm betting all Tay-Tay's lawyers will have to do is present the judge with the transcript of the small claims court hearing to prove that. If it even gets that far, of course...
 
TheGreatCitracett said:
You know, I was wondering about the neon thing too.

According to his "manifesto" it's derived from "porneon" which he claims means "club".
http://themilehighneonbro.wixsite.c...st/2015/12/21/MANIFESTO-OF-THE-MILE-HIGH-NEON

However, Google tells me a porneon was in fact not a club, but a house of forced prostitution, where the prostitutes were held against their will like slaves, treated cruelly, and subjected to rape and sexual assault from any horny man with a few shekels to rub together.
Click to expand...
That makes more sense, and matches up with how I picture the inside of the place:
Capture2.PNG
 
Nope said:
Reading through this, in the statement of the facts you can almost hear the sarcasm and disdain of the judge (or that might be me reading into it), talking about him being well-educated, talking about 'feeling loved' with the prostitutes and going into quite a bit of detail about the business plan in the footnotes
Click to expand...

I get the feeling that sarcasm may be involved as well. It also could be that the judge incorporated such wording due to the requirement to view all well-pleaded facts in a case in the light most favorable to the plaintiff when considering a motion to dismiss.

upload_2018-5-10_7-49-36.png
Despite all of Russhole's asserted facts being viewed in that most favorable light, I'm sure he'll still screech about the judge being "bias" once he wakes up and discovers the dismissal.
 
I'm not a believer but man I almost wanna pray he doesn't find out it was dismissed until he gets paid and files the TS case. I doubt this is demoralizing enough, but why chance it?

That being said.... lmfao @ that whole ruling. He didn't reply to the motion to dismiss, he didn't state a claim, he filed at least 14 rantings ehm I mean amendments, he basically wants laws changed through court and not legislation. He truly is a brilliant legal mind wow just wow
 
DarkAlien said:
I'm not a believer but man I almost wanna pray he doesn't find out it was dismissed until he gets paid and files the TS case. I doubt this is demoralizing enough, but why chance it?

That being said.... lmfao @ that whole ruling. He didn't reply to the motion to dismiss, he didn't state a claim, he filed at least 14 rantings ehm I mean amendments, he basically wants laws changed through court and not legislation. He truly is a brilliant legal mind wow just wow
Click to expand...

There's something magical about reading this decision on the train to my Con Law final. Taylor must be happy with the farms today :heart-full:
 
gREEEEEEEEEr said:
Russ would be a terrible poker player. He'd have a tard rage if the cards didn't play his way. That'd be his tell. I think Russ was the tard who you'd always let win at Uno because you didn't want the cards all crumpled and torn up because you called him out for not saying "Uno".
Click to expand...
I think he'd be a good poker player. His poker face is indistinguishable from every other face he wears.
 
Guy Smiley said:
So it says it was dismissed "with prejudice." If I recall correctly, during the Ariana Grande case that meant he had to pay the legal fees. (Which probably still hasn't happened.) What does it mean here?
Click to expand...
IANAL but I think that if there were legal fees to be covered, it would have been stated in that judgement/ruling.

Also this is now at least prejudice ruling #2. Not sure if the first TS and the Hoff brothel employee were prejudice too. I think 5 were needed in Utah for a vexatious label
 
Alec Benson Leary said:
I think he'd be a good poker player. His poker face is indistinguishable from every other face he wears.
Click to expand...
He would start snorting and slurping like an angry, asthmatic bulldog whenever things didn't go his way. It would be the audible equivalent of not being able to keep a poker face.
 
Bunny at Law said:
There's something magical about reading this decision on the train to my Con Law final. Taylor must be happy with the farms today :heart-full:
Click to expand...
Good luck on your final. TS is truly smiling down on us! Sts. Taylor and Katy and the benevolent State of Utah are in alignment and it's going to be an amazing summer.
 
I log in today and see that beautiful Stan parody and the brothel case being dismissed.

I eagerly await Russell's admonishing of that no-nothing judge who dismissed the case.
 
I love the fact that the judge told him to go bug the legislature. Talk about telling someone to fuck off without actually saying fuck off.
 
So I found this....
upload_2018-5-10_12-27-0.png


IG account he follows, it's dedicated to disabled girls, it states their disability, their location, their age and their IG account along with an inspiring quote. Because originally it angered me, I went through most of these girls accounts to see if dip shit was following any, none that I could find, nor did I see him commenting on their pictures. Then I didn't know if this made me feel better or worse. Is he looking at them for comfort, for inspiration? Is this a new pond to fish out of once he finds a super hot disabled girl in America? Is he grossly looking at them, objectifying them, thinking, I'd hit it but ew she's an amputee or wondering if a paraplegic can still have sex with him or who knows what else... I don't know, I don't know. This really ruined my vibe today. :(
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-10_12-26-55.png
    upload_2018-5-10_12-26-55.png
    369.4 KB · Views: 315
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom