- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Completely hilarious! John would never be guilty of colluding with """"journalists"""" for shitty op-eds or glowing game reviews, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When/where did John live in California? I bet it was some shithole like Stockton and he’s calling that “Silicon Valley.”Which one is your style, John?
View attachment 428008
Top tweet deleted due to not focusing well with test audiences/cancer
View attachment 428007
Take your meds, John.
View attachment 428028
Since when does Frank care what's socially acceptable? He writes fapfics about giant isopods, his idea of a great time is wrestling Drumpf in a Godzilla fatsuit on public-access TV, and he burned all bridges with his family to marry John Walker Flynt.Yes, this is my theory too. He and Brianna started dating pre surgical transition. I bet he got off watching her transition from the dude he wanted to the lady he thinks it's socially acceptable for him to love.
When/where did John live in California? I bet it was some shithole like Stockton and he’s calling that “Silicon Valley.”
Since when does Frank care what's socially acceptable? He writes fapfics about giant isopods, his idea of a great time is wrestling Drumpf in a Godzilla fatsuit on public-access TV, and he burned all bridges with his family to marry John Walker Flynt.
Yes I do imagine it's pretty hard to describe things that have never happened to you.
You are really on a tear today, John.
View attachment 428224
People are getting banned for one-word replies. Please don't make posts that are best answered "No".Doesn't she ever proofread her tweets?
Since when does Frank care what's socially acceptable? He writes fapfics about giant isopods, his idea of a great time is wrestling Drumpf in a Godzilla fatsuit on public-access TV, and he burned all bridges with his family to marry John Walker Flynt.
Yes I do imagine it's pretty hard to describe things that have never happened to you.
You are really on a tear today, John.
View attachment 428224
Howlongtobeat.com puts a “rushed” time at 16+ hours. Make of that what you will.
I'm not sure if anyone's verified what his family was like - the stern "SON, I AM DISAPPOINT" father in flowing imperial robes is just kind of an assumption based on Frank's age and social status as far as I know.He's from a traditional Chinese immigrant family, right? My guess is that it's either outright from worrying what his family thinks of his sexuality, or self-hate ingrained from childhood.
LOL, Wu refiled her Q1 accounts and the figures are different from her earlier version...
Exhibit A, old and busted:
View attachment 428357
Exhibit B, new hotness:
View attachment 428359
The old version didn't even add up correctly. How, oh how, is anyone this bad at accounting? High school dropouts with home hairdressing businesses keep books better than this fucking idiot. Neither figure of cash on hand at the end of the period tallies with the cash on hand reported in the April quarterly. This is a clown fiesta. The numbers seem like they're basically just made up.
Like, is anybody really going to give a shit about thirty six pennies being over the true amount?
Worse, it's not incompetence at math, it's incompetence at filling out an Excel spreadsheet correctly and using the sum function.It's amazing that Wu manages to be so incompetent in every aspect of her life. This stuff isn't exactly rocket science, it's simple
It's worse than that, the totaled expenditures don't even match up with the itemized ones.I don't think anyone is ever going to give a shit, no. The point is that these probably aren't the real figures even after corrections. The figures for cash on hand don't agree from the end of one period to the beginning of another, or even with previous versions of the same report.
Did anyone save the original edition of the Q4 report?
So in total, they're under-reporting their cash on hand by $749.50 - at least if the raw figures they're reporting are accurate. I don't see anything obvious that this could be a double-count for.
Could be that they finally skimmed a little money off the top, but I'm putting my bet on either they completely forgot to list an expense, or they just suuuuuuuck at record keeping.
Aaaaand wouldn't you know it, there are $763.55 of additional expenditures that didn't make it onto the revised formIt's still available on the site, it's just moved to the misc reports section.
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/487/201802020300192487/201802020300192487.pdf