Gamergate Hanger-Ons - 9_Volt88, 2dAmMuslim and friends

  • Thread starter Thread starter RK 672
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Alec Benson Leary said:
Funny how you never find that stuff noted in their wikipedia articles.
Click to expand...

Original research is forbidden on wikipedia, as well as sourcing from unreliable publications. "Unreliable publications" are basically anything outside Silicon Valley and the Bay area that they probably personally know, or is personally known to the subject of the article, or that doesn't align with that areas political culture. People have been perma-banned from wikipedia for pointing it out in talk pages.
 
Last edited:
invalid said:
Original research is forbidden on wikipedia, as well as sourcing from unreliable publications. "Unreliable publications" are basically anything outside Silicon Valley and the Bay area that they probably personally know, or is personally known to the subject of the article, or that doesn't align with that areas political culture. People have been perma-banned from wikipedia for pointing it out in talk pages.
Click to expand...
Reliable sourcing standards are probably the most often abused rule in my personal experience. Apparently everything on HuffPost or The Guardian is reliable, regardless of who wrote it, if it was opinion, if it was freelance, regardless.

The amount of articles that Leigh Alexander is cited in concerning GamerGate is staggering, considering she was directly involved in the catalyst that created GamerGate. But it's published on The Guardian so it's cool and totally reliable. But we'll apply double standards to any sources that go against ours.

GUARDIANEMAIL1.png
 
Oh, Leigh Alexander, the same cunt who called someone a "house nigger" and said she was sick of getting cat-called by "hood people." Clearly a champion of social progress.
 
I'm in the middle of updating my post on this guy retroactively because it felt a little thin. The neckbeard comment is pretty funny considering I left his face up for posterity:

2017-08-09-09:39:13.png


Granted I have never seen any receipts of Twitter DMs, but we do know he used to be a pro-GG sperg so that part is true.
 
Anytime an anti-gger calls someone a woman hating, virgin neckbeard its 9/10 projection. The other tenth are trannies.
 
Sissy Galvez said:
Anytime an anti-gger calls someone a woman hating, virgin neckbeard its 9/10 projection. The other tenth are trannies.
Click to expand...

Actually this is shockingly accurate, knowing what we do.

David Gallant, Jed Whitaker, Jake Alley... The list goes on.

invalid said:
Original research is forbidden on wikipedia, as well as sourcing from unreliable publications. "Unreliable publications" are basically anything outside Silicon Valley and the Bay area that they probably personally know, or is personally known to the subject of the article, or that doesn't align with that areas political culture. People have been perma-banned from wikipedia for pointing it out in talk pages.
Click to expand...

Fun note: On the rare occasions you find an article from one of their "accepted sources" that punches a gaping hole in their horse-shit, they will engage in some of the funniest acts of retardation you will probably ever see involving wikispergs. Seriously, it's fucking magical.
 
I'm so pleased 9 Volt finally got a thread of some kind and that we actually know who he is IRL. I find it really annoying that in a lot of his Tweets he goes "here we see" or "here is" like he's David Attenborough doing a documentary on neckbeards. Also that he has Koops from The Thousand Year Door as his avatar. Koops is a fucking badass - he was a shy kid who came out of his shell (quite literally) and became a hero. You're not even a tenth of the man he is 9 Volt.

A useful yardstick I now have for measuring how much of a pathetic SJW crybaby someone is is to see how they reacted to the 19th season of South Park. It's even better when you can compare it to their attitude towards the show before the 19th season aired. In 9 Volt's case he didn't have a public tantrum over it like MovieBob did, but what he did do was every bit as scummy.

This is what he thought of South Park before the 19th season aired:

South Park 1.png
South Park 2.png


Note the date on the latest tweet there: 21 June 2015. A few months before the 19th season aired. Looked like he was still pretty into the show right?

Then the 19th season aired and this happened:

South Park 3.png
South Park 4.png


Hm... I wonder why he doesn't find South Park funny anymore all of a sudden. I'm sure his newfound dislike for the show has nothing to do with the fact it mocked his political ideology. Nope, nothing at all...
 
TheImportantFart said:
I'm so pleased 9 Volt finally got a thread of some kind and that we actually know who he is IRL. I find it really annoying that in a lot of his Tweets he goes "here we see" or "here is" like he's David Attenborough doing a documentary on neckbeards. Also that he has Koops from The Thousand Year Door as his avatar. Koops is a fucking badass - he was a shy kid who came out of his shell (quite literally) and became a hero. You're not even a tenth of the man he is 9 Volt.

A useful yardstick I now have for measuring how much of a pathetic SJW crybaby someone is is to see how they reacted to the 19th season of South Park. It's even better when you can compare it to their attitude towards the show before the 19th season aired. In 9 Volt's case he didn't have a public tantrum over it like MovieBob did, but what he did do was every bit as scummy.

This is what he thought of South Park before the 19th season aired:

View attachment 260333 View attachment 260334

Note the date on the latest tweet there: 21 June 2015. A few months before the 19th season aired. Looked like he was still pretty into the show right?

Then the 19th season aired and this happened:

View attachment 260335 View attachment 260336

Hm... I wonder why he doesn't find South Park funny anymore all of a sudden. I'm sure his newfound dislike for the show has nothing to do with the fact it mocked his political ideology. Nope, nothing at all...
Click to expand...
With the 180 9volt did because of season 19 of South Park, he should realize that South Park takes a piss at many things. The show doesnt focus on just one target like other satirical cartoons but then again, the idea of South Park mocking many things would fly over 9volt's head.
 
Last edited:
c-no said:
With the 180 9volt did because of season 19 of South Park, he should realize that South Park takes a piss at many things. The show doesnt focus on just one target like other satirical cartoons but then again, the idea of South Park mocking many things would fly over 9volt's head.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he much prefers the works of Seth "christians and republicans are stupid" McFarlane. 9volt knows that his delicate worldview will never be challenged by the leftist heroism that produces Family Guy.
 
Does Greg even have any opinions of his own anymore or does he just say whatever gets the validation of his fellow Twitter spergs.

Must be fun, being moderated by your peers just in case you express enjoyment towards a taboo subject.
 
Alec Benson Leary said:
I'm sure he much prefers the works of Seth "christians and republicans are stupid" McFarlane. 9volt knows that his delicate worldview will never be challenged by the leftist heroism that produces Family Guy.
Click to expand...
He would until Family Guy makes a joke that could trigger him, then it will be like South Park in being unfunny just because it made a joke he didn't like.

D.Va said:
Does Greg even have any opinions of his own anymore or does he just say whatever gets the validation of his fellow Twitter spergs.

Must be fun, being moderated by your peers just in case you express enjoyment towards a taboo subject.
Click to expand...
Whatever opinion he has, genuine or twisted, it can used for validation from fellow Twitte spergs. Twitter itself is home to many spergs and 9volt sharing his opinion would be used for validation from whatever camp there is. The only benefit in being moderated by peers in case you express enjoyment to a taboo subject would getting likes you would regurgitate from them and saying things they would agree on.
 
Jaimas said:
Actually this is shockingly accurate, knowing what we do.

David Gallant, Jed Whitaker, Jake Alley... The list goes on.



Fun note: On the rare occasions you find an article from one of their "accepted sources" that punches a gaping hole in their horse-shit, they will engage in some of the funniest acts of retardation you will probably ever see involving wikispergs. Seriously, it's fucking magical.
Click to expand...

Wasn't there an actual list of anti-GG'ers calling people women hating neckbeards, and 1-2 years later all were charged with sexual assault of some kind.
 
invalid said:
Wasn't there an actual list of anti-GG'ers calling people women hating neckbeards, and 1-2 years later all were charged with sexual assault of some kind.
Click to expand...

I had a running tally going at some point. Here's a list of the ones that come readily to mind:

Sarah Nyberg: Confirmed Pedophile
Valis99 (FemFreq Twitch Mod): Convicted Sex Offender
Laurelai Bailey: Rapist
Rob Marmolejo: Sexually harassed over 20 women while working for CON
Chris Kluwe: Claims to have known about sexual indiscretions by his fellow players, did nothing.
Arthur Chu: Claims to have known about sexual indiscretions by his associates, did nothing.
Devin Faraci: Caught sexually harassing women and then tried the Jimmy Swaggart defense.
Timothy Craig: Another sexual harasser.

There's over 20 of them, and about half of them are either in the CON logs or in that circle of friends.
 
Last edited:
Stopped in for 9volt and got a bonus confirmation that commiesona is as big of a dunce as his twitter handle would suggest.

I see commiesona from time to time on twitter when he manages to make a weak joke between massively sperging out.
Something about him really rubbed me the wrong way, now it's clear it's because he's a dumbass tankie.
 
Isn't Kacho the guy who threatened to kill himself because Lo-Ping told him to go get some help instead of expecting him to act like his internet psychologist?
 
TheImportantFart said:
I'm so pleased 9 Volt finally got a thread of some kind and that we actually know who he is IRL. I find it really annoying that in a lot of his Tweets he goes "here we see" or "here is" like he's David Attenborough doing a documentary on neckbeards. Also that he has Koops from The Thousand Year Door as his avatar. Koops is a fucking badass - he was a shy kid who came out of his shell (quite literally) and became a hero. You're not even a tenth of the man he is 9 Volt.

A useful yardstick I now have for measuring how much of a pathetic SJW crybaby someone is is to see how they reacted to the 19th season of South Park. It's even better when you can compare it to their attitude towards the show before the 19th season aired. In 9 Volt's case he didn't have a public tantrum over it like MovieBob did, but what he did do was every bit as scummy.

This is what he thought of South Park before the 19th season aired:

View attachment 260333 View attachment 260334

Note the date on the latest tweet there: 21 June 2015. A few months before the 19th season aired. Looked like he was still pretty into the show right?

Then the 19th season aired and this happened:

View attachment 260335 View attachment 260336

Hm... I wonder why he doesn't find South Park funny anymore all of a sudden. I'm sure his newfound dislike for the show has nothing to do with the fact it mocked his political ideology. Nope, nothing at all...
Click to expand...
This is a classic example of how cult like social justice twitter is. All it takes is for someone prominant in the cult, usually a black woman or tranny, to call something "problematic" and then the rest take their marching orders and trip over themselves to signal boost. They turn into massive hypocrites and say "well I never liked it to begin with and knew it was problematic".

Slightly off-topic but I read this article the other day and it's just further proof how toxic and cult like social justice/twitter is. http://www.vulture.com/2017/08/the-toxic-drama-of-ya-twitter.html

One book buyer supposedly read the book, smeared it, and the twitter cult blew up and started harassing the author and publisher. None of them had even read the book and were basing their opinions off one person. The author of the vulture article is being dragged through the mud now by black "feminists" and "queer" authors because, as usual, they claim publishing world is off-limits to them and the article makes them look bad.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel. In this situation, the book was highly rated after it was released which means the majority of the audience didn't listen to the crazies on twitter. The twitter cult had no impact on sales either. They are definitely the minority and mainstream people aren't buying into their garbage so it's perfectly reasonable to ignore them and let them reeeeeeeeee on twitter in their echo chamber.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom