💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Layton Mysteries said:
One (1) white person does the same back to them and it is national news. Am I not supposed to cheer him on? The discomfort and annoyance the blacks that encounter him feel from being called nigger is nothing compared to the amount they put out into the world.
Click to expand...
The In-Group Bias for blacks is absurd aswell:
OJ Simpson got aquitted by the jury because of what happened to Rodney King back in '92.
Pair that with the absolute lunacy of the justice system at hand at the moment
(Iryna Zarutska, Eina and Sung Kwon, the way Koreatown got pogrom'd 1992 LA Riots despite them not beating the dogshit out of Rodney, countless others) that just release criminals back out to attack innocent people despite dozens of criminal charges and prior arrests.
It is really hard to give a fuck about some mustachio'd wigger like a wigger with a moustache in this situation, I really don't care about this sort of thing when this has been happening constantly for decades against my group and has been constantly justified and reinforced through the institutions.
 
Dragged Into Sunlight said:
Here is the crux of the issue and why I'm so fucking mad at people even on this site. Calling someone a mean name is NOT violence and by saying that Chud provoked the fight, you are agreeing with black people that calling them names is violence. Even conservative influences are doing this shit and it's driving me nuts. You are responsible for your own reactions to insults. If you start beating up on someone because they call you a naughty word, you deserve the bullets you take.
Click to expand...
Legal and reality are two different things. I should be able to walk down a dark alley at night with a bag full of gold bars literally labeled gold on the side. I know what's going to happen. Being a nigger in response to niggers isn't going to change shit. It's going to get you killed or arrested. I don't make the rules, but I have read the rulebook.
 
As far as I can tell his whole streaming thing is just to call niggers niggers for clicks. And a nigger tracked him down for it with intent.

Personally I find doing this streaming shit to be disruptive to good normal society and are usually done by the lowest IQ slop baiters acting like niggers to drive numbers. So I’m support of attacking and killing these kind of streamers but he also removed a low IQ impulsive nigger off the streets. But one good deed doesn’t unwash it all so… jail for life to think about what he did as a streamer.
 
Dragged Into Sunlight said:
Here is the crux of the issue and why I'm so fucking mad at people even on this site. Calling someone a mean name is NOT violence and by saying that Chud provoked the fight, you are agreeing with black people that calling them names is violence. Even conservative influences are doing this shit and it's driving me nuts. You are responsible for your own reactions to insults. If you start beating up on someone because they call you a naughty word, you deserve the bullets you take.
Click to expand...
The issue is how things are vs how things should be. In a perfect world words wouldnt lead to you getting hit. However, certain people, especially blacks, will take offense over every little slight to them. So, while calling somebody a nigger shouldn't be a provocation, everyone knows black people will snap and start threatening to kill you if you so much as look at them wrong. If you go around calling out a bunch of niggers for nigger behavior it is going to provoke them. If you're dumb enough to do it while also constantly talking online about how you're going to end up shooting one of them, your ass is probably going to wind up in jail.
 
Blacks cannot be expected to comprehend what freedom of speech means or entails that's why there's basically a separate set of laws and cultural expectations for them. Coexisting as equals is not possible because they're not equal as a race etc.
 
Vlad the Implier said:
Fighting words is more a matter of constitutional law but yes you're basically right. This is a matter of state self-defense law which generally doesn't allow it if you incite the conflict. Whether he incited it or not is what the lawyers are going to argue.



I'm aware. I don't live in Tennessee and I never studied law there so I don't know how judges typically rule in these types of cases, I'm just saying you generally don't have a right to self defense if you're the one instigating the fight.
Click to expand...
Right, it’s a constitutional thing when it comes to speech but I could’ve sworn that was used in reference to self defense in some states.i could absolutely be wrong on that, I’m not an attorney, but it’s also just a quick shorthand that I figured everyone knew what it meant- words meant to start a confrontation.

Thank you for your input!
 
Dragged Into Sunlight said:
If you start beating up on someone because they call you a naughty word, you deserve the bullets you take.
Click to expand...
If someone calls you a violent nigger and you chimp out and act like a violent nigger, you aren't responding to a legitimate provocation, you're just proving the accusation that you're a violent nigger, a vicious subhuman ape who responds to words with violence.
 
everyone is talking about how this man was provoking others, and that the response was to be expected..if that were true, why arent we responding in kind? because that is all they ever do, is provoke.

in a society where we are forced to exist with these subhumans, we cant go out for dinner on mothers day, let our children play outside, and we damn sure cant count on making it home from work safely. at this point, our safety isnt even guaranteed while AT work, anymore.

if that isnt provocative, i dont know what is anymore.
its ridiculous to pretend that there isnt a HUGE problem with blacks basically unleashing on anyone and anything in their path, like feral animals.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
Being a nigger in response to niggers isn't going to change shit. It's going to get you killed or arrested. I don't make the rules, but I have read the rulebook.
Click to expand...
I'd rather have a million "Chuds" as neighbours than lame status-quo legalists like you. Duckers and kneelers who always apologize and stay in their lane, are part of the reason why people give men like Chud money. Nobody will ever give you money, because no one likes to see more of weak, apologetic, proactively colourblind men. This entire circlejerk "being a productive member of society" has always been cope for submissive personalities. The entire west has been turned into a ghetto, enough of liberal masculinity already.
More fire and less water, please.
 
Last edited:
Nuklearius said:
Do people not understand how the legal system works?
The insults and the self defence are legally completely separate incidents. It also doesn't matter what you said months before or what you fantasized about, it never means that you loose your right to self defense.
Click to expand...
That's not how the legal system works. That's what the law is on paper.

In reality, though, the instant it gets into evidence that some guy said "nigger" before getting shot or shooting someone or something, he automatically loses because NIGGER. You automatically lose if you say "NIGGER." It sucks, but it's reality.

Even if you only call him a nigger after he stabs you to death and you're bleeding out, you're still the hate criminal and it was totally okay to murder you. (This is a reference to an actual case btw where the nigger was acquitted because the guy called him a nigger AFTER being stabbed.)
 
last whitey in Toronto said:
If this is the law then all the blacks should be in jail. They all antagonize others wether it's blasting music on the subway, doing wheelies on bikes and trying to hit and people, or harrassing others on the street just through plain assault.
Click to expand...
Well, there's a difference between what will sound good on an Internet forum for losers whose social currency is hatred and what's actually implementable.

Obviously, we will never imprison all black people, nor would you be given the time of day outside mongoloid vanilla niggers, but it sure did get you Green Reddit upvotes for espousing it, huh?

I don't see how posts like yours are fundamentally different from Shaniqua on Black Twitter saying how whitey all need to be sent back to Europe. You literally are that which you claim to hate, just in a different shade of retarded.

EDIT: All the stickers in the world won't make me incorrect on this point.
 
Last edited:
Doctor PooPoo Head said:
So his whole gimmick is just being Jack Doherty, but racist? What a nice guy.




Nigger isn't a skin color, it's a mentality. You can be black and not a nigger. Whites can be niggers. Asians can be niggers. Muslims can be niggers.
Click to expand...
Black but not a Nigger is a Chris Rock bit, Jay Zs " the story of OJ" makes a compelling refutation. "Still a nigger"

On topic I'm perfectly fine living in an honor based society where I can execute any crackhead that insults me on the spot, like the good old dueling days.

I'm also completely fine living in a society where I know people aren't justified in physically assaulting me for insults. That's the compromise you get for not living in an honor based society, your society becomes less bloody, but it also becomes crass.

The courts just need to pick one or the other. We can't keep living in limbo land. Whether or not Chud himself gets convicted I hope they set a clear precedent as to what the boundaries are here.
 
CowPox said:
Blacks cannot be expected to comprehend what freedom of speech means or entails that's why there's basically a separate set of laws and cultural expectations for them. Coexisting as equals is not possible because they're not equal as a race etc.
Click to expand...
Correct.

Niggers aren't even the same SPECIES as humans, so treating them as equals is retarded. Never mind giving them such a huge amount of unearned privilege.
 
AnOminous said:
In reality, though, the instant it gets into evidence that some guy said "nigger" before getting shot or shooting someone or something, he automatically loses because NIGGER. You automatically lose if you say "NIGGER." It sucks, but it's reality.
Click to expand...
Is that really the case in the US? In Germany generally speaking you are always in the right to defend yourself against a legal transgression and use whatever you have at your disposal. Technically you're even allowed to shoot someone if he just tries to steal your briefcase, as long as you can convince the judge that was the only tool at your disposal, you are cleared. I had the impression the American legal system worked similarily. The reason why Daniel Penny could be charged was that he himself was never threatened, nor did he interrupt an ongoing assault, so technically he was an attacker himself.
That's not the case here, and I struggle to see what they would charge Chud with, except the initial insult.
 
Nuklearius said:
Is that really the case in the US? In Germany generally speaking you are always in the right to defend yourself against a legal transgression and use whatever you have at your disposal. Technically you're even allowed to shoot someone if he just tries to steal your briefcase, as long as you can convince the judge that was the only tool at your disposal, you are cleared. I had the impression the American legal system worked similarily. The reason why Daniel Penny could be charged was that he himself was never threatened, nor did he interrupt an ongoing assault, so technically he was an attacker himself.
That's not the case here, and I struggle to see what they would charge Chud with, except the initial insult.
Click to expand...
Case law as opposed to strictly the text of the law tends to be more useful in making predictions and arguments because of the nature of being a precedential system, but with case law comes the caveat that sometimes someone's lawyer is just really good or some other anomaly. To really get a grasp of what the law is you'll have to read the specific cases in question, and that's hard and takes a while and as such we have lawyers.
 
Nuklearius said:
In Germany generally speaking you are always in the right to defend yourself against a legal transgression and use whatever you have at your disposal. Technically you're even allowed to shoot someone if he just tries to steal your briefcase, as long as you can convince the judge that was the only tool at your disposal, you are cleared.
Click to expand...
You couldn't legally use a gun to defend yourself in Germany. What are you talking about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom