YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Atun-Shei neutered himself like a dog because "Muh fascism" and "Muh climate change"
9tk_AwvsK4DJ6gMt.mp4
Dude's so deranged that his first thought when seeing a baby is them driving in an SUV and ignoring hobos. :story: Such obvious distain in his voice when he says "another American will come into the world" if he hates Americans so much and what they do to the environment he should go all the way and just kill himself.
All we can do now is pray he realizes MAID is the best option for him to permanent reduce his carbon footprint
 
It's great when our enemies remove themselves from the gene pool. With how things are going there aren't going to be many white socialists in the next generation as long as we keep them from grooming kids.
 
Some french guys tried to recreate how routs in ancient greek warfare happened. Has english subtitles.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=VerlSW1iPJ8
Sur Le Champs imo is the best military history channel by far... but it's in french. He's a libtard but his military stuff has no equivalent on english youtube. He's also based because he never runs ads, sponsorships, and only started crowdfunding when his camera stopped working , and never advertises his Patreon (i think he might even have closed it)
 
Yeah I highly doubt anyone with a Slavic name has any ACW blood. Pretty funny considering hes the biggest ACW larper on the internet.
Slavmutt with no blood ties (as far as I know) to Jamestown or Plymouth Rock politically aligns with nonwhite peoples born in North America with no identity? I'm not surprised, all things considered, even though Slavs are a Japhetic ethnic cluster themselves in spite of the Golden Horde.
Diocletian was brutal to the Christians, so I'm not a big fan.
I feel Augustus is the only Roman Emperor from early on whom Christians can say they "like" given there were no Christians to persecute at the time.
 
I feel Augustus is the only Roman Emperor from early on whom Christians can say they "like" given there were no Christians to persecute at the time.
I mean, by that same token Tiberius and Caligula are able to be liked. Tiberius is even name-dropped in Luke but only as a way to date the period. The first emperor who did anything was perhaps Claudius, who expelled the
'Jews' from Rome during a time when Jews and Christians weren't always easily distinguished.
 
We either trust the ancient historians or we don't and if we don't then our knowledge of the ancient world becomes fuck and all
Powerfully autistic stance, to be honest. In order to adhere to this, you'd need to throw out virtually every source we have about the Roman Republic, or covert to their religion. "Oopsie daisy, all the people writing about this want me to believe that Jupiter exists and had a direct role to play. I guess they were all wrong about everything, maybe there wasn't such a thing as the Republic!". The challenge (and fun) is in comparing different sources, figuring out where their biases are, and trying to construct your own idea of what really happened from that.
 
Gavin goes over the very early Arthurian mentions

Also Goldsworthy's new book has been released in the US
 
Last edited:
I found a real doozy of a multimedia project the other day: Before We Were White: The Hidden History of Heartland America, created by Brian Halpin. This centers around two conflicting ideas: that the pioneers in Colonial times were actually race-mixing; that the Anglo-American idea of White racial purity was a myth, and that White Supremacy was still the worst thing ever even though it didn't exist like we were taught it did.

Here's a good example of the writing (link to archive):
On a more local or micro level, distilled frustration also wells up and overflows whenever this writer sees the terms “Indian princess” or “Indian maiden” used to describe someone’s remote ancestor of indigenous American ethnicity.

Such terminology is intended to disguise certain truths, in order to place a romantic gloss on older, darker aspects of American history.

Using the words “Indian princess” or “Indian maiden” suggests some bygone age of intercultural amity, in which a woman of equal social standing was “courted” by a “white” outsider to her community – see the various incarnations of the Captain Smith and Pocahontas myth.

These words are meant to imply a 1950s-style of courtship, in which a love-besotted man approaches the family or tribe of said “maiden”, seeking her hand in marriage from her father, who is of course always a “Chief”.

The words “maiden” or “princess” are also intended to elevate the woman in question – a way to skate over the fact that, for most of American history, indigenous peoples were in fact treated much the same way as African-Americans.

Indigenous peoples were enslaved. They were sold. They were rounded-up in concentration camps and marched at gunpoint to dry and dusty places hundreds of miles from their rightful homelands.

And of course, they were killed in wars and slaughtered during massacres.

Their children were removed and placed into industrial schools, where they were abused physically and sexually, or beaten for speaking their native tongues.

And in a patriarchal society, no one was farther down the social ladder than indigenous women/women of color.

In the violent rough and tumble of Manifest Destiny, “non-white” women were often seen as little more than a labor resource, or a sexual commodity.

Almost everyone accepts that the disease, warfare, and land grabbing of the 1600s, 1700s, and 1800s saw the deaths of innumerable indigenous men.

What almost no one ever mentions is the countless number of indigenous women and children left to fend for themselves in the wake of these communal disasters, or the sheer number of children removed from their families and communities and put up for adoption, or sent to Indian boarding schools to be “assimilated” by force into “white” culture.

Not all indigenous women ended-up on reservations – perhaps not even the majority. Many were forced into a life of back-breaking manual labor or menial drudgery as farm hands or washerwomen.

Some were forced into prostitution.

The “luckier” ones might become wife or “consort” to a frontier trapper, miner, or settler, enduring a hard life of endless childbearing, cooking, sewing, washing, spinning, weaving, cleaning, etc.

This writer has in fact read first-hand accounts in which men were quite open about bringing their Indian consorts (yes, that’s plural) west, making them walk alongside an ox-wagon for days, their feet tied with rope to the woman ahead or behind them…

This is not ancient history, lost in the mists of time. Much of the foregoing (such as the Indian Boarding Schools) was still occurring in my own lifetime, and very much during the lifetime of my parents and grandparents.

*****

Everything was not horror. Some inter-ethnic pairings and marriages were based on mutually agreed trade-offs, even affection.

Many indigenous women came to be held in high regard by their wider communities, often because of their expertise and skills in pottery-making, basketry, herbal medicine and midwifery.

Anyone with deep roots in colonial-era America has one of these women in their family tree somewhere.

Modern DNA testing will rarely show it, because the DNA of one or two indigenous women during the late 1700s or early 1800s will usually have been “shuffled-out” by now.

But these woman WERE there, they were real, and they were almost never an “Indian princess”.
angry_kuruminha.png southern_civil_war_civilian_wojak.png
smug_conquistador_wojak-webp.8998027
blush_Kuruminha.png
 

Attachments

  • smug_conquistador_wojak.webp
    smug_conquistador_wojak.webp
    44.2 KB · Views: 358
So basically he's saying most of the people in America until very recently were white but because some of them had indigenous side pieces that means that whiteness doesnt exist? I dont understand the point this guy is trying to make beyond WHITE PEOPLE BAD. So whiteness doesnt exist but it exists enough that you can disparage the whole group for their actions?
 
Back
Top Bottom