You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
🍔 QuarterpounderJeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted alcoholic manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture, cucked by a Jewish bull (Adam Sellers), pisses in basement, shits himself, FLAGGOT, stalks little girls in public, scammer, sex pest
Probably posted already but just incase, HCB has a new video. Doesn't look like she's at leadership camp. I think KC is right, and that she is on break until the drama blows over on May 4th.
Mark me late if this was posted a couple of weeks ago but I haven't seen this posted.
A brand new account (12 hours old) just dropped these screenshots from the 17th of April on r/kinofelted from an unknown discord of a supposed bull by the name of "MasterMidwest81" (suspected to be Adam given the age of the screenshots and "their name being drug through the mud") talking about dropping pics and dirt on Jeremy and Heather. The OP so far hasn't said anything further.
We probably need Luther Morgan to get to the bottom of this, but Claude will have to do for now...
I copied the base-64 image URI for all 3 JPEGs, then had Claude AI test for any evidence that could potentially confirm or rule out the 3 most plausible objections to their authenticity: 1) The screenshots were digitally modified post-capture (beyond redacting markups), 2) All or most of the text in the screenshots were fabricated using DevTools (i.e., "Inspect Element"), or 3) The screenshot and text are authentic, but the message contents were pre-scripted and manually entered in real time.
Objection 1: The screenshot was digitally modified post-capture
Forensic Image Analysis Results (source: Claude AI): SCREENSHOT 1/3:
SCREENSHOTS 2/3 & 3/3:
Objection 2: Content was modified pre-capture using DevTools (Inspect Element) Likelihood of Pre-Capture Digital Manipulation (source: Claude AI):
Discord runs in a browser (or Electron, which is a wrapped browser). DevTools lets you directly edit any text node in the DOM — message content, usernames, timestamps — in seconds. You then screenshot the modified page before anything reloads. The result is a single, native screenshot with no image editing involved whatsoever.
Every test we ran looks for evidence of post-capture image manipulation.
Inspect element spoofing happens before the image exists.
What inspect element can and can't do: It can silently change: message text, usernames, timestamps, reaction counts, online status indicators, server/channel names, read receipts. It cannot easily change: avatar images (those are fetched by URL from Discord's CDN — swapping them requires also hosting a replacement), message IDs (embedded in the DOM but not visible in a screenshot), or anything that requires Discord's servers to validate. How to conclusively rule out inspect element fabrication:
Comparing against archived screenshots or the Discord changelog
Discord updates its UI continuously. If the UI chrome — fonts, padding, icon shapes, bubble styling, timestamp format — doesn't match what Discord actually looked like on the claimed date on the claimed platform, that's a flag.
Mobile Discord on Android renders text slightly differently from desktop Discord in Chrome.
Font rendering is platform-specific. If the screenshot claims to be a mobile DM but the subpixel rendering, line-height, or font weight looks like desktop, that matters.
The redaction marks are the one interesting wrinkle:
If this was an inspect element fabrication, you'd just not show the content in the DOM — there'd be no need to draw over it afterward. The presence of hand-drawn redaction suggests either the base screenshots are authentic (and the redaction was added for privacy before sharing), or the fabricator screenshotted a modified page and *then* drew over certain elements — which would mean a second modification after capture. Our ELA didn't catch that, but solid black paint on top of JPEG content is essentially invisible to ELA because pure black DCT coefficients are near-zero at any quality setting.
Image forensics can tell you whether pixels were manipulated after a screenshot was taken. It cannot tell you whether the *content* shown in the screenshot was genuine at the time it was taken. Inspect element bypasses everything we ran. For that attack vector, the linguistic analysis is the primary detection layer, and corroboration from a second source — server logs, the other party, metadata from the original device — is the only way to be certain.
Objection 3: Content was pre-scripted and manually entered in real time Linguistic Analysis Results (Source: Claude AI)
Hopefully something in these results will help clear the way for someone with the necessary skills and/or receipts to irrefutably confirm or deny their veracity.
Mark me late if this was posted a couple of weeks ago but I haven't seen this posted.
A brand new account (12 hours old) just dropped these screenshots from the 17th of April on r/kinofelted from an unknown discord of a supposed bull by the name of "MasterMidwest81" (suspected to be Adam given the age of the screenshots and "their name being drug through the mud") talking about dropping pics and dirt on Jeremy and Heather. The OP so far hasn't said anything further.
View attachment 8952700
So the channel is up but it wasn't popping up with my VPN set to LATAM. But with ALL THE CLIPS being him being felted, I'd delete it the same way he deletes his numerous drunken tweets
It cannot easily change: avatar images (those are fetched by URL from Discord's CDN — swapping them requires also hosting a replacement), message IDs (embedded in the DOM but not visible in a screenshot), or anything that requires Discord's servers to validate.
As much as I appreciate Claude's attempt to be an image autist, this isn't true. There are many ways to locally change images in the DOM, like finding a domain that Discord has whitelisted (e.g. Imgur) and swapping the src with something from there. I think you can also use <canvas> elements and shit like that too - more complicated than what Jer is capable of, but I want to be clear that this is definitely not valid proof either way.
I asked Gpt about it and could be illegal / breaking Tos :
YouTube does have rules around contests, giveaways, and promotions. A creator running a giveaway generally needs to follow YouTube’s contest policies, YouTube’s Terms of Service, Community Guidelines, and any applicable laws. YouTube also requires that contests have official rules and that the creator does not falsely imply YouTube is sponsoring or responsible for the promotion.
## Why this coffee-box giveaway may be legally questionable
A promotion can start looking like an illegal lottery if it includes all three of these elements:
1. **Prize** — for example, a $50 bill.
2. **Chance** — winners are chosen randomly.
3. **Consideration** — people have to pay, buy something, subscribe, or give something of value to enter.
In the coffee example, the concern is:
> “Buy this coffee / subscribe, and random subscribers will receive a $50 bill in their box.”
That may be risky because it appears to combine a paid purchase with a random chance to win money.
Lawful sweepstakes usually avoid this problem by offering a clear **“No Purchase Necessary”** method of entry, with the same odds of winning as paid customers.
Another concern is that the videos appear to show “winners,” but the winners may be fake, staged, or not verifiable.
That could raise additional issues if the creator is using fake winners to make viewers believe the promotion is real, fair, or more likely to pay out than it actually is.
Possible red flags include:
- Winners are shown but not clearly verifiable.
- The same people appear repeatedly as “random” winners.
- There are no official rules, odds, entry dates, or winner-selection details.
- There is no “No Purchase Necessary” entry method.
- The creator pressures people to buy quickly because they might win.
- The giveaway is used mainly to drive coffee sales or subscriptions.
- The creator does not disclose how many prizes exist or how winners are selected.
## Why this may violate YouTube rules
If the giveaway is misleading, staged, or deceptive, it may also fall under YouTube’s policies against scams, deceptive practices, or misleading content.
- People must buy coffee or subscribe to have a chance to win.
- Winners are selected randomly.
- The prize is cash.
- There is no free alternative method of entry.
- There are no clear official rules.
- The “winners” shown in the videos appear fake or staged.
This does not automatically prove the creator is breaking the law or YouTube policy, but it does raise legitimate concerns about whether the promotion is a legal sweepstakes, an illegal lottery, or a deceptive marketing tactic.
I don't think that works because of copyright cucking, prompts default to a random style or refuse to generate if you even mention the name of a known artists/song. You have to use genre emulation like "Eurodance, Dance-Pop, Europop" or you can add "gay bar music" if you want it extra faggy.
I was trying to upload numa numa into a chink AI site that doesn't give a shit about copyright and change the lyrics, But if you generate with the right genre (same as the song you're trying to parody) you get something like this:
Everytime I see someone new experience the nightmare of his renfair monologue about abandoning his wife and life it reminds me how sad he truly is.
This guy was having such a good time with anonymous chatters who all adored him. He was finally one of the guys. Nobody was there to hit on his wife. They were all there for him. This was probably one of the happiest moments in his online career. He basically says as much and you can hear how giddy the fat fuck is.
The fact this blew up and has caused him so much reputational damage must cut so fucking deep. It's not a random video or quartercast where he's regurgitating news - this was a happy memory turned into a nightmare. It's like making out with a beautiful woman, something you take pride in for years after, and then someone finally goes 'oh yeah, that girl has a dick - didn't you know?'
I mean sometimes and I'm not speaking for ALL women but sometimes a woman needs a good dicking so they come to their senses and listen. She is a female albeit a very old one, risking her getting pregnant is dangerous either way you end up with an autist/downie/Larson or a general problem like when yhe ovary egg gets fertilized in the fallopian tube which is bad.
This does not automatically prove the creator is breaking the law or YouTube policy, but it does raise legitimate concerns about whether the promotion is a legal sweepstakes, an illegal lottery, or a deceptive marketing tactic.
I mean sometimes and I'm not speaking for ALL women but sometimes a woman needs a good dicking so they come to their senses and listen. She is a female albeit a very old one, risking her getting pregnant is dangerous either way you end up with an autist/downie/Larson or a general problem like when yhe ovary egg gets fertilized in the fallopian tube which is bad.
Everyone's watching, to see what you will do
Everyone's cucking you, oh
Everyone's wondering, will you debate yellowflash tonight
Kino Casino's trying to clip it right, clip it right
Everybody's cucking Jeremy on the weekend
Heather Hambly wants a new romance
Jeremy's goin' off the deep end
Melonie can't even read the chat
You want a piece of Heather Hambly's heart
You better Bull from the start
You wanna take off her clothes
Come on baby let's go
Everyone's watching, to see if striking channels was you
The bull Sellers wants to come through
Jeremy's hoping it'll all work out
Kino Casino's waiting, they're not holding out
Everybody's cucking jeremy on the weekend
Heather Hambly wants a new romance
Hey, hey
Jeremy's goin' off the deep end
HCB left the quartering without a chance, oh
You want a piece of Heather Hambly's heart
You better Bull from the start
You wanna take off her clothes
Come on baby let's go
Hey
You want a piece of Heather's heart
You better Bull from the start
You wanna be in the show
Come on baby let's go
You want a piece of her heart
You better Bull from the start
You wanna take off her clothes
Come on baby let's go
Blacker Lotus is a magic: the gathering reference.
I would tend to agree. It seems the Adam Sellers stuff is what really rattles the cage. The CBC stuff is funny but doesn't result in full blown meltdowns.
Don't forget, Jeremy said that all of this take down stuff was his wife's idea. Perhaps because the bull has her ear...
He's hiding his theft from the Toys for Tots charity. It's way too late lol, so many people have that video archived. Hopefully Joon will expose that Jeremy steals from needy children.
I doubt Jeremy has any fans who could come up with "Brad Cool". They're all wheelchair dents working in Dickensian factories. They have ZERO whimsy... The only way you get a "Brad Cool" dent is if that's genuinely their irl name.
Before all this shit started I was fairly gracious towards Melonie Mac. I simply thought her a retard, not an evil retard, her behavior lately has changed my stance.
СЛАВА O
ХРАНИ ORANGE
СПАСИБО НАШИМ БОЙЦАМСлава Богу O
