🍔 Quarterpounder Jeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted alcoholic manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture, cucked by a Jewish bull (Adam Sellers), pisses in basement, shits himself, FLAGGOT, stalks little girls in public, scammer, sex pest

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lolcow live chat for stream discussion and chit-chat.

How long will Jer stay off Twitter?

  • <1 day.

    Votes: 480 31.0%

  • More than 1 day but less than 3 days.

    Votes: 583 37.7%

  • Around a week.

    Votes: 269 17.4%

  • Two weeks or more.

    Votes: 35 2.3%

  • Less than a month!

    Votes: 56 3.6%

  • He's gone, forever. Enjoy oranges, stalker.

    Votes: 124 8.0%
  • Total voters
    1,547
thebigdream said:
Well his criminal history was brought up, that could cause him issues if people IRL weren't aware of it.
Click to expand...
True, but it was really only brought up on Kino Casino and Kiwi Farms. He could've just shut the fuck up and there would've been almost no chance anyone he knows would've ever found out.
 
Blissed said:
It seems the Adam Sellers stuff is what really rattles the cage.
Click to expand...
I find it weird that he doesn't complain Adam got doxxed, just that he got dragged into the whole mess. Same as his wife initially; only once shit really blew up he hid behind her, but it still took a couple weeks before he hid behind her as a shield
 
Sydney Watson when Jer can't cut his bullshit act
8383.png
 
Nut Vicious said:
The reddit account is new but they have commented on a few other reddits like r/threesomes. From their comments the poster is female or at least playing one online. It could be the poster is this blackerlotus96.
Click to expand...
I think they've gotten spooked by their post getting popular or being reposted here because they deleted their posts on r/threesomes (I can confirm they existed though. It wasn't anything that scandilous, just like 3 comments saying "that's hot" and such). I've made an archive of what remains in case they nuke their whole account.

And I agree they type very female-coded, very upbeat with an overuse of exclamation marks
 
quarter_grifter said:
He's drunk-posting his political predictions again. Nothing new or spicy, he's probably just pretending to be normal to own the chuds.

View attachment 8964301


That's so funny. I didn't check audio tracks, I was checking subtitles and couldn't figure it out. What a fucking retard lmfao.
Click to expand...
"Anyone who watched the debate" = people on his payroll, his wife's bulls, the boomer dent true and honest fans in his chat who got mad about some disney star wars shit yesterday.

The fucking brain trust.
 
Bullooo said:
"Anyone who watched the debate" = people on his payroll, his wife's bulls, the boomer dent true and honest fans in his chat who got mad about some disney star wars shit yesterday.

The fucking brain trust.
Click to expand...

Jer trying to "I'm just a comedian" his way out of the Rex Jones public flogging was just embarrassing.
Him trying to rewrite history like he came out on top in that exchange is like hitting 315 for a clean set of 5 on bench and then the local fat ass ego lifter half reps it to show you how it's done.

Jer you're a faggot buddy 💯
 
Ralph's Unfinished Church said:
Mark me late if this was posted a couple of weeks ago but I haven't seen this posted.

A brand new account (12 hours old) just dropped these screenshots from the 17th of April on r/kinofelted from an unknown discord of a supposed bull by the name of "MasterMidwest81" (suspected to be Adam given the age of the screenshots and "their name being drug through the mud") talking about dropping pics and dirt on Jeremy and Heather. The OP so far hasn't said anything further.

View attachment 8964141View attachment 8964144View attachment 8964146

Link Archive
Click to expand...

We probably need Luther Morgan to get to the bottom of this, but Claude will have to do for now...

I copied the base-64 image URI for all 3 JPEGs, then had Claude AI test for any evidence that could potentially confirm or rule out the 3 most plausible objections to their authenticity: 1) The screenshots were digitally modified post-capture (beyond redacting markups), 2) All or most of the text in the screenshots were fabricated using DevTools (i.e., "Inspect Element"), or 3) The screenshot and text are authentic, but the message contents were pre-scripted and manually entered in real time.

Objection 1: The screenshot was digitally modified post-capture

Forensic Image Analysis Results (source: Claude AI):
SCREENSHOT 1/3:

forensic_overview_2.jpg





1fa.jpg 1ela.jpg

SCREENSHOTS 2/3 & 3/3:
forensic_overview_4.jpg

2-3fa.jpg 2ela.jpg 3ela.jpg



Objection 2: Content was modified pre-capture using DevTools (Inspect Element)
Likelihood of Pre-Capture Digital Manipulation (source: Claude AI):

Discord runs in a browser (or Electron, which is a wrapped browser). DevTools lets you directly edit any text node in the DOM — message content, usernames, timestamps — in seconds. You then screenshot the modified page before anything reloads. The result is a single, native screenshot with no image editing involved whatsoever.

Every test we ran looks for evidence of post-capture image manipulation.

Inspect element spoofing happens before the image exists.

What inspect element can and can't do:
It can silently change: message text, usernames, timestamps, reaction counts, online status indicators, server/channel names, read receipts.
It cannot easily change: avatar images (those are fetched by URL from Discord's CDN — swapping them requires also hosting a replacement), message IDs (embedded in the DOM but not visible in a screenshot), or anything that requires Discord's servers to validate.
How to conclusively rule out inspect element fabrication:

Comparing against archived screenshots or the Discord changelog
Discord updates its UI continuously. If the UI chrome — fonts, padding, icon shapes, bubble styling, timestamp format — doesn't match what Discord actually looked like on the claimed date on the claimed platform, that's a flag.

Mobile Discord on Android renders text slightly differently from desktop Discord in Chrome.
Font rendering is platform-specific. If the screenshot claims to be a mobile DM but the subpixel rendering, line-height, or font weight looks like desktop, that matters.

The redaction marks are the one interesting wrinkle:

If this was an inspect element fabrication, you'd just not show the content in the DOM — there'd be no need to draw over it afterward. The presence of hand-drawn redaction suggests either the base screenshots are authentic (and the redaction was added for privacy before sharing), or the fabricator screenshotted a modified page and *then* drew over certain elements — which would mean a second modification after capture. Our ELA didn't catch that, but solid black paint on top of JPEG content is essentially invisible to ELA because pure black DCT coefficients are near-zero at any quality setting.

Image forensics can tell you whether pixels were manipulated after a screenshot was taken. It cannot tell you whether the *content* shown in the screenshot was genuine at the time it was taken. Inspect element bypasses everything we ran. For that attack vector, the linguistic analysis is the primary detection layer, and corroboration from a second source — server logs, the other party, metadata from the original device — is the only way to be certain.


Objection 3: Content was pre-scripted and manually entered in real time
Linguistic Analysis Results (Source: Claude AI)
forensic_overview_8.jpg

forensic_overview_5.jpg

forensic_overview_6.jpg

forensic_overview_7.jpg

Hopefully something in these results will help clear the way for someone with the necessary skills and/or receipts to irrefutably confirm or deny their veracity.
 

Attachments

  • forensic_overview_8.jpg
    forensic_overview_8.jpg
    214.5 KB · Views: 35
  • forensic_overview_3.jpg
    forensic_overview_3.jpg
    155.5 KB · Views: 72
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom