📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Niggerddittor said:
I really don't think he can't tell, more like he's playing nice to get access to that bussy
Click to expand...
sounds like she is just a regular girl, pre-t. if she keeps to that likely he will just play along "yeah sure you're a valid man, bro" but if she starts taking T and getting a pube beard or a chop he'll be out of there. Best case scenario is she stops herself from ruining herself to keep the guy?

Also, very manly male brained post, dood.
 
Last edited:
1777997560615.png
Reddit -- Archive
I am aware of how ridiculous of a name it is, but since I let myself realise that I am genderfluid I keep thinking about being named Pixel as one of my names and get all giddy and happy. However I live in a country that, although there are worse conditions than here, is too accepting of enby identities. Should I aim for a more conventional name? Maybe keep Pixel as a sort of nickname?
Click to expand...
Plenty of comments. Consensus is go for it. :lit:
 
Magic Pickle said:
Last time we saw tragic li'l TiF ASilentThinker, she was more concerned that the fuckbuddy she'd let slide in real smooth into her chacha did not see her as a fellow man. Now, she learns, her suspicions were correct, and despite her efforts to escape such a terrible fate AST has fallen victim to the same destiny she tried to warn others away from: she let some straight-without-labels loser give it to her raw all because he reaffirmed her bullshit pronouns to her face, thus securing a successful Jimi-ing of her Hendrix. Yes, I can see how having your feelings hurt must be a far more egregious offense than giving you a fucking STD; truly, the priorities of troons 'n' poons are most logical.
Click to expand...
I also mentioned that I was worried that he might not see me as a guy because the STD he got was one that usually is transferred between straight partners not gay men and that he had said he was pansexual.
Click to expand...
What is a straight STD? Unwanted children? How does it differ from gay STDs?
 
Magic Pickle said:
OP wasn't retina-meltingly hideous
Click to expand...
That's a troon?! While I'm sure that there must be AGP-angles and filter-fuckery afoot, you may still have well discovered the only true passoid in existence, as this one actually passes as an attractive female in those pics. Very disturbing...

Slideshow Bill said:
How does it differ from gay STDs?
Click to expand...
Monkeypox is a gay STD, as it overwhelmingly affects gay men.
 
Last edited:
Slideshow Bill said:
What is a straight STD? Unwanted children? How does it differ from gay STDs?
Click to expand...
Lord Of Shit said:
Monkeypox is a gay STD, as it overwhelmingly affects gay men.
Click to expand...
But what's a straight STD? My guess is herpes. Maybe chlamydia,
Neither is exclusively for straights, but you hear a lot about them in a straight context.

The two historical biggies, syphilis and gonorrhea, are associated with straights in old literature.
But current years, much higher incidence in gays. Maybe always but people didn't write about it.
 
Sean Andalou said:
But what's a straight STD? My guess is herpes. Maybe chlamydia,
Neither is exclusively for straights, but you hear a lot about them in a straight context.

The two historical biggies, syphilis and gonorrhea, are associated with straights in old literature.
But current years, much higher incidence in gays. Maybe always but people didn't write about it.
Click to expand...
That about sums it up: there are gay STDs, bi STDs, but no straight STDs.
 
QwahlityKahntent said:
people with mental illness (i.e. trannies) should not be allowed to buy guns, period
Click to expand...
it really doesn't make sense to me. you get point blank asked (and background checked) if you've ever been committed when you buy a firearm, common sense would be that if you walk in looking like count dracula with a sundress on the box would automatically check itself. it's even worse when they somehow get a CCW permit because, PL i guess, when i got mine i was asked multiple times if i had a history of psychiatric issues or if i was ever committed to a facility. beyond that you have to take a class and get signed off on by an instructor and then you have to undergo a pretty thorough federal background check, which includes physical or digital full hand fingerprinting (palm and all).
 
harmacist said:
it really doesn't make sense to me. you get point blank asked (and background checked) if you've ever been committed when you buy a firearm, common sense would be that if you walk in looking like count dracula with a sundress on the box would automatically check itself. it's even worse when they somehow get a CCW permit because, PL i guess, when i got mine i was asked multiple times if i had a history of psychiatric issues or if i was ever committed to a facility. beyond that you have to take a class and get signed off on by an instructor and then you have to undergo a pretty thorough federal background check, which includes physical or digital full hand fingerprinting (palm and all).
Click to expand...
Given health privacy laws in America you can probably just fib about getting Baker Acted it won’t show up on a background check
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom