🍔 Quarterpounder Jeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted alcoholic manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture, cucked by a Jewish bull (Adam Sellers), pisses in basement, shits himself, FLAGGOT, stalks little girls in public, scammer, sex pest

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lolcow live chat for stream discussion and chit-chat.

How long will Jer stay off Twitter?

  • <1 day.

    Votes: 451 30.6%

  • More than 1 day but less than 3 days.

    Votes: 576 39.1%

  • Around a week.

    Votes: 258 17.5%

  • Two weeks or more.

    Votes: 28 1.9%

  • Less than a month!

    Votes: 48 3.3%

  • He's gone, forever. Enjoy oranges, stalker.

    Votes: 114 7.7%
  • Total voters
    1,475
Gator_Aids said:
View attachment 8921879

We might be eating good today folks. Its 11:30 Jer-time and hes doing drunken crazy shit.

I hope he remembers to reimburse his memberships considering his Discord was an essential selling point.

EDIT: I'm going to assume hes doing this because Brandon the Skybull / RC Bull / Ren Fair Bull is all over that discord. Time to get the shovels boys!!!!!
Click to expand...
Guys stop bullying Jeremy! His death grip will only get worse. Think of his wife! Think of the Jewbull! THINK OF HIS CUCKOLDING FETISH! WILL ANYONE THINK OF HIS FETISH!?!
 
There She Glows said:
Maybe yes maybe no, but I've spent enough time on the farms to know for sure that men who are YouTubers in particular have a habit of throwing vows out the window the moment they get a whiff of the possibility of e-pussy.
Click to expand...
Truth. Marital vows mean nothing to most people who make them. It's fucking depressing. They all deserve the misery they invite upon themselves with it.
 
GizmoG said:
so clearly he knows where he is sourcing his clips from, but couldn't give a fuck to either give them credit (of course throw his logo on top of their clip) nor clean up the templating parts:
Click to expand...
I would love it if people could find the original clips he's stealing for Shorts and touch base with the owners. Jer losing his channel due to the nonsense with his Shorts would be kino.
 
rearden_steel said:
About Brandon. The skybull
1) he was at renfair witg Heather Brust Hambly
2) he moved away from Wisconsi years ago se he aint fucking her anymore
3) when Heathers plane crashed he was sitll in wisconsin(not100% sure)
So probably he is the pilot who brought her home then, after plowing her.
4) he was always the third wheel in the clawstruck videos, soo more evidence of his bull status
5) even though it is funny we dont have confirmation that he is a swinger ,keep it in mind.
Click to expand...

 
1000047212.png
WE'RE DONE FOR KIWIS
 
Maori Kiwifruit Growers said:
I disagree. I mean why else would the divorce rate be so high?
Click to expand...
What?

A high divorce rate directly correlates to an increase in violation/disregard of wedding vows. For that matter, divorce is a literal violation of those vows. "Until death do us part" and all that.

ETA:
Rich Evans Ayypologist said:
Last week, he started going on about "taking scalps" before nothing happened, which leads me to believe he figured he could just buy the service again. Had other channels been terminated, that might have drawn attention and dispelled that plausible deniability -- which is why, I think, we started seeing so many more "old-fashioned" flaggings, where the videos are demonetized (or age-restricted) and the uploaders have a right to appeal (which seem to be succeeding regularly and going through quickly). If the clips channel was open and shut, its appeal wouldn't have still been open - that's my read, anyways.
Click to expand...
Something I never see discussed or addressed by any content platform is what they do post-appeal to the accounts that made the bogus (or overridden) report.

I'm sure the raw data is tracked -- no company can resist the allure of generating and collecting all available data at all times. They know how many reports every account submits, and they know the outcome of every report (rejected as invalid, accepted as valid but no direct action taken, accepted as valid and direct action was taken, appealed post-action and upheld on review, appealed post-action and reversed on review, etc.). They should also be able to easily compute how many reports you issue per minute watched, per video watched, per subscriber you have, etc. It could easily be used to indicate malicious mass-flagging (if you report 100 of a user's videos but haven't even watched 50 minutes of their uploaded footage, it should be obvious to anyone you're being malicious). And why would a channel with a million subs suddenly fancy itself a "youtube policeman"? Shouldn't they be uploading content instead of submitting endless reports?

You never hear anything from YT, Twitter, FB, or any of them really ... do they calculate "trust" or "reliability" factors over time? Do they take reports more seriously from long-time accounts that rarely (if ever) submit reports? Do they take reports by high-sub/view count accounts more seriously than those from "nobodies"? What about report accuracy? There's a difference between someone who reports 10 violations that prove true and someone who reports 10 violations where only 1 proves true. Do both accounts get trusted equally? What about appeal success? A successful appeal on any of these platforms means the original reporter wasted some of the company's time and money (paying a grunt to review something a second time, overrule the first review, etc.). Do successful appeals reduce the overall "trust" rating of a given account's reports?

There's a lot of shit you can determine programmatically here that can help prevent abuse, even by the "big boys." If your reports have a 99% success rate (out of every 100 reports resulting in action being taken, only one ends up being reversed on appeal), your reports should automatically have much more weight than someone who's got a 10% success rate. Or, rather, the shittier your "success" rate on reports, the less your reports should be trusted, or even reviewed at all. I think below a certain level you shouldn't even be listened to at all because you're obviously random, unreliable, full of shit, or being vindictive.

But they never talk about that kind of metric. They never even bring that shit up. I've never once heard any company at all talk about whether they start to silently ignore people who make excessive and/or consistently bogus reports or institute any other kind of punishment. Sometimes there may be allusions to abusing the report system buried in the TOS somewhere, but I've never heard of somebody getting banned or otherwise punished for endless misuse of the report system.

Tubby Aardvark said:
View attachment 8922706
This is the man fucking your wife Quartering 👏
Click to expand...
Well, one of them, anyway 🤣.
 
Last edited:
DSP for president 2032 said:
You're right, I updated the post. I also looked up what Jer actually said to the dog charity.
View attachment 8921712
He's explicitly NOT offering to donate, he's not even being vague about it lmao.
Click to expand...
Because this disgusting obese cunt receives donations for worthy causes from his fans, like abused dogs or needy children, and claims the ENTIRE LOT on his tax return which offsets his own monetary earnings, despite using other people's money.

The charity itself is just a means through which to steal from his fans and write off his tax papers. And then he pockets half the money to buy toys anyway.

Someone get IRS on this prick. Honestly most disgusting guy on the planet right now who isn't like a murderer or child rapist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom