What are the differences between Martin Luther King Jr. and Charlie Kirk, who were both assassinated?
1) Martin Luther King Jr. was a low IQ nigger, Charlie Kirk was a high IQ White man.
2) Martin Luther King Jr. was a degenerate who cheated on his wife and was likely a witness to rapes. Charlie Kirk presumably did none of these things.
3) Martin Luther King Jr. didn't write his own stuff, having plagiarized even his doctoral thesis. His speeches were ghostwritten by literal Jewish communists who puppeted him. Charlie Kirk was not any of this.
4) Martin Luther King Jr. is being tortured in Hell as we speak and will be suffering for eternity for his many crimes. Charlie Kirk, as far as we know, is likely in Heaven, overall being a moral human being in life as far as anyone can see.
5) Martin Luther King Jr. was useful to the left who made up a whole mythology about him, has this mythology taught in schools, et cetera. Charlie Kirk, despite being more deserving of such an honor, will not have this.
What does this tell us? The only thing that matters is having a propaganda apparatus shilling for a person after they die for them to have a positive legacy. Sadly, Charlie Kirk did not have this.