What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1776790596817.png

A dire warning on what the worldwide real ID collection instigated by Big Tech is actually for.

Rwanda is the testing ground. The entire world is next.
 
Joseph McCarthy said:
I really don't think it's just penguins and polar bears
Click to expand...
No bears at the South Pole. It’s in the name.
I have wondered if there’s stuff there that’s not for the public view. There’s definitely some military presence there as shown by the strava leaks.
it could be as dull as infinite cooling capacity and bring absolutely free from spy and surveillance activity, or as fun as weird ruins/biological stuff.
 
Joseph McCarthy said:
I think they're definitely hiding something in Antarctica. Some of the Antarctica conspiracy theories are utterly retarded, like I don't think a breakaway Nazi Hyperborean civilization exists there and I don't believe in Flat Earth.

But I think what they're hiding there could be any of these:
  • Some material resource that's much more available than they tell us
  • Proof of an extinct older civilization that changes what we know about history (Antarctica wasn't always icy)
  • Illegal activities or secret experiments
  • Maybe aliens
  • While I don't think Flat Earth is real, I think Hollow Earth could be

I really don't think it's just penguins and polar bears because it's odd how tightly they guard Antarctica. You can visit it but only certain parts. If you try to fly over it yourself, you will be stopped.
Click to expand...
The Arctic is strategically located and has extensive mineral wealth, so the military activity isn't surprising. It would also happen to be prime real estate if the Earth warmed up a little more.
1776815421390.png 1776815461135.png
 
Antarctica has been covered in ice far too long for there to be any civilisation there. It's just remote and hard to get to which allows peoples imagination to explore ideas. There are no buried alien pyramids or lost cities of the ancients. It's just a big piece of land covered in a shit load of ice.

I also don't know where this idea of you can't go to Antarctica came from. You can, I know, because I've been. There are the ship trips you can take from New Zealand, Australia or South America. There's plane flyovers.

If you want you can go do hiking there, climb mountains and volcanoes. There are even tent hotels and destinations that get put up every summer that people go and do go to. It's just expensive and difficult. Its in the realm of tourism for rich people that isn't advertised to the middle or lower classes.

When you go to your travel agent, they'll be telling you about Carnival cruises and not the 120K per person week long stay in an Antarctic tent resort. The same way they don't advertise private super yachts.
 
Last edited:
redbeardeded said:
The genocide fax was a fake. The Rwandan genocide was a hoax.
Click to expand...
You can make an argument that the Ugandans took USA or United Nations money to instigate it, but it's definitely not "it never happened". There's literal proof of the propaganda and the bodies/bones of the victims. Plus it would had been made a lot of sense for the Globalhomo to instigate Rwanda (unlike the Jew fat lantern and Jew fat soap claims during Hitler) as a social experiment for collecting real ID/personal info from the global population to increase efficiency for the upcoming worldwide mass killings -- from the Rwandan Genocide it's very clear that if a killer has your personal information and a record on your sins they will hunt you down and kill you without fail. There is a reason why the UN just stood by and ignored it as the roving machete mass murderers started killing every human being they came across.
 
Last edited:
Do Not Touch Me Pls said:
You can make an argument that the Ugandans took USA or United Nations money to instigate it, but it's definitely not "it never happened". There's literal proof of the propaganda and the bodies/bones of the victims. Plus it would had been made a lot of sense for the Globalhomo to instigate Rwanda (unlike the Jew fat lantern and Jew fat soap claims during Hitler) as a social experiment for collecting real ID/personal info from the global population to increase efficiency for the upcoming worldwide mass killings -- from the Rwandan Genocide it's very clear that if a killer has your personal information and a record on your sins they will hunt you down and kill you without fail. There is a reason why the UN just stood by and ignored it as the roving machete mass murderers started killing every human being they came across.
Click to expand...
I remember reading a schizo theory like 10 years ago, arguing that the Rwandan genocide was both an intentional experiment on how previously friendly groups can be manipulated into hating/killing each other, and also a succesful test for some type of microwave/ultrasonic frequency weapon designed to instigate violence in people.

I'm not making this up, though in fairness the person who wrote it might have. Has anyone heard anything like this?
 
Screamer_2 said:
Does African's turning violent and slaughtering each other require the need of some far-fetched explanation like an ultrasonic frequency weapon?
Click to expand...
I almost included a ">Inb4 niggers are violent to begin with" greentext sentence but decided to try and keep it serious.

It's a valid point, but I'm not a fan of dismissing things with simple excuses or thought-stopping cliches. At least in the case of Rwanda, there was outside involvement though the nature and extent of it is questionable, hence why I bothered to make a comment.
 
You know how some women online will post opinions along the lines of "If men didn't exist, I could dress as revealing as I wanted! I wish my clothes and body weren't sexualized!" Well, they got what they asked for. As a man walking around in 2026, there are plenty of practically naked women all over the place (but that doesn't necessarily make them attractive, although that's a discussion for another time). Obviously you can't approach them so you have 2 options:
1. Walk around like a gooner, drooling, staring, fetishizing specific parts and waiting to get home so you can beat off
2. Ignore women, desensitize yourself to the sexual impulse, and eventually feel nothing when you look at attractive women-in other words, the goal of the quote above
Number 2 is the most functional, and the one followed by most normal people. It's probably a 25/75 mix between mindset #1 and mindset #2, respectively, although that can constantly change as urges are fluid (no pun intended). You can connect examples like this, indicative of a larger problem, as reasons why Zoomers seem to be prude and have less real life sex while simultaneously being possibly the most perverted generation in recent history. However, things were not always this way; Listen to the stories of Gen X and older, and look at popular media up to the early 2010s, and you'll see a far healthier view of sexuality was commonplace. Obviously it wasn't perfect, anyone can see that, but things were clearly far better than the hell on earth we have now. It seems that today, you're either doomed to monk mode or given all the tools to go on your personal solo, screen assisted Eyes Wide Shut gooner rampage. We know who controls fashion and we know who got rid of third spaces, who jacked up the prices of everything, who made the dating apps, who throttles selected social media posts, who distributes hardcore pornography for free to children, and who propped up feminism. For everything they prop up there is always a controlled opposition, but if you consider all the factors around today, and how all these factors foster both inceldom and extreme sexual degeneracy with no middle ground, you can pretty plainly tell that whoever orchestrated these factors (you don't seriously think that "who" has just made all these coincidences?) knows how they would psychologically affect the population. They have the studies, they know how the brain's reward system works. It's one big club, and you ain't in it.
 
Do Not Touch Me Pls said:
There's literal proof of the propaganda
Click to expand...
Imagine believing jews.
Do Not Touch Me Pls said:
and the bodies/bones of the victims.
Click to expand...
If you would read the linked articles, you would see that the evidence indicates not that there was no killing, but that the previous government were the victims (rather than the alleged perpetrators). It was a classic color revolution organized by the CIA, and the real perpetrators (not the alleged victims) control Rwanda today at the behest of their international jew sponsors.
 
The Rwandan genocide was remarkably similar in tactics to the Soros NGO anti-ICE insurgent activities in Minneapolis and other Communist cities, right down to the use of whistles.
From the period of the First Republic up to 1994, this practice of igitero was used not to assist people under attack, but rather to assemble the attackers themselves. The whistles (induru) previously used to call for help (gutabaza) from neighbors were transformed into harbingers of impending destruction.
Ibitero became transformed into groups of attackers (numbering anywhere from 20-100 people) who set out to strike terror into their victims.

The result of involving everyone in the killings, whether directly or indirectly, was that all of them were made to feel equally complicit. Those who blew the whistles, those who attacked with clubs, hoes, machetes, as well as those forced to bury the dead, or contribute their agricultural implements,
became part of the carnage.
Click to expand...
Neighborhood groups of militia were organized to communicate with each other by blow-
ing whistles, a communication system used effectively to call for reinforcements and ammunition.

On the morning of April 7, 1994, the day after Habyarimana's death, Interahamwe began to blow their whistles, a signal agreed to kill the Tutsi; these gathered on the hill of Nkuzuzu. They resisted, using stones, spears and arrow bows.

When questioned about the use of whistles, Witness K said she saw persons go behind the bureau communal to get a professor who lived there. She said that these persons used whistles so as to terrorize this professor, and to attract the attention of others nearby.
Click to expand...
"Because my house was located near the main road, I heard all the whistles and saw my Tutsi neighbours being rounded up and taken to the church," says Mukamushinzimana, sitting in a small, bare prison room and sometimes crying.
Click to expand...
In addition, people had to respond to shouts or whistles calling them to join in the killings, to show their support for the government; some individuals were forced to participate in the killings directly or indirectly (for example, burying bodies)
Click to expand...
 
Screamer_2 said:
Antarctica has been covered in ice far too long for there to be any civilisation there. It's just remote and hard to get to which allows peoples imagination to explore ideas. There are no buried alien pyramids or lost cities of the ancients. It's just a big piece of land covered in a shit load of ice.

I also don't know where this idea of you can't go to Antarctica came from. You can, I know, because I've been. There are the ship trips you can take from New Zealand, Australia or South America. There's plane flyovers.

If you want you can go do hiking there, climb mountains and volcanoes. There are even tent hotels and destinations that get put up every summer that people go and do go to. It's just expensive and difficult. Its in the realm of tourism for rich people that isn't advertised to the middle or lower classes.

When you go to your travel agent, they'll be telling you about Carnival cruises and not the 120K per person week long stay in an Antarctic tent resort. The same way they don't advertise private super yachts.
Click to expand...
Agarthan hands typed this post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom