US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of normies are going to see Trump come out of this with no deal and more fighting and it will look terrible for him. Couple that with gas prices bouncing back and sentiment for the war is going to drop quickly. Without an actual ceasefire, the American public can’t put up with two weeks of ‘negotiating’. That’s what Obama did and it was tiresome.
 
Trump completely bodying Megyn, Tucker, Alex, and Candace is hilarious, and it's going to become even more hilarious when seeing the spergtastic reactions from them.
The response from tucker was that the president is under an inhuman amount of pressure from israel, and gave the example of israel blackmailing president clinton with phone recordings of him and monica lewinsky to get policy favors. They said the president should be given grace because none of us know what he is being put through right now, and everyone on the show hopes he makes good decisions.

The gayest thing about the current media landscape is that no matter what happens some retard will chime in to announce that their preferred side totally OWNED the other side. I spent about 20 minutes on X this morning and it seems like his betrayal raised the perception of everyone he named in his truth post, even those who don't deserve it at all like candace owens. I know that these websites tailor your feed to whatever you originally thought anyway though, so I don't know who TOTALLY BODIED who. I don't know that anyone would give a shit if the president derided owens, tucker, and megyn, but throwing alex jones in there was a pretty serious error because he has paid so dearly for his loyalty to the president. Everyone else on the list is going to be just fine and their careers are better for their association with trump. But jones? Why kick a man when he is down?

QRD? I was under the impression that he got railroaded.
He didn't get an actual trial on the merits of the case. The judge asked for discovery documents that weren't produced. His attorney said they did not have the materials the court wanted. The other side said his attorney was just lying. I don't have a way to know what is usual here or who is telling the truth, but the judge declared him guilty by default at that point and the only thing the jury decided was how much money jones should be ordered to pay. It felt a lot like a show trial to me. He was sued in the rare districts where judges can select their cases instead of having them randomly assigned.

the timing of the case seemed to be related to the political landscape more than anything that had to do with the shooting or the families. In the same way it seems that LFJ wants to make a system he can sell to censor the net, other people are extremely interested in creating a legal life-ruination system that can be used on people for their political speech. I strongly believe that the reason for going after jones was to test that out. If they get away with it then it will be used on more and more people, until we are all just used to hearing about someone being eleventy billion dollars in un-dischargable debt because they said something unpopular on the internet. The press ignored all this to their own peril IMO, they all seem to think they will never be on the chopping block.
 
QRD? I was under the impression that he got railroaded.
Long story short two different courts in two different states ordered him to produce financial records which he failed to do. So he got default judgmented.

Then his lawyer sent a digital copy of his entire phone which among other things proved he lied under oath that he didn’t text about Sandy Hook (as the phone did indeed contain texts about it).

From what i understand that’s specifically why the Connecticut lawsuit was specifically so comically huge. Default Judgments are generally very harsh and perjury didn’t help.

He was also doing shit like talking smack about the families on his show and stuff like that while the lawsuit was going on.
 
The DNC expected big money after big Democratic wins. It never came.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Dan Merica, Hannah Knowles, and Clara Ence Morse
2026-04-10 09:00:27GMT
Officials at the Democratic National Committee were hopeful heading into last fall’s elections.

Party infighting and frustrating recriminations around Democrats’ 2024 losses had made 2025 a slog. Donors were avoiding fundraising requests from the committee. DNC officials, including chairman Ken Martin, told party officials that victories that November would boost their beleaguered fundraising, especially from top donors.

Democrats won resoundingly, flipping the Virginia governor’s mansion by 15 percentage points and sweeping other key races. But big checks did not flood back.

The continued money woes, according to multiple people familiar with the party’s donor operation, caused the committee to scale back some of its plans, hamstrung by $17.4 million in debt and with only $15.9 million in the bank at the end of February.

The committee shelved some of its plans to invest in the South, a region where Martin says the party needs to expand its reach into growing areas dominated by Republicans, according to two people familiar with the plans who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal conversations. They also discarded the idea of a midterm party convention to showcase candidates because they worried there wasn’t enough money for the proposal, the sources said.

The DNC is still making other long-term investments in the South, putting the issue front and center at its ongoing spring meeting in New Orleans.

The co-chair of the DNC’s national finance committee and a committee spokeswoman denied that plans to invest in the South were pulled back because of lower-than-expected fundraising. But party officials did acknowledge top donors have been slow to open their wallets again.

“With the momentum at the end of last year, there is still some lag from 2024, but it is improving," said Maria Cardona, a longtime Democratic communicator and member of the DNC’s powerful Rules & Bylaws Committee. "The large dollar donors are, maybe not as quickly as one would want, coming back. They are rolling themselves out of the fetal position and they are coming back to us.”

The ongoing uneasy financial position has led some Democrats to grumble that Martin began his tenure at the DNC by pledging to give $1 million every month to all 57 Democratic state and territory parties, not just those in battleground states.

“Ken was bullish on fundraising picking up,” said a person familiar with the committee’s fundraising plans. "They just have no money, and no clear path to either pay off their debt incurred by Ken, nor to fund some of the stuff he’s already announced.”

While it is common for the party in power to significantly outraise opponents, the gap between the Republican National Committee and the DNC has been dramatic since Trump took office in 2025. The Republican committee, buoyed by donors eager to stay in Trump’s good graces, ended February with $109 million in the bank — seven times what Democrats had at their disposal.

“Democrats are putting our resources into the field, building infrastructure to power wins today and for years to come, and delivering overperformances all across the country, meanwhile Republicans are losing elections at a humiliating rate in spite of their billionaire donors," said Mia Ehrenberg, a DNC spokesperson.

Many Democrats note their party went through a similar period of slow fundraising at the beginning of Trump’s first term. Back then, the DNC also had debt; the RNC ended February 2018 with four times more cash on hand.

Party officials say success at the ballot box matters more than money in the bank. Democratic candidates have consistently overperformed over the past year — including in races where the DNC spent money — and DNC officials say their cash crunch won’t change that.

“I don’t care if the RNC outraises the DNC by seven times, because they are going to get their asses kicked in the midterms," said Chris Korge, the DNC finance chair.

Some worry that an underfunded committee indicates lingering donor skepticism of the national party and could undercut their efforts to bounce back. The DNC is an influential arm of the party, largely tasked with improving Democratic state parties, governing an oftentimes unwieldy party and organizing the presidential nominating process.

At the national party meeting that began Thursday in New Orleans, Jay Parmley, executive director of the South Carolina Democratic Party, said a lack of cash was among the biggest challenges facing him and his colleagues this year.

“It’s money,” he said. “It’s our ability to raise money, and it’s also our ability to react quickly enough to provide these things for what is an expanding coalition every day."

Two top DNC fundraisers, Michael Pratt and Colleen Coffey, recently left their roles in a shake-up. One person close to the DNC’s fundraising argued it would have been better to start Martin’s term with new fundraisers “not tainted by past losses" and party missteps.

While big donations to the DNC have been slow to come in, small donors are still giving generously. The DNC raised more than $5 million from donors giving $200 or less in February, similar to the RNC’s small-dollar haul that month and their own February 2022 small-dollar contributions. Martin touted the successful month by attacking Republicans for leaning on “billionaire donations” while Democrats were “proud to be powered by grassroots donors making their voices heard.”

1775837920281.png

But the RNC’s big donor advantage has helped it pull far ahead.

Between February 2025 and February 2026, during Martin’s time as chair, 30 individual donors gave at least $100,000 to the DNC, including two who gave the legal maximum of $443,000, according to finance reports. During the same time frame, the RNC recorded 233 six-figure donors, including 47 who gave maxed-out donations. The disparity echoes 2017, when Trump first took the White House and Democrats struggled to rebuild.

Ehrenberg, the DNC spokesperson, said the committee has seen growth in high-dollar donors since December, including 11 donations of over $100,000 in March that have yet to be formally reported.

Adding to the pressure: The DNC took out $15 million in loans ahead of last fall’s elections to fund the investments it said would build momentum and, in Martin’s words, “rally supporters back to the table.”

Chris Lowe, co-chair of the DNC’s national finance committee, said officials decided last year that debt was worth it in the long term. "We could spend money on the races which mattered, and then we knew we would make it up this year. And I would much prefer to be in this situation than say, we’re not going to take that debt,” he said.

A top Democratic donor said the thought that November victories would lead to a flood of cash was “a bit misguided,” but that large donors have started giving again in recent months.

The DNC’s challenges over the past year go beyond fundraising. Infighting spilled into public view early in Martin’s tenure last year when then-officer David Hogg moved to fund primary challenges against incumbent Democrats, drawing fierce blowback. The committee opted late last year not to release a much-anticipated autopsy of Democrats’ 2024 losses, suggesting it would just become a distraction.
 
Good. Candace is the worst of them. She's an evil cunt, and I have literally zero nice things to say about her.
I'm surprised Trump didn't body Candace for boosting schizo-theories about the Charlie Kirk assassination, but perhaps bringing it up is too distasteful. I despise her so much for helping to turn the momentum from a domestic focus on leftist extremism into an international (unactionable) focus on Zionism and Jewsperging.
 
The response from tucker was that the president is under an inhuman amount of pressure from israel, and gave the example of israel blackmailing president clinton with phone recordings of him and monica lewinsky to get policy favors. They said the president should be given grace because none of us know what he is being put through right now, and everyone on the show hopes he makes good decisions.

The gayest thing about the current media landscape is that no matter what happens some retard will chime in to announce that their preferred side totally OWNED the other side. I spent about 20 minutes on X this morning and it seems like his betrayal raised the perception of everyone he named in his truth post, even those who don't deserve it at all like candace owens. I know that these websites tailor your feed to whatever you originally thought anyway though, so I don't know who TOTALLY BODIED who. I don't know that anyone would give a shit if the president derided owens, tucker, and megyn, but throwing alex jones in there was a pretty serious error because he has paid so dearly for his loyalty to the president. Everyone else on the list is going to be just fine and their careers are better for their association with trump. But jones? Why kick a man when he is down?

"It's the Joos!" is a tiresome response. I just have to give a big ol' yawn to Tucker.

And maybe Alex Jones shouldn't have openly recommended an insurrection against the President. FAFO.
 
Kind of wild to think that Jones had major corporate sponsors like Visa at one point.
He used to do pumpkin carving segments for Halloween on fox. We used to be allowed to have fun *sigh*
Also off the cuff prediction. Iran will continue to "test"(violate) the ceasefire and we'll be bombing them again by Monday.

Edit: figured I toss in my favorite Alex Jones segment/episode. The interview with Alex, Fuentes and Kanye was absolute gold. Alex definitely regretted bringing them on.
 
Last edited:
I'll throw on a trend i've noticed. The Anti-War "Right" is made up of doomers, third worlders and those grifters preying on them. Jews act as a convenient boogeyman as well.
I would say your view of the majority of the Anti-War right is correct. But I'd also add that:

Boomers and Gen X

Who normally would just watch TV and accept whatever is on there as truth, are being ONE-SHOTTED by TikTok and social media from Doomers. (These people never grew up learning to question everything online, be skeptical of sources and their income streams, or what online personalities will do for clout).

Especially when it comes to anti-Jew / anti-Israel theories/ideas. Because their whole lives they have been inundated with Pro-Israel media/talking points/ wars/ institutions / etc.... discovering that criticism of Israel is O.K has led them to over-indulge in that kind of content. Due to it seeming like """hidden knowledge"""" or """truth""" which is why if you watch Tucker or Candace, they will constantly add for their Boomer audience.
  • "This is something you CAN'T say."
  • "This is illegal to do."
  • "Your not allowed to talk about this or know about this. But I'M going to."
It puts on the guise of being let in on a BIG secret and that you are BREAKING THE MATRIX. Never doubt how alluring that concept is to people. (Same reason these people WANT Tyler Robinson to walk free. Only so that their allusion of breaking the matrix can be solidified.)

Meanwhile, criticism of Israel, AIPAC, ADL, etc... has been an ongoing thing for years. With many books, podcasts, documentaries, theories, etc... made on it available easily on the biggest platforms.


Because of them it puts many people on the right in an awkward position when it comes to Israel as they actually have to defend them from outragous conspiracies. Even though they were the originators of common sense Israel / ADL / AIPAC criticisms.

It really is people joining your side but wearing and acting like a Hollywood stereotype, which then makes your side look retarded. (Westboro Baptist Church and Flat Earthers, etc...)
 
Sanctuary cities could be getting a kick in the teeth soon. Looks like DHS is considering cutting services like customs from airports in said cities.

DHS chief mulls yanking customs from sanctuary city airports, raising O’Hare angst, Pritzker rebuke
Archive/Link


This is particularly bad for Chicago. Because they have spent $12.1 billion on O'Hare airport upgrades.
Do it!
Make them suffer.

Guys what if Miller loses all of his powers if he converts? Like Superman without the sun.
Samson without the hair?
Through Christ, all things are possible.
 
The DNC expected big money after big Democratic wins. It never came.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Dan Merica, Hannah Knowles, and Clara Ence Morse
2026-04-10 09:00:27GMT
The Democrats are literally going full Communist and expecting those with money to pay for it. Any of their big donors living in New York are immediately seeing things that alarm them about the Democrats and want no part of it.
 
A lot of normies are going to see Trump come out of this with no deal and more fighting and it will look terrible for him. Couple that with gas prices bouncing back and sentiment for the war is going to drop quickly. Without an actual ceasefire, the American public can’t put up with two weeks of ‘negotiating’. That’s what Obama did and it was tiresome.
I don't think a deal is possible at this point. Not because of stuff like browns or Islam but because of logistics. A government only has as much power/control as it can physically enforce. Whatever new government has formed, we have no idea what levels of control they can exercise. Any gaggle of retards in Iran can ring the US delegation and say "hello, yes, America we are the new government. Please do a dealings with us" and it effectively means nothing if they don't have actual hard power to back it up. The policy makers in Tehran can't do much if there's no telecommunications with the IRGC or military, 400± miles away, on the coast of the strait of Hormuz. More so, if the military doesn't want to stop threatening ships and the new government doesn't have a way to punish them. These problems with communications and hard power are difficult to navigate when even dealing with a reasonable nation. We're dealing with Iran.... Bombing them would be simpler, that's all I'm saying.
 
I don't think a deal is possible at this point. Not because of stuff like browns or Islam but because of logistics. A government only has as much power/control as it can physically enforce. Whatever new government has formed, we have no idea what levels of control they can exercise. Any gaggle of retards in Iran can ring the US delegation and say "hello, yes, America we are the new government. Please do a dealings with us" and it effectively means nothing if they don't have actual hard power to back it up. The policy makers in Tehran can't do much if there's no telecommunications with the IRGC or military, 400± miles away, on the coast of the strait of Hormuz. More so, if the military doesn't want to stop threatening ships and the new government doesn't have a way to punish them. These problems with communications and hard power are difficult to navigate when even dealing with a reasonable nation. We're dealing with Iran.... Bombing them would be simpler, that's all I'm saying.
If it's really that bad the only solution is a partitioning of the country which never ends well.
 
"It's the Joos!" is a tiresome response. I just have to give a big ol' yawn to Tucker.

And maybe Alex Jones shouldn't have openly recommended an insurrection against the President. FAFO.
Actually, as an enlightened wignat I think that Muslim retards should be allowed to hold all of civilization hostage and that the Chinese Communists should rule the world.. Oh no!! I'm being zapped by the GOYBEAM!! Ahhh now thanks to JEWS I think that those things are actually really bad and only a faggot would allow that when it costs basically nothing to stop it! It's all the JEW CUM that' making me think these things!
 
I m sorry did I miss something

I m not on Twitter how is Maga dead?
TRUMP TURNED HIS BACK ON HIS GREATEST SUPPORTERS

ALEX “BUY MY SUPPLEMENTS” JONES

CANDACE “ERIKA KIRK SCISSORED ME SENSELESS” OWENS

AND TUCKER “YOU KNOW MAYBE ISLAM IS RIGHT ABOUT GOATS” CARLSON

HIS STAUNCHEST SUPPORTERS. HIS DEAREST DEVOTED, HIS TOUGHEST TONGUE TWISTERS!
 
as much as i sympathize with the free speech cause, alex jones calling the parents of murdered children lying deep state crisis actors was insanely unhinged, nasty and malicious behavior. dude can rot in hell for that.
He never did that, though.
Let’s be honest they didn’t do that out of grief or personal offence. Them or more likely their lawyers smelled blood in the water.
the timing of the case seemed to be related to the political landscape more than anything that had to do with the shooting or the families. In the same way it seems that LFJ wants to make a system he can sell to censor the net, other people are extremely interested in creating a legal life-ruination system that can be used on people for their political speech. I strongly believe that the reason for going after jones was to test that out. If they get away with it then it will be used on more and more people, until we are all just used to hearing about someone being eleventy billion dollars in un-dischargable debt because they said something unpopular on the internet. The press ignored all this to their own peril IMO, they all seem to think they will never be on the chopping block.QRD? I was under the impression that he got railroaded.
As I noted in the thread about the bankruptcy auction activity:
I found it interesting that the Sandy Hook Families and their attorney stated in open court that they intended to seize all of Alex Jones's media presence (and if he made another media company to seize that one) in order to transform them into anti-gun platforms. While in the middle of trying to argue their way into breaking all the rules of the bankruptcy court, no less. Pretty underhanded and very revealing of their true motives, if you ask me.

Again, the 'families' didn't go after Lanza's family, the guests Alex Jones had on that said it was a hoax, or the weirdos that actually did stalk them - instead they went after Jones. Fuck them.
He didn't get an actual trial on the merits of the case. The judge asked for discovery documents that weren't produced. His attorney said they did not have the materials the court wanted. The other side said his attorney was just lying. I don't have a way to know what is usual here or who is telling the truth, but the judge declared him guilty by default at that point and the only thing the jury decided was how much money jones should be ordered to pay. It felt a lot like a show trial to me. He was sued in the rare districts where judges can select their cases instead of having them randomly assigned.
Thats the joke, it isn't constitutional, but since the system is corrupted that doesn't matter at all. Alex Jones, dipshit or no, was denied his Constitutional right to due process by crooked judges working hand in glove with government actors and the plaintiffs. He was denied the opportunity to present a defense before a jury in a trial to determine his fault, thanks to crooked judges. I'll explain the sequence, with simplification and commentary.

1. The plaintiffs demand Alex Jones provide certain documents during the discovery phase, which is routine in civil cases.
2. Alex Jones responds with documents A, B and C. He replies that Document D is in the custody of Google, since its a google record he cannot access.
3. The plaintiffs complain that Alex Jones never produced Document D, which is again in the custody of another party.
4. Alex Jones tells the Judge and plaintiff that they should request Document D from its current legal custodian, Google.
5. The Judge declares that because Alex Jones did not raid Google HQ with Seal Team Six to retrieve Document D, that he will penalize Alex Jones for the failure to produce Document D.
6. The Judge decides that, for failure to produce a document Alex Jones cannot legally access, he will punish Alex Jones with the highest penalty available at civil trial.
7. The Judge declares that, due to the above, Alex Jones now has a default judgement against him and is guilty. The plaintiffs win automatically, without any trial of ability for Jones to defend himself.
8. A new trial, for penalty only, is arranged, where Jones cannot defend himself, his attorneys are not able to defend him, and he must be struggle sessioned until a sufficiently poisoned jury finds a penalty of billions.

This is the exact same playbook they then used for Rudy Guliana, except it was a cellphone the FBI seized, I believe. The crooked judges seize upon an excuse to penalize the defendant and deny them a trial where they can produce a defense, instead going right to the penalty phase. It is absolutely Soviet, and the judges and attorneys involved should all be disbarred and imprisoned.
 
This is the exact same playbook they then used for Rudy Guliana, except it was a cellphone the FBI seized, I believe. The crooked judges seize upon an excuse to penalize the defendant and deny them a trial where they can produce a defense, instead going right to the penalty phase. It is absolutely Soviet, and the judges and attorneys involved should all be disbarred and imprisoned.
Thanks for beating me to the effort post. It's extremely depressing how many people (even here) think that Jones either wasn't railroaded, deserved to be railroaded or somehow lost his case on actual merits.
 
Back
Top Bottom