UK Elizabeth I will be transgender in ITV drama

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link

Elizabeth I will be transgender in ITV drama​

IMG_6941.webp
Elizabeth I will be portrayed as transgenderin a forthcoming ITV drama.

The Tudor queen, who never married and established England as a rising imperial power, will be shown as a biological man in the six-part series next year.

The independence of the “Virgin Queen”, who ruled from 1558 to 1603 and defeated the Spanish Armada, has given rise to improbable conspiracies that she was a man masquerading as a woman.

Claims of her being a trans woman will be a central focus of the new series, titled Majesty, in which the monarch will be played by a transgender woman, according to reports.

ITV said the drama was “far from being a historical account” and was an “intriguing reimagining of her life based upon conspiracy theories”.

Elizabeth I’s strength as ruler and decision not to marry have prompted speculation about her sexuality and gender identity. Some claim she had male pseudohermaphroditism, a condition in which an individual has testicles and female genitalia.

A 19th century theory, included by Bram Stoker in a 1910 book about “famous impostors”, held that the queen died from a fever in Bisley, Gloucestershire, at the age of nine and was replaced by a local boy who looked similar to her.

Sir Robert Cecil, her chief minister, is recorded as having said she was “more than a man, and, in truth, sometimes less than a woman”.

In 1588, as the Spanish fleet approached England, Elizabeth I told troops in Tilbury, Essex: “I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king – and of a king of England, too.”

In 2022, academics working for Shakespeare’s Globe in central London said she could have been non-binary, when people believe they are neither male nor female.

Elizabeth I was presented as such in an essay published by the theatre which referred to the female monarch with the gender-neutral they/them pronouns.

Feminist thinkers have raised concerns that casting doubts on the womanhood of prominent women because they defied gender norms and did supposedly “manly” things will effectively write them out of history.

Set at the court of Henry VIII when Elizabeth was a girl, the ITV drama will be produced by Strong Film and Television.

Born in 1533, Elizabeth I became England’s longest-serving female monarch until Queen Victoria, and was famous for overseeing the emergence of the country as an international power during her 44-year reign.

James Strong, the director behind the production company, previously said the series would “re-imagine” history to make it “modern and relevant to today’s viewer”.

“The brilliant scripts are a director’s dream as we get to re-imagine and recreate an iconic piece of English history and tell a period story that looks stunning but also feels modern and relevant to today’s viewer,” he said.

Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said the series “sounds like an April fool’s joke”.

“The news that Queen Elizabeth I is to be portrayed as transgender in a new ITV drama sounds like an April Fool’s joke, not the basis for a six part show that people will keep watching,” she told The Telegraph.

“Some in the arts sector seem to think that portraying historical female figures such as Joan of Arc as trans-identifying is edgy, but TV viewers who are already sick of gender ideology may say ‘this is too much’ and vote with their remote.

“The sexist conspiracy theory that Elizabeth I was a man because a woman couldn’t possibly have led as she did is tired enough already.

“Reinventing it with a new layer of transgender fantasy only adds insult to injury when women are still fighting for equal pay, and sex stereotypes are being used to promote the modern-day scandal of child gender medicine.”

The show is expected to begin filming this summer.

ITV and Strong Film and Television were approached for comment.
 
On one hand, distorting well-beloved historical figures to serve your faggot agenda is bullshit. On the other, saying no woman could have done what she did, and she was really a man is fucking hilarious.
 
Ok? We’ve had movies imagining US Presidents as vampire hunters, as long as it isn’t trying to push it as the true story but an adaptation of a fringe theory who cares?
 
Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said the series “sounds like an April fool’s joke”.

“The news that Queen Elizabeth I is to be portrayed as transgender in a new ITV drama sounds like an April Fool’s joke, not the basis for a six part show that people will keep watching,” she told The Telegraph.

“Some in the arts sector seem to think that portraying historical female figures such as Joan of Arc as trans-identifying is edgy, but TV viewers who are already sick of gender ideology may say ‘this is too much’ and vote with their remote.

“The sexist conspiracy theory that Elizabeth I was a man because a woman couldn’t possibly have led as she did is tired enough already.

“Reinventing it with a new layer of transgender fantasy only adds insult to injury when women are still fighting for equal pay, and sex stereotypes are being used to promote the modern-day scandal of child gender medicine.”
Liberal women are so close to getting it, but will never quite get there.
 
So one of the greatest monarchs England has ever had was actually just a pervert in drag or a retarded person of gender instead of a genuinely remarkable true & honest woman? And this is something we should applaud? What level of gigaclown horrorworld is this?
 
Suffah Anglos suffah.
This is so retarded if you know anything about Elizabeth I. And more importantly about her father of Henry VIII.
 
The independence of the “Virgin Queen”, who ruled from 1558 to 1603 and defeated the Spanish Armada, has given rise to improbable conspiracies that she was a man masquerading as a woman.
>woman is actually good at leading her country and military actions
>progressives decide she must have actually been a man all along

What did they mean by this? :thinking:
 
You know, in a certain way Elizabeth is what every brick-hon aspires to. Everyone at court had to pretend she was young and beautiful.
 
Back
Top Bottom