The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
IMG_4186.jpeg
Don’t know if this has been posted here but meet Indian Visajeet. “That is all, thank you for your attention in this matter.” -Bibi’s Beautiful Boy.
 
dontwantagoudatime24 said:
From my POV most Bollywood movies are really over the top really on constant effects and slow motion and you don't know what the fuck is going on most of the time. Also most if not all of them are almost 3 hours, actually 3 hours and more which makes me question how the fuck do they sit through through these especially when they bring their kids to what i presume R rated movies.
Click to expand...
Bollywood slop is brown-coded, obviously, but what people need to look into is how much Hollywood is borrowing from brown slop with their current output.

I have long postulated that entertainment agencies are creating content for low IQ niggers and shitskins, instead of Whites, and that's why we're seeing such a dramatic drop in quality of content over the past decade.

They're thinking that Whites are on the way out and they can make more money by pandering to the swarthy subhumans and adapting content for their lower cognitive abilities.

BaronVonBonk said:
Don’t know if this has been posted here but meet Indian Visajeet.
Click to expand...

Did he make sure to tell them he's a Brahmin from a good family?
 

Footage from Brampton, Ontario, Canada. It's so wonderful to see tax dollars at work!

Fixed video, it should play now.
 
Shiki Ouji said:
View attachment 8709099
This guy regrets every hyper Liberal policy he ever voted for.
Click to expand...
He might, but he'll never admit it, because that would mean that he doesn't get to watch his wife's boyfriend blast her full of hyper-pozzed niggerjizz. But it's only a few years until Syrupeans are so low-testosterone and cucked that even jeets are going to start looking like bulls to the average male maple ape, at this rate.
 
indomitable snowman said:
1773676560389.png
Click to expand...
TIL jews only have an IQ of 60.
regalterry said:
They're thinking that Whites are on the way out and they can make more money by pandering to the swarthy subhumans and adapting content for their lower cognitive abilities.
Click to expand...
Been that way for a while, sadly. All the blockbuster movies from the last 20 years have been aimed squarely at the Chinese market. Michael Bay Transformers kept getting sequels because it did so well in China, where audiences didn't care if it didn't make sense (it's a foreign film, it's not supposed to make sense to them) as long as it was loud and flashy.
 
I suppose relevant to the thread: A new paper estimates that India's GDP may have been overestimated by approximately 22%.
The problem comes as a result of the Indian government using the movements of the formal sector as a proxy to estimate how the informal sector of the economy is doing, but whereas companies like Tata seem to be growing, Rajesh selling clothes with 3 other people is struggling for his life. Not to mention that the formal sector itself is probably lying when it comes to statistics, so the numbers are hard to believe in the first place.

1773682353370.png
The overestimation of long‐run growth suggests that as of 2025, the level of real GDP is overstated by about 22 percent and the level of real consumption by about 31 percent (figure 15). India’s economy is thus smaller and the average standard of living significantly lower than official estimates indicate. (Page 21).

1773682486384.png
The underestimation of GDP growth between 2005 and 2011 and its overestimation thereafter portray a trajectory of growth over the last two decades that is at variance with general perception and most indicators. The macroindicators surged from the 1990s to the early 2000s but then decelerated sharply, falling below pre‐2005 levels(figure 16). Yet official GDP growth figures portray a picture of stable growth over the entire period.

Statistically speaking India was barely above Subsaharan African levels of GDP per capita and this throws them right into that category.
India Superpower by 2040 or whenever they figure out how to make the numbers look big enough in Excel.
 
Last edited:
PozzedByCoronachan said:
I suppose relevant to the thread: A new paper estimates that India's GDP may have been overestimated by approximately 22%.
The problem comes as a result of the Indian government using the movements of the formal sector as a proxy to estimate how the informal sector of the economy is doing, but whereas companies like Tata seem to be growing, Rajesh selling clothes with 3 other people is struggling for his life. Not to mention that the formal sector itself is probably lying when it comes to statistics, so the numbers are hard to believe in the first place.

View attachment 8709457
The overestimation of long‐run growth suggests that as of 2025, the level of real GDP is overstated by about 22 percent and the level of real consumption by about 31 percent (figure 15). India’s economy is thus smaller and the average standard of living significantly lower than official estimates indicate. (Page 21).

View attachment 8709466
The underestimation of GDP growth between 2005 and 2011 and its overestimation thereafter portray a trajectory of growth over the last two decades that is at variance with general perception and most indicators. The macroindicators surged from the 1990s to the early 2000s but then decelerated sharply, falling below pre‐2005 levels(figure 16). Yet official GDP growth figures portray a picture of stable growth over the entire period.

Statistically speaking India was barely above Subsaharan African levels of GDP per capita and this throws them right into that category.
India Superpower by 2040 or whenever they figure out how to make the numbers look big enough in Excel.
Click to expand...
Well duh, if you exclude the top 10% India is poorer than Africa. They basically skipped industrialization and went straight to services without a period of manufacturing in between. As a result the top 10-20% who work in the skilled service sector live the high end east asian lifestyle with bullet trains and glittering skyscrapers while everyone else lives in bronze age poverty and filth. Indias urbanization rate is very low, half the country are still mud hut dwelling illiterate subsistence farmers. Yes, I know they have some industry but compared to their population size its puny. 90% of Indias consumer spending is done by 10% of the population. Unfortunately 10% of 1.4 billion is 140 million, nearly half of Americas entire population so they can kind of pretend theyre rich because of the absolute volume of luxury imports and high end neighborhoods despite the fact that 90% of their population doesnt get to eat every day.
 
DSHK said:
As a result the top 10-20% who work in the skilled service sector live the high end east asian lifestyle with bullet trains and glittering skyscrapers while everyone else lives in bronze age poverty and filth.
Click to expand...
No they don't. It's impossible to buy your way out of filth in India, which is why most rich Indians flee to Dubai, London, or the US.

As a reminder, this is what India's equivalent of Billionaire's Row looks like:
1773692185672.png
That is what the richest man in India sees whenever he leaves his house.
 
DSHK said:
Well duh, if you exclude the top 10% India is poorer than Africa.
Click to expand...
i'm not sure why i assumed pajeet wealth inequality was any better than that. for a moment i was wondering how on earth india made it through the 20th century in such close proximity to major communist powers without falling to communism itself, considering the sheer size and plight of its shit-scrubbing underclasses. but then it occurred to me: in order for people to have class consciousness, they must first possess any consciousness, and that's not really a pajeet's strong suit
 
monatium's #1 wagie said:
i'm not sure why i assumed pajeet wealth inequality was any better than that. for a moment i was wondering how on earth india made it through the 20th century in such close proximity to major communist powers without falling to communism itself, considering the sheer size and plight of its shit-scrubbing underclasses. but then it occurred to me: in order for people to have class consciousness, they must first possess any consciousness, and that's not really a pajeet's strong suit
Click to expand...
Ironically, India is the one country where Marxist rhetoric was most applicable (blatant class/caste system) and the one country where a Communist revolution might actually have been a net benefit. Imagine a cultural revolution that abolished the caste system, abolished the retarded religious practices, abolished the arranged marriage nonsense, harshly punished any kind of murder/rape, and used conscripted labor to build commieblocks to replace the mud huts. And any Indian opposing the Communists would have been purged.

Communist and Post-Communist India would still be a shithole, but it would be a considerable improvement.
 
monatium's #1 wagie said:
i'm not sure why i assumed pajeet wealth inequality was any better than that. for a moment i was wondering how on earth india made it through the 20th century in such close proximity to major communist powers without falling to communism itself, considering the sheer size and plight of its shit-scrubbing underclasses. but then it occurred to me: in order for people to have class consciousness, they must first possess any consciousness, and that's not really a pajeet's strong suit
Click to expand...
When the communists took over in Russia they were already concerned they were too early. Russia didnt have proper industrialisation/capitalism yet. Since marx said history is a set number of steps, some communists even thought they would have to let capitalism happen for a bit before they could do the communism. But in the end, they wanted communism, and they could find an oppressed class in the serfs. China too had a large class of exploited peasants getting squeezed by large land owners mao could recruit from. India meanwhile. Most of their peasants lived in medieval villages where the large land owner was their village elder.

Trying to explain marxism to them is trying to explain camouflage to a medieval knight. He would just be confused why he would try to blend with the environment, for his kind of warfare, his society and culture, it is irrelevant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom