Culture CNN deletes tone-deaf post downplaying moment suspected terrorists hurled bombs near Gracie Mansion: ‘Enjoying the city’

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1773163246755.png

CNN deleted a social media post Tuesday after outraged critics flamed it for trivializing the self-radicalized ISIS fanatics accused of hurling bombs at Gracie Mansion — calling them two “teenagers” who entered New York City for “what could’ve been a normal day.”

“Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather,” said the tweet from the lefty news outlet, which was also the since-removed summary accompanying the full article, according to screenshots.

“But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs.”

By Tuesday morning, a link to the social media post produced an error message and the news outlet released a statement acknowledging it was deleted.

“A post regarding the two individuals arrested for throwing homemade bombs outside of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home failed to reflect the gravity of the incident thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all our reporting. It has therefore been deleted,” CNN said in a statement.

The full article remained available on CNN’s site, notably referring to Ibraham Kayumi, 19, and Emir Balat, 18, as “two Pennsylvania men,” not “teenagers,” and omitting the flowery language on the weather and “what could’ve been a normal day.”

An editor’s note from CNN said a previous version of the story included a summary that was removed for the same breach of editorial standards.

Social media users blasted the post online, questioning how it made it through the editing process and mocking the writer’s casual tone.

“What sort of country do we live in, where two Pennsylvania teenagers aren’t allowed to enjoy a lovely spring day throwing bombs at people?” one user wrote.

Another joked: “Two guys on a day out in Manhattan. Plan: 1. A walk through sunny Central Park. 2. Brunch at a stylish cafe. 3. A little routine terrorism. 4. Haircut, maybe a manicure.”

“They framed two people who built homemade bombs as sympathetic figures whose lives were ‘drastically changed,’” yet another wrote. “That’s not a lapse in editorial standards, that’s the editorial standard working exactly as intended.”

Another social media user questioned how the tweet ever made it out of the draft stage, saying, “Someone signed off on both the headline and the social media post, and that person is drawing a paycheck from you. The people you hire are a direct reflection of your standards, and they seem pretty low.”

The FBI has raided the swanky homes of the two ISIS-inspired extremists accused of throwing homemade bombs near Gracie Mansion during a violent clash Saturday afternoon between right-wing agitators backing Jake Lang and pro-Muslim counter-protesters.

Kayumi and Balat both self-radicalized in recent years and traveled to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and other terror-training hot spots, The Post previously reported.

The pair admitted to cops that they also watched ISIS videos and tossed the bomb at right-wing agitators because they felt their religion was being insulted, according to law enforcement sources.

The homemade explosives — which did not detonate — were sports drink bottles filled with triacetone triperoxide, or TATP, a substance known as “Mother of Satan” and favored by terrorists since it can be made using household ingredients, The Post reported.

https://nypost.com/2026/03/10/media...d-terrorists-hurled-bombs-near-gracie-mansion (Archive)
 
sports drink bottles filled with triacetone triperoxide, or TATP, a substance known as “Mother of Satan” and favored by terrorists since it can be made using household ingredients
[Mark Cuban taking notes .gif]
 
They really have been doing this a lot more lately. Or was it always this bad and we just heard about it more since Charlie Kirk?
 
They really have been doing this a lot more lately. Or was it always this bad and we just heard about it more since Charlie Kirk?
I suspect a lot of people quietly retired from management positions that would normally have stepped in before something like this made it to print. As such a lot of the best propagandists are being pulled between too many fires right now.
 
I suspect a lot of people quietly retired from management positions that would normally have stepped in before something like this made it to print. As such a lot of the best propagandists are being pulled between too many fires right now.
They have been doing this on air too though like the dumbass who thought Charlie Kirk getting shot might have been some MAGA supporter accidentally pulling his trigger or some bullshit.
 
They really have been doing this a lot more lately. Or was it always this bad and we just heard about it more since Charlie Kirk?
I think there are a few defining moments that have continued to nudge things in the media this way:
  • Trump 1.0 - Trump being openly hostile from the outset against "Fake News" (repurposed by Trump to mean the mainstream media, but originally was a Clinton-esque term for the alt right media)
  • Mueller/Kavanaugh - Media desperate for Trump and his (perceived) allies to finally get their just desserts
  • Covid - really launched the "according to experts" and "Experts say" type of articles into the stratosphere, where "journalists" would just launder opinion pieces they agree with into the main news section by selecting experts that agreed with their opinions
  • Awokening - arguably the peak of cancel culture power in the U.S. spilled over and 20 year old "journalists" finally could import their worldview into the pages, and excise the prior generation that came before them of real journalists (e.g. Donald McNeil)
  • Biden's Censorship Push - aligning with Dem gov/institutional forces seemed like a good way to eliminate competition in the information ecosystem, incentivizing "journalists" to try to push for more power for themselves
  • Biden Brain Melt - Minimize the obvious dementia to keep Trump from retaking power
  • Jews/Palestine - reporting guidelines went out the window after Oct 7 to protect the media's favored terrorists, ensuring that islamists got to hold the pen on any reporting that might otherwise minimize THE GENOCIDE THAT IS BEING LIVESTREAMED TO THE WORLD
  • Charlie Kirk - the first signal of the counter-culture utilizing cancellations successfully, and a desperate desire to minimize sympathetic views of people "journalists" think should all be assassinated
I'm sure there are others, but I think the ride we got on a decade ago is so far along the tracks that there's no going back anymore. Journalists don't want to go back, and the people who they write for don't either. Only can hope the boomers who have shitlibbed out over the last decade die soon and we don't need to keep going through this exercise of trying to remind/convince people that what they see on CNN cable stations is essentially fabricated when reporting would go against the media's desired narrative
 
were sports drink bottles filled with triacetone triperoxide, or TATP, a substance known as “Mother of Satan” and favored by terrorists since it can be made using household ingredients, The Post reported.
I shouldn't have Googled that. I work with all three chemical precursors of this stuff, I'm going to be on a list now.
 
This sort of thing has a long history. I'd say it began with Ross Perot's presidential campaign and the vilification of Phyllis Schafly, but those are just the earliest examples I can remember. They do seem to be getting a lot more obvious recently.

It's been going on for literal centuries at this point. The reason it is becoming more obvious is because a) the proliferation of recording devices, b) the amalgamation of media outlets, and c) lower and lower barriers to share and disseminate information easily.

You had this stuff going on in bubonic plague-era London, but few people are going to read the collected writings of a concerned observer vs what Daniel Defoe wrote years later.
 
Last edited:
They need to stop deleting the articles and start deleting the journalists. These people should never work again other than breaking rocks for 20 years
 
Back
Top Bottom