Ask men why they do things the way they do and maybe you'll get an honest answer

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Can you give an example?
I mean these things looks different in every relationship, but I can certainly if an example. This probably won’t be familiar to you because, as I said, they’re different in every relationship:

Let’s say your husband works outside the home, and you stay at home and take care of the kids. And that’s the division of labor you both prefer.

So a parent teacher conference comes around, and you’re both going. And on the car ride over you learn that your husband doesn’t know the name of your kids teachers. And he didn’t know last year and it bugged you then and you told him and he still didn’t bother to go out of his way to learn them.

You could snipe at him. Imply he doesn’t care as much about the kids. Remind him he did this last year. OR you could tell him their names because it fundamentally doesn’t matter except this one night a year.

(This is not from my relationship but is a real life example)

It’s usually small shit that just adds up. It’s picking your battles.

You might well just not do this kind of thing at all, people are individuals, but this is the biggest complaint I see from men who aren’t just dating a crazy person and respite from it is worth all the special dinners in the world.
 
Men actually see less colors than women on average so shit like mother-of-pearl is meaningless to most of us.
Depends on the man. Being capable of seeing more colour and being able to see more colour is not the same thing. I've had women completely change their perspective because I'm an autist who paints things. I understand how colours work and that really brings things into focus for them. There's lots of differences in the way men and women process visual data.
If you find yourself using a word for a color more complex than teal, you’re on the wrong track. If you use the word “top”, you’re on the wrong track.
Men use the word top. "I like her top" when you have no idea WTF it is called. or "I need a top to go with these jeans" when you're unsure if you want a jumper or a hoodie or a jacket.

The other stuff is pretty spot on though.

The teacher thing is interesting. My memory sucks, I've made this clear to my other half and she knows it. I won't remember birthdays, I won't remember dates. Her job is to remind me of things like this and make sure I'm not missing something important. Birthdays become rough dates like "At the start of this month I need to buy a gift", so December is Christmas gifts. Buy when December hits and then I will always have a gift ready for Jesus. Then she tells me the day or two before and it's all sorted. It's a much more workable system than expecting men to have memories like women. We simply aren't equipped the same way unless we're autistic.
 
You could snipe at him. Imply he doesn’t care as much about the kids. Remind him he did this last year. OR you could tell him their names because it fundamentally doesn’t matter except this one night a year.
Well, I forget half of them so yeah, I’d just be recapping the ones I did know and anticipating the embarrassment of having forgotten the rest when I have to talk to them. This isn’t something to create stress over when you’re driving or about to go do something.
I see sniping at small stuff as a manifestation of deeper resentment within a relationship. If you love someone, stuff like that doesn’t bother you, and if you’re past that and it’s going downhill, everything bothers you. The guy in question’s relationship is in trouble because she’s just just annoyed at HIM and looking for any excuse to have a go.
 
I don’t think that’s quite what I mean either. The example of grief for example - he’s saying that he knew his brain was processing it somehow as a problem to be fixed yet it’s not fixable. He knows that, but that’s still how it’s going through his head.
Shoot - I should've specified that I wasn't responding to the grief point - because that is absolutely an unfixable thing and so I agree with the comments about it. Mine was more on the general point that has been voiced a few times in the last few pages and is common shorthand for how men and women supposedly interrelate or act when it comes to "problems."

We fall into thought patterns that are sometimes just fine for one thing but maladaptive for others and I’m as guilty as anyone on that.
I’m also not prone to any kind of overt emotional crying yelling stuff (maybe I should be, it seems to get results for every other woman I know, and female acquaintances have told me I need to make more of a fuss.) I tend to turn it all inwards, but there are times when my thought process is more ‘I have had a really terrible day at work. There is no ‘problem to solve’ here, I just need to tell you how absolutely fucking retired what I saw today was, and have you say ‘wow, that’s retarded’ and then on we go.
I’m sure most people get in from work and would appreciate someone to listen from them. How was your day, honey? Is something that shows care, no? Whether it’s a hug, or a massage, or cooking dinner or a shag. It’s all showing someone else you’re aware they’re stressed or unhappy and doing something that might not fix the underlying retardation but maybe makes life a bit nicer
And yet it's a trope that "men want to fix things" and women just want "affirmation." And yes, hey, take a load off and I'll take care of dinner is nice, if that is what you want - contrast if you cooking dinner would be something that you want as a release of pressure but a man insists that he will do it because that is what he has decided he will do for you. Ime, as unfortunate as they may be, that kind of scenario comes to feel more about them than the person supposedly needing or wanting the kindness (supposedly me), often based on what someone thinks I should want rather than something I actually do. The first time, I'll accept and appreciate the gesture, but after I've (later, bc I don't want to dismiss or not reinforce thoughtfulness) said what would really be helpful or relieving for me, having the same thing I don't really enjoy done over and over becomes its own irritant.
 
You just said the same thing twice and said it's different.
No. Words mean things.
A man wants solutions. He wants to find a way to solve the problem or a way to deal with the problem.
Or confirmation that the problem has no solution, or no reasonable solution within his power to enact.
Reaffirming he has a problem and he has thought about it is what the woman wants.
Correct.
That's usually as far as female-oriented therapy goes, which is why it feels like such a waste of time.
A woman wants to be on the journey, the man wants to be at his destination
Male hyperagency and female hypoagency. Or gender malagency, as a general term.

Affirmation is sufficient for the female patient because she feels no accountability or reason to Do Something. It doesn't matter if it's a problem entirely within her control, that she could solve entirely on her own, That's not what hypoagents do. Hypoagents don't do things; they have things done to them.

Hyperagents take it too far in the other direction. Things outside a man's power to cause, prevent, or change are somehow still his responsibility.
 
Stfu. We were married for well over a decade; he was abusive, a philanderer, and other unspeakable things. Fuck off.
Pull the other one love. Literally every "I'm not like the other girls" and "my abusive ex" type of woman says the exact same shit.

Then when you actually see how they really act it's the same as every other woman. The rational female meme is something women constantly tell themselves and everyone else knows is bullshit. "Not all women are like that" is the term for it, but it's always used by women who are like that and aren't capable of seeing it.
 
No. Words mean things.

Or confirmation that the problem has no solution, or no reasonable solution within his power to enact.

Correct.
That's usually as far as female-oriented therapy goes, which is why it feels like such a waste of time.

Male hyperagency and female hypoagency. Or gender malagency, as a general term.

Affirmation is sufficient for the female patient because she feels no accountability or reason to Do Something. It doesn't matter if it's a problem entirely within her control, that she could solve entirely on her own, That's not what hypoagents do. Hypoagents don't do things; they have things done to them.

Hyperagents take it too far in the other direction. Things outside a man's power to cause, prevent, or change are somehow still his responsibility.
@Otterly, this is what I'm talking about.
 
Pull the other one love. Literally every "I'm not like the other girls" and "my abusive ex" type of woman says the exact same shit.

Then when you actually see how they really act it's the same as every other woman. The rational female meme is something women constantly tell themselves and everyone else knows is bullshit. "Not all women are like that" is the term for it, but it's always used by women who are like that and aren't capable of seeing it.
Sometimes people just have bad experiences and meet bad people

Sure, there's a lot of women that lie but i don't see @Friend of Dorothy Parker having anything to gain lying about this here
 
I guess I'm atypical "for a woman." I don't vent for or really seek "affirmation"; if I'm talking about a thing, it's almost always either because I'm just telling a nbd story or I'm thinking out loud to problem-solve it myself, or because I specifically want input: either improvements to my own thinking/ thoughts about what I'm missing & where my blind spots are, or at least another perspective or creative ways to approach it. And yes, I say which it is.

"Gee, that sucks, honey," is...nice, I guess, but not what I'm looking for. Let me speak, pay attention and engage, offer possible perspectives or solutions if there is a problem to solve that I'm asking for help with. My experiences getting this have been mixed; I've made the error of having relationships with people who don't typically have the experience or perspective or understanding of specific things I've struggled with, and to be honest, if they can't or don't offer any of that, it's a disappointment.
Something that has always stuck with me is I read about a study where, under the auspices of a written test, some grad students put a bunch of men in a room and had them socialize for fifteen minutes while they prepared the "test", and then had them take the test and sit silently for fifteen minutes while they waited for supposed stragglers to finish the "test"; I don't remember if it was self-report data or if they measured it but men were supposedly more stressed when they had to socialize, but relaxed when made to sit silently. They did the same thing with a room full of women and got the opposite result: they were comfortable when they were socializing but anxious when they had to be quiet. Similarly there are stats floating around that women speak on average anywhere from 50% to 100% more words a day than men do. Women like to be talking, men sort of don't, at least not to the same extent, and we run out of patience for it faster. Sort of like the idea that extroverts feel energized by socializing while introverts feel drained. Obviously there's more nuance to it than that, but it's a good heuristic to set your expectations by.

As for the legendary, "men fix things," I've yet to be with someone able or willing to solve anything difficult or important for me or take some of it on in any concrete way. Rather, it almost always ran the other direction. Some were decent at small things, but most of it was superficial at best
Pick better men. Every time I've gotten to know a man like the ones you're describing it was because they had some sort of childish vice that they would rather be doing instead of being productive. Mostly weed and video games. When you cut that shit out, you start looking for stuff to fix out of boredom. That said, there's also a bias in the sense that the things that feel satisfying to work on and fix, at least in my experience, are the things that have no ambiguity -- cars, appliances, software, plumbing, things where the outcome is plainly apparent: it either works or it doesn't. If you asked me to sort out government documents or something I could probably figure it out but it's not something I'd get any sort of innate satisfaction out of. We like to fix things in the most literal sense.

On the other hand, the whole "Mr. Fix It" mentality can be neurotic and border on savior complex, where you take on someone else's challenges in order to save them from discomfort, which only succeeds in stunting their growth while subtly... I'm not sure how exactly to say it, making the recipient feel like negative feelings are unwelcome, something to be stopped and avoided and rescued from rather than a necessary part of life that you have to experience and tolerate and process. Neither extreme is good, there's a balance to be struck somewhere between robot and manchild.

there are times when my thought process is more ‘I have had a really terrible day at work. There is no ‘problem to solve’ here, I just need to tell you how absolutely fucking retired what I saw today was, and have you say ‘wow, that’s retarded’ and then on we go.
This is the key. If you just tell us what you need from the conversation up front we'll be better equipped to provide it rather than A) falling into whatever default predisposition we have or B) dividing our attention between listening to what you're saying and guessing at what role we're supposed to be filling. Men are not as attuned to the weird subtle social cues women are used to because we're more capable of surviving exile from the tribe if we fuck up socially so we don't have as much of an instinct to read the room -- I have heard that this is actually observably correlated to testosterone levels, that when men have low test they will overthink social interactions to a much higher degree than otherwise, but I haven't seen any hard data on that. We don't have to worry about that shit so we're not good at it or used to it so if you don't want us to get it wrong then just tell us what you want. Yeah sure that takes some of the romance out of it or whatever but not nearly as much as feeling like you're talking past each other.

Men don’t suppress crying, we just don’t have the physiological reaction in the same way.
I've cried a lot but I've had a pretty fucking hard life. I've noticed that I don't cry from sadness so much as from something akin to helplessness, when I have exhausted myself and I cannot see a path forward. Which I think is the purpose of crying in the first place, signifying to others that you need help. Though I've also noticed that I typically don't cry when bad things are happening, I cry when they're over, like the emotion is set aside while there is action to be taken and then revisited when it won't get in the way. But that was all during some pretty fucking tough times. It's also commensurate to what I've bottled up, if it's the end of a years-long struggle I'm going to cry a lot more than even the loss of a loved one. Anyway, point being, I've cried quite a bit. But I've had ample reason to.
I see sniping at small stuff as a manifestation of deeper resentment within a relationship. If you love someone, stuff like that doesn’t bother you, and if you’re past that and it’s going downhill, everything bothers you. The guy in question’s relationship is in trouble because she’s just just annoyed at HIM and looking for any excuse to have a go.
“When women love us, they forgive us everything, even our crimes. When they do not love us, they forgive us nothing, not even our virtues.”
 
Sometimes people just have bad experiences and meet bad people

Sure, there's a lot of women that lie but i don't see @Friend of Dorothy Parker having anything to gain lying about this here
Attention and validation.

I've known women who have nasty ex partners. None of them want it out in the open. They don't want people to look at them any different because of their past. Any one who throws it at you as a weapon is doing it for attention or validation. They think it will win them an argument if they say "I'm a victim!" loud enough or someone else will come along and solve the problem (why are you bullying this poor abuse victim?).

It's just funny to me to see a woman claim to be different then act in the predicted ways every time. Women who think they're different never are. And they get so angry when you show them.

So he was dogshit and you still stuck around for a decade?
In b4 "I didn't know how to leave"
 
Attention and validation.

I've known women who have nasty ex partners. None of them want it out in the open. They don't want people to look at them any different because of their past. Any one who throws it at you as a weapon is doing it for attention or validation. They think it will win them an argument if they say "I'm a victim!" loud enough or someone else will come along and solve the problem (why are you bullying this poor abuse victim?).

It's just funny to me to see a woman claim to be different then act in the predicted ways every time. Women who think they're different never are. And they get so angry when you show them.
Emotional abuse can be a terrible thing. Almost always will introduce physical abuse. People under daily emotional duress won't leave their partners, especially if there's kids involved

Even men can be victims of a situation like that. There's a huge difference between being an asshole spouse and an abusive one
 
Pull the other one love. Literally every "I'm not like the other girls" and "my abusive ex" type of woman says the exact same shit.

Then when you actually see how they really act it's the same as every other woman. The rational female meme is something women constantly tell themselves and everyone else knows is bullshit. "Not all women are like that" is the term for it, but it's always used by women who are like that and aren't capable of seeing it.
You're quite wrong.

I described my actual perspective and experience. It's interesting that in a thread dedicated to understanding men's thinking that has had about zero women telling men they are wrong about what they think, you've decided to tell me you know me better than I know myself and to attempt to dismiss my very rational and ACTUAL perspective and approach (lol literally no one irl has ever considered me hysterical or illogical).

I get it: you have a shallow and simplistic worldview informed by memes, are incapable of anything outside your own perception and retard-level categorizations, and exist in a state of outsized and unwarranted arrogance based in delusions of superiority. I'm sorry you lack the grey matter or ability to process nuance, but don't show your ass by trying to take it out on me with generic bullshit dismissals.
As proof of this.

The second you were confronted by someone disagreeing with you. You instantly rushed to another woman in an attempt to make a gang against the people disagreeing with you. You jumped into female behaviour patterns. You are not an exception.
No, stupid, my @ was about clarifying my reference yo common perceptions of men vs women in terms of needs/ support. It was a continuation of my prior comment to her, not some sort of retarded alliance-seeking. If you think it was in response to you, lol, hadn't even read your dumb comment, you utter child.
 
Attention and validation.

I've known women who have nasty ex partners. None of them want it out in the open. They don't want people to look at them any different because of their past. Any one who throws it at you as a weapon is doing it for attention or validation. They think it will win them an argument if they say "I'm a victim!" loud enough or someone else will come along and solve the problem (why are you bullying this poor abuse victim?).

It's just funny to me to see a woman claim to be different then act in the predicted ways every time. Women who think they're different never are. And they get so angry when you show them.


In b4 "I didn't know how to leave"
I feel like I should tell you for your own sake that I don't think you're helping bridge any kind of gap of understanding between the sexes but I'm glad you're making it blatantly apparent why people shouldn't put much stock in your other posts here.
 
Back
Top Bottom