Culture Pete Docter Says Pixar Cut LGBTQ Storyline From ‘Elio’ Because ‘We’re Making a Movie, Not Hundreds of Millions of Dollars of Therapy’

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Variety - Archive

Pete Docter, chief creative officer at Pixar and director of “Monsters Inc.,” “Up” and “Inside Out,” recently told the Wall Street Journal why the studio decided to completely overhaul 2025’s “Elio” and cut out the film’s LGBTQ storyline.

Docter told the WSJ that Pixar didn’t want to expose its young audience to things they weren’t ready to see or hadn’t discussed with their parents. He said, “We’re making a movie, not hundreds of millions of dollars of therapy.”

“Elio” follows a lonely kid who looks to the stars for friends after being rejected as an outsider by other kids his age. Despite the clever premise, WSJ reports that the film tested poorly in early screenings, with most audiences saying they wouldn’t pay to see it in theaters. In response, Docter ordered a complete overhaul of the film, even though a significant chunk of the animation was complete. The overhaul led to the exit of the film’s original director, Adrian Molina.

Madeline Sharafian and Domee Shi then stepped in and made significant changes to “Elio.” This included, according to the WSJ, removing moments that indicated the title character was gay. Previous versions of the film reportedly showed Elio with a pink bike and had a scene where he imagines a life together with his male crush. The changes sparked backlash within the Pixar staff, drama that was compounded by Disney’s decision to cut a transgender character from Pixar’s animated series “Win or Lose.”

“Elio” launched in June 2025, earning $150 million worldwide at the end of its run. That would be a stellar number if it weren’t for the fact that the film cost $150 million to produce, not factoring in global marketing costs.
 
In 2023, Disney released a movie called Strange World, where the main character was a half black half white gay kid who had a crush on another half black half white gay kid. That movie was the biggest animated bomb Disney ever had, losing them around $200 million when all was said and done.

This all happened while Elio was still in production, so it doesn't surprise me that they made these decisions in an attempt to dodge another bomb. Didn't work though.
 
these faggots that position themselves as experts on sexuality and identity also have the shallowest fucking conception of both of those things. a pink bike being an indication of homosexuality would be furiously decried as homophobic in any other context. "but what if it was good, actually?" said the fucking retard
They also cut out a scene/subplot where Elio designs outfits for the crabs and other seashore creatures from litter he finds on the beach and holds a "trashion show" for them.

It wasn't just full of gay representation. It HAD to be the shallowest and most stereotypical they could have dreamt up.

I mean, if that was the ONLY thing? I'd say you were being a bit conspiracist if you called it globohomo-coded. On it's own? It's harmless and actually kind of funny... but taken with everything else?

Yeah, gay theatre kids continue to be the most insufferable people on the planet who somehow think they're being subtle in their choices.
 
The fact that Coco made more money and is still somehow, despite being boring as sin, remembered while the far superior book of life fell under the radar makes me irrationally angry.
Coco was kinda like Encanto in that it felt "mexican-adjacent" like a powerful and intelligent group of white-ass people tried to make a mexican movie.

Book of Life was straight up made by beaners and it really shows, they know their shit backwards and forwards.
 
The last time pixar movies were profitable was back when they were heterosexual.

Heterosexual is a taboo word in Hollywood. You can't groom kids or push progressive politics if your heterosexual and I guess up until this year that was more important to Hollywood then profits seeing as how all their faggot movies cost them hundreds of millions in losses.
 
In 2023, Disney released a movie called Strange World, where the main character was a half black half white gay kid who had a crush on another half black half white gay kid. That movie was the biggest animated bomb Disney ever had, losing them around $200 million when all was said and done.

This all happened while Elio was still in production, so it doesn't surprise me that they made these decisions in an attempt to dodge another bomb. Didn't work though.
Ok what the fuck? I have never even seen let a lone heard of that movie just now. And looking at the the cover art I think someone in there had absolutely no faith in that movie.
They probably kept their head down, nodded to every decision so they won't get blacklisted, and took the paycheck.
It's applauded for underscoring inclusivity and representation through diverse characters and relationships.
From Imdb....yeah no thanks I think I'm just gonna get a quick rundown from a kiwi on here.
 
Coco was kinda like Encanto in that it felt "mexican-adjacent" like a powerful and intelligent group of white-ass people tried to make a mexican movie.

Book of Life was straight up made by beaners and it really shows, they know their shit backwards and forwards.
no wonder it's so obscure
lol
Heterosexual is a taboo word in Hollywood. You can't groom kids or push progressive politics if your heterosexual and I guess up until this year that was more important to Hollywood then profits seeing as how all their faggot movies cost them hundreds of millions in losses.
that's just being normal
 
Elio being nominated for Best Animated Film in 2025 was criminal when Ne Zha 2 was right there. Screw your uninspired trash, I'll watch the little demon chink punch some fucking dragons
 
comment.png
Just gonna post this comment here.
 
I've been seeing a lot of trannies and fags mad as hell over this decision, and it's been funny seeing them try to pull the "just say some guys/girls like their own gender" while trying to ignore everything else that's wrong with their "community" lately - or even the simple fact that Pixar NEEDS to have broader appeal in general.

It's funny seeing the IDpol culture die out in ways I didn't expect, but can both approve of and be amused by.
 
Heterosexual is a taboo word in Hollywood. You can't groom kids or push progressive politics if your heterosexual and I guess up until this year that was more important to Hollywood then profits seeing as how all their faggot movies cost them hundreds of millions in losses.
No no child, you're allowed to heteroly groom children if you are a woman.

Isn't it odd that 99% of trannies identify as women?
 
I've been told it's the parts of BoL done in a tutti-fruitti hyperstylized art style that turn a lot of people off.
I think it's more the whole Mexican Halloween spirit of the dead motif appeals exclusively to them.

The closest you see of that in the west is tim buttons nightmare before Christmas.
 
Pixar Movies prior to 2014:
Mister Mosquito - Mosquito enters Medical school
Teddy's Adventure - Robinson Crusoe but a lost teddy bear
Space Hamsters - hamsters on the moon working on a space mission to earth

Pixar Movies after 2014:
Abdil - Brown gay child
Hambo - Brown gay child
Kooki - Brown gay child
 
Last edited:
I honestly hope that Hollywood never learns, that they keep dumping massive amounts of money into the endless pit that is progressive "kulture" until they finally burn too much and die.

The Hollywood system is crap, it produces crap and it employs crap people. The sooner it's gone the sooner we can maybe get some decent entertainment.
 
Back
Top Bottom