Culture Pete Docter Says Pixar Cut LGBTQ Storyline From ‘Elio’ Because ‘We’re Making a Movie, Not Hundreds of Millions of Dollars of Therapy’

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Variety - Archive

Pete Docter, chief creative officer at Pixar and director of “Monsters Inc.,” “Up” and “Inside Out,” recently told the Wall Street Journal why the studio decided to completely overhaul 2025’s “Elio” and cut out the film’s LGBTQ storyline.

Docter told the WSJ that Pixar didn’t want to expose its young audience to things they weren’t ready to see or hadn’t discussed with their parents. He said, “We’re making a movie, not hundreds of millions of dollars of therapy.”

“Elio” follows a lonely kid who looks to the stars for friends after being rejected as an outsider by other kids his age. Despite the clever premise, WSJ reports that the film tested poorly in early screenings, with most audiences saying they wouldn’t pay to see it in theaters. In response, Docter ordered a complete overhaul of the film, even though a significant chunk of the animation was complete. The overhaul led to the exit of the film’s original director, Adrian Molina.

Madeline Sharafian and Domee Shi then stepped in and made significant changes to “Elio.” This included, according to the WSJ, removing moments that indicated the title character was gay. Previous versions of the film reportedly showed Elio with a pink bike and had a scene where he imagines a life together with his male crush. The changes sparked backlash within the Pixar staff, drama that was compounded by Disney’s decision to cut a transgender character from Pixar’s animated series “Win or Lose.”

“Elio” launched in June 2025, earning $150 million worldwide at the end of its run. That would be a stellar number if it weren’t for the fact that the film cost $150 million to produce, not factoring in global marketing costs.
 
I haven't even heard of this movie in the first place.
I'd be scared to see what the people who were originally making this movie look like.
 
Docter told the WSJ that Pixar didn’t want to expose its young audience to things they weren’t ready to see or hadn’t discussed with their parents. He said, “We’re making a movie, not hundreds of millions of dollars of therapy.”
Based as fuck, and watch Docter get shoved out of the door over it (though it's possible he's got immunity due to the financial troubles Pixar has been going through).
 
I haven't even heard of this movie in the first place.
I'd be scared to see what the people who were originally making this movie look like.
It's been rather infamous from the get-go. Pic related.
elio.jpg
 
I'd be scared to see what the people who were originally making this movie look like.
It's been rather infamous from the get-go. Pic related.
The original director was a gay Mexican who wanted the story to be about...a gay Mexican child. His prior movie was Coco, a movie about a Mexican child who just acts gay.

Example eleventeen gorillion of theatre kids being unable to write anything besides self-insert characters.
 
The original director was a gay Mexican who wanted the story to be about...a gay Mexican child. His prior movie was Coco, a movie about a Mexican child who just acts gay.

Example eleventeen gorillion of theatre kids being unable to write anything besides self-insert characters.
The fact that Coco made more money and is still somehow, despite being boring as sin, remembered while the far superior book of life fell under the radar makes me irrationally angry.
 
Last edited:
From "You've got a friend in me" to "I've got my friend in me".

Reminder that nu-Pixar made a feature film about Buzz Lightyear and it was so unspeakably gay they couldn't stomach attaching Tim Allen to it.
 
moments that indicated the title character was gay
a pink bike and had a scene where he imagines a life together with his male crush

these faggots that position themselves as experts on sexuality and identity also have the shallowest fucking conception of both of those things. a pink bike being an indication of homosexuality would be furiously decried as homophobic in any other context. "but what if it was good, actually?" said the fucking retard

very funny that this homoslop couldn't even pass test screenings. perhaps nature is finally healing.
 
What happened in it?
Buzz Lightyear's commanding officer was a butch black lesbian. Buzz, voiced by Chris Evans, was a white male buffoon and got everyone stranded while the LBGTQ+ womyn of color was hypercompetent. She raises a son with her lesbian lover, and a later descendent (womyn of color as well) becomes Buzz's future teammate. At one point Buzz has a chance to go back in time, but refuses out of consideration for the LBGTQ+ womyn of color's proud existence and lifestyle.

Banned in most of the Arab world. ABSOLUTELY HARAM. Commercial flop that lost Pixar $100,000,000.
 
The changes sparked backlash within the Pixar staff, drama that was compounded by Disney’s decision to cut a transgender character from Pixar’s animated series “Win or Lose.”
The homos working at Pixar can piss and shit themselves all they want, but it still doesn't change the fact that the grand majority of the planet despises them and doesn't want to see them in their children's films.
 
The fact that Coco made more money and is still somehow, despite being boring as sin, remembered while the far superior book of life fell under the radar makes me irrationally angry.
I've been told it's the parts of BoL done in a tutti-fruitti hyperstylized art style that turn a lot of people off.
 
Back
Top Bottom