Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

[AltisticRight]

exactly, again definitely on the Far Left, but its clear Interventionism and Zionism is the biggest issue the US is facing. Fine with voting and supporting Right Wingers if we drop and frankly we need to isolate and attack this terrorist state.

It's funny because most far right lolberts would take Adolf Hitler over an AnCom, even though the latter shares far more core beliefs with lolbert ideology (like small/abolish the state, guns and so on).

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

It's funny because most far right lolberts would take Adolf Hitler over an AnCom, even though the latter shares far more core beliefs with lolbert ideology (like small/abolish the state, guns and so on).

Both of those sound bad to me, and I guess I'm a far right lolbert. Although in some ways those two things kind of contradict eachother. I only think I'm right wing in the sense that in previous years the Overton window got shifted so far left, that it makes where I stand seem like I'm pretty far on the right.

I personally just dont think going full ancap is practical with the way the world currently works, and I think ancom would have the same issues. I also think communism is a completely flawed ideology, from the core assumptions that were made at the time it was created. I think if people are going to try to come up with an opposing economic model to capitalism, they should probably jusy start from the ground up with something new. But this time actually keep in mind human nature, and the things that lead to the problems we see in our current model of capitalism, and the ones we have seen when governements attempted communism.

The for hitler, from everything I know about what he was trying to do, its about as unappraling to me as anarcho communism. I haven't studied 1930s-40s germany, and Hitler like I'm sure a lot of people on the site, particularly autistic thunderdome people have autistically obsessed about, so I'm sure I would get some of the details about his goals, and what he did wrong. But in the end from what I recall he was attempting to have the state control many of the businesses in the country, either by getting them to cooperate, or by forcibly taking them over. He seemed to really like the socialist rhetoric, and at least claimed to want to make Germany a socialist state on some level, which I'm obviously not a huge fan of.

 

[Lurker]

You do NOT need new gasoline
You do NOT need peace
You do NOT need zero casualties

You WANT them

There is a big difference and if you look at the people whining about the war I challenge you to ask them how their lives have been affected in any way

inb4 'being alive' is not a human right

 

[The tired cat]

The for hitler, from everything I know about what he was trying to do, its about as unappraling to me as anarcho communism. I haven't studied 1930s-40s germany, and Hitler like I'm sure a lot of people on the site, particularly autistic thunderdome people have autistically obsessed about, so I'm sure I would get some of the details about his goals, and what he did wrong. But in the end from what I recall he was attempting to have the state control many of the businesses in the country, either by getting them to cooperate, or by forcibly taking them over. He seemed to really like the socialist rhetoric, and at least claimed to want to make Germany a socialist state on some level, which I'm obviously not a huge fan of.

I really dont get where the whole "control state bussiness" shit even came from, Hitler was backed up by the rich fat cats because he protected their interests against communism, heck Volkswagen came into existence right about as Nazi ruled the country. The whole "socialist" shit was just a smokescreen to get more votes because the communist party was kicking their asses. Thr guy LOATHED communist shit hardcore.

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

I really dont get where the whole "control state bussiness" shit even came from, Hitler was backed up by the rich fat cats because he protected their interests against communism, heck Volkswagen came into existence right about as Nazi ruled the country. The whole "socialist" shit was just a smokescreen to get more votes because the communist party was kicking their asses. Thr guy LOATHED communist shit hardcore.

I was going off of my memory of what I've heard explained about national socialist germany. Like I said, I really don't have the interest in it to spend much time actually studying it. Everything I've heard about it, from both sympathetic, and critical people didn't make it sound very appealing (not even getting into the camps and ghettos).

But just to give an idea of what I meant, heres what a question to braves ai came up with.

 

[SBG]

My heart goes out to Kristi Noem. Loses her job during a speech and may even lose her free home she was able to shack up with her fuck buddy Corey when she felt like. May not even get to keep the jet unless Trump is generous.

 

[SOLDIER OF WALES]

There are reported leaks from within CENTCOM that allege the war is going to last until September by the way.

oh nigga DAMN

are these recent leaks or is it like some gay 2018 shit?

 

[Imperial Citizen]

Aside from their own group, Evangelicals view Jews as the most favourable

And all over a quote from God to convince a 75 year old Mesopotamian man to pack his shit up and move to Canaan.

If Evangelicals love my people so much, why don’t they just convert to Judaism? They won’t need to worry about eternal damnation for sinning against Jesus because Jewish eschatology doesn’t have a hell!

 

[BigMan13]

This one talks about them talking with staff member from the admin, both said basically the same thing. "you have no idea how bad it is".

I'm figuring they're referring to the inability of any administration to make significant change, then they are precisely correct. The entire item with American politics is that it is decentralized via defferentialisms and split power sources, such that nobody is actually capable of making decisions beyond a very vague and abstractive norm the broader collective agrees to. It's fucking insane.

So, the 'deep state' runs the govt., they're just carrerists, not a cabbal, mutually enforcing each other until what remains is a confused direction. An administration could try to remove them, pretending legal protections don't exist, but the public would resist that, it's a game everyone plays.

Closest thing I can think of in somebody trying to break this cycle was Carter literally saying precisely everything wrong with America at the time (also being correct on how it would get worse), and announcing the implementation of actual solutions. It lasted barely any time before the collective struck him down.

The U.S. is hopeless because nobody can actually change it, but nobody wants anybody to get the ability to change it. I'm beginning to doubt if America even supports the kikes becuase the latter controls them, but perhaps because they are the only states and cultures like each other, often with similar outlooks and inabilities for stopping their own descents.

This Iran war's gotten everybody speaking their minds.

 

[SOLDIER OF WALES]

What is the point of invading Iran if we're not just gonna milk their resources? Not saying this in a hehe im an epic roman conqueror way but why are we wasting tens of billions of dollars to take out Iran who only gets bombed by Israel and funds terrorist spergouts in irrelevant sandnigger countries?

 

[The Fuck's Going On Here]

I personally just dont think going full ancap is practical with the way the world currently works, and I think ancom would have the same issues. I also think communism is a completely flawed ideology, from the core assumptions that were made at the time it was created. I think if people are going to try to come up with an opposing economic model to capitalism, they should probably jusy start from the ground up with something new. But this time actually keep in mind human nature, and the things that lead to the problems we see in our current model of capitalism, and the ones we have seen when governements attempted communism.

The issue with any anarchic model is that once you get outta small-scale groups and into even tribal level populations (think a couple hundred people, at least) which have to live together and depend on one another, hierarchies automatically start to develop, and that will eventually cause the end of the "anarcho-" part of the society. For all the memes he has on him, Peterson even pointed this out with lobsters and shit, where hierarchies form in nature amongst even animals with simple as fuck brains.
"Anarcho-" is pretty much always transitory; it's never actually present in a stable society. The closest you can get is libertarian/liberal, where there is very little govt control on the markets/general life, though usually that leads to societal control on those positions (which is more nebulous and less concrete).

I really dont get where the whole "control state bussiness" shit even came from, Hitler was backed up by the rich fat cats because he protected their interests against communism, heck Volkswagen came into existence right about as Nazi ruled the country. The whole "socialist" shit was just a smokescreen to get more votes because the communist party was kicking their asses. Thr guy LOATHED communist shit hardcore.

Hitler's whole "Nazi economy" was "third way". He hated commies and didn't think communism would work, but he also hated free-market capitalism, seeing it as a Jewish invention. So his "capitalism" was much more in line with corporatism, where people could TECHNICALLY own the company, BUT they would usually be members of the Nazi party or closely connected to the members. Plus, the govt could come on in and apply rules or quotas or whatever to individual companies to ensure loyalty and meet "production requirements". In return, the govt would likely directly or indirectly support the company. It's very much in line with corporatism, but with govt holding the company leash than companies holding govt leash.
Also, a lot of Hitler's economy was govt spending and loans which were to be paid back through aggressive expansion which drove a lot of his "lebensraum" stuff, along with the whole ideological stuff.
Funnily enough, the economy of the CCP has more in common with the Nazi economy than actual "communist economies".

 

[LORD IMPERATOR]

I personally never understood why atheists had such a hardon against evangelicals until I realised that I grew up in a relatively tame religious household that attended a non-preachy church.

Evangelicals are to Atheists what SJW feminists are to gamers. Low-hanging fruit who are easy to pick on. And to be fair, they're hardly the only ones. Catholics, secular liberals, Jews, Muslims, Orthodox Christians, they can all unite over how much they can laugh at how stupid Evangelicals and Zionists are.

And all over a quote from God to convince a 75 year old Mesopotamian man to pack his shit up and move to Canaan.

You can stretch that quote to apply not only to Jews, but Muslims and Christians as well. God was talking to Abraham, not the Jewish people, who are but a tiny fraction of his descendants. Muslims claim descent from Abraham through his bastard Ishmael, and the Christians claim descent from Abraham through the Davidic line that ended with Joseph, Mary, and Jesus Christ. So the Evangelicals, once again, misunderstood what was in the Bible.

What a fucking surprise.

If Evangelicals love my people so much, why don’t they just convert to Judaism? They won’t need to worry about eternal damnation for sinning against Jesus because Jewish eschatology doesn’t have a hell!

They don't want to give up eating pork, and they obviously don't want to get circumcised as male adults.

That, and they LOVE talking about anyone who isn't them will burn in Hell. So they won't give THAT up.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

My heart goes out to Kristi Noem. Loses her job during a speech and may even lose her free home she was able to shack up with her fuck buddy Corey when she felt like. May not even get to keep the jet unless Trump is generous.

And her replacement- some fag who says the nigger who executed Ashli Babbett is a hero.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/mar/05/donald-trump-war-powers-latest-news-updates?filterKeyEvents=false

Checks out. Trump and Trump supporters supporting a guy with a made up name, Marywayne Mullet, who is 100% down for murdering White women for fun.

The for hitler, from everything I know about what he was trying to do, its about as unappraling to me as anarcho communism. I haven't studied 1930s-40s germany, and Hitler like I'm sure a lot of people on the site, particularly autistic thunderdome people have autistically obsessed about, so I'm sure I would get some of the details about his goals, and what he did wrong. But in the end from what I recall he was attempting to have the state control many of the businesses in the country, either by getting them to cooperate, or by forcibly taking them over. He seemed to really like the socialist rhetoric, and at least claimed to want to make Germany a socialist state on some level, which I'm obviously not a huge fan of.

Fortunately, there are serious books that you can read on this topic- the man who recruited Hitler to the NSDAP, Gottfried Feder, wrote a book called 'The German State on a National and Socialist Foundation', which has been translated in the last decade and which you will be able to readily find online.

Loading…

www.theoccidentalobserver.net

The NSDAP had no objection to businessmen making a reasonable profit, as long as they were working in the interests of the nation and not exploiting workers. As someone from another designated Evil Empire said more recently- "as long as it catches mice, it is a good cat".

There are certainly reasonable criticisms to be made of NSDAP economic and other policy. While the use of trade credits to work with friendly nations and avoid the curse of gold was genius, more could have been done to implement more humanistic, civilized forms of economic organization like worker and shopkeeper and farmer cooperatives that enable the small man and his family to not just survive but prosper. That would no doubt have evolved if Germany had been able to stop the jews from launching their demonic war of destruction. And the power of capitalists in Germany, just like the continuing presence of jews/Trotskyists in the USSR, undoubtedly assisted in stirring tensions between those two great nations when they should have been able to gang up on Britain and the US.

Of course, MAGA queers who giggle to themselves over posts about jews on 4chan while they serve the jews most evil golem, Donald Trump, do not even bother to consider that actually learning anything about history might be worthwhile.

 

[The Projects]

The administration claims to love veterans and the military, yet that's how they treat them.

Even worse, in the Iran thread, they were celebrating it

I agree that its fucked up and he didn't deserve that; but on another note (not saying this justifies it, obv) if you put on your uniform to make political statements you are a stinky fucking nigger.

I agree with the sentiments of all three of these posts.
I'd say my take on the subject is that this marine is speaking the truth, but the way he went about it was probably not the smartest, or most tactful. I don't think a uniform should be used to make political statements, it sets a bad precedent. Nor is it wise to go into the Senate chamber and start screaming at the top of your lungs. But we are in such extraordinary times, they have made our legislature into a total farce, more or less a rubber stamp machine. Congress is supposed to check the power of the Executive, and yet they are enabling the Executive branch by refusing to do anything when it exercises powers that are intended for the Legislative branch.

As it stands right now, all three branches of government, the Legislature, Judiciary, and the Executive are in the pockets of one single party, and effectively one man. The Supreme Court, for instance, six are Trump allies, and of those six, three were directly appointed by Trump. They made a big show of mass firing employees of the Federal government, these people worked for departments under the Executive branch, meaning they've effectively purged resistance in the Executive Branch. A slim majority of Congress is Republican, and I can imagine that at least some of those Republicans don't want to work with Trump, but say they go against him? He will pull out the checkbook and make sure that representative is slandered and smeared, they will run thousands of ads against him, they will drown him out, demonize him, and replace him with a loyalist. So any non-MAGA Republican is putting his ass on the line if he speaks out or votes wrong.

The system has been thoroughly broken, not by a coup, not by the end of, or rigging of elections (Though I find it pretty scary the comments they make), but simply through concentration of power by one party. In times like these, how can I blame a veteran for acting out, when all other avenues of reasonable protest have been closed? When we are being dragged into a war that no sensible person wants, by a man who promised to us, "No new wars"? When they could not care less about hearing us out?

Frankly, they should be thankful that a marine is protesting peacefully, in other countries, upset veterans overthrow the government. It has almost happened here before, as well, several times. Silver lining is that this is not the first time we have had our government compromised like this, but it was by men of a higher caliber. Lincoln, Roosevelt, say what you want of some of their choices, but they were men who valued our institutions, and had legitimate reasons for the power they wielded. They exercised noblesse oblige, I doubt Trump even knows the meaning of that phrase. We have rooted out one party rule before, but when it has happened before, the potential for damage wasn't nearly so high.

 

[General Patton]

The more I hear Trump, the more he makes me miss when there were more eloquent presidents. Lincoln, JFK, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, even Barack Obama.
We're not going to get any great famous speeches from this guy.

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

The more I hear Trump, the more he makes me miss when there were more eloquent presidents. Lincoln, JFK, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, even Barack Obama.
We're not going to get any great famous speeches from this guy.

He's very George Bush like in that way.

The only thing I can give Trump, is sometimes he's made me laugh. Too bad that doesn't make for a good president. Maybe if he was just a celebrity that did commentary on politics that would be great. It's sad that we live in times where all someone has to do to manipulate half the country into eating up everything they do, and going along as if they always wanted it is throw around some insults they think are funny, and pretend to be "based" every once in a while to keep them from going off the reservation. You would think more people would have seen through Trumps shtick by now.

 

[The Projects]

The more I hear Trump, the more he makes me miss when there were more eloquent presidents. Lincoln, JFK, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, even Barack Obama.
We're not going to get any great famous speeches from this guy.

See, what's really depressing about it is that people have been arguing this for a long, long time, that everything is designed to be a sound-bite, or a headline. It became a real talking point for the first time back in the 60s-80s, that our politicians began using more and more simple and emotional language. But even a speech by Bill Clinton, H.W. Bush, Reagan (I do not like any of those presidents), sounds brilliant compared to the drivel we're subjected to 24/7, not even just by Trump, but by all his cronies, by the Democrats, by pundits, by analysts. God, in order to have a serious discussion about politics, I have to come to the fucking Kiwifarms, avoid stepping in the shit stain that is USPG2, then and only then, can I read something written by someone politically aware, and not grifting or braindead. Even then, those good posts are mixed in with posts of partisan dick-sucking, flag waving and 1984 2 minutes hate bullshit vitriol.

 

[souschef]

The more I hear Trump, the more he makes me miss when there were more eloquent presidents. Lincoln, JFK, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, even Barack Obama.
We're not going to get any great famous speeches from this guy.

Honestly i don't even blame Trump for uninspiring speeches

If you stop to think about it, all western leaders really don't feel the need to do that to appeal to the masses. They'll only have short twitter-sized slam dunks on their opponents because we all live in a social network age. That's why in countries that are isolated from the world, their leaders still make inspired almost poetic speeches

Kim Jong Un is an example of this

 

[Sooty Soot]

Both of those sound bad to me, and I guess I'm a far right lolbert. Although in some ways those two things kind of contradict eachother. I only think I'm right wing in the sense that in previous years the Overton window got shifted so far left, that it makes where I stand seem like I'm pretty far on the right.

A far right lolbert is just a Paleolib from 1970-ish, wanting an ethnically homogenous state 70 years ago was a mainstream position depending on where you were.

 

[Popper Whiting]

My heart goes out to Kristi Noem. Loses her job during a speech and may even lose her free home she was able to shack up with her fuck buddy Corey when she felt like. May not even get to keep the jet unless Trump is generous.

Roll the credits for Kristi Noem I guess.