Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

[Arbiter]

You got any info on Kiwi’s mating habits?

Spoiler: Kiwi Sperging

Kiwi are interesting because both males and females invest a ton into their offspring, but in different ways, and their offspring are superprecocial. Kiwi are also remarkably long-lived, with some living into their 60s. Males are (usually) territorial and establish ranges that they aggressively defend from other males. Females are larger and stronger than males and essentially have to lay on the ground to mate, so they could easily thwart any forced copulation attempts from a male. Kiwi courtship involves mutual chasing, vocalizations, and poking and rubbing with their beaks. Kiwi are almost entirely socially monogamous with a high degree of genetic monogamy, meaning most mate for life and form stable relationships with high fidelity.

(Some populations with high female-to-male ratios are an exception to this. They have a yearly divorce rate of about 50%, and males are not territorial. Divorce in these populations appears to be "forced divorce", that is, not instigated by either of the mated pair, but instigated by an unpaired female coming in and kicking out the resident female. Other kiwi populations have been observed with a third of the mating units being polygynous trios. These populations don't have a sex ratio bias, but they are found in colder climates that necessitate females help with incubation. Because of this, females aren't able to recover as quickly to lay another egg, so males benefit from having a second mate. Yet another population, that of Ponui Island, has a minority of polyandrous trios. The population has incredibly high density and nowhere to disperse, so it's believed some males tolerate being part of a trio, and the females gain a fitness advantage. All in all, kiwi appear to be monogamous by default but somewhat flexible depending on the environment, much like humans.)

Females gestate for an entire month and lay a huge egg 20% of their body weight. After that, the males do all or most of the incubating, which lasts up to three months. When the chick hatches, it is fully feathered and sighted and has a large yolk that feeds it for over two weeks. Parents don't typically brood or feed their young, although the young do stay within their parents' territory for a few weeks to a few years. During this time, parents and older siblings show them how to survive and provide protection from predators. (Speaking of predators, kiwi evolved defenses against predatory birds but not invasive mammals. Kiwi chicks are especially vulnerable, with 70% of them being killed by stoats and cats within their first six months. Only about 5% of kiwi chicks survive to adulthood.)



In conclusion, our mascot is very sweet and romantic

 

[Weland]

They can use the word women 53 times for the victims but somehow the rapists are just people.

They're probably conflating men with people (as if women aren't people) which just makes it worse. I dont think theyre bigbrained enough to pull linguistic manipulations and avoid saying men

You don’t hate them enough:

They call every woman who looks after herself a pornstar, a cumdump, a knot attractor etc then they wonder why sundresses arent in fashion anymore lmao. Fiy I looked up some pornstars (but not before ingesting brain bleach) and they all have implants and makeup. Its literally an average girl who doesnt even look like a pornstar wtf is wrong with u people

Average moid in 2026

View attachment 8604601

If you caught your guy playing a gacha/anime money stealing machine game you dump him on the spot lol, thats the same level as alcoholics

 

[pot of sneed]

They're probably conflating men with people (as if women aren't people) which just makes it worse. I dont think theyre bigbrained enough to pull linguistic manipulations and avoid saying men

I think it's deliberate and I recall a good post by @crazedaze a few weeks ago, that men will usually regard their fellow criminals as 'people' as a way to distance the gender from their deeds, but you can be sure that they never fail to call female criminals "women". It's subtle but once you start noticing it, it's another tier of double standards where male criminals are individuals and do not reflect on men in general, but somehow a single female criminal IS indicative of the entire female collective and we are all to blame, as if women operate under a hivemind.

But then again, what can you expect from the 'logical' sex that blame women as a collective as to why we're no longer in Eden via creation myths?

 

[keke]

At least copy-paste or post the archive of it.

I was on mobile, summarised the whole thing because the archive website wouldn’t load, next time I’m not even including a link

I think it's deliberate and I recall a good post by @crazedaze a few weeks ago, that men will usually regard their fellow criminals as 'people' as a way to distance the gender from their deeds, but you can be sure that they never fail to call female criminals "women". It's subtle but once you start noticing it, it's another tier of double standards where male criminals are individuals and do not reflect on men in general, but somehow a single female criminal IS indicative of the entire female collective and we are all to blame, as if women operate under a hivemind.

But then again, what can you expect from the 'logical' sex that blame women as a collective as to why we're no longer in Eden via creation myths?

It’s for sure deliberate. Teenage rape victims are called young women, and in the same article the over or around 18 man who raped her is called a boy. Something awful happens, it’s all “What’s wrong with humanity?” and never men. This in insidious because it actually works, people (women say this too, again a lot of women live in denial about how much men hate them) truly forget the male aspect of it all. But we land on the moon? “One small step for man…” lol. Tale as old as time.

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

Another Pelicot case just dropped

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2026-02-20/husband-charged-with-drugging-and-raping-wife-along-with-12-other-men

 

[sperginity]

One running for governor fully admits capital punishment is the end game

If these people had gotten their way in the 70s the entire country would have been over run by blacks by 1990. It is completely illogical for the most virulent racists to be against abortion generally, and yet that is what I see in A&N and RW twitter.

Another Pelicot case just dropped

a particularly disgusting moid behavior is to express doubt at the concept of date rape. "that never happens", trying to make women seem hysterical for being careful about their drinks, etc. The article said that identifying any of the twelve perpetrators could identify the victim, which makes me think all these men are related, which makes me think they're probably immigrants... but usually when pakis do this kind of shit they don't bother drugging anyone, so who knows. If he had recruited random men from the internet like pelicot's husband they could be identified without phonebooking the victim, so whoever they are they must have some kind of identifiable connection in day to day life.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

This article was published today.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/23/15-year-old-girl-misogyny-social-media-online-abuse

https://archive.is/LLPZO

Opinion

I am a 15-year-old girl. Let me show you the vile misogyny that confronts me on social media every day​

Anonymous
Objectification, hate, rape threats: the politicians debating online abuse mean well, but to truly understand, they need to see what I see
Mon 23 Feb 2026 03.00 EST

If you’re anything like my parents, you probably wouldn’t even understand most of the content that floods my social media, no matter how hard I try to avoid it.
Here’s a recent example from Instagram: “Do y’all females ever tell ur homegirls ‘Sis chill you letting too many dudes hit?’” Essentially, that means: “Women – do you ever tell your girlfriends that they’re whores and need to stop letting so many guys fuck them?” The reel, posted by a 19-year-old man, appeared on my Instagram feed without me wanting to see it, or ever interacting with any other similar content. The comments that followed were pure misogyny. “Women see body count as a leaderboard and they try to outdo each other,” was one of them. Translation: all women are competitively promiscuous.

Consider the use of the word “female” in these posts. It is not a neutral term here, it is a term of abuse. It’s used by teenage boys to degrade us and equate us to animals. Boys are never described as “males”, but girls are always “females” – the equivalent of sows or calves, creatures that are less than human. We’re also “thots” (whores), “community pussy” and “bops”. “Bop” stands for “been over passed” and is a derogatory term used by boys to refer to a girl they’ve decided has been “passed around” or had too much sex. Sexual equality has ceased to exist online. It’s absolutely fine for boys to have sex, but when girls do, they are called worthless and referred to as objects. “When community pussy tries to insult me, I just want to beat that bitch up.” That’s a message I saw on TikTok.

I’m a 15-year-old schoolgirl and like most teenagers I spend a fair portion of my spare time on social media, often scrolling through short-form videos on apps such as Instagram or TikTok. All of my friends use those apps, and many spend multiple hours a day on them. I actively try to avoid online misogyny, but I am met with it incessantly whenever I open my mainstream social media apps. It only takes a few minutes before there’s subtle or overt misogyny, such as comment sections on a girl’s post filled with remarks about her body, videos made by men or boys captioned with a degrading joke, and even topics such as domestic violence or rape, trivialised and laughed about.

A few days ago I saw an Instagram reel of a young woman talking about how she had been raped six years ago, struggled with thoughts of suicide afterwards, but managed to rebuild her life again. Among the comments – the majority of which were from men – were things like “Well at least you had some”, “No way, she’s unrapeable”, “Hope you didn’t talk this much when it happened”, “Bro could have picked a better option.” Reading those comments, which had thousands of likes and many boys agreeing with them, made me feel sick.

If a girl my age posts any video of herself online, the comments section will be filled with objectifying and hateful remarks about her, regardless of what the topic of her post was. If she wears anything revealing, or just happens to have larger breasts, she’ll be abused and sexualised. Completely unprompted, there might be hundreds of comments insulting specific features she may have, or rating her attractiveness out of 10. “Sub5”, for example, describes someone who is below 5/10 in attractiveness. I’ve seen videos of boys telling anyone who is unattractive that they should end their own life.

Despite the sexual ways in which boys my own age describe us online, there is also an extreme emphasis on female purity and virginity. Sex is often called as “cracking” by my age group, where men do the cracking and women get cracked. “Body count” – referring to the number of times someone has had sex – is used only to degrade women. A girl with a “high body count” is “used up” and no longer has value. “You can always tell if she’s ran through,” one boy said on Instagram.

Often it feels like we’re hated not only if we’re sexual but simply for existing. I would be lying if I said I wasn’t affected by seeing boys my own age post things about women like: “Men are objectively superior in pretty much every conceivable metric,” and “They are just devils that imitate feelings so we feel empathy.” Words such as “bitch” are the least of it. One of the worst labels is “foid” – originally from incel subculture but now becoming mainstream – which refers to women as being less-than-human, female humanoids.

And what is the effect? If I spend even 10 minutes on an app such as Instagram, I will close it, feeling disheartened and unhappy about being a girl. When nearly every comments section on a video of a girl my age is filled with disgusting and objectifying comments about her body from boys, it causes me to feel deeply uncomfortable in my own body, and compare myself to her; especially if she is beautiful and still being deemed unattractive. Endless emphasis on beauty as worth and all kinds of videos criticising specific features, some of which I possess, have made me start to loathe my own face, as difficult as that is to admit. But the worst thing is knowing how much hate there is from men and boys for all women and girls, including me.

Using social media has ruined my self-esteem and my relation to being a girl in this world, and nearly every day I feel hatred towards my gender, my appearance, or even teenage boys as a category. The misogyny I see from boys my age online, which is echoed in real life too, has made me grow resentful and bitter towards them, as much as I try to avoid it. As wrong as it is, I persistently find myself considering if there are truly any boys out there who are not misogynistic to some extent, and have even questioned whether I can find love in the future because of this. I understand that boys are victims of harmful content, as well as perpetrators of online misogyny – they’re growing up learning how to do this from the adults who post misogynistic videos first. But even so, I feel such a strong divide now between girls and boys in my generation, especially when the way they talk about us in real life mirrors the way they do on the internet.
I can’t speak for every girl my age, but I frequently feel objectified, dehumanised and disgusted by the hate towards women I see online, and I can say with certainty that most of my friends would agree with me. A social media ban for under-16s might prevent young boys seeing endless content that treats women with contempt and hate. Boys at this age are very susceptible to the cool and funny framing of what is, in reality, relentless misogyny. A ban might not fix the problem, but it would help. If society can’t stop it, it can show it disapproves.

• The writer is an anonymous teenage web user
• Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

 

[Jellie Opal]

It's okay, @keke. I posted about this case when it dropped back in December. People can read the article there, too.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/official-kiwi-farms-man-hate-thread.169351/post-23112033

 

[Spock]

It is completely illogical for the most virulent racists to be against abortion generally, and yet that is what I see in A&N and RW twitter.

All of the actual racists I've spoken to are pro abortion because they believe in eugenics (based). I think a lot of RW twitter and A&N men are only 'racist' because it got popular to be racist and, following in line with other popular trends, they're also Christian or Catholic because it's popular to be religious. They didn't come to their current conclusions by themselves and can't reason through them. Thus, they hate blacks but hate abortion because a church said it was bad at some point, so they hypocritically want to destroy the best depopulation method we currently have.

Grug sees that Tyrone is a retard and gelds him, the sage says that dysgenics shouldn't reproduce, and you have the midwit christcuck in the middle seething about 'borties and the sanctity of life. The greatest irony is that if these men thought about the issue logically and not emotionally they would come to the conclusion that something can be morally wrong and necessary at the same time. Instead they twist themselves up inside convincing themselves that racial genocide is morally right because they are weak willed and need Christ's approval.

There's also a group of misogynist men who are genuinely racist, but they perceive that they are pissing the most women off by trying to outlaw abortions and don't really think about blacks out of, idk, a hatred blind-spot. I just wonder what kind of women these men picture when they imagine a woman getting an abortion. Surely they aren't imagining black women, crackwhores, Latinas with 9+ kids already, the raped, or pregnant teenagers who weren't educated or were taken advantage of, read: not educated. They think the only women who get abortions are college art hoes and they want to teach these women a lesson.

 

[Chandelier]

Do y’all females ever tell ur homegirls ‘Sis chill you letting too many dudes hit?’” Essentially, that means: “Women – do you ever tell your girlfriends that they’re whores and need to stop letting so many guys fuck them?” The reel, posted by a 19-year-old man, appeared on my Instagram feed without me wanting to see it, or ever interacting with any other similar content. The comments that followed were pure misogyny. “Women see body count as a leaderboard and they try to outdo each other,” was one of them. Translation: all women are competitively promiscuous.

The fact I instantly knew these were teenapers is fun. While teens of other races can and do talk like that, blacks are always the most sexually aggressive. Also, we would use the word "woman" but troons wanted that word for themselves, so...in any case, shutting off social media for teenage boys will not erase misogyny. They learn about it from their music, for one. If they use a VPN or wait until college they'll get right back into it because users like Legion of Men will talk about how women will become obsolete thanks to artificial eggs and wombs. They are actually excited they get to eliminate women.

The greatest irony is that if these men thought about the issue logically and not emotionally they would come to the conclusion that something can be morally wrong and necessary at the same time. Instead they twist themselves up inside convincing themselves that racial genocide is morally right because they are weak willed and need Christ's approval.

This reminds me of the Tucker vs Huckabee debate: Evangelicals say abortion is murder because the Bible says life begins at conception, yet there are direct commands to wipe out the people of Amalek, even those in the womb. That passage calls for wholesale genocide but that isn't seen as abortion but a divine act of God.

 

[Spock]

This reminds me of the Tucker vs Huckabee debate: Evangelicals say abortion is murder because the Bible says life begins at conception, yet there are direct commands to wipe out the people of Amalek, even those in the womb. That passage calls for wholesale genocide but that isn't seen as abortion but a divine act of God.

God has killed countless of his own children. God has killed more of his own children than any woman who has ever existed could possibly hope to match. Men have also killed plenty of God's children. I'm not even a big proponent of abortion for 'muh freedom' reasons because I don't intend to have one, but I find the kvetching funny to look at.
It always reminds me of how I used to raise and breed mice to feed my pet snake. One day one of my mice gave birth to nine babies! I gave her some boiled egg, kept her in a clean and quiet place, and checked on her intermittently. A few days later she had seven babies. Then six. Then three. Then none. Just how God intended.

 

[keke]

Another Pelicot case just dropped

View attachment 8609301

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2026-02-20/husband-charged-with-drugging-and-raping-wife-along-with-12-other-men

Would be near impossible for a woman to find 12 other women eager to sexually assault their drugged out husband

 

[Dr. Butt]

He used to put his beak between a raping duck and his victim.

Do you have any pictures? Put him in the OP. Puddles is our guy.

how about just dating people your age instead of doing differential calculus to determine the acceptable age of your underage-but-not-really partner

Some women are universally hated by males their own age and are relegated to 15-20 year age differences for some reason I don't care to investigate because you can still date women your own age or younger if you have this supposed "bad personality" that repels men under 50.

I've met better behaved intact tom cats compared to some men. Some toms do end up killing kittens, but the rest of the colony will take care of him swiftly and brutally. Generally male cats will care for the kittens of the colony, even if they aren't his. They don't even have a reversed Y gene. The ones who don't behave get murked pretty quickly.

How come cats who eat their wife's kids get eaten by the wife's friends, but human women never do that? Cats don't even have guns and they manage to kill creepy guys all the time. Step it up, fellow hairless chimps.

In Puerto Rico, they voted to recognize fetuses as people. The new law allowed a third person to intervene between a woman and her doctor.

How can any American disagree that Puerto Rico should be a state? Fetuses are people and everyone joins the army. How irrationally racist do you need to be to oppose that?

Fiy I looked up some pornstars (but not before ingesting brain bleach) and they all have implants and makeup. Its literally an average girl who doesnt even look like a pornstar wtf is wrong with u people

These guys watch the human trafficking kind of porn where it's normal-looking teenagers who got tricked into thinking porn is a job before they were old enough to vote. There's a decent amount of hidden camera stuff on the free porn websites now, too.
The painted plastic middle-aged ladies who show up at the sex expos may as well be, on paper, actresses employed by a production company and have employment protections. Their shitty lives are magnitudes better than the lives of the girls who were in primary school when OF was invented.

“What’s wrong with humanity?” and never men.

50% OF THE POPULATION COMMITS 99% OF RAPES.
UNTREATED EBOLA DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A 90% MORTALITY RATE.
Moids are more rapey than ebola is deadly.

users like Legion of Men will talk about how women will become obsolete thanks to artificial eggs and wombs. They are actually excited they get to eliminate women.

Why haven't they figured out that the Manosphere is homosexual rapist men grooming victims via youtube? They want to eliminate women and then "mentor" teenage boys, and use pictures of ancient Greek statues for all their profile pictures. I can't even say that they're deceiving anyone because it's so obvious.

In conclusion,

 

[a vending machine]

If any one pays attention to gaming you might have seen this game called pragmata. It's the game with the blond haired android child that doesn't wear shoes for some reason (I'm sure we all know why)

To no one's surprise most of the people praising this game are blantly pedophilic moids that want an excuse to gawk at a character that is undoubtedly meant to look like a child.

Spoiler: Replies under their posts"

"TheFurher8888" yeah this is definitely what Hitler would've wanted.



Dispite this guy bashing "brown games" like most twitter white supremacists, he's not white.

Credit the lolicon thread for compiling these. Check out the post for more details.

I do think the dev are intentionally pander to people, atleast softly if you see posts from their official Twitter page they're really parading this girl around.
I guess this is what they meant when they said they want attractive "women" in games again they just meant literally children. I wonder if they'll call you "woke" if you criticize their behavior?

 

[DeeNaMeeTay]

I wonder if they'll call you "woke" if you criticize their behavior?

*a woke feminist tourist

---

Why haven't they figured out that the Manosphere is homosexual rapist men grooming victims via youtube? They want to eliminate women and then "mentor" teenage boys, and use pictures of ancient Greek statues for all their profile pictures. I can't even say that they're deceiving anyone because it's so obvious.

Not just the manosphere, but right wing in general. Ben Shapiro loves wicked, Michael Knowles starred in pro gay film before his grift, Benny blanco did male thirst articles on buzzfeed, and JD Vance crossdressed. They all talk shit about women and parade their wives around like trendy handbags; there’s nothing worse than a closeted homo.

---

This is why male SA victims aren’t taken seriously…BY OTHER MEN:

Spoiler: If they were women thirsting like this these men would call them whores

It’s still being celebrated… by YOU GUYS. NOT WOMEN!

“Is whether she is hot and if the dude liked it.” This is how these freaks view SH and rape. Have heard men say that stuff to females too and now they are saying it to this boy. It’s not a joke.

Some of them want to see the “proof” aka the nudes to jack off to …ofc

Ugh yeah your son should remain fictional

---

So guys can have a night out drinking with ‘the boys’ but a girl can’t go to a music festival with her girlfriends without them thinking they’re gonna cheat.




Nah this is definitely insecurity and projection bc they assume they’d be cheating so they must have a reason why they assume that or…that’s how they cheat themselves

---

Someone pointed out that there is no faces shown which shows how these scrotes dehumanize us as incubators.


They want social credit scores for women to get pregnant. How much do we need at minimum you think?

---

Anyways that’s the end of another episode of moid twitter. Goodnight and congrats to the women’s hockey team for another win

 

[Dr. Butt]

there’s nothing worse than a closeted homo.

I mean...it sounds like a closeted rape homo is worse.

So guys can have a night out drinking with ‘the boys’ but a girl can’t go to a music festival with her girlfriends without them thinking they’re gonna cheat.

Man I wish that girls who never shut the fuck up about "I like to TRAAAAVELLLLLL" were doing it for sex. They're actually just fucking dumbasses who think Asia has magical powers "did you have your rice today ISN'T THAT BEAUTIFUL" or that looking at the outsides of random houses in Spain and Amsterdam where another normal girl lives means they're now eruditely educated even though they all manage to make it to age 40 without ever learning even a second language, and I'd pay most of them $200 an hour to stay away from me. Travel bunnies are the complete opposite of whores, especially in the language learning department.
However, it's tragic that males seem to think there is so little worth seeing on this earth that they believe 80-IQ girls who think Burning Man is a good time and tie-dye is exciting can't possibly be going to look for cool photos and must only be searching for sex because why else would you leave your house. That's very sad.

 

[Mamimi]

This is why male SA victims aren’t taken seriously…BY OTHER MEN:

Spoiler: If they were women thirsting like this these men would call them whores

It’s still being celebrated… by YOU GUYS. NOT WOMEN!

“Is whether she is hot and if the dude liked it.” This is how these freaks view SH and rape. Have heard men say that stuff to females too and now they are saying it to this boy. It’s not a joke.

Some of them want to see the “proof” aka the nudes to jack off to …ofc

Ugh yeah your son should remain fictional

Whenever a woman is arrested for a sex offense there are always comments from confused moids saying "IMAGINE IF THE ROLES WERE REVERSED..." Like, she was arrested and it's national news. We know about it in the first place because we're reading an article about her being charged with a crime. And I don't have to "imagine" the roles being reversed because men raping is incredibly common. A few years ago, a teacher in my area was arrested for jorking it in class. If I google his name, the last result I get is about him being released from jail. I have no idea if he was ever prosecuted and he ought to have been because there was video evidence. And it only made local news - you won't see his mugshot plastered on Twitter because a scrote preying on children is just business as usual.

 

[Kiwisee]

Someone pointed out that there is no faces shown which shows how these scrotes dehumanize us as incubators.

Pro-natalism is a psyop backed by billionaire CEOs that are concerned about a decrease in workers and debt cattle to make them and their cronies even richer. Infinite growth is all they care about, regardless of how much higher populations do correlate with pollution and driving other animals to extinction.

Ironically, if the human population continues to grow everywhere, we will go extinct. There are only finite resources on the planet to sustain us in the long term; and if we don’t let the birth rate hit zero for a few years, then Mother Nature will. And no one is going to like it when Mother Nature finally intervenes.

Women around the world choosing not to have so many kids are (unintentionally) doing a hell of a lot more good for the environment than most of the pro-natalists ever will. Having fewer kids means that the ones who do arrive will have access to better education and resources to help them out in life.

 

[Safir]

Pro-natalism is a psyop backed by billionaire CEOs that are concerned about a decrease in workers and debt cattle to make them and their cronies even richer.

Pro-natalism is a racist grift. Billionaire CEOs do not care about a "decrease in workers". There's no decrease in workers. If they really want more qualified workers, they can always hire and train competent people (but they'd rather do the needful, oblige and kindly revert). If they really wanted children, they'd promote child-friendly policies, feminism, single motherhood (yes -- this makes women burdened with scrotes feel safer about having children).

Ironically, if the human population continues to grow everywhere, we will go extinct.

It will not "grow everywhere". That one filthy jap whatshisname lied like a common solzhenitsyn: this is not the end of history, and history is full of dead civilizations. The future belongs to those who show up. I like chinks, it'd be fair if they won. Russia is done. I play gaymes on Steam, half the identifiable Russians on there are proud pedophiles. But I'm culturally Soviet, not a day passes that I don't invent some wordplay or don't come up with a clever reference, I'd hate for the so-called hanzi culture to sweep it away.

Women around the world choosing not to have so many kids

Women in the Western world (what the racist grifter CEOs claim to care about) do not have as many children as they want to. Previously, women were forced to have the children they couldn't afford to have (but many were childless for exonomic reasons). Now, women can prevent or abort the children they can't afford to have. The notion that modern childlessness is a choice is a psyop intended to desensitize women to the need for a revolution to end what is effectively forced sterilization.

 

[Tutu]

Falling birth rates are based because they make moids seethe, simple as. The real question is why are they extremely butthurt about this subject? Is it because they love babies that much? They just care so deeply about the family unit, or the future? Don't make me laugh.

Our great-grandmothers had no option. There was no reliable form of birth control. Abortion still existed but the methods were nowhere near as safe. The man would typically enforce as many kids as possible upon the woman. A lot of kids did not survive to adulthood because of the time period's shitty medical practices or lack thereof.

None of this misery is anything to romanticize but what do moids know? Their role in making babies remains the same since the Stone Age: Cooming and fucking off. Their stakes were always low, women's is always high.

Men want children like kids want puppies. Look at this retarded disparity.


I will never care about the male opinion when it comes to keeping a pregnancy, or how many kids a woman should have. It is an absolute disgrace that the state does. The man is not carrying the baby. He will not birth it. He will almost certainly do fuck all to raise it. Why would he have equal say in these matters?

I would much rather live in a world with below replacement birth rates than vice versa. All statistical evidence proves that women will have fewer children if they get to have any say in the number. High fertility is correlated with primitive, shitty living conditions, while lower fertility indicates prosperity. Modern moids do not live anything like their ancestors, yet they expect women to have as many as kids as possible like we just entered the age of Agricultural Revolution.

While women who want a lot of kids do exist, I am just saying the data available shows most women across the world choose to have 0-2 kids. Birth rates are decreasing everywhere due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to women's rights. This is the case in countries with very different cultures, the only exception being sub-Saharan Africa and Afghanistan. I wonder why moids aspire to be like these shitholes so badly.

In the end, what is men's suggestion? Forced marriages, rape, not giving women the right to receive an education or work. That's exactly what they did throughout history to control and subjugate women, all it accomplished was create dysgenic incels who should have never been born. Now we have to deal with their subhuman descendants who cry online about how victimized they feel by women having autonomy. Boo fucking hoo dickniggers.