The underlying question is why did he serve them in Los Angeles? Their registered agent, as is required by that statute, is in Nevada.
I was wondering, lol
Did this get bounced before he filed it? Or was that the other case? I thought Boulware boud out.
Says he filed it on the 19th, the swap happened on the 19th too so maybe he just filed it earlier in the day.
My headcannon is that Boulware saw this filing, and noped the fuck out instantly. I'm sure judges have a big red ejection seat button and he slammed that so fast.
I was just thinking the same thing. I wonder, if pressed, what he would state his "good cause" for recusing himself was, though.
The docket entry doesn't appear to have a document associated with it. My guess would be some relationship with Aguilar. Or he owns property that would be affected by the case.
That's the address of their registered agent in California.
Does it matter that it says "may be served" on the NV agent? I don't see an explicit allowance to serve a foreign corporation in their home jurisdiction.
Yes, but that doesn't answer "why". Why spend the extra money dealing with their California agent when he could likely have paid much less and had someone serve them in Vegas.
This is so much insanity I can't even begin to articulate it. That he thinks he is entitled to stick something on the ballot just because he wants to get his dick wet in Podunk Winnemucca, NV, actual law be damned. Because the law is offensive to his pee pee. I can't even.
"The state is controlling my destiny and my penis. This is so ridiculous."
Maybe he didn't know they had one in Nevada?
The proposed motion reads like a comedy.
I do not mean to shock you with wild new information, but Russell Greer does not make the careful or intelligent decisions when it comes to lawsuits.
He sent other documents to their California corporate office too, including the $100 demand for arbitration. He probably thinks everything legal has to go there, since they only have branches in Nevada and other states.
